Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[vivuta111]

These websites are just my beginings of research but they dont affect if i am investing or not.There are so many wrong or payed reviews so always DYOR before you invest

[bayu7adi]

ICORATING website at this time I think less transparent, which could be a project to pay some bitcoin to get full star, and get a good review just by paying a few dollars only
this is what makes ICO worse and can not be trusted anymore

[Goeniesa]

I read the rankings from time to time but I am not totally dependent on them and prefer to compare the various sources. It's even better to do your own project analysis, so at least there'll be no one to blame except yourself in case of ICO failure.

[ohkkstaaahp]

I believe in ICO rankings, and I choose high-index projects, but not always because of high indexes and other factors. So that would not make me wrongly pick a scam ICO project.

[RESPONSIBLE_]

When I'm analyzing ICO, first of all I'm checking out the idea of project, what problem it solves, then team members, the product, how much support they got for this ICO and in last only I'm checking ICO rating sites.

[Btcallans]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

Well, I also don't believe in ICO rating web. You could easily manipulate the number of people who could vote on it. That is why I'm not looking at the rating as the baseline for a good investment.

[bitcoinforus]

Ratings help to navigate in projects, to understand what to hope for, and what not! I first look at the rating, and then explore the project itself!

[ichanjay]

Well ICO ratings are not 100% sure and exact. Most of the time. Companies just pay these ico reviewers to promote their project in exchange of paying them. But I'm not saying it's completely useless. You can still refer on this ratings and do your own research on it

[vktrglbr]

I checked my bounties in this ratings. My analytic do not coincide with it. I think this rating was purchased also, but some parameters it is good for check. Use your head, trust your intuition and have a profit!

[rehanaurora]

I think is not that reliable but if you look on the factors regarding how an ICO is rated you could see that it doesnt really predicts the outcome of the token sale you can see that ratings are just a prior knowledge and what a simple person thinks of that ICO not considering the factors that affects the end game.

[Semenpaliy]

Hello everybody! If we analyze all the companies that conducted their promotions and their ratings on the respective sites, then we can confidently say that 80% of the forecasts are true. Therefore, I believe that you can trust such ratings. Therefore, I trust Konios Company.

[KaramazovBro]

I draw attention to ICO rating, but do not believe in 100%
It seems to me that people who assign these ratings do not always study the project in detail.

[fivefingers]

I think a website like ICObench, ICOrating only as one of the reference factors when we will invest on a project. But we also should not be too trust in these websites. The best result is when we do our own research on the project that we will invest.

So  the ico rating website is just one of our references when we going to do deeper research on a project. That's my opinion. Btw sorry for my bad english and thanks!

ICO Ratings are a good source of information and must be one of the considerations when looking at the ICO's. Whoever, the top criteria in determining the value of an ICO should not be based on this but rather, be based on your own research.

[billbear]

I tended to use them before but for now I think that making your own decisions and your own researches are way better, than to listen how somebody else is making decision about your money instead of you.

[iceblasto]

I use ico rank as a reference for what to see. Some of their ratings are not really done because they use predictions as well but yes I believe in ico rank because some of them really help us to join or where to join ico. but all back to you, Believe in yourself and I think check out ico yourself better

[boblets243]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

Usually I don’t rely on these websites because there are a lot of instances that the ratings are good but in actual it turns out bad. I believe these websites has something to improve on to increase their credibility. So the only way to make a research on your own instead of relying on these ratings.

[lalunalaguna]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

I don't generally confide in the rating of locales, yet I trust the live appraising of the members more. Great audits, high participation and positive surveys about the organization.

[ivlvov]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

Of course, it's best not to completely trust these sites and try to make their own assessment of the project. But the algorithm of such sites and their evaluation of ICO projects is easy to understand. They learn their business model, test the team and predict the value and innovation of the project.Although, it's obvious that such sites may take the money to promote the ICO, even if it could ruin their reputation.

[buiviet173a]

I usually look at the rating of "icodrops", but before the contribution of course I study the project personally, aspects such as the project team of their roadmap are very important and you can evaluate them yourself.

[Tatzky]

Let me give you a hunch.... During airdrops some ICO requires participants to rate the token before they are qualified... This activity says that rating is somewhat 100% real....