Bitcoin Forum
June 28, 2024, 01:35:35 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 [86] 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 ... 508 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]  (Read 771097 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
stslimited
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


View Profile
October 28, 2013, 05:48:26 AM
 #1701

share transfer done
canth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 1001



View Profile
October 28, 2013, 06:59:20 AM
 #1702

I don't think there's any point in posting when you've done the share transfer. Ken already knows and quite frankly, I don't think anyone else cares. Smiley

Bargraphics
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


Every man is guilty of all the good he did not do.


View Profile
October 28, 2013, 11:59:33 AM
 #1703

Transfer complete. Feeling a bit nervous about it.

My transfer from AMC to ActiveMining went smoothly, so I don't doubt Ken's ability to sort out shares.

I think hes talking about the fact that shares are being sent back to the company and that theres a chance that the company could just take off with them...I have this same concern and I havent sent shares for the same reason (although I trust ken to follow through on his promise)

Let's throw a little logic in this situation.

If he does take off with them (Hypothetically) you're shares that you hold on to become useless. So technically it doesn't matter who holds them.


What I'm trying to say is with the unknowns on Bitfunder, you are probably safer to just transfer them and be done with it since he requested you to do so and has proven himself capable of at least this task in the past.
interJ
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 37
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 28, 2013, 12:40:02 PM
 #1704

Ken,

My verification as a non-US resident as gone through on WeExchange, so I'm fully clear to trade on BitFunder. I just wanted to clarify that it's fine to leave my shares on BitFunder. I think SumZero was asking for clarification on this as well.


Cheers!
Stuartuk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile
October 28, 2013, 01:01:22 PM
 #1705

I think it goes without saying that your shares are 100% safe being temporarily stored with the CEO at this time. He has 15Million of his own and not even 5% of them could be sold in this market without crashing the price so another few Mill from investors is not going to change anything.

So long as you keep a record of the transfer amount and the time, that is easily cross checked with the Bitfunder transaction log.
VinceSamios
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
October 28, 2013, 01:09:06 PM
 #1706

Ken, are you aware of this bitfury chip auction? Might be worthwhile for ActM while the 28nm chips come online - these are fantastically power efficient: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=319965.0

Quote
2 reels;
3,000 chips each reel
= 6,000 chips @ 3GH/s = 18TH/s
This is limited opportunity to buy at the discount vs official price of $60,000/reel and $25/chip in smaller quantities.

Each reel sold separately. You can bid for 1 or both reels like : 1@$32,000 or 2@$32,000. Highest bid wins.

The Happy Clappy Bitcoin Chappy - http://twitter.com/vincesamios
Bargraphics
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


Every man is guilty of all the good he did not do.


View Profile
October 28, 2013, 01:15:15 PM
 #1707

Ken, are you aware of this bitfury chip auction? Might be worthwhile for ActM while the 28nm chips come online - these are fantastically power efficient: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=319965.0

Quote
2 reels;
3,000 chips each reel
= 6,000 chips @ 3GH/s = 18TH/s
This is limited opportunity to buy at the discount vs official price of $60,000/reel and $25/chip in smaller quantities.

Each reel sold separately. You can bid for 1 or both reels like : 1@$32,000 or 2@$32,000. Highest bid wins.


I would hate to see Ken focus on anything other than his own chips right now. The money spent buying these, engineering the boards, and all other included costs could literally buy 3-6 Wafers of his own chips maybe even more.
VinceSamios
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
October 28, 2013, 01:19:41 PM
 #1708

I would hate to see Ken focus on anything other than his own chips right now. The money spent buying these, engineering the boards, and all other included costs could literally buy 3-6 Wafers of his own chips maybe even more.

I agree to a limited extent, however we don't know the timescales for ActM chips, or mass production timescales. If mass production is 2 months off it might be worth picking these up in the interim. Further, these chips are excellent on power consumption, better than the KNC 28nm chips, so if ActM chips are going to hash at the same power consumptions as KNC chips then this would be a good long-term investment (and the interim mining would pay for a few wafers of chips too)

edit: It's just an option really - and considering the Avalon chips fell through, this might be a good bridge.

