The End Of The Bounty.

[Yudhis23]

maybe bounty will always exist, because later ico projects will be more in the future, because many of them are starting to move in the strategic field.
but not all the bounty promises a great income.
also there are some bounty participants who are not competent to participate in the bounty. I think, should be given the regulation, so that the bounty track record of each participant can also be recorded properly in a new system.
so later if you want to follow a bounty, we must provide our track record to the bounty manager.

[Milansilver7]

I really do not like it when bounty managers do not limit the number of participants. I believe that this is not right and not fair. Now a lot of people want to participate in the bounty. Often the bounty does not have a lot of money. I've had cases when I got less than 5 dollars for 20 weeks of TW&FB bounty. And such things will faster kill the bounty than anything else.

working for 20 weeks for a $ 5 wage, it's very painful, I'm experiencing almost the same thing, I think the bounty of the campaign participants should be limited, the restrictions required for better gift allocation

[rupesh2]

it is bound to happen .
one day bounty campaign will be no more beneficial for most of people .
reason is either budget will be less or number of participant will be much more .

[rupesh2]

I really do not like it when bounty managers do not limit the number of participants. I believe that this is not right and not fair. Now a lot of people want to participate in the bounty. Often the bounty does not have a lot of money. I've had cases when I got less than 5 dollars for 20 weeks of TW&FB bounty. And such things will faster kill the bounty than anything else.

this is the benefit in signature bounty .
one person can do only 1 signature campaign at a time .

but in twitter or FB bounty one person can do twitter and fb bounty of all projects at same time .
so this makes it useless .
there should be a limit for number of projects at a time for a bounty hunter .

[OSYA]

Currently, there are a huge number of ICO projects. Of course, we all understand that half of these projects are either Scam or just very weak projects that nobody needs. But now there are at least such projects. What will be in a year, when the ICO every day will be less and less until it reaches the point that one project per month will be released? It is also worth mentioning that the number of participants in the bounty companies is increasing day by day, and the money allocated to the bounty companies are becoming less.  Conclusion: the bounty of the company will exist for another year, or a maximum of two.
What do you think about this?

It seems to me that the terms of participation in the bounty campaign will soon change. Each participant will have to undergo the procedure of the KYC. This will exclude many scammers.

[BLTC]

I don't think bounty will end. Like in traditional business that many people on a daily basis put-up there new companies. The same here in digital world, those existing companies who's driving there platform to blockchain or cryptocurrency. They will continue to increase as this is just the beginning of the digital currency era.  Bounty hunters just hold on ok.

[cryptamod]

I am not sure about the end of these campaigns as the ICOs are going to keep popping out these campaigns wont stop.Not unless there is permanen ban globally that is the only time that these bounties will come to its end,because if theres no ICOs there will be no bounty campaigns from these ICO projects.

[khaled0111]

Many of them are just scams, people invest some money to start an ICO because they know they will earn a fortune from it. They are harming the cryptocurrency market because no one will invest  anymore in other projects even they are good and useful.
As you mentioned, many join the forum just to participate in bounties and get a free and quick money. Bounty campaigns are not useful for ICOs anymore because of low quality articles and posts written by bounty hunters.

[Moiyah]

Currently, there are a huge number of ICO projects. Of course, we all understand that half of these projects are either Scam or just very weak projects that nobody needs. But now there are at least such projects. What will be in a year, when the ICO every day will be less and less until it reaches the point that one project per month will be released? It is also worth mentioning that the number of participants in the bounty companies is increasing day by day, and the money allocated to the bounty companies are becoming less.  Conclusion: the bounty of the company will exist for another year, or a maximum of two.
What do you think about this?

ICO investors are looking only for the profits in return and not truly implementing  their platform and goal. That is why most of the ICOs are failing, because it is easy to raise money but hard to succeeds really. There will be thousands of ICOs that may be created in a year but 80-90% will fail. And the fact that useless scammers are just contributing the market is giving me a headache and is truly awful.

Nevertheless, it will not still be the end for the bounties as not all are disappointments and not all are giving up.

[Harriti]

Given the current state of fraudulent ICOs, the future of limiting ICO projects is essential to ensuring a more robust and trustworthy ICO market at the moment. And the manager of the bounty ICO should limit the number of bounty players depending on the budget the project pays for promotion. Since the bounty campaign now has a lot of people involved and that makes the number of skates is significantly reduced.

[oneidentity]

Currently, there are a huge number of ICO projects. Of course, we all understand that half of these projects are either Scam or just very weak projects that nobody needs. But now there are at least such projects. What will be in a year, when the ICO every day will be less and less until it reaches the point that one project per month will be released? It is also worth mentioning that the number of participants in the bounty companies is increasing day by day, and the money allocated to the bounty companies are becoming less.  Conclusion: the bounty of the company will exist for another year, or a maximum of two.
What do you think about this?

