Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[rahul7timt]

i do not believe it completely but that help me to select some good projects. i consider those projects for my study as i select projects with high rating. i am also aware that these sites got paid to give rating but there are some projects also that i can looked in to.

[Hold good]

I do not believe in ICO rankings. I believe in what I analyze. When evaluating an ICO project I often see what the idea of ​​project development is. The domain's uptime. Team project development team and further test contract of the project.

[Rosilito]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

Well, at somewhat at somepoint. Nevertheless that is what makes them credible to be true. We, and the individual won't even dare to just dig in on ICO; investing, lending or even join some stuffs on it like signature campaign, facebook, twitter, instagram, telegram or other sorts of option if the ICO isn't pleasing to the eyes or more likely they aren't real, the ratings are too low, not credible enough, because it might end up as a failure or worst it is just a scam.

[andreyhilton]

to analyze whether the ICO can be believed or good is one of them by looking at the rating, if it has a good rating then many believe and will have many investors so that it can be my reference to follow the ICO

[Ingoats]

Basically, those ICOs that are having high ratings are also having large popularity which is a huge factor on the success of a project. The promotion through bounties for a project aims to make the project big, so if it is having already high rating, it is obviously an advantage. Also, based on my past experiences, those that are in the top ico ratings are the ones that are more profitable to invest because huge profit is a bit assured.

[hansbans]

I dont believe that. Everyone is acting in their own interests. if you give money to a site or to someone they will find positive comments for you and give you high marks.
Not investment only by looking at ratings

[andreyhilton]

No I do not believe. I trust, only my personal analysis of projects and experience. Ratings can be corrupt, so they can not be trusted.

[Lab_Rat]

ICO rating is a good way to filter out normal projects and create shortlist for investment. But the ratings can not be used to make a final investment decision. You need to make your own research.

[mr_smith99]

I don't trust ico ratings. I trust only my own research 

[trollercoaster]

Yes, I always watch ICO ratings. These ratings are made by smart people with a lot of experience. They often write about the fact that you need to pay special attention on something and where there can be risks. Of course, the investor makes the decision independently, but such ratings pay attention to fraudulent projects. Most of these website are getting paid with every post or good reviews they posted,its for the project's hyping promotions so more people will know a lot about this ICO,which is unhealthy they are making up people's mind even the project is trashy,the best way to find great project is to do your own research.

[Bobocantik]

These websites made a lot for ICOs, because they simplified the process of project researching for investors. Moreover, the collected and structured their information and data from the whitepaper and website. So, at least we have to say thanks for them. About the ratings, don't trust them, because it is not objective.

[Telegramrazer]

I think that some of them are corrupted , and because of them I never follow those type of websites. I simply do not trust

[Anchor867]

Yes because they provide necessary information about that certain ICO and in this way you can use it as a basis on your research if you find it that good and accurate but you can use it as a additional information

[datmacro]

ICO reviews are just objective assessments. I think these assessments are just for beginners and are the place to find the fastest ICOs. The actual development of the project must be based on community, development ideas, and development team.

[Vaniaevergarden]

Such websites like  ICObench.com, ICOrating.com are very useful and worthy of attention, but completely relying on their ratings would be a mistake, I believe that it is necessary to conduct our own research before making a decision about investments.

[kobe24]

Such websites like  ICObench.com, ICOrating.com are very useful and worthy of attention, but completely relying on their ratings would be a mistake, I believe that it is necessary to conduct our own research before making a decision about investments.

You're right i notice also that most succesfull ico have a low rating on icobench and those failed has a high rating it's not advisable to rely on thi sites

[Visibel]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

It seems quite clear that their judgments are based on only external criteria. Of course we do not have to believe it, but we must admit that they are quite helpful, at least only to know the outline of the ongoing ico or the upcoming.

[beckspace]

I follow the ICO ratings, i always check them. it's an important criterion but i don't believe its. There are other criteria that i seek primarily. Always i do my own research on ICO and more confidence in myself.

[Sithara007]

I normally check the ICO review and ratings before entering in to a bounty campaign. And so far, it has helped a lot. They are not 100% accurate, but 80% to 85% is enough for me. Anyway, they are providing free service. 

[baus]

Most of them are bought ratings, so you should not trust on them soo much as a 1# signal to invest into a project. The best thing that you can do is just to follow your own advices and to make a deep analysis about that project before joining there