FreeBitco.in-$200 FreeBTC🏎Win Lambo🔥0.2BTC DailyJackpot🏆$32,500 Wager Contest

[fbtcvip10]

No "last week in crypto" email this Monday?!
Q2 of 2021 is ending and no casino for funtoken?!
They didn't even change the token's logo!
Such a lazy team!
I'm feeling being scammed!
I bought a lot of funtoken just because of freebitcoin!

[1714952459]

1714952459

[1714952459]

1714952459

[TheQuin]

~
Q2 of 2021 is ending hasn't ended and so no casino for funtoken yet ?!

~
I'm feeling being scammed!
I bought a lot of funtoken just because of freebitcoin!

I have a feeling that you don't understand the meaning of the word scammed.

[fbtcvip10]

~
Q2 of 2021 is ending hasn't ended and so no casino for funtoken yet ?!

~
I'm feeling being scammed!
I bought a lot of funtoken just because of freebitcoin!

I have a feeling that you don't understand the meaning of the word scammed.

My English is bad, you know what I mean.

[SunnyMoonHere]

Hi TheQuin,

I hope you're feeling good and everything is fine.

I have a question about the commission share feature ("Share amount based on referral activity since last payout" specifically). I tried to search for an answer in this thread but haven't found anything yet.
Does this phrase mean that manually shared amount will be calculated based on activity since last Sunday's payout (scheduled payout event) or these calculations based on the ref's activity during the time frame from the previous share this week?

I mean, If I'm going to share with my refs twice a week, for instance, then their reward won't be fair in the first case, right?  

I.e., I have 10 refs, for example, and nine of them brought 100 sat each and 10th brought 1000 (from Monday to Wednesday). So, I decided to share with them in the middle of the week, and the 10th will get the bigger cut of share. Next, by the end of the week, nine of them brought 500 sat more each, but the 10th ref was inactive all that time still he will get the bigger cut again.

Is that picture is correct?  
Thanks

[TheQuin]

Hi TheQuin,

I hope you're feeling good and everything is fine.

I have a question about the commission share feature ("Share amount based on referral activity since last payout" specifically). I tried to search for an answer in this thread but haven't found anything yet.
Does this phrase mean that manually shared amount will be calculated based on activity since last Sunday's payout (scheduled payout event) or these calculations based on the ref's activity during the time frame from the previous share this week?

I mean, If I'm going to share with my refs twice a week, for instance, then their reward won't be fair in the first case, right?  

I.e., I have 10 refs, for example, and nine of them brought 100 sat each and 10th brought 1000 (from Monday to Wednesday). So, I decided to share with them in the middle of the week, and the 10th will get the bigger cut of share. Next, by the end of the week, nine of them brought 500 sat more each, but the 10th ref was inactive all that time still he will get the bigger cut again.

Is that picture is correct?  
Thanks

It means since Sunday payout. I really don't see it being unfair. In your example, the ref you earned you 1000 has still done more than the others that earned 600 so he still deserves the most. If you think that's unfair then stick to doing it once a week.

[SunnyMoonHere]

Hi TheQuin,

I hope you're feeling good and everything is fine.

I have a question about the commission share feature ("Share amount based on referral activity since last payout" specifically). I tried to search for an answer in this thread but haven't found anything yet.
Does this phrase mean that manually shared amount will be calculated based on activity since last Sunday's payout (scheduled payout event) or these calculations based on the ref's activity during the time frame from the previous share this week?

I mean, If I'm going to share with my refs twice a week, for instance, then their reward won't be fair in the first case, right?  

I.e., I have 10 refs, for example, and nine of them brought 100 sat each and 10th brought 1000 (from Monday to Wednesday). So, I decided to share with them in the middle of the week, and the 10th will get the bigger cut of share. Next, by the end of the week, nine of them brought 500 sat more each, but the 10th ref was inactive all that time still he will get the bigger cut again.

Is that picture is correct?  
Thanks

It means since Sunday payout. I really don't see it being unfair. In your example, the ref you earned you 1000 has still done more than the others that earned 600 so he still deserves the most. If you think that's unfair then stick to doing it once a week.

Thanks for your reply, TheQuin.

Wait, in my example, this guy (who earned an imaginary 1000 for me) gets a fair share in the first time based on his activity (in the middle of the week). After that he did nothing till the end of the week but still gets (after the second satoshis distribution) a bigger cut for free from satoshis amount earned by other referrals, therefore their share will become less than should be. Are you with me? I'm not sure that this can be considered as a fair sharing.  

The thing is that I want to stimulate my referrals more often than once a week, but this idea becomes pointless because of the significant difference between their turnovers. In the light of described situation that interferes intending to motivate less active members. 

