Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated: Guess who is Sicker?

[BADecker]

Being vaccinated is a duty simply for all those that can't...

Some people are allergic to vaccins and if you're not vaccinated you allow the disease to spread to them.
Someone vaccinated can't get REALLY harmed even if they can get slithly sick. But very young children and people enable to take vaccins are still affected.

Simple vitamin C and D3 in combination strengthen the immune system.

If as much study went into nutrition as goes into medicine, nobody would ever need a doctor. As an example...


Ginger Destroys Cancer Cells More Effectively than Cancer Drugs

Most people nowadays have heard of the amazing anti-cancer properties of turmeric, which clinical research is showing to be a truly effective treatment for various forms of this serious disease. Fewer people are aware, however, that ginger – which is botanically related to turmeric – can also be an incredibly effective and natural cancer treatment option. Read out to find out more about ginger’s amazing benefits for cancer patients.
Why Ginger Works

Like turmeric, the cancer-fighting power of ginger seems to stem from two of its most important properties: it is a powerful anti-inflammatory and it is loaded with anti-oxidant compounds. Anti-inflammatories help treat cancer patients since chronic inflammation is now believed to be one of the underlying causes of cancer development and seems to favor the growth of cancer cells. Anti-oxidants help fight cancer by reducing oxidative tissue damage (another underlying reason for cancer development) and by strengthening the body’s own natural immunity to help fight off the growth of cancer cells.

Read more at http://www.naturalnewsblogs.com/ginger-destroys-cancer-cells-effectively-cancer-drugs/.

[1714966701]

1714966701

[1714966701]

1714966701

[1714966701]

1714966701

[1714966701]

1714966701

[1714966701]

1714966701

[mainpmf]

Being vaccinated is a duty simply for all those that can't...

Some people are allergic to vaccins and if you're not vaccinated you allow the disease to spread to them.
Someone vaccinated can't get REALLY harmed even if they can get slithly sick. But very young children and people enable to take vaccins are still affected.

Simple vitamin C and D3 in combination strengthen the immune system.

Yeah yeah yeah
Vitamin C and D3 can cure cancer and brin back the love one.
Could we stop spreading such bullshit?

[ScriptYoYo]

Being vaccinated is a duty simply for all those that can't...

Some people are allergic to vaccins and if you're not vaccinated you allow the disease to spread to them.
Someone vaccinated can't get REALLY harmed even if they can get slithly sick. But very young children and people enable to take vaccins are still affected.

Simple vitamin C and D3 in combination strengthen the immune system.

Yeah yeah yeah
Vitamin C and D3 can cure cancer and brin back the love one.
Could we stop spreading such bullshit?

Vitamins can only strengthen immunity in order to prevent the body from getting cancer, but when the body is already sick with cancer, more serious methods for treatment are needed.

[BADecker]

Being vaccinated is a duty simply for all those that can't...

Some people are allergic to vaccins and if you're not vaccinated you allow the disease to spread to them.
Someone vaccinated can't get REALLY harmed even if they can get slithly sick. But very young children and people enable to take vaccins are still affected.

Simple vitamin C and D3 in combination strengthen the immune system.

Yeah yeah yeah
Vitamin C and D3 can cure cancer and brin back the love one.
Could we stop spreading such bullshit?

The BS will stop only when you stop it. Have you seen any medical bring back a loved one?

Vitamin C and D3 will strengthen the immune system so that much of the medical isn't needed. And this is only a little tip of the protection we can get from nutrition.

Please stop spreading the BS that the medical wants to help anyone.

[BADecker]

Being vaccinated is a duty simply for all those that can't...

Some people are allergic to vaccins and if you're not vaccinated you allow the disease to spread to them.
Someone vaccinated can't get REALLY harmed even if they can get slithly sick. But very young children and people enable to take vaccins are still affected.

Simple vitamin C and D3 in combination strengthen the immune system.

