JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3766
Merit: 10485
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
April 10, 2018, 02:51:47 AM |
|
The only way is down now no chance we are reaching 8k for a very long time.
The way I see it, in this particular moment it's very hard to name a "no chance" event. Merited. Wise words. While catching up on this thread gradually you see how unwise and price prediction in any direction is, on any near/medium term time frame. TA / price analysis is fun to see, but so much of it is as accurate as a stopped clock, as all we can do is to try to set up for whatever happens. I was watching your 'short insurance' strategy, seemed to make sense - may I ask how it has panned out? Or is it just too much work to keep on top of it? Thanks for the appreciation. My insurance is doing fine! With today's dip, I'm comfortably in the money. With the latest fluctuations, I'd already managed to nurse it to a higher entry point with incidental small profit. My aim isn't maximum profit, but maximum comfort, as JayJuanGee said. This makes it a little easier, but it's still hard work for me. Of course there's a different "hard work" threshold for each one of us. With the position moving to a higher entry point, the amount of work decreases. However, if it doesn't hurt at times, I feel I'm doing it wrong. It's supposed to hurt a little now and then, unless you're magically able to spot either tops or bottoms (which would make hedging moot anyway). I'm not closing it yet. Bring it down to 5k or 3k, will you? Please?? I've also worked out a "pain threshold" in advance. That's where I'll close the insurance hedge (at a loss) before liquidation if I don't manage to close gradually on the way up while still in the money. The numbers are good: by the time we reach that threshold, it will be Carolina Train time around here. That's just my play money, of course. If it was my stash at stake, I wouldn't be so detached or cool headed in making difficult decisions. Is it possible for you to have established partial closiong targets? For example, four of them, or some other comfortable quantity: 1) at $6,200, 2) at $5,200, 3) at $4,200 and 4) at $3,200. I really don't believe that it is very likely that your $3,200-ish one would close, but of course, from time to time, we do get to experience real extremes in bitcoinlandia... and if BTC prices go lower than $3,200 (which would likely be partially attributable to various alt coin markets exacerbating such a negative downward drive), then you still would have made a lot of money on your shorts, so you would also be able to buy more BTC below that $3,200 price point. Do you have a better way of framing your tentative ongoing correction strategy, at this time?
|
|
|
|
d_eddie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2548
Merit: 3189
|
|
April 10, 2018, 03:20:03 AM Merited by JayJuanGee (1) |
|
Is it possible for you to have established partial closiong targets? For example, four of them, or some other comfortable quantity: 1) at $6,200, 2) at $5,200, 3) at $4,200 and 4) at $3,200.
Entirely. I do have partial close orders sprinkled - you guessed it - along a ladder. The lowest, most profitable, is well above 3200 for now, but I hope that by the time we get to that, I'll be profiting already and perhaps the ladder will be exhausted. I really don't believe that it is very likely that your $3,200-ish one would close,
Right. That's if we get to that, which I also doubt. Do you have a better way of framing your tentative ongoing correction strategy, at this time?
I'm nursing my hedge to as high an entry point as I can. My loose guidance: I'm trying to keep approximately fixed hypothetical profit at, say, 5k or 4.5k. This can be done with a smaller position as long as the entry is better (higher). So I make the position smaller by closing partially when in the money, waiting for another climb to average up, so that when it gets down in the money again, I can release (cash out) a little more than in the previous cycle. All this goes by small increments, small sums. The idea is not to be found flat when it really plunges, and be ready to release with some predetermined stop when the pain becomes unbearable. (When/if are used interchangeably. It's the same thing. I don't know. I don't care.)
|
|
|
|
Rosewater Foundation
|
|
April 10, 2018, 03:45:08 AM |
|
Yeah, I'm really hoping to be verified sometime before $3200..
|
|
|
|
d_eddie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2548
Merit: 3189
|
|
April 10, 2018, 04:07:12 AM |
|
It was Rosewater who brought the topic into this arena of gentlemen. The taint paper has stirred several reactions. tasty find my arse Hm, by the refined language, I sense a fellow Oxford scholar? Seriously, I don't see the paper as advocating anything in particular. If it actually is, I didn't notice or I deem the advocacy irrelevant. The strength of that discussion is the what-if speculation it suggests. It is assumed that the public Taintchain is a reality. The Taintchain makes it effectively instant to look up taint, which is distributed in a strict LIFO fashion. This sounds as a prescription (advocating), but I hear a scientific stance. "It's a precise working hypothesis with good effects on the engineering," it sounds to me. The Taintchain can actually become real today, once the blockchain is scanned to create a different view of the transaction database. Keeping the Taintchain current is a trivial matter. Under these assumptions, there are interesting consequences. Different administrations will be interested in tracking different events. And they will each be able to do that in a much easier way than today. And anyone else can do the same, too. The algorithm is there. How long before an open source solution allows you to track any taintchain known to man, as well as hypothetical ones defined by the user's ow custom rules? I think this ease of implementation makes it likely that it will get done. Now, initiating taint on a whim or on user action can be a daunting task for a public administration, but limiting the initial " taint award" to only a few well-known events (like, Mt.Gox size only - either finance-wise or by media resonance) is completely doable. As is picking your own pet taint-generating events. No one has to like that. I don't know if I would myself. But it's a realistic possibility in, say, China for export controls. See the what-if? Chinese taint wouldn't mean much in the USA, right? Or wouldn't it? Food for thought. Reporting doesn’t need to be false to be damaging. A sends coins to exchange and sells, withdrawing different coins. B truthfully claims that A stole the coins and sues exchange for value of the coins. Exchange is liable to compensate B.
