Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[Sevaev]

I think that there is some truth in them, but this truth is not enough that to trust projects. If there are honest ratings, then this is subjective opinion and experts, if they exist, assess projects on templates, without enthusiasm. Very questionable resources.

[Bilipus]

To be honest, no, since I think all the ratings have been bought, it's not that much money compared to the millions that the project team builds on the ICO. I would not trust it. For me the component of the team and the technical documentation is more important.

[eolitic]

I believe ratings that I can find on icodropds.com website. It is very convenient to use this website, cause you can find all the necessary information and links. The information about bounty campaigns and airdrops is also there. But there are lots of such websites, but I, personally, prefer this one. Besides, lots of telegram channels devoted to ico analysis are out there. Lots of information, lots of opportunities, you just have to be able to spend time reading and to make conclusions.

[Best Coin8]

I think basically, to have a good income, you need to choose a good ICO. It's hard to say and predict which ICO is now good, at least you should read White paper.

[strauberyg]

I think a website like ICObench, ICOrating only as one of the reference factors when we will invest on a project. The best result is when we do our own research on the project that we will invest.

[bountyhunter433]

I think ICO's rating can only be used for reference. After all, the ICO risk itself is huge. So still rely on their own analysis. If you say that rating agencies have insider. Then you will become a pig.

[AndyKete]

On regards to acceptable websites for investors searching for proper initial Coin Offerings these tend to be ICO Rating and veteran related specialised locations.

[kudryas]

I think ICO's rating can only be used for reference. After all, the ICO risk itself is huge. So still rely on their own analysis. If you say that rating agencies have insider. Then you will become a pig.

What was that about becoming a pig?  
ICO ratings are just a piece of information just alike any other that needs to be verified and checked not believed in without a second thought.

[adamreb]

In fact, I think such ratings are quite useful for understanding the overall picture. But in any case, do not unplug your head, keep thinking for yourself.

[nhoj25]

For an ICO projects, having a third party rating your ICO means getting valuable and honest information on the quality and the potential of the ICO. If the outcome is positive, the results of the rating can be used for marketing purposes, since it transmits trust and transparency. Although not all highly rated ICO became sucessful. It is always better to make some self-resarch regarding the Project you will be participating

[flying_bit]

I believe that ICO rating have still impact with ICO but gone are the days that it's very valuable and ratings are honest. I have heard that most ico rating site we're asking fees for good feedback and so with this, I believe ICO rating are more of for marketing and advertising but still good to check out for more info since project are well explained there and also you see in one place almost all info you need to know.

[Coroline]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

all valuations are not from sales but taken from several sides, such as team, ico profile, vision and product. it's all rated and accumulated. so not only from token sales alone

[coin-investor]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

I don't look at them at all, I trust my judgement and my criteria, I read from one post here that you can increase your rating by paying your rating, these are what you called the new hyip monitor, better trust your judgement, not all of these Ico rating sites are accurate.

[ofeefee]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

I don't look at them at all, I trust my judgement and my criteria, I read from one post here that you can increase your rating by paying your rating, these are what you called the new hyip monitor, better trust your judgement, not all of these Ico rating sites are accurate.

Your way is probably the best way of doing it. I usually check the ratings of the projects I am interested in, just for a brief idea, but I form my final opinion myself.

[Marine8]

I don't believe in ICO ratings any longer. Most of them don't just work at all. What I do most of the time is to look at the project itself and make some analysis bases on how the project looks promising. I consider if there is a similar project already running or if there is one which is far better than the current one or vice versa.

[exfilesx]

Ico ratings can show u interst of people for that ico, after that u need to make your search for that ico and most important thing is investitors of ico. If they are famous its very important.

[jlqueen]

There is a well known method for ICO investing: do your own research. In the previous year once I've been asked to help one ICO to send some e-mails to different ICO related websites (including listings) and I've discovered that a pretty big part of the ICO ratings are require payments to get your project listed on their website. That comes especialy about the local websites. The mail nesson was that ICO ratings can never be 100% trusted. Ofcourse they may show the grneral hype around the coin but you should always make your own research.

[Bokile]

I believe only if the rating isn't good. If it's good I research more, but at least I'm not wasting my time on bad projects.

[Pokemon Go]

no, because ICO rating can not prove that ICO is very good to be an investment, therefore I rarely see ICO rating if I want to invest in ICO.

[100kk]

I do not believe the ratings, but still consider them when choosing an ICO project. It is best to learn how to do your own qualitative analysis. It will take a long time, but the result is likely to be more accurate, based on your own reasoning.