Bitcoin Forum
May 19, 2019, 09:57:34 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 [865] 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 ... 922 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Pro on-chain scaling - Cheaper fees  (Read 648558 times)
nutildah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1575


Permanent Tourist


View Profile
November 23, 2018, 01:38:59 PM
 #17281

Bitcoin is capitalism. The individual or company that use the most resources gets the highest reward. Because one company is currently using more resources than all other individuals and companies, that does not make make Bitcoin centralized, that makes that company the hardest working.

You mean "than all the other individuals and companies combined," and that is certainly what centralization is.

Besides, we're not talking about bitcoin, we're talking about Bitcoin SV. CSW was just dumb to claim that ABC was centralized when his coin is even moreso. Bad, bad argument. He's been reaching for straws since the beginning but now he is reaching for... pine needles.

Coingeek currently up to 70%.

███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
#1
███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
BTC 
  ●
   BTC
  BTC  
.
    ▄▄▄▀▀▀▀
 ▄██▀
███        ▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄
▀███▄▄▄▄▀▀▀                 ▀▀▄▄
  ▀▀▀██████████████████████████▀
   ▄█▄     ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
    ▀▀██▄▄█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀
      ▄  ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
      ▀██▄  ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
        ▀█▀██████████████▀▀
         ▀█▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
            █▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀
             ▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
.
     BTC
  BTC   
  ●
  BTC  
███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
1558303054
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1558303054

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1558303054
Reply with quote  #2

1558303054
Report to moderator
1558303054
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1558303054

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1558303054
Reply with quote  #2

1558303054
Report to moderator
1558303054
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1558303054

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1558303054
Reply with quote  #2

1558303054
Report to moderator
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. EWallets such as Coinbase are like banks -- a central organization has complete control over your money. You shouldn't put much money in EWallets.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
sirsplashalot
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 480
Merit: 120



View Profile
November 23, 2018, 01:50:38 PM
 #17282

Bitcoin is capitalism. The individual or company that use the most resources gets the highest reward. Because one company is currently using more resources than all other individuals and companies, that does not make make Bitcoin centralized, that makes that company the hardest working.

You mean "than all the other individuals and companies combined," and that is certainly what centralization is.

Besides, we're not talking about bitcoin, we're talking about Bitcoin SV. CSW was just dumb to claim that ABC was centralized when his coin is even moreso. Bad, bad argument. He's been reaching for straws since the beginning but now he is reaching for... pine needles.

Coingeek currently up to 70%.


the cen·tral·i·zation
/sentrələˈzāSH(ə)n/Submit
noun
the concentration of control of an activity or organization under a single authority of an activity or organization under a single authority

The concentration of control isn’t under a single authority as any individual or company can become that ‘single authority’ if they simply work harder then that ‘single authority.’

Worried about my trust rating? I am too. Bitcointalk user ‘Lauda’ has abused the trust system. Please refer to Lauda’s other reviews and my posts prior to make educated judgements. Thank you.
sirsplashalot
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 480
Merit: 120



View Profile
November 23, 2018, 01:55:31 PM
 #17283

BSV is happening
#

Dude. Who gives a flying fuck if BSV gets 1,000 blocks ahead of ABC? It will simply be a less valuable, less used altcoin that has a needlessly high hash rate and is 7-8 spots lower in the market cap rankings than BCH. It's not like the exchanges and everyone else is gonna back-peddle and say "Oh shit, we messed up. Guess BSV is BCH after all." That's not how it works.



That’s definitely not how it works. PoW is much stronger then ‘proof of exchange ownership ego’

Worried about my trust rating? I am too. Bitcointalk user ‘Lauda’ has abused the trust system. Please refer to Lauda’s other reviews and my posts prior to make educated judgements. Thank you.
European Central Bank
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 1078



View Profile
November 23, 2018, 02:07:29 PM
 #17284



https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1065876603165687810

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/9zmq3x/increasingly_desperate_calvin_ayre_schooled_by/?sort=confidence

i guess things are winding down a little though note the infantile insistence that ABC do the replay protection. i would've thought it was polite for the chain no one wants or uses to fork again to implement it.

so now we'll have another bitcoin, but one vastly less credible than BCH or bitcoin gold or bitcore or all the other ones. SV will soon be worth less than the obscurest shitforks.
Icutgrass205
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 4

Bitcoin is today what the internet was decades ago


View Profile
November 23, 2018, 04:21:27 PM
 #17285

Can someone point to where it says bitcoin was supposed to be decentralized in the white paper?

Bitcoin, a peer-to-peer electronic cash system for the world. BTC tips are greatly appreciated 35BqJwcycsLDoPrBxmxuh1e4MY7bcDPvGW
Crypitol
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 115
Merit: 1


View Profile
November 23, 2018, 04:31:02 PM
 #17286

Can someone point to where it says bitcoin was supposed to be decentralized in the white paper?

