DrearyUrbanite
|
|
February 07, 2014, 01:25:33 AM |
|
Why are you making logos that looks like a tomb stone? Now i said it. Cheers I think they look like they came out of Fallout III - not necessarily a bad thing
|
|
|
|
okaynow
|
|
February 07, 2014, 01:30:32 AM |
|
Why are you making logos that looks like a tomb stone? Now i said it. Cheers Its a CfB private commission...he's gonna be handing out boxes of Chocolates-from-Beyond.
|
1PeecNu1J8VNKpgR13nasMZWLcMZrwNJfc
|
|
|
opticalcarrier
|
|
February 07, 2014, 02:10:53 AM |
|
I received this response from a Crypto expert after reviewing code, here was the response, need some clarification from CFB or devs:
"Thanks very much for sending me the code. I took a quick look and understood that it is an implementation of two well known crypto algorithms -- elliptic curve based key agreement scheme (ecdh) and digital signature scheme (ec-kcdsa). The code itself was ported from C to Java back in 2008, and so it has been around for quite a while.
I am wondering what you are looking for in the code review. If it is mainly the correctness of the implementation, then I would take a pass. I feel that what would be most helpful for Nxt is to review how the above crypto algorithms are utilized within the Nxt currency system to achieve the intended security goals. "
If anyone has an appropriate response, let me know.
It seems to me that his two categorizations are really the same thing and are what we are looking for Okay, is there something else I can send, perhaps more clarification to exactly what we are looking for? Also, it's a she, Lisa Yin, PHD in Cryptography from MIT. It is that C port to java that we are concerned with. I believe our issue is that we can not yet fully trust that this code we do have is in fact the authors original, and cannot get hold of him to ask questions. Its in lines 1414 - 2315 in the source that JLP posted early Jan. I think the proper language is "to audit the implementation of Curve25519 classes and EC-KCDSA classes and their implementation in transaction/block signing as used in NXT" to look for vulnerabilities. But dont commit the funds right now - I believe we may have found someone to take the funds for an audit. We'll need to figure out what is what. please get your source this info and see what she says.
|
|
|
|
opticalcarrier
|
|
February 07, 2014, 02:19:58 AM |
|
uhhhh... why the big hangup on block 60000?
|
|
|
|
gs02xzz
|
|
February 07, 2014, 02:33:31 AM |
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YqRKMKi7IQg it looks like ltbcoin and the gameshow are public knowledge now. so i guess that means im finally able to tell you guys that i reserved the first 3 episodes of that gameshow to have nxt as the prizes. +1. It seems that this LTBcoin can be built on top of Nxt like cfb's Lak. It might be an opportunity to promote Nxt.
|
|
|
|
dzarmush
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1001
|
|
February 07, 2014, 03:17:40 AM |
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YqRKMKi7IQg it looks like ltbcoin and the gameshow are public knowledge now. so i guess that means im finally able to tell you guys that i reserved the first 3 episodes of that gameshow to have nxt as the prizes. +1. It seems that this LTBcoin can be built on top of Nxt like cfb's Lak. It might be an opportunity to promote Nxt. Or even like Nxt itself.
