[ANN][ICO] EHF eHealth First

[haxllega]

I continue the idea I expressed 5 pages ago. If it is not possible to reduce the product development time, why not at least provide a demo version? Also, instead of burning unsold tokens, I propose to distribute them proportionally among investors in this round (pre-sale). This method has already shown its success in some ICO. This strongly stimulates sales. Finally, we should revise the paragraph in the whitepaper that the second round of the ICO will not begin earlier than a year after the first round of the ICO. And another condition for the start of the second round is that the market price of the token should be higher than in the first round of the ICO. Then it turns out that the second round is not in the interests of the first investors, since after it the price of tokens will immediately fall due to an increase in their circulating supply.

I hope they will have a working demo ready for their second ICO. I also think that in the first round there will not be a huge interest because the market is quite down at the moment.

[Fermin AK]

Yes they communicate well but I think a marketing campaign to step up the visbility of ehf to the next level could be good. It’s really important for the sucess of an ico, especially these days, we have a lot of project on the market so visbility is mandatory. Ehf have good contents to share so it could not be so hard.

No, they communnicate not well. Its a one way communication.
It feels like a bot which is sending constantly messages here, but no reading our comments and give answers to it.
We as the community are making our job, 375 pages so far, we discuss, ask questions and look for solutions and make suggestions, pushing this thread to the top.
Now eHealth, its your turn, make the project to this what it can be, the best medical coin in crypto.

That seems to be the case, i see attention in here around eHealth as the concept is without doubt unprecedented and interesting. But will need to be concretized by reaching out to the right investors.

Yes, in this thread the communication is just one way. They publish some info, article or video and we don't know anything more about then until the next post they publish. There isn't any interaction with the community.

[BY_ATOM]

Yes they communicate well but I think a marketing campaign to step up the visbility of ehf to the next level could be good. It’s really important for the sucess of an ico, especially these days, we have a lot of project on the market so visbility is mandatory. Ehf have good contents to share so it could not be so hard.

No, they communnicate not well. Its a one way communication.
It feels like a bot which is sending constantly messages here, but no reading our comments and give answers to it.
We as the community are making our job, 375 pages so far, we discuss, ask questions and look for solutions and make suggestions, pushing this thread to the top.
Now eHealth, its your turn, make the project to this what it can be, the best medical coin in crypto.

That seems to be the case, i see attention in here around eHealth as the concept is without doubt unprecedented and interesting. But will need to be concretized by reaching out to the right investors.

Yes, in this thread the communication is just one way. They publish some info, article or video and we don't know anything more about then until the next post they publish. There isn't any interaction with the community.

I understand the failure of the situation with the pre-sales is directly related to the way the creators of the project communicate with the community.

[bitcoin-shark]

in fact, more participation is needed not just the simple news releases but question and answer interact with the community here on the forum, i believe that with the release of a demo the interest of investors who could test the product would grow, so the investments would also increase...

[ImTotya]

Wish in October they will deliver a stunning MVP and manage to start this project, it sounds like the only health ico will ever need frankly.

I guess everybody in the community will be waiting for that day, as an MVP release will be a major milestone for the project.

Because of the complex topic maybe also investors wait for MVP to see the first result.

its so hard to do ico this days , even more without mvp.

You're wrong. A lot of companies collect hard cover for a few days! This is a question of well-posed PR and marketing. Alas, this company somewhere missed something and needs to come together now and fixed all my mistakes.

[Genesis07]

Wish in October they will deliver a stunning MVP and manage to start this project, it sounds like the only health ico will ever need frankly.

I guess everybody in the community will be waiting for that day, as an MVP release will be a major milestone for the project.

Because of the complex topic maybe also investors wait for MVP to see the first result.

its so hard to do ico this days , even more without mvp.

You're wrong. A lot of companies collect hard cover for a few days! This is a question of well-posed PR and marketing. Alas, this company somewhere missed something and needs to come together now and fixed all my mistakes.

yep, the better you market your own product and raise the media awareness the more investors you will attract and probably sell out within a couple of weeks and reach your hard cap

[Trrrt]

They don’t communicate that much with the community on bitcointalk, but EHF communicate with YouTube videos and articles, it’s also an important part of the communication, especially in order to increase the visbility of the project. But It could be even better if they start to interact more with community.

[Altcoinrusher]

It would still be awesome if the project development would have a fast tract pace so that the community will be delighted and at the same time be excited. A demo version would be great.

[LastHiT]

They don’t communicate that much with the community on bitcointalk, but EHF communicate with YouTube videos and articles, it’s also an important part of the communication, especially in order to increase the visbility of the project. But It could be even better if they start to interact more with community.

It would be ideal if communications are always open to the community and this will result in a good camaraderie among the team and community members.

[nkryuchkov]

Hi everyone!

