Coin++
|
|
January 15, 2018, 12:17:33 PM |
|
This is really weird, the miner seems faster in miner and on API, but slower on the pool than DTSM.
Checked on 1080Ti cards: reports ~800h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~780h/s Checked on Titan Xp cards: reports ~840h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~810h/s
Aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~9 Khash in pool.
On DTSM aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~11 Khash in pool.
Checked with ZCASH on flypool and with ZCLASSIC on Coinmine.pl
Optimizations are on. nofee command isn't listed. What gives?
Same results in my side : the hashrate in the pool in less with BMiner than DSTM (all with fees, 1080Ti, 1070, 1050Ti...). Numbrs in the miner are suspicious for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"This isn't the kind of software where we can leave so many unresolved bugs that we need a tracker for them." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
DES_MX
Member
Offline
Activity: 216
Merit: 13
|
|
January 15, 2018, 12:19:41 PM |
|
You are running under Linux right? I'm running under Win 10 x64. Meaning it's not OS specific either. For now advise caution with this miner This is really weird, the miner seems faster in miner and on API, but slower on the pool than DTSM.
Checked on 1080Ti cards: reports ~800h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~780h/s Checked on Titan Xp cards: reports ~840h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~810h/s
Aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~9 Khash in pool.
On DTSM aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~11 Khash in pool.
Checked with ZCASH on flypool and with ZCLASSIC on Coinmine.pl
Optimizations are on. nofee command isn't listed. What gives?
Same results in my side : the hashrate in the pool in less with BMiner than DSTM (all with fees). Numbrs in the miner are suspicious for me.
|
|
|
|
Coin++
|
|
January 15, 2018, 12:26:40 PM |
|
You are running under Linux right? I'm running under Win 10 x64. Meaning it's not OS specific either. For now advise caution with this miner This is really weird, the miner seems faster in miner and on API, but slower on the pool than DTSM.
Checked on 1080Ti cards: reports ~800h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~780h/s Checked on Titan Xp cards: reports ~840h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~810h/s
Aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~9 Khash in pool.
On DTSM aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~11 Khash in pool.
Checked with ZCASH on flypool and with ZCLASSIC on Coinmine.pl
Optimizations are on. nofee command isn't listed. What gives?
Same results in my side : the hashrate in the pool in less with BMiner than DSTM (all with fees). Numbrs in the miner are suspicious for me. Yes, Linux (Ubuntu 16.04).
|
|
|
|
Andrey09
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 176
Merit: 0
|
|
January 15, 2018, 12:36:32 PM |
|
Same results in my side : the hashrate in the pool in less with BMiner than DSTM (all with fees, 1080Ti, 1070, 1050Ti...). Numbrs in the miner are suspicious for me. Same for me.
|
|
|
|
DES_MX
Member
Offline
Activity: 216
Merit: 13
|
|
January 15, 2018, 12:54:22 PM |
|
Additionally to all previous comments, seeing about ~1 out of 100 rejects on shares, with DTSM literally no rejects.
|
|
|
|
MagicSmoker
|
|
January 15, 2018, 05:41:23 PM |
|
I was also averaging about 1% rejected shares with 5.0.0, and virtually 0% with dstm 0.5.7.
|
|
|
|
NameTaken
|
|
January 15, 2018, 05:47:44 PM |
|
0.0016% rejected shares.
|
|
|
|
realbminer (OP)
|
|
January 15, 2018, 09:43:14 PM |
|
This is really weird, the miner seems faster in miner and on API, but slower on the pool than DTSM.
Checked on 1080Ti cards: reports ~800h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~780h/s Checked on Titan Xp cards: reports ~840h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~810h/s
Aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~9 Khash in pool.
On DTSM aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~11 Khash in pool.
Checked with ZCASH on flypool and with ZCLASSIC on Coinmine.pl
Optimizations are on. nofee command isn't listed. What gives?
How long have the miners been running? The pool is estimating the speeds based on the number of submitted shares. Therefore you'll need at least 24 hours to get accurate results. What are the percentages of rejected shares? Many people have tried on nanopool / miningpoolhub / suprnova and the numbers seem pretty accurate. Can you try these pools?
|
When Crypto-mining Made Fast. @realbminer on TWTR
|
|
|
torstenx
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
January 15, 2018, 09:59:50 PM |
|
The version 5.1.0 has released: - Support NiceHash.
- Fix unstable network connections in 5.0.0.
- Fix performance regressions for 1080Ti under Linux.
Enjoy mining! The performance regression hasn't been fixed. Instead it has been made another 0.5% worse.
|
|
|
|
realbminer (OP)
|
|
January 15, 2018, 10:39:31 PM |
|
The version 5.1.0 has released: - Support NiceHash.
