[ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread

[BitThink]

Ouch.  .0028 on burnside's.  Stop playing with shapes & colors -- buy some shares

I am not sure whether buying now is a good idea. Cannot foresee any upside until November. The dust dividend does not justify locking fund for more than 2 months. Maybe it's still better to come back on October?

[crumbs]

Ouch.  .0028 on burnside's.  Stop playing with shapes & colors -- buy some shares

I am not sure whether buying now is a good idea. Cannot foresee any upside until November. The dust dividend does not justify locking fund for more than 2 months. Maybe it's still better to come back on October?

Sorry -- was aimed at the usual Cheerleading squad, the ones waiting for cheap shares  I'm certainly not buying now.

Edit:  All-time low since the IPO on burnside's, .0017 on Bitfunder -- quality merch at bargain-basement prices!  Buy buy buy!

[camu6]

Well.. Labcoin is about to implode. I guess there will be alot of BTCs coming back to Actm.

[Ytterbium]

Well.. Labcoin is about to implode. I guess there will be alot of BTCs coming back to Actm.

I'll likely just scare people off mining stocks all together - the big selloff in Labcoin coincided with a big drop in ActM's prices as well, and LC's actually rebounded more.

[BitThink]

Well.. Labcoin is about to implode. I guess there will be alot of BTCs coming back to Actm.

If it implode, majority of BTC just disappear. The tiny part of fund of the few luckiest people will not help much.

[carpetbagger]

Bitfunder price is sinking

[lewicki]

I'll get to it in a bit, gotta get those 6am League of Legends games in first. #thuglife

Gold 1

[Stuartuk]

only for fun

The problem with this general design is that lewicki holds the licensing rights to something very similar and so the potential for legal dispute means ACtM cannot risk going with anything similar. A multi million dollar company could be sued for a very large sum for such a breach of copyright.

You need a different design guys.

Edit- I'm not saying lewicki himself would launch a case (he could) but if he sells the rights to the logo on to someone else to get his money back then that new owner could take it to court - basically a minefield.

[yuansuyi]

only for fun

The problem with this general design is that lewicki holds the licensing rights to something very similar and so the potential for legal dispute means ACtM cannot risk going with anything similar. A multi million dollar company could be sued for a very large sum for such a breach of copyright.

You need a different design guys.

Edit- I'm not saying lewicki himself would launch a case (he could) but if he sells the rights to the logo on to someone else to get his money back then that new owner could take it to court - basically a minefield.

How about the computer case photo in this webpage ?
http://www.virtualminingcorp.com/about.html

same image here: http://usa.chenbro.com/corporatesite/products_detail.php?sku=163

[Effayy]

only for fun

The problem with this general design is that lewicki holds the licensing rights to something very similar and so the potential for legal dispute means ACtM cannot risk going with anything similar. A multi million dollar company could be sued for a very large sum for such a breach of copyright.

You need a different design guys.

Edit- I'm not saying lewicki himself would launch a case (he could) but if he sells the rights to the logo on to someone else to get his money back then that new owner could take it to court - basically a minefield.

How about the computer case photo in this webpage ?
http://www.virtualminingcorp.com/about.html

same image here: http://usa.chenbro.com/corporatesite/products_detail.php?sku=163

When there are products to take pictures of, those will most likely change.

[yuansuyi]

only for fun

The problem with this general design is that lewicki holds the licensing rights to something very similar and so the potential for legal dispute means ACtM cannot risk going with anything similar. A multi million dollar company could be sued for a very large sum for such a breach of copyright.

You need a different design guys.

Edit- I'm not saying lewicki himself would launch a case (he could) but if he sells the rights to the logo on to someone else to get his money back then that new owner could take it to court - basically a minefield.

How about the computer case photo in this webpage ?
http://www.virtualminingcorp.com/about.html

same image here: http://usa.chenbro.com/corporatesite/products_detail.php?sku=163

When there are products to take pictures of, those will most likely change.

Sure it will change.
So HTC can put photos of iPhone5S on their homepage until there are new products to take pictures of?

[sayaz]

Oh yuansuyi you cutie

[Stuartuk]

How about the computer case photo in this webpage ?
http://www.virtualminingcorp.com/about.html

same image here: http://usa.chenbro.com/corporatesite/products_detail.php?sku=163

I'm not a lawyer but you have a guy with a license to an logo, and ACtM are potentially going to change their current logo to a very very similar logo to the one that is copyrighted. You can't know what a judge would rule on that change, at this time, after certain relevant contacts between Ken and lewicki. Not worth the risk IMO.

[crumbs]

Lolz, 12:46 (S) 463 @ 0.00275000 ACTIVEMINING

[EskimoBob]

Attention everyone! Please take off your graphic designer hats an put on your armchair lawyer or judge hat. Solicitor wigs are fine too.
Please start dreaming up elaborate court dramas.

Thank you and please, carry on.

[Effayy]

Attention everyone! Please take off your graphic designer hats an put on your armchair lawyer or judge hat. Solicitor wigs are fine too.
Please start dreaming up elaborate court dramas.

Thank you and please, carry on.

Lol you may have accurately described the thread theme of the day.

[Effayy]

only for fun

The problem with this general design is that lewicki holds the licensing rights to something very similar and so the potential for legal dispute means ACtM cannot risk going with anything similar. A multi million dollar company could be sued for a very large sum for such a breach of copyright.

You need a different design guys.

Edit- I'm not saying lewicki himself would launch a case (he could) but if he sells the rights to the logo on to someone else to get his money back then that new owner could take it to court - basically a minefield.

How about the computer case photo in this webpage ?
http://www.virtualminingcorp.com/about.html

same image here: http://usa.chenbro.com/corporatesite/products_detail.php?sku=163

When there are products to take pictures of, those will most likely change.

Sure it will change.
So HTC can put photos of iPhone5S on their homepage until there are new products to take pictures of?

No but they are an established company with previous profit to fund R&D and manufacturing on future products. They can afford to have a prototype or HQ renders to use for marketing.

What I do agree that should be done is to append a disclaimer to the bottom of the image stating that the picture does not accurately represent the final product.

[snowdropfore]

the share price is sinking, you guys are still talking about the logo,  WTF.

[Stuartuk]

the share price is sinking, you guys are still talking about the logo,  WTF.

lol what do you recommend we do? maybe we should conjure up a magic share price spell?

[crumbs]

Remain calm, don't buy into the FUD -- HOLD!!!