Yeah yeah yeah
Vitamin C and D3 can cure cancer and brin back the love one.
Could we stop spreading such bullshit?

Vitamins can only strengthen immunity in order to prevent the body from getting cancer, but when the body is already sick with cancer, more serious methods for treatment are needed.

The more serious methods of treatment are chemo, surgery, and radiation. Once these have been completed, most patients are dead.

Saving cancer patients who have been diagnosed with only a couple of weeks to live, is for the heavy duty nutrition, like at the Gerson Institute (http://gerson.org/gerpress/).

[Symphony_fr]

Even with the help of a systematic vaccine you can not protect yourself from all diseases, because every day new viruses can appear.

[Nathan047]

Yeah yeah yeah
Vitamin C and D3 can cure cancer and brin back the love one.
Could we stop spreading such bullshit?

The only thing anti-vaccination or anti-medicine people can turn to is either nutrition or “alternative medicine,” nether of which can actually cure cancer (or any other medical alignment that need treating). There not going to stop any time soon.

[BADecker]

Even with the help of a systematic vaccine you can not protect yourself from all diseases, because every day new viruses can appear.

Right. And how much less protection you have when you get vaccinated, because the vaccines wreck your immune system... at least somewhat.

[Kronos21]

Even with the help of a systematic vaccine you can not protect yourself from all diseases, because every day new viruses can appear.

Right. And how much less protection you have when you get vaccinated, because the vaccines wreck your immune system... at least somewhat.

Vaccines are destroying the immune system of a person. On the contrary, they stimulate it. It's like exercise. If you regularly perform exercises that your muscles are toned and you to easily overcome the load. If you spend your days lying on the bed then in time, you will be hard just to take one step.

[BADecker]

Even with the help of a systematic vaccine you can not protect yourself from all diseases, because every day new viruses can appear.

Right. And how much less protection you have when you get vaccinated, because the vaccines wreck your immune system... at least somewhat.

Vaccines are destroying the immune system of a person. On the contrary, they stimulate it. It's like exercise. If you regularly perform exercises that your muscles are toned and you to easily overcome the load. If you spend your days lying on the bed then in time, you will be hard just to take one step.

Waste money on vaccines? Wanna stimulate your immune system for free? Eat dirt.

[tvbcof]

Even with the help of a systematic vaccine you can not protect yourself from all diseases, because every day new viruses can appear.

Right. And how much less protection you have when you get vaccinated, because the vaccines wreck your immune system... at least somewhat.

Vaccines are destroying the immune system of a person. On the contrary, they stimulate it. It's like exercise. If you regularly perform exercises that your muscles are toned and you to easily overcome the load. If you spend your days lying on the bed then in time, you will be hard just to take one step.

It's more accurate to think of our immune systems.  Plural.  Our bodies have multiple protective systems.  Vaccines only work on one aspect of immunity.  It's like adding a turbo to an engine but not upgrading the cooling system.  The engine will fail because of the 'upgrade', and I think that it is this principle which is causing a lot of auto-immune problems and others.  Of course these are not as much of a 'problem' for those who own shares in pharmaceutical companies.

I'm enough of a believer in the principle of excising one's whole immune system that I am relieved to get a touch of whatever seasonal bug is going around if I've not been sick for a while.  Most of the time I either don't catch the bug, or feel a little funny in the throat one morning then it passes.  Very rarely do I get sick enough to stop doing whatever project I'm doing.  Only once in the past 4 years did I lay around in bed and sleep a lot one day.

Immunity aside, there is a significant difference between eating something and having something injected directly into one's bloodstream.  Basically, everything one consumes is broken down in the gut into more basic components and only then passes through the intestinal walls.  The good stuff (lipids, proteins, sugars, etc) are selected and the bad stuff dumped.  Aluminum, for instance, is very common in the environment and our digestive systems have had millions of years to figure out how to deal with it.  Injecting it bypasses all of that and can be quite dangerous.  It's why ticks and mosquitoes and so forth are potentially quite problematic (and, parenthetically, why these creatures have long been of interest to bio-warfare developers.)