Everywhere, but the first is in it's opening argument abstract. Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main
benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required
to prevent double-spending

The revocation of a trusted third or central party is the definition of decentralization.
bones261
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1530


My hat is in storage. https://ibb.co/YLkPgXb


View Profile
November 23, 2018, 04:41:26 PM
Merited by Lind (1)
 #17287

Can someone point to where it says bitcoin was supposed to be decentralized in the white paper?

    It doesn't. It just states that it is p2p electronic cash. However, it is much better to have many entities mining rather than fewer entities mining. More entities mining helps ensure that the mining nodes are competing rather than colluding. If you make the barrier for entry too high, you end up with an oligarchy that have a good likelihood of entering into a cartel. (Although it is abundantly clear in BCH case that the two big mining alliances in BCH are actually competing. However, it has resulted in a split, and now each chain is mostly being support by one alliance. I wouldn't go so far as state that it is a "cartel" but it is obvious that both the BCHABC chain is now run by Bitmain and it's allies and BCHSV is now run by nChain and it's allies.)
   Also, in order to be true p2p electronic cash, it would be nice if most people have the option of performing an independent audit of what the miners are actually doing, by running a full node. Although a proper SPV wallet can assure that at least your transactions are valid, it would be nice to be assured that the miners are not colluding and pulling some dubious shit. If you make it prohibitively expensive for anyone to be able to conduct their own audit, we all have to rely on the fiscally capable to keep tabs on the miners. How is that really any better of an alternative than just using banks which are controlled by a central bank of the government?

......
.L I V E C O I N . N E T.
.
..PROFITBOX..
██  █████████████████████████
  █████████▄      ▄██████████
█████████████▄  ▄████████████
    █████████████████████████
  ██████████▀    ▀█ ▀████████
████  █████▀  ▄▄  ▀█  ▀██████
  ████████▀  ▄██▄  ▀█   ▀████
    ██████   ▀██▀   ██   ████
  █████████▄      ▄██████████
██  █████████▄  ▄████████████
  ███████████████████████████
██  █████████████████████████
  █████████████████████▀ ███
█████████████████████▀   ███
    █████████████▀     ████
  █████████████▀   ██    ████
████  █████▀     ██    ████
  ███████▀   ██    ██    ████
    █████    ██    ██    ████
  ███████    ██    ██    ████
██  █████    ██    ██    ████
  ███████████████████████████
.....
HelgaJ
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 23, 2018, 07:54:15 PM
 #17288

At the moment, the price of this coin has gone down very much, but I believe that this project will remain one of the most powerful and promising.

Icutgrass205
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 4

Bitcoin is today what the internet was decades ago


View Profile
November 23, 2018, 07:58:04 PM
 #17289

Can someone point to where it says bitcoin was supposed to be decentralized in the white paper?

    It doesn't. It just states that it is p2p electronic cash. However, it is much better to have many entities mining rather than fewer entities mining. More entities mining helps ensure that the mining nodes are competing rather than colluding. If you make the barrier for entry too high, you end up with an oligarchy that have a good likelihood of entering into a cartel. (Although it is abundantly clear in BCH case that the two big mining alliances in BCH are actually competing. However, it has resulted in a split, and now each chain is mostly being support by one alliance. I wouldn't go so far as state that it is a "cartel" but it is obvious that both the BCHABC chain is now run by Bitmain and it's allies and BCHSV is now run by nChain and it's allies.)
   Also, in order to be true p2p electronic cash, it would be nice if most people have the option of performing an independent audit of what the miners are actually doing, by running a full node. Although a proper SPV wallet can assure that at least your transactions are valid, it would be nice to be assured that the miners are not colluding and pulling some dubious shit. If you make it prohibitively expensive for anyone to be able to conduct their own audit, we all have to rely on the fiscally capable to keep tabs on the miners. How is that really any better of an alternative than just using banks which are controlled by a central bank of the government?

But it seems that temporary centralization of the mining nodes on SV is what is needed to push the global adoption for p2p electronic cash. SV wants to lock down the protocol, SV wants big business and enterprise level use of bitcoin. ABC does not want any of these things, hence the implementation of DSV which effectively makes bitcoin illegal.

Bitcoin, a peer-to-peer electronic cash system for the world. BTC tips are greatly appreciated 35BqJwcycsLDoPrBxmxuh1e4MY7bcDPvGW
bones261
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1530


My hat is in storage. https://ibb.co/YLkPgXb


View Profile
November 23, 2018, 08:11:17 PM
 #17290

Can someone point to where it says bitcoin was supposed to be decentralized in the white paper?

