bitHopper: Python Pool Hopper Proxy

[djex]

bitclockers i have problems and high stales with all the pools i try

Yeah I got 14% stales with bitclockers, 7% with mtred, 2.3% with unitedminers.

How can I get rid of these stales?

Wow, I wish I had your problems:

bitclockers: 58.41%
poolmunity: 45.16%
UM: 7.55%

Oh wow. How is that even profitable with so many stales?

[hawks5999]

bitclockers i have problems and high stales with all the pools i try

Yeah I got 14% stales with bitclockers, 7% with mtred, 2.3% with unitedminers.

How can I get rid of these stales?

Wow, I wish I had your problems:

bitclockers: 58.41%
poolmunity: 45.16%
UM: 7.55%

Oh wow. How is that even profitable with so many stales?

I spend very little time on either of the high stale pools.

[gooie]

are there any plans on adding how much estimated and confirmed rewards one have on the stats site?

Also, does anyone have a hoppersden.info invite? please PM me.

[ewibit]

Yeah I got 14% stales with bitclockers, 7% with mtred, 2.3% with unitedminers.

bitclockers 13.5%
mtred         5.9%

edit-update
bitclockers 15.9%

edit-update2
bitclockers 18.9%

[c00w]

bitclockers: 17.67%
mtred 9.53%
ozco 7.62

[muyoso]

Is there a way to reset the graphs?  Mine are messed up now.



Also, can't stay connected to bitclockers for more than a minute at a time.

[ewibit]

is there somewhere an option in
http://localhost:8337/stats
to force mine (above the limit which ist set)
if for any reason I want to do it?
(without editing pools.cfg)

[ewibit]

Also, can't stay connected to bitclockers for more than a minute at a time.

the same here and I have tried
pool(x,y,z).bitclockers.com

[kbsbtc]

How is mining namecoins implemented into this? Reason I ask is that when the next difficulty increase happens namecoins are gonna be more profitable...

[Clipse]

From what I could figure out it seems like bitclockers is limiting the getwork requests per worker which makes it a pain in the ass to use reliably.

Ive setup multiple workers and holding stable connection now but as soon as I push all my gpus through one worker the crapshoot starts to happen.

[Clipse]

How is mining namecoins implemented into this? Reason I ask is that when the next difficulty increase happens namecoins are gonna be more profitable...

Right now at current nmc/btc conversion, bitcoins difficulty must increase to to just <3million to be equal in diff=price. The next namecoin difficulty which is more than a month away at current rate would make namecoins more profitable than current bitcoin difficulty.

Eitherway, bitcoins will be more profitable to mine for a long time.

[c00w]

1) Namecoins?
You switch the role to mine_nmc.

2)Issues with the graph?
refresh.

3) Bitclocker sucks?
Yep. Not sure how to fix it.

[gnaget]

Is there a way to reset the graphs?  Mine are messed up now.



Also, can't stay connected to bitclockers for more than a minute at a time.

Hit refresh

[gnaget]

3) Bitclocker sucks?
Yep. Not sure how to fix it.

Sounds like a fix would be to allow multiple workers per site in the config

[Clipse]

3) Bitclocker sucks?
Yep. Not sure how to fix it.

Sounds like a fix would be to allow multiple workers per site in the config

Ill keep testing and if possible others should do the same, but so far multiple workers seem to do the job. I do however think that its also likely not the real solution considering I see other people in bitclockers stats under worker running at >15gh so clearly they are also running multiple gpus behind one worker and not having these issues (unless they are and simply dont care and the stats wont show there reconnection drop of gh speed)

[gnaget]

Just because I always get a little tickle when I see 420 anywhere...

[Clipse]

Just because I always get a little tickle when I see 420 anywhere...

They got that far, they should aim for >10mil atleast

[ed64]

ed64

like the merging you are doing. New hopper looks nice.

one small thing... in the password.py.default

can you copy and paste the pools  that arent in use and the ones that are.... into the right section.

sure it will annoy someone who isnt away of the pools we have disabled to fill up that "pools in use" section to only find out most of them arent.. and then worse, find out that a good bit of the pools "not in use dont worry about changing the user or pass" are actually in use and you are mining for someone else.

I'm going to abandon that branch and start hacking away at c00w's. I like the new pool.cfg, thought about merging that into ryouiki's branch, but decided to just jump to c00w and merge in the hopping logic into c00w's in a pluggable fashion.

Plan is to:
 - Configurable scheduler at startup (eventually runtime)
 - Merge in ryouiki's round time selection
 - Merge in flower's time slice
 - Add hybrid roundtime + timeslice scheduler

Current work so far:
 - Work done to seperate scheduling/hopping logic away from code
 - Need to find a way to easily modify the website depending on the scheduler (e.g. for slicing, add in a slice column)

Will push my changes in soon, maybe someone can help out with implementing new schedulers

PS Any hoppersden invites?

[gnaget]

Just because I always get a little tickle when I see 420 anywhere...

They got that far, they should aim for >10mil atleast

I actually feel really bad for them...  we should all jump in there and get them past this horrible hump.  It'll be good PR

[bb]

*cough*http://hoppersden.info/showwiki.php?title=Pool+Status*cough*

There are some reason: fields needing filled, btw.

*couinvitegh*