Possible limits to exchange liability are also vaguely hypothesized, but it's lawyer stuff, so the authors - computer scientists, remember - don't toy with the idea too much. They appear to be fascinated by the game theoretical implications. I also am. You say "successfully disputed", I say that "successfully" involves a new layer of lawyers.
You say "they bust you bullshitting the system, its trouble..." I say "ho ho, Deripaska, Zuma..."
Or maybe it's no trouble at all. Your claim is simply ignored because it didn't make it to the master list of scams. It's not even 1/100,000 of Gox size after all. Or maybe someone snitches on you, dealing in drugs or military technology or whatever. One address paying you gets leaked. What happens to your coins? Which countries are involved? Which exchange did the coins pass through? A paper that gets me thinking along these lines must be a good paper under some definition of good. Nice find my ass, my ass As we say in Oxford after class.
|
|
|
|
|
d_eddie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2548
Merit: 3189
|
|
April 10, 2018, 04:14:54 AM |
|
^^ TROLL BAIT
|
|
|
|
Karartma1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2310
Merit: 1422
|
|
April 10, 2018, 04:42:07 AM |
|
Finally I know:that is what is called a self fulfilling prophecy, am I right? You are telling me that we are fighting in the dark meanwhile our hero is gaining back his strenght. Fine by me
|
|
|
|
Jacques_Bittard
Member
Offline
Activity: 154
Merit: 10
.
|
|
April 10, 2018, 05:37:42 AM |
|
It feels like a third of the market has just shut down. Sideways movement without any real direction, followed by sharp slices through thin books. The market usually looks like this when it is at the end of the bubble, so it's surprising to see it now. Possibly something brewing that hasn't hit the news yet.
|
|
|
|
Rosewater Foundation
|
|
April 10, 2018, 05:46:35 AM |
|
It feels like a third of the market has just shut down. Sideways movement without any real direction, followed by sharp slices through thin books. The market usually looks like this when it is at the end of the bubble, so it's surprising to see it now. Possibly something brewing that hasn't hit the news yet.
It's plum pudding, Jacques. It's English tradition. The next 25 kilometres are critical.
|
|
|
|
STT
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1426
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
|
|
April 10, 2018, 06:03:47 AM |
|
silver is not going to save you.
It might save you if you were a silversmith and able to utilise it in value creation via skilled labour. Silver is an industrial commodity, mined alongside such common metals as lead. Its never rare exactly but also its highly useful maybe increasingly so following the rapid decrease of conventional photo development consumption. I think I saw a chart showing greater demand for silver in a way like lithium is expected to rise, due to new energy technology types. I think it'll be a vital metal for reasons like that but I dont know it'll take off exactly, I do think it'll maintain its value for sure from current $16 (long term) Silver price prospects will suffer quite alot with any knock to global GDP estimates (I dont think its overpriced at all presently). Its a long road to any monetisation concept, I think if gold does raise greatly silver will be picked up but not in a steady way. Its not a bad hold but I wouldnt say its especially superior to oil or any general bet on world commerce out pacing the devaluation of dollars. One of the biggest subsidies for crypto is the failure of US dollar rates to offset effective inflation, if there really was a strong dollar it would greatly impede growth here I think as well many avant garde technology areas still developing. I generally agree strong dollar is impossible now, its holed below the water line but market prices wont reflect that for years probably. I expect dollar to rise with appearance of higher rates and QE reversal though its impossible to complete especially without a budget surplus and we just saw thats not happening, the biggest market prices can be wrong and still have secondary effects on smaller markets like this one. BTC price is dismal / idle / drifting. A flat wedge perhaps looking purely short term, is it waiting for something.