    It doesn't. It just states that it is p2p electronic cash. However, it is much better to have many entities mining rather than fewer entities mining. More entities mining helps ensure that the mining nodes are competing rather than colluding. If you make the barrier for entry too high, you end up with an oligarchy that have a good likelihood of entering into a cartel. (Although it is abundantly clear in BCH case that the two big mining alliances in BCH are actually competing. However, it has resulted in a split, and now each chain is mostly being support by one alliance. I wouldn't go so far as state that it is a "cartel" but it is obvious that both the BCHABC chain is now run by Bitmain and it's allies and BCHSV is now run by nChain and it's allies.)
   Also, in order to be true p2p electronic cash, it would be nice if most people have the option of performing an independent audit of what the miners are actually doing, by running a full node. Although a proper SPV wallet can assure that at least your transactions are valid, it would be nice to be assured that the miners are not colluding and pulling some dubious shit. If you make it prohibitively expensive for anyone to be able to conduct their own audit, we all have to rely on the fiscally capable to keep tabs on the miners. How is that really any better of an alternative than just using banks which are controlled by a central bank of the government?

But it seems that temporary centralization of the mining nodes on SV is what is needed to push the global adoption for p2p electronic cash. SV wants to lock down the protocol, SV wants big business and enterprise level use of bitcoin. ABC does not want any of these things, hence the implementation of DSV which effectively makes bitcoin illegal.

     My concern with SV is it is obvious that if anyone comes along and has competing ideas, Dr Wright will just threaten to ruin and orphan them. How is that encouraging free and open competition? Agree with us or else?
However, if I really had any skin in BCH, which I don't, I would prefer SV over ABC. Bitmain is the absolute worst. Anything that counters them is welcome.

......
.L I V E C O I N . N E T.
.
..PROFITBOX..
██  █████████████████████████
  █████████▄      ▄██████████
█████████████▄  ▄████████████
    █████████████████████████
  ██████████▀    ▀█ ▀████████
████  █████▀  ▄▄  ▀█  ▀██████
  ████████▀  ▄██▄  ▀█   ▀████
    ██████   ▀██▀   ██   ████
  █████████▄      ▄██████████
██  █████████▄  ▄████████████
  ███████████████████████████
██  █████████████████████████
  █████████████████████▀ ███
█████████████████████▀   ███
    █████████████▀     ████
  █████████████▀   ██    ████
████  █████▀     ██    ████
  ███████▀   ██    ██    ████
    █████    ██    ██    ████
  ███████    ██    ██    ████
██  █████    ██    ██    ████
  ███████████████████████████
.....
what is happening
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 186
Merit: 1


View Profile
November 23, 2018, 09:30:56 PM
 #17291

buying BSV dip like crazy
bones261
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1530


My hat is in storage. https://ibb.co/YLkPgXb


View Profile
November 23, 2018, 09:40:37 PM
 #17292

buying BSV dip like crazy

   You realize Dr Wright doesn't respect people sitting in their pajamas and daytrading. To show your support, get a non-Bitmain Asic and start mining. (Or build platforms that actually give SV use cases.)

......
.L I V E C O I N . N E T.
.
..PROFITBOX..
██  █████████████████████████
  █████████▄      ▄██████████
█████████████▄  ▄████████████
    █████████████████████████
  ██████████▀    ▀█ ▀████████
████  █████▀  ▄▄  ▀█  ▀██████
  ████████▀  ▄██▄  ▀█   ▀████
    ██████   ▀██▀   ██   ████
  █████████▄      ▄██████████
██  █████████▄  ▄████████████
  ███████████████████████████
██  █████████████████████████
  █████████████████████▀ ███
█████████████████████▀   ███
    █████████████▀     ████
  █████████████▀   ██    ████
████  █████▀     ██    ████
  ███████▀   ██    ██    ████
    █████    ██    ██    ████
  ███████    ██    ██    ████
██  █████    ██    ██    ████
  ███████████████████████████
.....
cvdesty
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 442
Merit: 20


View Profile
November 23, 2018, 11:55:55 PM
Merited by cAPSLOCK (1), nutildah (1)
 #17293

My concern with SV is it is obvious that if anyone comes along and has competing ideas, Dr Wright will just threaten to ruin and orphan them. How is that encouraging free and open competition? Agree with us or else?
It's because of self-centered people like Dr. Craig that regulations must come to this market. The crypto market already had a bad reputation. Dr. Craig made things much worse with his malicious threats. His intentions are highly questionable. He is not worthy of our support.
nutildah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1575


Permanent Tourist


View Profile
November 24, 2018, 02:21:38 AM
Merited by bones261 (2), cAPSLOCK (1)
 #17294

Can someone point to where it says bitcoin was supposed to be decentralized in the white paper?