Is there any chance that you would implement a feature (another checkbox) that will allow taking into account activity since the last period of the share distribution only (at least for a one-week time frame)? I mean, not based on scheduled Sunday's share event, but some kind of dynamic activity tracker, which allows sharing only with referrals who were really active since the time they were rewarded previously (in case if share distribution happens multiple times during the week).

Please, don't get me wrong. I'm not whining or complaining. I respect your Team responsiveness and the sense of receptiveness for the community members ask and proposals, and I just want to make a reasonable suggestion, which could improve user involvement in the FreeBitcoin environment. I think that would benefit both sides. And thank you very much for your efforts and support. I really appreciate your work.

[TheQuin]

Hi TheQuin,

I hope you're feeling good and everything is fine.

I have a question about the commission share feature ("Share amount based on referral activity since last payout" specifically). I tried to search for an answer in this thread but haven't found anything yet.
Does this phrase mean that manually shared amount will be calculated based on activity since last Sunday's payout (scheduled payout event) or these calculations based on the ref's activity during the time frame from the previous share this week?

I mean, If I'm going to share with my refs twice a week, for instance, then their reward won't be fair in the first case, right?  

I.e., I have 10 refs, for example, and nine of them brought 100 sat each and 10th brought 1000 (from Monday to Wednesday). So, I decided to share with them in the middle of the week, and the 10th will get the bigger cut of share. Next, by the end of the week, nine of them brought 500 sat more each, but the 10th ref was inactive all that time still he will get the bigger cut again.

Is that picture is correct?  
Thanks

It means since Sunday payout. I really don't see it being unfair. In your example, the ref you earned you 1000 has still done more than the others that earned 600 so he still deserves the most. If you think that's unfair then stick to doing it once a week.

Thanks for your reply, TheQuin.

Wait, in my example, this guy (who earned an imaginary 1000 for me) gets a fair share in the first time based on his activity (in the middle of the week). After that he did nothing till the end of the week but still gets (after the second satoshis distribution) a bigger cut for free from satoshis amount earned by other referrals, therefore their share will become less than should be. Are you with me? I'm not sure that this can be considered as a fair sharing.  

The thing is that I want to stimulate my referrals more often than once a week, but this idea becomes pointless because of the significant difference between their turnovers. In the light of described situation that interferes intending to motivate less active members. 

Is there any chance that you would implement a feature (another checkbox) that will allow taking into account activity since the last period of the share distribution only (at least for a one-week time frame)? I mean, not based on scheduled Sunday's share event, but some kind of dynamic activity tracker, which allows sharing only with referrals who were really active since the time they were rewarded previously (in case if share distribution happens multiple times during the week).

Please, don't get me wrong. I'm not whining or complaining. I respect your Team responsiveness and the sense of receptiveness for the community members ask and proposals, and I just want to make a reasonable suggestion, which could improve user involvement in the FreeBitcoin environment. I think that would benefit both sides. And thank you very much for your efforts and support. I really appreciate your work.

You're overcomplicating things. The database keeps a record of total ref com earned and ref com earned this week. Trying to keep track of when and what each of 45 million accounts has already shared this week would require a lot of resources for almost no benefit.

[xellosmoon]

Anyone else's reward points thinggy not working? I can't open up the redemption stuff like the reward and lottery bonuses.

[UserU]

Anyone else's reward points thinggy not working? I can't open up the redemption stuff like the reward and lottery bonuses.

Yeah, most probably its from some site maintenance. It happened before so don't worry, things would be fine soon.

[Stumpy21]

Hello,
Would very much appreciate some help from an admin.
I have 2FA activated and had my account hacked into. Lost all my 0.099 bitcoin. Is there anything that can be done to verify? To track? To investigate what may have happened?
Any advice would be much appreciated. I thank you for your time.

[UserU]

Hello,
Would very much appreciate some help from an admin.
I have 2FA activated and had my account hacked into. Lost all my 0.099 bitcoin. Is there anything that can be done to verify? To track? To investigate what may have happened?
Any advice would be much appreciated. I thank you for your time.

Yes, just send a private message to TheQuin along with your email address.

[Stumpy21]

Hello,
Would very much appreciate some help from an admin.
I have 2FA activated and had my account hacked into. Lost all my 0.099 bitcoin. Is there anything that can be done to verify? To track? To investigate what may have happened?
Any advice would be much appreciated. I thank you for your time.

Yes, just send a private message to TheQuin along with your email address.

Thank you. I have already done that but am designated as Newbie therefore unsure if he receives PMs from newbies. For that reason bringing attention to my call for help here as well.

[UserU]

Thank you. I have already done that but am designated as Newbie therefore unsure if he receives PMs from newbies. For that reason bringing attention to my call for help here as well.

