Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[lamacchia]

I don't believe at all for their ICO ratings or something like that because ICO pays them to promote and introduce their project. It will become not objective in their ratings.

[1714766592]

1714766592

[1714766592]

1714766592

[1714766592]

1714766592

[jamesbond007pro]

In my opinion i believe ICO rating, but not almost, i think ICO rating on some famous website is the good information for us to focus on and decide to invest ICO or not. And i always find information from the other famous person, they have more experience, they can help us to success. Thank you

[GandiwaSF]

there is nothing wrong with ICO rantings, enough help me to see the ICO summary and after seeing the review I usually just go to his website to find out more. so quite helpful.

[willybacem]

For this I chose the ICO does not pass through the ICO rating, I always choose manually and according to my knowledge of the ICO project. But for ICO rating I feel is also very helpful to us and we have to be careful because not all ICO rating is correct. There are some projects which we check in ICO's rating was very good but in reality, the ICO is not successful.

[manyung]

As my opinion, ICO Ratings is the way to check or used as guides only whether if it is High or Low ratings but definitely we must do an own research regarding ICO's project that we want to know more about it. Other saying, the highest rating will become a successful project but its only their opinion. Once do a research, just study and analyze it.

[kliown]

I do not really trust the ratings of ICO projects, but sometimes I use them, as it is still interesting to know what people think about this. All projects are better to analyze yourself.

[retnocintaku]

Of course I believe. That a portal, it is not possible to provide news or information manipulation. Anyway I made the ICO's rating as one of the criteria in selecting projects ICO which is nice. And still never disappoint until today. So I think the information in the ICO's rating is correct.

[Vladique]

Personally, I do not believe in ICO ratings, this is not an indicator of the quality of ICO, I also think that many ratings simply take money for a good evaluation of the project, I believe they should not be trusted

[Ambrosius]

Between sure and not because several times I found ICO ratting exact and some times also mishit. I think the ICO ratting that is on some famous sites is not 100% correct. So we need to check it first before joining the ICO.

[mashino12]

I trust only one site, Icodrop is the best in my opinion . Many times relied on the ratings of icodrop and never let me down

[O9NpJ9ld1opS]

Don't blindly believe on ICO rating site only. It is your money, so you should invest it wisely. Many of the rating sites are scams which give rating for money. Always do your own research before investing even a penny in any icos. I have recently read an article regarding icobench stating how they give rating based on money. Its pretty sad that how people blindly believe these sites and invest.

[zzxcvv]

Not really, I don't think we should trust the sites and make a decision based on them . You should always be based only on your beliefs

[yeezycheezy]

yes most of all projects get succes in ico ratings because many people depends on the ratings of ICO ratings. thats why it get successful faster and get many investors .

[agatha90]

That's the competition of votes from some members in the project, and their way if we help to vid their project ico, they dare to pay us. So for me the largest and most voting results do not become a benchmark ico is a success.

[MudahDanHemat]

No, I do not believe it and never rely on ICO ratting that exists. I will be more confident and satisfied if I do my own investigation to see if the ICO is good or not. That's what I've been doing.

[Luntop]

I'm not based on the rating from the sites , I look at the project site , read the technical document , study the team .

[shiningstar]

I don't trust that kind of sites because they may be paid to give better review so for me it's better to do the research myself so i can get a better understanding regarding the project and that will help me a lot on deciding whether to invest in the ico or not. It's definitely better to do research yourself because you'll trust the project more and won't panic sell easily.

[rogovih]

I never go to such sites and do not look at the ratings. I rely only on my opinion. I look at the project, study it, communicate with the team in a telegram and ask various questions

[ravijadon12jan]

I trust them to a certain extent, don't believe them blindly. Always remember to do your own research before looking to invest in any project. Everyone out there has there own understanding of the project or a motive that is unknown to us. Crypto space is too volatile and scammy to trust on any other person.

[ptolimeus]

I don't trust that kind of sites because they may be paid to give better review so for me it's better to do the research myself so i can get a better understanding regarding the project and that will help me a lot on deciding whether to invest in the ico or not. It's definitely better to do research yourself because you'll trust the project more and won't panic sell easily.

Yes, the rating on such sites is simply bought. All these assessments of experts simply are worthless because it can be bought for money. Therefore, the best ICO rating is a rating made by us personally.