From Satoshi's introduction of the whitepaper:

Quote
I've developed a new open source P2P e-cash system called Bitcoin. It's completely decentralized, with no central server or trusted parties, because everything is based on crypto proof instead of trust.

http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/forum/topics/bitcoin-open-source

Its the entire premise of the idea. Creating a DECENTRALIZED currency.

Show's over. Craig lost. Actually, all of BCH lost. Nothing more to see here.

███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
#1
███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
BTC 
  ●
   BTC
  BTC  
.
    ▄▄▄▀▀▀▀
 ▄██▀
███        ▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄
▀███▄▄▄▄▀▀▀                 ▀▀▄▄
  ▀▀▀██████████████████████████▀
   ▄█▄     ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
    ▀▀██▄▄█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀
      ▄  ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
      ▀██▄  ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
        ▀█▀██████████████▀▀
         ▀█▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
            █▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀
             ▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
.
     BTC
  BTC   
  ●
  BTC  
███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
███████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████████
mk111
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 191
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 24, 2018, 05:47:48 AM
 #17295

BCash is slowly dying.... LOL i mean BTrash!
bones261
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1530


My hat is in storage. https://ibb.co/YLkPgXb


View Profile
November 24, 2018, 06:03:49 AM
 #17296

Can someone point to where it says bitcoin was supposed to be decentralized in the white paper?

From Satoshi's introduction of the whitepaper:

Quote
I've developed a new open source P2P e-cash system called Bitcoin. It's completely decentralized, with no central server or trusted parties, because everything is based on crypto proof instead of trust.

http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/forum/topics/bitcoin-open-source

Its the entire premise of the idea. Creating a DECENTRALIZED currency.

Show's over. Craig lost. Actually, all of BCH lost. Nothing more to see here.

Thank you so much for this link. It totally debunks the narrative that the white paper doesn't mention the word "decentralized."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FscIgtDJFXg


Last piece of the puzzle.

......
.L I V E C O I N . N E T.
.
..PROFITBOX..
██  █████████████████████████
  █████████▄      ▄██████████
█████████████▄  ▄████████████
    █████████████████████████
  ██████████▀    ▀█ ▀████████
████  █████▀  ▄▄  ▀█  ▀██████
  ████████▀  ▄██▄  ▀█   ▀████
    ██████   ▀██▀   ██   ████
  █████████▄      ▄██████████
██  █████████▄  ▄████████████
  ███████████████████████████
██  █████████████████████████
  █████████████████████▀ ███
█████████████████████▀   ███
    █████████████▀     ████
  █████████████▀   ██    ████
████  █████▀     ██    ████
  ███████▀   ██    ██    ████
    █████    ██    ██    ████
  ███████    ██    ██    ████
██  █████    ██    ██    ████
  ███████████████████████████
.....
Mrpumperitis
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1070


View Profile
November 24, 2018, 07:05:51 AM
 #17297

https://twitter.com/ProfFaustus/status/1065920263093669889
@wormholeSV

Replying to @ProfFaustus
Looking forward to seeing big business begin to use WSV tokens for loyalty points, stocks, and more. #BitcoinSV is business. Wormhole is here to compete.


 
@ProfFaustus

Coin Burning on SV is a donation to miners - thank you


 
@VivienBTC
 
What happenned to the Satoshi that was OK with it being a donation to the community?


@TeamWinnaar

losing keys != burning coins


 
@ProfFaustus

Correct

I got red trust because i speak the truth....This thread shows why many long term users are being tagged red, ...https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2399315.msg24593043#msg24593043 ,nullius and lauda are scammers.Bitcoin cash is the real upgrade bitcoin needed, not segwit.
How The Banks Bought Bitcoin  The Lightning Network - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYHFrf5ci_g&feature=youtu.be&repost= Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
what is happening
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 186
Merit: 1


View Profile
November 24, 2018, 11:40:03 AM
 #17298

guys buy as much as you can 0.03 minimum
presduterte
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 54

They call me Rad Rody.


View Profile
November 24, 2018, 11:47:51 AM
 #17299

guys buy as much as you can 0.03 minimum

OK who deployed the low-effort SV pump bot?

Real funny guys.
bitcircle
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 1002


View Profile
November 24, 2018, 12:06:44 PM
 #17300

guys buy as much as you can 0.03 minimum

OK who deployed the low-effort SV pump bot?

Real funny guys.

Now whales have been divided in 2 groups this has been turned into war it seems this will continue for long time and only wise people keep making profit from this pump when it will happen.
Pages: « 1 ... 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 [865] 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 ... 922 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!