EHF Senior Expert in Clinical Medicine and Biomedical Studies Lyle Dennis:
5 Reasons why EHF is valuable for society and profitable for investors
https://youtu.be/4fsVgVd2rNo

All the details are on the website http://www.ehfirst.io/ and in the White Paper http://www.ehfirst.io/#wp.

The WHITE LIST is launched!
Please use the link to fill in the form:
https://ehfirst.io/whitelist
It takes 5 minutes only.
NB! After submission the form all investors participate in the lottery, in which 20 randomly selected winners will receive an additional 2 000 EHF tokens.

Pre-ICO:
Up to 1 500 000 EHF tokens for sale.
Price at launch 0.006 Ethers.
Daily price increment +1%.
Bonuses of up to 40% is available.

Take a look on https://ehfirst.io

[Nazgar]

They don’t communicate that much with the community on bitcointalk, but EHF communicate with YouTube videos and articles, it’s also an important part of the communication, especially in order to increase the visbility of the project. But It could be even better if they start to interact more with community.

It would be ideal if communications are always open to the community and this will result in a good camaraderie among the team and community members.

They focus on their news site on http://news.ehfirst.io and are not that active here in bct. Maybe not the worst solution because here in Ann are many posts

[Makkara]

It would still be awesome if the project development would have a fast tract pace so that the community will be delighted and at the same time be excited. A demo version would be great.

Starting the development and maybe show or explain every month the progress made would be quite good indeed

[Nazgar]

It would still be awesome if the project development would have a fast tract pace so that the community will be delighted and at the same time be excited. A demo version would be great.

Starting the development and maybe show or explain every month the progress made would be quite good indeed

At the beginning normally they work on concept and later on on platform. Of cause they can publish some information but these are very technical. As soon as the base work has been done they can work on fronted and the progress can be shown in the releases

[jonnytracker]

you know its not doing good when you see the annoucement thread is left unattended or ignored 

[the_donald]

It would still be awesome if the project development would have a fast tract pace so that the community will be delighted and at the same time be excited. A demo version would be great.

Starting the development and maybe show or explain every month the progress made would be quite good indeed

At the beginning normally they work on concept and later on on platform. Of cause they can publish some information but these are very technical. As soon as the base work has been done they can work on fronted and the progress can be shown in the releases

they should already be showing something being developed no?

[king_of_alts]

It would still be awesome if the project development would have a fast tract pace so that the community will be delighted and at the same time be excited. A demo version would be great.

Starting the development and maybe show or explain every month the progress made would be quite good indeed

At the beginning normally they work on concept and later on on platform. Of cause they can publish some information but these are very technical. As soon as the base work has been done they can work on fronted and the progress can be shown in the releases

they should already be showing something being developed no?

The roadmap is a bit unfortunate in that regard. Development of software will start in May, an MVP should be ready in October. We'll see if something changes.

[Jay2408]

It would still be awesome if the project development would have a fast tract pace so that the community will be delighted and at the same time be excited. A demo version would be great.

Starting the development and maybe show or explain every month the progress made would be quite good indeed

At the beginning normally they work on concept and later on on platform. Of cause they can publish some information but these are very technical. As soon as the base work has been done they can work on fronted and the progress can be shown in the releases

they should already be showing something being developed no?

They have re-scheduled the launch of their MVP, they will show it now already before 1st round of ICO and not only in 2 years or so. This is a good thing and we can hope for better sale in their ICO, yet of course they still have to improve their communication and marketing.

[wissy]

It would still be awesome if the project development would have a fast tract pace so that the community will be delighted and at the same time be excited. A demo version would be great.

Starting the development and maybe show or explain every month the progress made would be quite good indeed

At the beginning normally they work on concept and later on on platform. Of cause they can publish some information but these are very technical. As soon as the base work has been done they can work on fronted and the progress can be shown in the releases

I don't really think they gonna show the development, especially on the early stages. These kinds of information can be easily used by their competitors.

[Frickeladm]

It would still be awesome if the project development would have a fast tract pace so that the community will be delighted and at the same time be excited. A demo version would be great.

Starting the development and maybe show or explain every month the progress made would be quite good indeed

At the beginning normally they work on concept and later on on platform. Of cause they can publish some information but these are very technical. As soon as the base work has been done they can work on fronted and the progress can be shown in the releases

I don't really think they gonna show the development, especially on the early stages. These kinds of information can be easily used by their competitors.

Yeah thats not possible. You can create a dummy userinterface (that would maybe attract some more investors who only look at the design, not the functionality), I remember cryptoflix for doing something like that. But I dont know how effectiv such a "disguise" is.

[crazyfrog01]

Ehealth is definitive one of the projects with a really good use case, that is what people have to realize. Even if the roadmap is quite long.

Yeah, it is but no one will know about it until the team won't work in the marketing departed as there are so many projects and competition is stiff.

Yeah, that is unfortunately true.