Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 10:28:43 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 18892 18893 18894 18895 18896 18897 18898 18899 18900 18901 18902 18903 18904 18905 18906 18907 18908 18909 18910 18911 18912 18913 18914 18915 18916 18917 18918 18919 18920 18921 18922 18923 18924 18925 18926 18927 18928 18929 18930 18931 18932 18933 18934 18935 18936 18937 18938 18939 18940 18941 [18942] 18943 18944 18945 18946 18947 18948 18949 18950 18951 18952 18953 18954 18955 18956 18957 18958 18959 18960 18961 18962 18963 18964 18965 18966 18967 18968 18969 18970 18971 18972 18973 18974 18975 18976 18977 18978 18979 18980 18981 18982 18983 18984 18985 18986 18987 18988 18989 18990 18991 18992 ... 33324 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26372317 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
bitcoinPsycho
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2478
Merit: 2077


$120000 in 2024 Confirmed


View Profile
December 31, 2017, 12:49:42 PM

Does anyone care that bitcoin is completely centralized?  No.
I for one dont give a fuck. why you here?

To stop the bugmen cucks from cheerleading some completely centralized govt tracking system obviously.  There is no defeating the jew bankers using bitcoin.  The bankers love you buying this garbage.  The only thing the bankers are afraid of is people buying physical metals.
your so funny
buy sand cus it's not held by banks and it's decentralized sand is the future
1714904923
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714904923

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714904923
Reply with quote  #2

1714904923
Report to moderator
1714904923
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714904923

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714904923
Reply with quote  #2

1714904923
Report to moderator
Whoever mines the block which ends up containing your transaction will get its fee.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714904923
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714904923

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714904923
Reply with quote  #2

1714904923
Report to moderator
1714904923
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714904923

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714904923
Reply with quote  #2

1714904923
Report to moderator
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
December 31, 2017, 12:55:45 PM

When LN is going to be a complete trojan horse (as I explained in my post on the previous page), why would the bankers NOT want you to buy bitcoin?  Whether cockstream is in on the scheme and doing this on purpose or they're somehow delusional and don't know what's going to happen is the only question.  It's possible they drank too much Antonopolous koolaid and don't even understand it's not possible to create a decentralized digital currency in the first place, only centralized ones.
ivomm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1853
Merit: 2841


All good things to those who wait


View Profile
December 31, 2017, 01:11:58 PM

At 13300 someone sold 700 BTC on bitfinex down to 12768. Sells like this are highly suspicious and quite often in the last 2 weeks. I am convinced that the xrp company is behind the last attack just like Ver and sockpuppets did before that. This was prepared months ago by gathering hundred of thousands BTC, then sell each time it starts rising. In the meantime they buy of their own offers (mostly) to continue the pump. Fortunately, BTC has only several millions coins in circulation, so this manipulation can't continue longer than few weeks. Hodlers know this and won't fall for their satanic rituals  Grin
bitserve
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1820
Merit: 1464


Self made HODLER ✓


View Profile
December 31, 2017, 01:18:55 PM
Last edit: December 31, 2017, 01:38:14 PM by bitserve

Will you have some patience? It looks like LN is coming soon enough.

You cannot be serious.  Do you actually know what LN is?  I'll tell you what it is.  LN is nothing more than establishing bitcoin banks on top of the blockchain.  All of the exact same regulation traditional banks have will be applied to them and bitcoin will be virtually identical to your current banking system.  The only reason it hasn't happened yet is because it's too difficult for them to play whack-a-mole with regulating miners, but the LN "nodes" aka banks are less ambiguous in nature and will be regulated to infinity just like any normal financial services provider or bank.  

The costs, compliance, and amount of lawyers needed will be so high only entities like JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs will run them.  This is how crony capitalism works.  You introduce regulation with compliance requirements and fees so high that only your existing monopoly can participate while all small competitors are eliminated.

Nevermind the fact LN doesn't function in a decentralized manner in the first place.  There is also ZERO incentive for LN nodes aka banks to broadcast transactions to external peers.  There is actually incentive for these bitcoin banks to FORCE a hub and spoke model or cartel collective in order to hold their users hostage for usury fees (just like regular banks do). There's also nothing that stops them from changing usage of bitcoin as settlement to ripple, US dollars, or anything else.  I wrote more on why LN is unworkable on the technical side here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg26860586#msg26860586

I am completely serious. The trees aren't letting you see the forest behind. Yes, LN in its first phase might introduce some sort of "centralization" in that a hub and spoke model will be easier, cheaper and faster to deploy. But:

1- We are talking about L2. I wouldn't have any problem in additional layers more or less de/centralised. You shouldn't too, as they are all optional... just additional layers!

2- That's just at its first stage. It won't be that hard to evolve into a more decentralized structure some time later.

3- Rerouting a big amount of tx's to those (maybe) more "centralised" layers will free up more "space" for direct blockchain tx's.