The Happy Clappy Bitcoin Chappy - http://twitter.com/vincesamios
ATC
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 49
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 28, 2013, 01:26:59 PM
 #1709

How long will it take for weexchange to verify my identification after I submitted the documents?
Bargraphics
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


Every man is guilty of all the good he did not do.


View Profile
October 28, 2013, 01:27:20 PM
 #1710

I would hate to see Ken focus on anything other than his own chips right now. The money spent buying these, engineering the boards, and all other included costs could literally buy 3-6 Wafers of his own chips maybe even more.

I agree to a limited extent, however we don't know the timescales for ActM chips, or mass production timescales. If mass production is 2 months off it might be worth picking these up in the interim. Further, these chips are excellent on power consumption, better than the KNC 28nm chips, so if ActM chips are going to hash at the same power consumptions as KNC chips then this would be a good long-term investment (and the interim mining would pay for a few wafers of chips too)

edit: It's just an option really - and considering the Avalon chips fell through, this might be a good bridge.

I understand, however these can't use any of their engineering towards the Avalon chip boards with the bitfury chips.

Also because ActM's 28nm chips will be less power efficient than KnCs we'd have bigger problems than the few dollars saved at the time buying bitfury chips.

KnC's units can run <1W/GH at the wall if underclocked. Bitfury chips are only running at .8W/GH at the wall. The .2W saved if both are hashing at 1000GH (Just for easy math sake) would be the difference of $2.88 if Ken is paying $0.02/kWH per month. You can figure out the cost for $0.04/kWH and $0.06/kWH etc.. It really doesn't add up to much. (We'd be getting dust for dividends anyways at this Difficulty for mining)

If we have to wait 2 more months for Mass Production of these units then we're screwed either way. Regardless of with or without Bitfury chips.
drawingthesun
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015


View Profile
October 28, 2013, 01:39:58 PM
 #1711

These will mine about 600 Bitcoins by the beginning of 2014.

To account for delays getting them delivered and all the chips running lets kick out the next 2 weeks and say just over 500 Bitcoins will be mined with 18 TH/s by the end of 2013.

Because this is a risk we want at least 2x return on our money and thus we have to account boards and power. Lets say the chips should be worth 25% - 35% of projected profits by years end.

So the absolute top price these are worth is around 150 Bitcoins or a total of $25,000 - $30,000 for both reels combined. Anymore and the risk for little gain is not worth it.

I have a feeling these are going to auction end a lot higher than $12,000 a reel.

Bid under 150 Bitcoins for both, sure, Bid over 150 and you are throwing our money away. it will never be made back factoring boards, other costs and delays.

EDIT: Although personally I would not go into any Bitcoin mining venture without expecting 10 - 20 times return as the risk is just so massive. I have already been burned by ActiveMining so I would prefer Ken either buy eASIC or return money to investors, please don't go near anything else with our money.
drawingthesun
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015


View Profile
October 28, 2013, 01:40:25 PM
 #1712

How long will it take for weexchange to verify my identification after I submitted the documents?


It has taken about 6 days for mine.
LorenzoMoney
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 335
Merit: 250



View Profile
October 28, 2013, 06:34:41 PM
 #1713

Ken is not going to run off with anyone's shares.

Ken does have a sense of integrity and he DOES want to make money and wants his share holders to make money.

Ken's problem is NOT integrity. His problem is communication.

He also needs to accept help when it is offered.

Transfer complete. Feeling a bit nervous about it.

My transfer from AMC to ActiveMining went smoothly, so I don't doubt Ken's ability to sort out shares.

