[ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread

[Stuartuk]

...I still love you, Stuart 

In all seriousness, fuck right off.

[1714967239]

1714967239

[1714967239]

1714967239

[crumbs]

...I still love you, Stuart 

In all seriousness, fuck right off.

I thought u ragequit?

"All the rest has been waffle but tell you what Lorenzo. As you have PM'ed me multiple times telling me to shut up I'll do so. It's all yours now. See how you get on. I don't know what the feck you are going to talk about, but hey maybe another week of silence will do wonders for the share price. Be seeing you."

[drawingthesun]

Damn investing in this company seems like a bad idea now, not feeling very good.

[N_S]

In all seriousness, fuck right off.

This guy!

[zumzero]

Damn investing in this company seems like a bad idea now, not feeling very good.

expand

[zumzero]

Guys,  we're on Reddit.

Feel free to jump in and spread the love.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1lur6u/easic_announces_24_ths_fasthash_miner/

[drawingthesun]

Damn investing in this company seems like a bad idea now, not feeling very good.

expand

Someone mentioned here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=254930.msg3095894#msg3095894 that ActiveMining does not yet have a fab to create the chips whilst all our competitors are using TSMC.

This is a little worrying.

[N_S]

Damn investing in this company seems like a bad idea now, not feeling very good.

expand

Someone mentioned here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=254930.msg3095894#msg3095894 that ActiveMining does not yet have a fab to create the chips whilst all our competitors are using TSMC.

This is a little worrying.

Wait, am I completely daft or is eASIC not the fab?

[drawingthesun]

Damn investing in this company seems like a bad idea now, not feeling very good.

expand

Someone mentioned here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=254930.msg3095894#msg3095894 that ActiveMining does not yet have a fab to create the chips whilst all our competitors are using TSMC.

This is a little worrying.

Wait, am I completely daft or is eASIC not the fab?

Nope, they are a fabless company.

[N_S]

Nope, they are a fabless company.

Interesting. Any ideas where they've been fabricating ASICs in the past?

[drawingthesun]

eASIC is a fabless semiconductor company offering NEW ASIC devices used in the production of customized silicon devices.

[auto2nr1]

Is ActiveMining still taking delivery of the 2 batch of Avalon chips that are still on order or did we request a refund?

[drawingthesun]

Nope, they are a fabless company.

Interesting. Any ideas where they've been fabricating ASICs in the past?

No idea, I am just a little perplexed that we have no physical chips. Everyone is using TSMC and we are still creating designs on computers. No wonder Ken is not around anymore.

I feel like I have made a huge mistake.

[dexX7]

Nope, they are a fabless company.

Fabless means they are outsourcing the fabrication. Due to the nature of eASIC producing structured ASICs I'm convinced they are partnered with a semiconductor foundry and this is already covered.

Structured ASIC is an intermediate technology between ASIC and FPGA, offering high performance, a characteristic of ASIC, and low NRE cost, a characteristic of FPGA. Using Structured ASIC allows products to be introduced quickly to market, to have lower cost and to be designed with ease.

In a FPGA, interconnects and logic blocks are programmable after fabrication, offering high flexibility of design and ease of debugging in prototyping. (...) Every different design [with custom ASICs] needs a complete different set of masks. The Structured ASIC is a solution between these two. It has basically the same structure as a FPGA, but being mask-programmable instead of field-programmable, by configuring one or several via layers between metal layers. Every SRAM configuration bit can be replaced by a choice of putting a via or not between metal contacts.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structured_ASIC_platform

And also: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=252531.msg3091216#msg3091216

[drawingthesun]

Nope, they are a fabless company.

Fabless means they are outsourcing the fabrication. Due to the nature of eASIC producing structured ASICs I'm convinced they are partnered with a semiconductor foundry and this is already covered.

I am getting the feeling that the nameless semiconductor foundry is remaining nameless for a reason, because TSMC would be far better and the share price would fall even lower if we found out.

I don't understand why the secrecy around a darn semiconductor company, we know that hashfast, avalon, labcoin all use TSMC.

[drawingthesun]

But dex, think of the FUD opportunities!

I will be honest, I have lost over $3000 on this stock so far, I can't even sell to recoup any losses and my only chance to get back is if this company works out. I just don't understand the no information thing.

Why are all of you ok with not knowing the foundry? Every other company discloses the foundry they use publicly.

[madmalkav]

TSMC would be far better

Why?

[drawingthesun]

Nope, they are a fabless company.

Fabless means they are outsourcing the fabrication. Due to the nature of eASIC producing structured ASICs I'm convinced they are partnered with a semiconductor foundry and this is already covered.

Structured ASIC is an intermediate technology between ASIC and FPGA, offering high performance, a characteristic of ASIC, and low NRE cost, a characteristic of FPGA. Using Structured ASIC allows products to be introduced quickly to market, to have lower cost and to be designed with ease.

In a FPGA, interconnects and logic blocks are programmable after fabrication, offering high flexibility of design and ease of debugging in prototyping. (...) Every different design [with custom ASICs] needs a complete different set of masks. The Structured ASIC is a solution between these two. It has basically the same structure as a FPGA, but being mask-programmable instead of field-programmable, by configuring one or several via layers between metal layers. Every SRAM configuration bit can be replaced by a choice of putting a via or not between metal contacts.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structured_ASIC_platform

And also: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=252531.msg3091216#msg3091216

Thanks for this, so its not as hard to produce an active mining asic compared to asicminer and labcoin?

Is it as good? And if so why don't the other companies do this?

[drawingthesun]

TSMC would be far better

Why?

Well apparently TSMC wouldn't be better because the asic design is easier (see post above)

I don't quite understand the difference but it sounds like you don't need a full blown foundry.

[Vbs]

eAsic uses Global Foundries and Fujitsu. http://www.easic.com/migration-to-cell-based-asic/easic-ecosystem/