- Fix unstable network connections in 5.0.0.
- Fix performance regressions for 1080Ti under Linux.
Enjoy mining! The performance regression hasn't been fixed. Instead it has been made another 0.5% worse. I'm using 384.111 and it seems working pretty well. Will look into it more closely.
|
When Crypto-mining Made Fast. @realbminer on TWTR
|
|
|
realbminer (OP)
|
|
January 15, 2018, 10:41:18 PM |
|
The version 5.1.0 has released: - Support NiceHash.
- Fix unstable network connections in 5.0.0.
- Fix performance regressions for 1080Ti under Linux.
Enjoy mining! It actually shows all sols computed by the bminer. Note that the number remains the same even the devfee is turned off (which does not submit devfee shares but it disables *quite a few* optimizations). Im curious what these optimizations do? 1) You can add GPU temps on miner window? 2) You can add colors to miner window for best reading? Many of optimizations are around how to schedule CPU / GPU jobs to maximize the effective utilizations. For the other two questions is the UI sufficient?
|
When Crypto-mining Made Fast. @realbminer on TWTR
|
|
|
realbminer (OP)
|
|
January 16, 2018, 01:11:38 AM |
|
The miner doesn't work on Ubuntu 14 (Ethos)
./bminer: relocation error: ./bminer: symbol _ZTTNSt7__cxx1118basic_stringstreamIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEE, version GLIBCXX_3.4.21 not defined in file libstdc++.so.6 with link time reference
What to do?
Can you please try the following? sudo add-apt-repository ppa:ubuntu-toolchain-r/test sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install libstdc++6
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:ubuntu-toolchain-r/test
Done sudo apt-get update
Done sudo apt-get install libstdc++6
Already the newest version installed The same error... Did not have an environment to reproduce it yet -- but will look into it.
|
When Crypto-mining Made Fast. @realbminer on TWTR
|
|
|
hedgeez
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
January 16, 2018, 06:45:28 AM |
|
could anyone post their .bat setup for slushpool? thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
flatounet
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 2
|
|
January 16, 2018, 07:30:28 PM |
|
i just see you today , im testing it on windows 10 3 rigs of 7 . 1060 3gb on rig 1 , look a bit slower than dstm , 1940 vs 1892 for Bminer. on rig 2 (6 card at this time) dstm 1503 vs 1547 for Bminer this info was on dos windows on win10 but i let it work and see the diff on few days .... thx for release ,u look have a watch dog and api ? you look work on miner can you add for control pool ? when pool1 not answers use pool2 ? or include a Zproxy ? all i want ,miner never stop ... thank's
|
|
|
|
Nexworks
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
January 17, 2018, 03:36:10 AM |
|
MPH shows my hash rate as substantially higher than what the miner is showing (its estimating based on last 5 minutes of shares). So for some pool appears to be lower, while for others like myself it appears to be higher. Not sure if this is related to the miner or just share luck. The amount of rejected shares does concern me a bit, its around 0.5%
|
|
|
|
hanskan
|
|
January 17, 2018, 06:11:32 AM |
|
Can't be bothered reading all the posts here or do my own testing - win version of this miner is slower than dstm's ? Correct ?
|
|
|
|
flatounet
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 2
|
|
January 17, 2018, 08:29:44 AM |
|
Can't be bothered reading all the posts here or do my own testing - win version of this miner is slower than dstm's ? Correct ?
i tested it since yesterday , loook be 3% faster than dstm. i got 301 with dstm ,and im at 310 with bminer ... ( on flypool) but just one night here .... the blue line ( current effective hashrate , look more regular with bminer) with dstm ( the blue line goes higher and lower , and average is lower ...) bminer let me think have a "zecproxy" include , more régular about job found .....
|
|
|
|
Yami2733
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
January 17, 2018, 10:59:35 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Yami2733
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
January 17, 2018, 11:55:35 AM |
|
Can't be bothered reading all the posts here or do my own testing - win version of this miner is slower than dstm's ? Correct ?
i tested it since yesterday , loook be 3% faster than dstm. i got 301 with dstm ,and im at 310 with bminer ... ( on flypool) but just one night here .... the blue line ( current effective hashrate , look more regular with bminer) with dstm ( the blue line goes higher and lower , and average is lower ...) bminer let me think have a "zecproxy" include , more régular about job found ..... Newbie here! My very second post. Can you pls share your result one more time here tomorrow? if this miner is so good! I will definitely try Bminer
|
|
|
|
NameTaken
|
|
January 17, 2018, 11:58:24 AM |
|
Better than 1% and worse than 0%.
|
|
|
|
|