[tvbcof]

Being vaccinated is a duty simply for all those that can't...

Some people are allergic to vaccins and if you're not vaccinated you allow the disease to spread to them.
Someone vaccinated can't get REALLY harmed even if they can get slithly sick. But very young children and people enable to take vaccins are still affected.

Pretty much everyone is 'allergic to vaccines'.  Scientifically speaking, that's kind of the point.

The propaganda you've been fed here falls apart because vaccines are injected into most everyone without any sort of testing to see if they might produce a negative reaction in that individual.

The 'test' seems to be the way witches were detected back in the day; throw a woman into a lake.  If she swims, she's a witch.  If she drowns, she wasn't a witch.

[BADecker]

First Ever Study of Unvaccinated Vs. Vaccinated Kids, Pulled from Journal, Erased from Internet

In recent years, the glaring spotlight of skepticism has been turned to the topic of vaccines, bitterly dividing parents and giving doctors of modern medicine conniption fits — but no matter where you stand on vaccinations, the fact two groundbreaking, scientific, peer-reviewed studies painting inoculations in not-so favorable light have vanished from the Internet is cause for concern.

Originally, the study, titled, "Pilot comparative study on the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated 6- to 12- year old U.S. children," was published in Open Access Text.

Until, that is, Open Access Text removed it and a second, similar study by the same authors from their archives without explanation. In fact, The Free Thought Project attempted to contact Open Access Text on multiple occasions for an explanation on the abrupt decision to pull the studies — but, as of publishing, had yet to receive a response.

Lead author Anthony R. Mawson, Professor of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at Jackson State University's School of Public Health, establishes that his team takes no issue with vaccinations, in their own right, stating in the study's introduction,

"Vaccines are among the greatest achievements of biomedical science and one of the most effective public health interventions of the 20th century. Among U.S. children born between 1995 and 2013, vaccination is estimated to have prevented 322 million illnesses, 21 million hospitalizations and 732,000 premature deaths, with overall cost savings of $1.38 trillion. About 95% of U.S. children of kindergarten age receive all of the recommended vaccines as a requirement for school and daycare attendance, aimed at preventing the occurrence and spread of targeted infectious diseases. Advances in biotechnology are contributing to the development of new vaccines for widespread use."

Mawson responded by email to The Free Thought Project's request for a comment concerning the studies' abrupt disappearance, stating only,

"I am forwarding your inquiry to our funding agency for comment. I am not at liberty to provide details at this moment."

Although that sheds no light on the motivation for OAT to pull the study, it provides added evidence studies running counter to the long-held assumption vaccinations should not be questioned are far more frequently so explosive, the ensuing controversy and rush by modern medicine — often backed by the pharmaceutical industry — to denigrate such results is powerful and swift.

The study stated,

"Under the currently recommended pediatric vaccination schedule, U.S. children receive up to 48 doses of vaccines for 14 diseases from birth to age six years, a figure that has steadily increased since the 1950s, most notably since the Vaccines for Children program was created in 1994. The Vaccines for Children program began with vaccines targeting nine diseases: diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, Haemophilus influenzae type b disease, hepatitis B, measles, mumps, and rubella. Between 1995 and 2013, new vaccines against five other diseases were added for children age 6 and under: varicella, hepatitis A, pneumococcal disease, influenza, and rotavirus vaccine."

Mawson and his team of researchers included nine charts and a full 71 references in their comparison of the long-term health prospects between vaccinated children attending public schools and their unvaccinated, homeschooled peers, to determine what results from the current scheduling of vaccines that could, perhaps, be overlooked under the general assumption of vaccine safety.

Results were astonishing.

