Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[ZaBelyi]

No, I do not believe it and never rely on ICO ratting that exists. I will be more confident and satisfied if I do my own investigation to see if the ICO is good or not. That's what I've been doing.

I think it would be right. The rating is based on the opinion of people, and a small number, and among this number may well walk the wrong opinion. If there was a rating that covered all investors, then I would still believe.

[inyakizuryel]

They can be trusted too, you can still trust them they are based on the market also but there are some ICO ratings that are biased and still up to now I really dont know where it came from.

[Lolox]

With the ICO rating, it provides a bit of enlightenment for all of us who follow ICO. Because with the assessment system that makes us know the rank of ICO that we follow. The ICO rating will be above if it has many communities and investors in it. In addition, it will also affect the value of sales, the ICO rating above is usually also has a high value because the demand for coins from their ICO is also high.

[IuriMalakai]

it depends, i think. each rating site has its advisors. just like any testing site for anything watch them closely and check, if they make the right choices. look at the advisors and how they feedback their ratings. with some effort you will be able to sort the ones out, who are paid, and get a better overview. i think icobench is the biggest, but also there it depends on the advisors who rates.

[atorle]

Not really,I do not trust them enough to make investment decisions based purely on the ratings.Also such ratings may be bought or biased if a close associate is the rating platform

[benjamin11]

At some point yes. There are ICO monitoring sites that are really good in analyzing ICO. They look on every aspect of the project and report it very transparent on their website. But there are also some sites that rates almost all ICOs 4 points and up without scrutinizing it very carefully. For me its just a guide for us in choosing the right ICO. We should conduct our own study on the project.

[katawan4741]

Where actually the rating base on? Higher rating could possible be hyped or amything but os doen'st neccesarilly mean that it you give an ICO or project a 100% success. There are lots of ICOs were rated low but made their success. Ratings are actually just guides where to put an imvestments but it would all depends on how the ICO will be performed.

[tayecrypto]

Yes, I always read ICO ratings. These ratings are made by smart people with a lot of experience. They often write about the fact that you need to pay special attention on something and where there can be risks. Of course, the investor makes the decision independently, but such ratings pay attention to fraudulent projects.

[safi71]

Yes, I always read ICO ratings. These ratings are made by smart people with a lot of experience. They often write about the fact that you need to pay special attention on something and where there can be risks. Of course, the investor makes the decision independently, but such ratings pay attention to fraudulent projects.

Can you give examples of ICO ratings that you see and trust? Perhaps among them there are good ones, for example I do not know about. Just a lot of popular ratings place biased estimates on projects. More precisely, good ratings in such ratings are bought, so I do not trust them.

[mboot]

No. At the moment I don’t trust ICO ratings. I analyze everything by myself and choose some important points. In time you also will do this.

[mario00]

I do not believe in ICO ratings simply because the creators of a coin can just as easily pay the people who run a site to give their ICO a good rating even if the project is not a good one. Scammers can use this to get people to invest in their projects because people tend to trust this ratings which should npot be the case. Only trust your own research

[worldsuccess01]

Not really I believe in ICO Ratings because mostly of it will not obey the rules of there own handshake of campaign they wanna lost immediately especially campaign going to end ICO is missing and cannot be trusted if they did not change there habit.

[Masha.G]

I used to use these sites and their ratings to find good ICOs and learn more about them. But I always never bought a coin making decision just on their rating. Now, when almost everybody knows how these resources work, I think not so many people still use them

[paulscathedral]

No. Recently, I stopped believing these ratings. And the reason here is a lot of projects with a high rating are scams or just bad projects. Besides I saw somewhere on the forum offer with paid cheat rankings.

[Krabat]

Rating agencies and rating firms are mostly fraudsters. I've met many projects with low ratings, which have very big successes. Therefore, I do not believe in ratings.

[Stioned1987]

I do not trust in them that much however at the least they someway deliver me some help me with my ICO studies. in the end, we nonetheless want these ICO critiques to get the reviews of the so referred to as experts in the market. but, we ought to now not simply live on those evaluate website's rankings. Their scores do not guarantee in any way that the better the initiatives get the extra a success they'll be. apparently, that is not the case.

[BTCreward]

All sites that put up an ICO rating, do it always approximately the same. You will not be able to distinguish a really good project from the next slag, because even the assessment will be almost the same.

[robynmario]

I do not really trust ICO ratings. I just rely on my feelings and thoughts and take the time to follow the ICO project that I am interested in before investing. However, the ICO ratings from a number of websites still provide a reference value and many details of interest. It is also a method that every ICO investor wants to consult.

[phutgiaydinhmenh143]

I still believe in ICO ratings although it seems that the ICO rating is not so influential with the success of ICO in the future

[00DKM@]

No. At the moment I don’t trust ICO ratings. I analyze everything by myself and choose some important points. In time you also will do this.

Yes, I agree this. I do not believe in rankings from websites like ICObench or ICOrate ... recently, some ICO projects on their evaluation have failed and brought no less disappointment to the confidence of investors. Can not blame the market for bad conditions. But I realize, some projects are superficial in ideas and too rush.