I think hes talking about the fact that shares are being sent back to the company and that theres a chance that the company could just take off with them...I have this same concern and I havent sent shares for the same reason (although I trust ken to follow through on his promise)

https://twitter.com/Lorenzo_Money -- Bitcoin Address: 1EttqaSSCksRAXrwejoChs5zmGjSikN9mC -- http://lorenzomoney.wordpress.com/
The Bulk of mankind is as well equipped for flying as thinking. - Jonathan Swift
DOGE COIN address: DSYMgD1HfmJFwNuc6Zvhp7PkrVD1QRBsgu
drawingthesun
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015


View Profile
October 28, 2013, 06:53:10 PM
 #1714

Ken is legitimately trying to run off with peoples money.  What do you think most of these "costs" are?  It's his salary.  He can do the shittiest job imaginable but he is still able to pay himself off with a healthy chunk of the IPO funding, which he has referred to in the past as "engineering costs".  If the business fails, who cares, he can still purchase 28nm chips for his own personal use because we paid for his rights to buy chips right off the factory floor.  we so smrt

Is Ken actually taking a salary from the IPO funds? Even when there is nothing for him to do until the eASIC chips arrive?
drawingthesun
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015


View Profile
October 28, 2013, 07:27:42 PM
 #1715

according to him he is very busy getting the boards designed etc.  he is always claiming to be working hard, why?  so he can pay himself a salary.  not all the money was for NRE.  the engineering costs are quite hefty and he even had to put up another sell wall when the first .0025 one was eaten up.  these engineering costs are an excuse to pay himself as much as he wants

Damn. Most CEO's/Founders pay themselves a very small salary in a start-up, if you have no skin in the game of course it doesn't matter when the eASIC chips arrive.

This is disappointing if true, especially considering most CEO's/Founders end up owning a small part of their company (10 - 30%) but in this case Ken owns over 50%. I really hope VE is lying here. We have already lost so much money and have delayed chips, nothing more.

I will give Ken the benefit of the doubt.
coinfresh
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 88
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 28, 2013, 07:46:53 PM
 #1716

More FUD from VE, why don't you go to the doc and get some prozac and calm down.

Of course Ken is paying himself. How else do you expect him to eat and live when trying to start up this company? You think he is going to go collect foodstamps and welfare checks? This was kind of a given. If it is a surprise to anyone that ken is paying himself, then you must not understand how all this works.
EskimoBob
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000


Quality Printing Services by Federal Reserve Bank


View Profile
October 28, 2013, 09:32:33 PM
 #1717

looks like this Ukio character has fallen flat on his face. Time to transfer the shares and hope we can get out of this shit storm, brewing on the horizon, before it hits the town.

Ken is form US, kens Co is form US, did he ever mention, how is this new "exchange" of his going to be safe form SEC's grabby sweaty sausage fingers?

While reading what I wrote, use the most friendliest and relaxing voice in your head.
BTW, Things in BTC bubble universes are getting ugly....
Stuartuk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile
October 28, 2013, 09:34:25 PM
 #1718

Even when there is nothing for him to do until the eASIC chips arrive?

Nothing? Are you being serious?

Website maintenance, orders, payment processing, book keeping
Product design and product engineering - including software design
Product manufacturing (PSBs, PCI cards, Cases etc)
Share issues including transfers/tenders, new exchange design and implementation, coloured coins
Legal issues, legal consultation
Thread moderation

Lets take one of those and you tell us how long it would it take you to design and manufacture a PCI card for an ASIC chip?

thefunkybits
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1000


View Profile
October 28, 2013, 09:36:13 PM
 #1719

The SEC is our friend here, they JUST passed crowdfunding laws and still I doubt we are on their radar.

We need to stop acting like this is a big deal and just carry on with business
EskimoBob
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000


Quality Printing Services by Federal Reserve Bank


View Profile
October 28, 2013, 09:42:26 PM
 #1720

Even when there is nothing for him to do until the eASIC chips arrive?

Nothing? Are you being serious?

Website maintenance, orders, payment processing, book keeping
Product design and product engineering - including software design  <- a bit too late for that?
Product manufacturing (PSBs, PCI cards, Cases etc) <- a bit too late for that?
Share issues including transfers/tenders, new exchange design and implementation, coloured coins <- Oh Look, rainbow! Seriously?
Legal issues, legal consultation
Thread moderation - Right...

Lets take one of those and you tell us how long it would it take you to design and manufacture a PCI card for an ASIC chip?



Le'Duck, If he is still busy with task you listed, we do not see a single mining rig before February 201X.

While reading what I wrote, use the most friendliest and relaxing voice in your head.
BTW, Things in BTC bubble universes are getting ugly....
Pages: « 1 ... 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 [86] 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 ... 508 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!