... And, above all, it will be the best digital payment system ever known to man... Invest now, wait for it, and then fucking sell all your BTC for more shiny metals if that's your thing. Do you have some ethical (or mental) problem getting profits for your investments? No wonder you hate Jews so much. They don't fucking care about all those irrelevant details.
gentlemand
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2590
Merit: 3013


Welt Am Draht


View Profile
December 31, 2017, 01:22:14 PM

I am completely serious.

Why are you bothering to engage this nothing? In the time you wrote that you could've saved a life or invented cold fusion.
Wekkel
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3108
Merit: 1531


yes


View Profile
December 31, 2017, 01:29:07 PM

it will be the best digital payment system ever known to man...

On that note, I foresee that exchanges will morph into banks (or banks morph into or move towards exchange functions) creating payment gateways on top of cryptocurrency systems and also cryptocurrency card providers slowly but surely building up a secondary payment layer, first between users of the same card (Monaco is going to offer this), later between cryptocurrency credit card providers themselves.

But the option to work outside of all these additional layers remains. That is the power of it all.
bitserve
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1820
Merit: 1464


Self made HODLER ✓


View Profile
December 31, 2017, 01:32:57 PM

I am completely serious.

Why are you bothering to engage this nothing? In the time you wrote that you could've saved a life or invented cold fusion.

Ohh, yeah, I felt on the trap again. Sorry. Sad
d_eddie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2492
Merit: 2899



View Profile
December 31, 2017, 01:40:47 PM

I am completely serious.

Why are you bothering to engage this nothing? In the time you wrote that you could've saved a life or invented cold fusion.

Ohh, yeah, I felt on the trap again. Sorry. Sad
Don't worry. He needs some attention, too. It's New Year, let's be good.
Besides, he's good against intruders (inJEWders?). Woof. Woof.
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2506
Merit: 12038


BTC + Crossfit, living life.


View Profile
December 31, 2017, 01:41:12 PM

Interesting that the majority feels price will be at 20-22k by the 31st....
I'm still calling $20000 by new year Smiley

that would be one CRAZY run Smiley     if this happens i would almost say to eat my own dick Smiley

John MaCafee!  Is that you?

Aaah Thats good thinking who know’s :-)
yefi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2842
Merit: 1511



View Profile
December 31, 2017, 01:55:58 PM

Quote
Lee Nak-yeon expressed concerns over Korea’s bitcoin craze, warning  that “young people and students are rushing into virtual currency trading to earn huge profits in just a short period of time,” and that “it is time for the government to take action as it could lead to serious pathological phenomena if left unchecked" forcing young people into illegal activities like drug dealing.

Oh yes I came here just for trading but then was forced into using the drugs.  Thats how it works. Roll Eyes

It's real. One day I was at my desk happily trading on Trex, the next I was carrying bags of cocaine in my rectum. Roll Eyes
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
December 31, 2017, 02:09:25 PM

The vast majority of thread participants herein would have never bought such a stupid dumbass centralized manipulated coin,

While they may not have bought it, they may have received it. Anyone who asked got 20,000 XRP back in the day.

Really? 

You are trying to assert that these coins were "free" and/or fairly distributed based on some kind of "ask" scenario? 

You really believe your own bullshit half the time?

A little holiday greeting:  Get the fuck out of here, picnic food eating bear dude.. (   Cheesy  ) 

Get over yourself JJG - your noobishness is on full display.

Yes indeed, 20,000 XRP were given to anyone who provided a Ripple address to which said XRP could be sent. True story.

How could this be about me?

You are such a distraction with your off topic pursuits.  Making me feel like this:   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

The attentive reader will note that JJG was discussing Ripple in this branch of this thread before I.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
December 31, 2017, 02:10:50 PM

All the bugmen who were worshipping these completely centralized cuckchains seemed to have stopped talking about lambos and are now trying to find someone to give them a used Evinrude bass boat motor for a bitcoin.


I don't care who ya are - dat dere's funny.
conspirosphere.tk
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2352
Merit: 1064


Bitcoin is antisemitic


View Profile
December 31, 2017, 02:17:09 PM

It's real. One day I was at my desk happily trading on Trex, the next I was carrying bags of cocaine in my rectum. Roll Eyes

it's because one has to be heavily inebriated to play in the alts markets.

lightfoot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3108
Merit: 2239


I fix broken miners. And make holes in teeth :-)


View Profile
December 31, 2017, 02:20:30 PM

your so funny
buy sand cus it's not held by banks and it's decentralized sand is the future
Indeed. Sand is a key strategic material, it's the main component of egg timers, which as we all know are a central component of trivial pursuit games....

Damn Arabs are sitting on a gold mine, not oil, but SAND!

(remembers the sand shortages due to big screen tube TV's. Boy that fixed itself......)

Anyway on to Bitcoin, still sitting around 13100 I see. Will be interesting to see if things go up in 2018...

