Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[hienvienlang]

I believe on the ICO ratings but even they have high ratings, I still don't trust their ratings. Every ICO I participated is very full of research by mine, I just don't watching the ratings of every ICO, I also consider the technical side of the project and their technology behind also. Most of ICOs nowadays are scam.

[kudryas]

I'm not believing on the things that somebody else have made a conclusion instead of me, and furthermore I have heard about one woman who helps her husband to get a higher ratings on the ICO bench.

How exactly is she helping him get the high rating? What ICO are we talking about?

[AgentZero23]

I give my two cents on some ICO rating sites. Some of them are biased towards the project. I always did my own research in some ICO's that i participated.

[maemunah]

I give my two cents on some ICO rating sites. Some of them are biased towards the project. I always did my own research in some ICO's that i participated.

that's really what you say mostly in following the project as it really helps to improve the higher rankings

[Gheka]

I do not trust sites that assign rating to crypto projects, I believe that all ratings are often appropriated unobjectively. Perhaps they assign a high rating to the project, for a part of the award, I took part in critical projects with high ratings, and in the end I lost all my money. Only study crypto projects yourself.

I do not suggest you trust completely but I suggest you still have a little faith in the ranking sites because although they can get rewarded when they appreciate a project but not all, they also often have comments, accurate analysis, we can not deny that. What they summarize from the project is something that we should care about, then we can re-analyze it according to our thinking, failure in the past is also a part of your mistake when you trust too much on them, you should remember that this is an investment market, not a charity, can not trust too much on anyone

[kris679]

This is your choice, because many people feel the market is falling and sells this coin, and then buys the same thing only when it is at a lower price, but this tactic is also quite good, but I do not practice it!

[KurtEldon]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

We should always check the ICO ratings for a reference so that we know how they are working, but the main concentration should be upon research of investors. You should see for yourself. The ICO ratings of PRG, ICX were not that satisfying but I am investing in them and they are working great.

[Majharul Saiif]

Honestly,I don't believe this properly.There are many scam ICO still spreading in the forum.First of all,we need to know the project then we search for its ratings.Sometimes ratings can be wrong.So,we need to our own research about this matter.

[KenyonCarter]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

ICO ratings are very important too. Yes, they might be wrong sometimes, but for a general idea they should be considered. TAU, ADA, POWR for instance have normal ratings and a few great comments and undoubtedly, they are working tremendously in the industry.

[Orsen]

The ratings of new projects are quite good help to pick up a new project, because many people are simply not very knowledgeable in this business and this is too difficult for them!

[bevthazor]

As an investor the ico rating and ico bench both the portals are most beneficial for me because before investing in any ico first of all i will check the ratings and reviews of that particular ico and then i will invest and according to me 90% of rating is valid.

[tuannguyenn110]

ICO ratings should be used as guides only, so it's fine to look at them and see what they have to say, but I wouldn't part with any funds based solely on their opinion. Best to do your own research, coupled with ICO ratings, plus it doesn't hurt to check forums - like here - to see what others have to say.

[Kusnechik]

Personally, I trust only single companies that honestly say which of ICOs pay their appearance in the rating themselves.

[bitcon]

As an investor the ico rating and ico bench both the portals are most beneficial for me because before investing in any ico first of all i will check the ratings and reviews of that particular ico and then i will invest and according to me 90% of rating is valid.

In reality, it does not matter if you believe in them or not. These ratings really help people to understand how many people support the project and if they trust in different ICOs. I will use these ratings further.

[InitialCoinList.com]

ico-ratings-an-investigation - Found another very interesting article about how easy it is to buy ratings on icobench

(written by Markus Hartmann co-founder of Alethena)
https://medium.com/alethena/this-is-how-easy-it-is-to-buy-ico-ratings-an-investigation-13d07e987394

[ChaChaiTL]

I believe in the rankings in ico when the ico is rated good they will be ranked good and reverse the ico bring benefits to the community they will be appreciated better than the other ico

[trash321]

I used to trust rating sites. But today such thoughts do not exactly visit me. Why do this? I think that you can make your own conclusions about what kind of project it is and why you want to invest money in it.

[sithuminimsara1234]

We can see everything in two hands.As a newbi I only have one choice.I have to  follow the ICO Ratings.because I'm still learning.

[kudryas]

I do not trust sites that assign rating to crypto projects, I believe that all ratings are often appropriated unobjectively. Perhaps they assign a high rating to the project, for a part of the award, I took part in critical projects with high ratings, and in the end I lost all my money. Only study crypto projects yourself.

I do not suggest you trust completely but I suggest you still have a little faith in the ranking sites because although they can get rewarded when they appreciate a project but not all, they also often have comments, accurate analysis, we can not deny that. What they summarize from the project is something that we should care about, then we can re-analyze it according to our thinking, failure in the past is also a part of your mistake when you trust too much on them, you should remember that this is an investment market, not a charity, can not trust too much on anyone

Of course some of their ratings are solid, if they didn't have those then nobody would fall for their paid revs. But I agree that you could use the info that they provide and ultimately process all of it by yourself before investing.

[RGMan]

I did not believe in ratings before. But I got results for half a year working with ICO projects and was surprised to find the following. Those who received low scores as a result of more than 30% turned out to be a scam. Those who received high marks - scam not more than 5%. Now I think that you still need to pay attention to the rating.