I believe he does, since he deals with alot of inquiries from that group.

Else your PM wouldn't go through. Assuming it was sent without any error, you're good to go

[Stumpy21]

Thank you. I have already done that but am designated as Newbie therefore unsure if he receives PMs from newbies. For that reason bringing attention to my call for help here as well.

I believe he does, since he deals with alot of inquiries from that group.

Else your PM wouldn't go through. Assuming it was sent without any error, you're good to go

In my outbox it appears to have gone through. Much appreciated. Thank you.

[rdlsau]

Anyone else's reward points thinggy not working? I can't open up the redemption stuff like the reward and lottery bonuses.

I have exactly the same!
Long do not fix !!!

[rdlsau]

Anyone else's reward points thinggy not working? I can't open up the redemption stuff like the reward and lottery bonuses.

I have exactly the same!
Long do not fix !!!

working!

[SunnyMoonHere]

Thanks for your reply, TheQuin.

Wait, in my example, this guy (who earned an imaginary 1000 for me) gets a fair share in the first time based on his activity (in the middle of the week). After that he did nothing till the end of the week but still gets (after the second satoshis distribution) a bigger cut for free from satoshis amount earned by other referrals, therefore their share will become less than should be. Are you with me? I'm not sure that this can be considered as a fair sharing.  

The thing is that I want to stimulate my referrals more often than once a week, but this idea becomes pointless because of the significant difference between their turnovers. In the light of described situation that interferes intending to motivate less active members.

Is there any chance that you would implement a feature (another checkbox) that will allow taking into account activity since the last period of the share distribution only (at least for a one-week time frame)? I mean, not based on scheduled Sunday's share event, but some kind of dynamic activity tracker, which allows sharing only with referrals who were really active since the time they were rewarded previously (in case if share distribution happens multiple times during the week).

Please, don't get me wrong. I'm not whining or complaining. I respect your Team responsiveness and the sense of receptiveness for the community members ask and proposals, and I just want to make a reasonable suggestion, which could improve user involvement in the FreeBitcoin environment. I think that would benefit both sides. And thank you very much for your efforts and support. I really appreciate your work.

You're overcomplicating things. The database keeps a record of total ref com earned and ref com earned this week. Trying to keep track of when and what each of 45 million accounts has already shared this week would require a lot of resources for almost no benefit.

Hello TheQuin,

   Am I overcomplicating things? Really?

   Let's do the math:
   I assume, that accordingly to several of your lottery round reports (on Twitter) you have about 600,000 active members who claimed free BTC at least once a week (not multiplied nor gambled, but just claimed) + I guess, maybe a few thousands of members who disabled the tickets in favor of rew. points. About 2/3 of them are really active (more or less). So, let's say that the total number is about 500k. (500k / 45mio) * 100 = ~1,11% The real number is nearly close to 1,1% of active users from 45 million accounts the users had registered by that date. I suppose that members who only keep their BTC for annual interest are perfectly fit in this number as well. Think about the ratio of 500k to 45mio.

   I noticed that there is a lot of newcomers, who lose interest before they get a weekly reward. Instead, they would become loyal members if they'll get the motivation before they leave, IMHO. That is not only in my case, but that is a general picture accordingly to the simple math above.

   The server load won't be that big if you implement this feature for the guys who reached let's say 1000-5000 referrals mark (in comparison to 45mio users). But that will allow these guys to be more fair and flexible in a strategy of share distribution, which in its turn will motivate their referrals to be more active on your platform not only in free games. As well as prevent some % of cheating attempts.

   Anyway, it's an idea and it's up to you to decide whether you want to increase members' involvement or you're happy with the current situation (1,1%).

Cheers,

[TheQuin]

  Am I overcomplicating things? Really?

Yes really.

[SunnyMoonHere]

  Am I overcomplicating things? Really?

Yes really.

Whatever, I guess you don't see any prospect of further development for freebitco.in specifically, but for the FunToken only. I suppose in that case there is no point for me or anyone else to bring more referrals there. Since these two projects won't co-exist and I suppose one of them must be shut down at some point soon, right?

I mean, that is how do I see the meaning of your answers between the lines.

Well, ok, np.  

Regards,

[FinneysTrueVision]

  I noticed that there is a lot of newcomers, who lose interest before they get a weekly reward. Instead, they would become loyal members if they'll get the motivation before they leave, IMHO. That is not only in my case, but that is a general picture accordingly to the simple math above.

There are already other benefits like rewards points, lottery tickets, and interest. If people aren't motivated to stay longer it's not because you're not sharing sats often enough with them. It's because it takes such a long time to reach the withdrawal minimum if you're just a faucet user.