C
bones261
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1827



View Profile
December 31, 2017, 03:04:17 PM


Block #501853
A new one, but the "unknown" miner only sacrifices only the Tx fee this time.
Number Of Transactions = 1
Transaction Fees   0 BTC

https://blockchain.info/block-height/501853

Viable attack to use when the blockchain is already backlogged with txs?
Somebody needs to start working on a fix.
Hoping it isn't a viable attack in the long term.
Cant keep sacrificing 12.5 BTC unless there is a bigger end game. But can keep sacrificing  fees for keeping the mining fee higher for longer.
Have a bad feeling about this. Mostly the timing. Already a bit too down on price and might end up testing long term support levels .Hope its nothing.



This is just a standard empty block being mined. The block was mined in less than a minute after the last solved block. This is not an attack but pretty standard. Many pools mine empty blocks while they validate the last block. Before they can start including tx, they need to know which transactions in their mempool are already included in the last block. Rather than experience downtime, many pools elect to mine empty blocks during the validation period.
d_eddie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2492
Merit: 2899



View Profile
December 31, 2017, 03:09:09 PM


Block #501853
A new one, but the "unknown" miner only sacrifices only the Tx fee this time.
Number Of Transactions = 1
Transaction Fees   0 BTC

https://blockchain.info/block-height/501853

Viable attack to use when the blockchain is already backlogged with txs?
Somebody needs to start working on a fix.
Hoping it isn't a viable attack in the long term.
Cant keep sacrificing 12.5 BTC unless there is a bigger end game. But can keep sacrificing  fees for keeping the mining fee higher for longer.
Have a bad feeling about this. Mostly the timing. Already a bit too down on price and might end up testing long term support levels .Hope its nothing.



This is just a standard empty block being mined. The block was mined in less than a minute after the last solved block. This is not an attack but pretty standard. Many pools mine empty blocks while they validate the last block. Before they can start including tx, they need to know which transactions in their mempool are already included in the last block. Rather than experience downtime, many pools elect to mine empty blocks during the validation period.
Allright, this looks fairly normal - but what's your opinion on the block with the lost reward?
bones261
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1827



View Profile
December 31, 2017, 03:23:09 PM



This is just a standard empty block being mined. The block was mined in less than a minute after the last solved block. This is not an attack but pretty standard. Many pools mine empty blocks while they validate the last block. Before they can start including tx, they need to know which transactions in their mempool are already included in the last block. Rather than experience downtime, many pools elect to mine empty blocks during the validation period.
Allright, this looks fairly normal - but what's your opinion on the block with the lost reward?

Error trying to implement RootStock commitment. https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/7n1ie5/someone_destroyed_125_newly_mined_bitcoins/
alani123
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2394
Merit: 1412


Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform


View Profile
December 31, 2017, 03:23:23 PM

There are crazy price differences between GDAX and bitstamp. How come that there are consistent price differences for hours at a time?

Could this be a sign of price manipulation that's rumored to be happening in GDAX? I mean, both exchanges are operating without major issues, trading with big volumes and accepting FIAT deposits... How come there can be long-lived price differences for their BTC pairs?
bones261
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1827



View Profile
December 31, 2017, 03:38:06 PM

There are crazy price differences between GDAX and bitstamp. How come that there are consistent price differences for hours at a time?

Could this be a sign of price manipulation that's rumored to be happening in GDAX? I mean, both exchanges are operating without major issues, trading with big volumes and accepting FIAT deposits... How come there can be long-lived price differences for their BTC pairs?

I wouldn't be surprised if GDAX has some price manipulation going on at all. After all, it is owned by Digital Currency Group. We are all just small fry subjected to Barry's whims.
600watt
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2338
Merit: 2106



View Profile
December 31, 2017, 03:51:27 PM

There are crazy price differences between GDAX and bitstamp. How come that there are consistent price differences for hours at a time?

Could this be a sign of price manipulation that's rumored to be happening in GDAX? I mean, both exchanges are operating without major issues, trading with big volumes and accepting FIAT deposits... How come there can be long-lived price differences for their BTC pairs?

I wouldn't be surprised if GDAX has some price manipulation going on at all. After all, it is owned by Digital Currency Group. We are all just small fry subjected to Barry's whims.


gdax/$: 13 330

bitstamp/$: 13 321

that is not even one percent difference.
Pages: « 1 ... 18892 18893 18894 18895 18896 18897 18898 18899 18900 18901 18902 18903 18904 18905 18906 18907 18908 18909 18910 18911 18912 18913 18914 18915 18916 18917 18918 18919 18920 18921 18922 18923 18924 18925 18926 18927 18928 18929 18930 18931 18932 18933 18934 18935 18936 18937 18938 18939 18940 18941 [18942] 18943 18944 18945 18946 18947 18948 18949 18950 18951 18952 18953 18954 18955 18956 18957 18958 18959 18960 18961 18962 18963 18964 18965 18966 18967 18968 18969 18970 18971 18972 18973 18974 18975 18976 18977 18978 18979 18980 18981 18982 18983 18984 18985 18986 18987 18988 18989 18990 18991 18992 ... 33324 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!