|
|
|
|
Lontonbit
|
|
April 10, 2018, 06:51:17 AM |
|
I'm looking forward to another jjgee spree, you entertain me
|
|
|
|
CoinCube
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1055
|
|
April 10, 2018, 07:26:34 AM |
|
07/03/2018 CoinCube Typo on my part here. I meant 2019 not last month.
|
|
|
|
Rosewater Foundation
|
|
April 10, 2018, 07:57:41 AM Last edit: April 10, 2018, 08:23:26 AM by Rosewater Foundation |
|
07/03/2018 CoinCube Typo on my part here. I meant 2019 not last month. Surprised you're still here, Doc. Did you hodl all the way down? Because that's just sad.
|
|
|
|
Last of the V8s
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4392
Be a bank
|
|
April 10, 2018, 08:28:44 AM |
|
It was Rosewater who brought the topic into this arena of gentlemen. The taint paper has stirred several reactions. tasty find my arse Hm, by the refined language, I sense a fellow Oxford scholar? blah blah blah A paper that gets me thinking along these lines must be a good paper under some definition of good. Nice find my ass, my ass As we say in Oxford after class.Dear, dear Ed, Read the effing thread. Rosewater was making a pass At my sweet, sweet arse.
|
|
|
|
realr0ach
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 311
#TheGoyimKnow
|
|
April 10, 2018, 08:29:11 AM Last edit: April 10, 2018, 08:44:14 AM by realr0ach |
|
it's like when the tyran of the kremlin attack the poor civilians in syria
^^^ Like I said a million times before, Jews are an evil cult that are not even capable of telling the truth. Look at this lying kike. Every single word out of his mouth is a lie. It's not even a good lie. Nobody in this entire thread is dumb enough to believe their Zionist false flag chemical attack. Nobody. Each time you tell this lie, all it does is create a new Nazi soldier from random Goyim passerbys seeing that you're a chronic liar and refusing to put up with your lies and scams anymore. You are a mobile Nazi recruiting center. Keep up the good work!
|
|
|
|
Rsiyz
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 138
Merit: 6
|
|
April 10, 2018, 08:39:41 AM |
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gleiwitz_incident widely regarded as a deceitful false flag operation staged along with some two dozen similar German incidents on the eve of the invasion of Poland leading up to World War II in Europe.[1] The attackers had been posed as Polish nationals. Adolf Hitler invaded Poland the very next morning after a lengthy period of preparations. During his declaration of war, Hitler did not mention Gleiwitz incident by name, but grouped all provocations staged by the SS as an alleged Polish assault on Germany. The Gleiwitz incident is the best-known action of Operation Himmler, a series of special operations undertaken by the Schutzstaffel (SS) to serve Nazi German propaganda at the outbreak of war. .... Merkel congratulation to v. Orban hungary pm three times ))) and in hungary is soros "wanted" soo keep it in head usa molons..)) Noobody eat that false attack (gas) from saudi/il/gb/usa coalition .. usa get kick ass on un voting palestina 14-1 again ))) here where i live(strong nato country) also all media stoped write about that last fake gas attack ... so I am very pleasantly surprised .. proably some changes will comming..(not very good for usa)
|
|
|
|
Spaceman_Spiff_Original
|
|
April 10, 2018, 08:46:27 AM |
|
very quick short list for a small "game list" or how i have to call it..... only when breaking 12288 dollar price..... almost same rules as the list before just a winning date
I ll take 15/04/2019, thanks! Hi Mic, I saw I was added for 2018 instead of 2019.
|
|
|
|
realr0ach
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 311
#TheGoyimKnow
|
|
April 10, 2018, 08:54:18 AM |
|
proably some changes will comming..(not very good for usa)
Why do you keep pretending the US is run by Americans or even really exists in the first place? The US as an entity solely consists of scamming Jewish criminals at the banks, and lying Jewish criminals at the media. That's all America is. It also happens to be the same exact model in most nations on the planet. However, this power structure is nothing more than a frail paper tiger that instantly implodes once the bread and circuses fail to appease the mob, then the mob expels them from the country - either alive or in boxes - just like they've been expelled from countries over 100 times before.
|
|
|
|
Last of the V8s
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4392
Be a bank
|
|
April 10, 2018, 08:57:16 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
realr0ach
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 311
#TheGoyimKnow
|
|
April 10, 2018, 09:14:29 AM Last edit: April 10, 2018, 09:40:15 AM by realr0ach |
|
I resent this depiction of god, as earth is mostly a closed ecosystem. Combine the 2nd law of thermodynamics with a closed ecosystem and you have no peace, eternal metaphorical tidal waves of disruption, and essentially a UFC cage match to the death among many/most of it's inhabitants. If that specific manifestation of god was real, he would have designed it all much differently. One does not simply walk into Valhalla: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIu8WAO1iFU
|
|
|
|
|