[ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread

[N_S]

^^^ Priceless 

[kslaughter]

Yes, lewicki web site looks good; however, it is an unproven site.  Our current site is making 8X times what we are spending on advertising.  Also, there have already been some licensing problems with the site that lewicki developed.

[zumzero]

Is there a case to argue that if an improved website was to be made to work then it would generate more than 8x advertising spend?

[kslaughter]

Is there a case to argue that if an improved website was to be made to work then it would generate more than 8x advertising spend?

Yes, but you do not know that it will do that.  Also, there are a lot of back office functions that we use that are not in the lewicki site.

[auto2nr1]

Is there a case to argue that if an improved website was to be made to work then it would generate more than 8x advertising spend?

Yes, but you do not know that it will do that.  Also, there are a lot of back office functions that we use that are not in the lewicki site.

Good to see you online Ken. Can you give us a update in regards to the direction we are heading? Are we meeting our projected goals? Please share how Sept should play out as well as October so we know what is going on within the next 6-8 weeks before we start hashing.

[auto2nr1]

And.. he's gone.

I am sure he read my previous post. Not sure why you would choose to ignore someone straight up. So disappointing.

[Stuartuk]

And.. he's gone.

I am sure he read my previous post. Not sure why you would choose to ignore someone straight up. So disappointing.

Any comment from the CEO on these questions could/would breech the NDA. A breech could lead to a lot of repercussions including cessation of partnership or a damages claim through the courts.

[SoylentCreek]

Is there a case to argue that if an improved website was to be made to work then it would generate more than 8x advertising spend?

Yes, but you do not know that it will do that.  Also, there are a lot of back office functions that we use that are not in the lewicki site.

This will probably be buried by the time you get back on here, but would you at the least consider using hazryder's logo?  This is such an easy fix that would require less that two minutes to achieve.  I realize that the chances of changing the logo will not do anything to the staggeringly low share price, but at the least it would show that you are willing to listen to us.

[SoylentCreek]

And please for the love of god can we get this atrocity off the front page?!

[knybe]

that image alone is making me take this whole thing... not very seriously.

[stereotype]

Is there a case to argue that if an improved website was to be made to work then it would generate more than 8x advertising spend?

Yes, but you do not know that it will do that.  Also, there are a lot of back office functions that we use that are not in the lewicki site.

Ken.
A list was produced by one of the board members yesterday, and its generally felt the questions raised need your time and focus. When are these necessary issues going to be addressed?

[zumzero]

And.. he's gone.

I am sure he read my previous post. Not sure why you would choose to ignore someone straight up. So disappointing.

PM him, he is really good at replying to PM's.

I had just done that myself and I suspect he's had a few emails about the website very recently so decided to come online briefly.  

As disappointing as it is, I think he knows that if he stays online and starts responding to numerous posts, he might end up doing more damage than good.  I mean no disrespect by this, I just think he has learned from past mistakes on the AMC thread.

[adub]

Based on Ken's response, it seems we need to target the possibility of layering the look and some of Lewici's functionality (The rack builder tool) over the existing website.

[crumbs]

...
This will probably be buried by the time you get back on here, but would you at the least consider using hazryder's logo?  This is such an easy fix that would require less that two minutes to achieve.  I realize that the chances of changing the logo will not do anything to the staggeringly low share price, but at the least it would show that you are willing to listen to us.

The logo stays.  
Stop begging.  
Because FU, that's why.

Don't like mah eyerapings?  So ask me again, brah, i dare you!  I DARE YOU!

--Ken
   "I had just about enough out of YOU "

P.S:  If it whines at me with PMs, it gets the hose again.

[kingcrimson]

At this point it is clear it is more of an ego issue, re: website

[N_S]

At this point it is clear it is more of an ego issue, re: website

+1

[zumzero]

At this point it is clear it is more of an ego issue, re: website

-1

I disagree, I don't think his response suggested that at all.

[Stuartuk]

Ken was man enough to listen to complaints and restructure his company and give share holders a much bigger slice of the assets and divs. Everyone has an ego but I don't think Kens is any different to the rest of us.

[SoylentCreek]

Ken was man enough to listen to complaints and restructure his company and give share holders a much bigger slice of the assets and divs. Everyone has an ego but I don't think Kens is any different to the rest of us.

Cool!  Then a logo change and removing hideous artwork from the front page of the website should be a no brainer. Yes?

[crumbs]

Labcoin stock just passed ActM in the race to the bottom!  Definite WIN, Activ Miners!