"Assessment of the long-term effects of the vaccination schedule on morbidity and mortality has been limited," the study stated, with paragraphs artificially inserted for clarity. "In this pilot study of vaccinated and unvaccinated homeschool children, reduced odds of chickenpox and whooping cough were found among the vaccinated, as expected, but unexpectedly increased odds were found for many other physician-diagnosed conditions."

Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/vaccinated-study-pulled-internet/.

[Portman99]

Being vaccinated is a duty simply for all those that can't...

Some people are allergic to vaccins and if you're not vaccinated you allow the disease to spread to them.
Someone vaccinated can't get REALLY harmed even if they can get slithly sick. But very young children and people enable to take vaccins are still affected.

Pretty much everyone is 'allergic to vaccines'.  Scientifically speaking, that's kind of the point.

The propaganda you've been fed here falls apart because vaccines are injected into most everyone without any sort of testing to see if they might produce a negative reaction in that individual.

The 'test' seems to be the way witches were detected back in the day; throw a woman into a lake.  If she swims, she's a witch.  If she drowns, she wasn't a witch.

Allergy to the vaccine is not the only cause of complications after vaccination. It often happens that the child after the disease has weakened the immune system, but parents lead him to the vaccine. It is the responsibility of parents, but not the issue of vaccination.

[BADecker]

Autism, caused by vaccination, under control.

262 kids cured to as close as you can get - http://cdautism.org/.

AutismOne - http://www.autismone.org/.

[Sithara007]

Even with the help of a systematic vaccine you can not protect yourself from all diseases, because every day new viruses can appear.

There is not a single vaccine which protects you from all the diseases. You need to take different vaccinations for each of the diseases. Also, the viruses sometimes mutate and evolve, making the existing vaccinations obsolete.

[mainpmf]

Tss...

I just don't understand how you can seriously defend your thesis...

You're actually saying there is something very harmful and NO ONE knows it in the world!
Except those who profits from it.
But doctors and health workers don't know about it.
Universities don't know about it.
Only you.

[28days_ever]

Even with the help of a systematic vaccine you can not protect yourself from all diseases, because every day new viruses can appear.

There is not a single vaccine which protects you from all the diseases. You need to take different vaccinations for each of the diseases. Also, the viruses sometimes mutate and evolve, making the existing vaccinations obsolete.

Vaccinations become obsolete every year, because new viruses are constantly appearing and it will be more effective to improve immunity in a healthy way, rather than letting all kinds of vaccines.

[BADecker]

Even with the help of a systematic vaccine you can not protect yourself from all diseases, because every day new viruses can appear.

There is not a single vaccine which protects you from all the diseases. You need to take different vaccinations for each of the diseases. Also, the viruses sometimes mutate and evolve, making the existing vaccinations obsolete.

Vaccinations become obsolete every year, because new viruses are constantly appearing and it will be more effective to improve immunity in a healthy way, rather than letting all kinds of vaccines.

That's because God made nature with self-protective mechanisms built in. We simply aren't smart enough to thwart the self-protection God placed into nature.

[tvbcof]

Tss...

I just don't understand how you can seriously defend your thesis...

You're actually saying there is something very harmful and NO ONE knows it in the world!
Except those who profits from it.
But doctors and health workers don't know about it.
Universities don't know about it.
Only you.

Lots and lots of people know it and many of them medical doctors and academic researchers.  Many of them are speaking out, but since mainstream media doesn't cover them most of the peeps remain ignorant.  In fact, the propaganda and conditioning is structured such that many of the peeps will fight tooth and nail for something they don't understand.  You are pretty much a poster-child for this phenomenon.

As for money, very few people are making a ton of money off being anti-vax.  A few people sell herbal remedies and/or snake-oil, but most of the time saying anything which goes against the official corp/gov stance leads to nothing but grief in one's career and financial life.  Most people who understand and disagree with the corp/gov activity will do so quietly and try to protect their family and friends, and probably their patients as much as practical even though there is a danger in doing so.  Only a small percentage will go public, but again, that is enough to provide a wealth of information to anyone who has an interest to go looking.