It seems to me that the terms of participation in the bounty campaign will soon change. Each participant will have to undergo the procedure of the KYC. This will exclude many scammers.

I think so too. The procedure for verifying participants in bounty campaigns will become necessary because there are too many multi-accounts.

[Way2Paradise]

yes, i think too, bounty campaigns will only be there for a limited time. but I think it will be a long time before that happens.

imagine it's been more than 2 years, but that's just my assessment.

[jamesndungu1]

Currently, there are a huge number of ICO projects. Of course, we all understand that half of these projects are either Scam or just very weak projects that nobody needs. But now there are at least such projects. What will be in a year, when the ICO every day will be less and less until it reaches the point that one project per month will be released? It is also worth mentioning that the number of participants in the bounty companies is increasing day by day, and the money allocated to the bounty companies are becoming less.  Conclusion: the bounty of the company will exist for another year, or a maximum of two.
What do you think about this?

Bounties is a great concept and would like the trend to continue but improved. I believe bounties is the future of online Jobs.

[andthereyou]

Currently, there are a huge number of ICO projects. Of course, we all understand that half of these projects are either Scam or just very weak projects that nobody needs.

Yes it's increasing everyday because it's the trend for a get-rich-quick scheme whether legit or scam. Just like the gold rush in 19th century, people will flock to where money is.

But now there are at least such projects. What will be in a year, when the ICO every day will be less and less until it reaches the point that one project per month will be released?

Unless there's a new trend for a get-rich-quick scheme other than ICO then more likely what you have mentioned will happen.

It is also worth mentioning that the number of participants in the bounty companies is increasing day by day, and the money allocated to the bounty companies are becoming less.  Conclusion: the bounty of the company will exist for another year, or a maximum of two.
What do you think about this?

I don't think that the money allocated for bounties are becoming less and less. It's because it's only a portion of the sales. If the sales is too small then that will be the reasons why the  money for bounties is too small too. Bounties will exist as long as the cryptomarket exist.

[cryptoamumu]

I do agree that there should be a limit of bounty participants. A lot of people create multiple accounts and twitter handles. To combat this, I believe bounties should be limited to people rank jr members or higher and people who continue to post reports after a bounty has ended should be disqualified from the bounty.

[paramex]

I want to say if I do not think so. Because there are so many ICOs being launched from time to time that why a bounty campaign will not stop as long as there are ICOs there will always be a bounty campaign that will become more profitable. And also some of them will not have the gift and they will become a great ICO and others with less precious gifts. You need DYOR before you start the bounty.

[East2011]

Yes its true that there are so many projects that are release day by day. And its hard to determine whether its good project or scam. But i think don't put a limit in bounyy participants. Its is more better of there are more participants. So that the project will promote hy many people.

[typeplus]

Of course they arent going to limit the numbers! They get massive exposure for peanuts as a result.

[judeafante]

Currently, there are a huge number of ICO projects. Of course, we all understand that half of these projects are either Scam or just very weak projects that nobody needs. But now there are at least such projects. What will be in a year, when the ICO every day will be less and less until it reaches the point that one project per month will be released? It is also worth mentioning that the number of participants in the bounty companies is increasing day by day, and the money allocated to the bounty companies are becoming less.  Conclusion: the bounty of the company will exist for another year, or a maximum of two.
What do you think about this?

That's possible the kind of bounty campaign two years ago is very much different now,actually it's hard to find a legit and profitable bounty campaign, one bad example  was blocklancer, the manager fail miserably to limit the participants, and bounty participants end up getting pennies for very long campaign, I call this greediness they don't care how much the participant is getting they want to accept as many as possible.

[cryptoalfs76]

Currently, there are a huge number of ICO projects. Of course, we all understand that half of these projects are either Scam or just very weak projects that nobody needs. But now there are at least such projects. What will be in a year, when the ICO every day will be less and less until it reaches the point that one project per month will be released? It is also worth mentioning that the number of participants in the bounty companies is increasing day by day, and the money allocated to the bounty companies are becoming less.  Conclusion: the bounty of the company will exist for another year, or a maximum of two.
What do you think about this?

Maybe you have a point in your statement,about this  but this is not  a good to the forum of this community,because we are here being a bounty campaigners to earn a profit and support our financial need and not to make the bounty will exist only in another  year  or a maximum of two,by the way this happen of some bounty scam  we already know that there is circumstances of this happen, thats why only we can do is being a vigilant and review the white paper of that project  that  we joined ,if its a legit or not so that our effort will not turn to nothing.