|
|
|
|
^[GS]^
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
February 07, 2014, 03:35:23 AM |
|
In the 0.7.0e... [2014-02-06 23:02:27.556] [2014-02-06 23:07:14.766] Generated an incorrect block. Waiting for the next one ... [2014-02-06 23:07:24.895] Generated an incorrect block. Waiting for the next one ... [2014-02-06 23:07:28.927] Generated an incorrect block. Waiting for the next one ... [2014-02-06 23:07:33.959] Generated an incorrect block. Waiting for the next one ... [2014-02-06 23:07:49.125] Generated an incorrect block. Waiting for the next one ... [2014-02-06 23:07:50.130] Generated an incorrect block. Waiting for the next one ... [2014-02-06 23:07:51.133] Generated an incorrect block. Waiting for the next one ... [2014-02-06 23:07:52.140] Generated an incorrect block. Waiting for the next one ... [2014-02-06 23:08:08.327] Generated an incorrect block. Waiting for the next one ... [2014-02-06 23:08:10.345] Generated an incorrect block. Waiting for the next one ... [2014-02-06 23:08:14.421] Generated an incorrect block. Waiting for the next one ... [2014-02-06 23:08:31.597] Generated an incorrect block. Waiting for the next one ... [2014-02-06 23:08:45.140] Generated an incorrect block. Waiting for the next one ... [2014-02-06 23:08:57.255] Generated an incorrect block. Waiting for the next one ... [2014-02-06 23:08:59.263] Generated an incorrect block. Waiting for the next one ... [2014-02-06 23:09:01.278] Generated an incorrect block. Waiting for the next one ... [2014-02-06 23:21:00.402] Generated an incorrect block. Waiting for the next one ... [2014-02-06 23:41:16.716] Generated an incorrect block. Waiting for the next one ... [2014-02-06 23:42:28.774] Generated an incorrect block. Waiting for the next one ... [2014-02-06 23:54:09.921] DEBUG: Reversal of alias assignment not supported [2014-02-06 23:54:09.922] DEBUG: Popping off last block not possible, will do a rescan [2014-02-06 23:54:09.925] Re-scanning blockchain... [2014-02-06 23:55:01.334] Generated an incorrect block. Waiting for the next one ... [2014-02-06 23:55:08.856] ...Done [2014-02-06 23:55:12.822] Generated an incorrect block. Waiting for the next one ... [2014-02-06 23:55:29.899] Generated an incorrect block. Waiting for the next one ... [2014-02-06 23:56:35.716] Generated an incorrect block. Waiting for the next one ... [2014-02-06 23:56:38.723] Generated an incorrect block. Waiting for the next one ... [2014-02-06 23:56:52.764] Generated an incorrect block. Waiting for the next one ... [2014-02-06 23:56:55.777] Generated an incorrect block. Waiting for the next one ... [2014-02-06 23:56:56.780] Generated an incorrect block. Waiting for the next one ... [2014-02-06 23:57:11.831] Generated an incorrect block. Waiting for the next one ... [2014-02-06 23:57:14.837] Generated an incorrect block. Waiting for the next one ... [2014-02-06 23:57:16.841] Generated an incorrect block. Waiting for the next one ... [2014-02-06 23:57:53.947] Generated an incorrect block. Waiting for the next one ...
|
|
|
|
allwelder
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1004
|
|
February 07, 2014, 04:03:12 AM |
|
dgex is always downtime,what is the problem?
|
|
|
|
brooklynbtc
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
AKA jefdiesel
|
|
February 07, 2014, 04:05:03 AM |
|
what a day...
5 updates! or was it 4?
New chocolates in time for valentines
BTC drops, Nerdery abounds..
I got a letter from Teddy RE: the NYC CryptoConvention. He's seemingly unprepared, sending form letters, but promising website will have speakers package ready soon. I will post it here and we can go over the format and my suitability for the event
|
|
|
|
|
brooklynbtc
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
AKA jefdiesel
|
|
February 07, 2014, 04:12:53 AM |
|
Par for the course.. Russia is clamping down on capital flight. Read this week about how Russias budget relies on spot oil being $100 and its hovering around $103 with shale gas boom driving it further down every week. Russian budget used to be financed with oil/gas at $20bbl. Future is gonna hurt.
|
|
|
|
dzarmush
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1001
|
|
February 07, 2014, 04:31:54 AM |
|
I think the fact that Russia is gonna get bitcoin banned is one more reason for US government to support bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
allwelder
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1004
|
|
February 07, 2014, 04:56:49 AM |
|
How to sign a message?
1. Generate SHA256 of the message 2. Unlock an account 3. Generate a token (purple key icon next to account id) with SHA256 hash used instead of "website" got it ,thank you,CfB
|
|
|
|
allwelder
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1004
|
|
February 07, 2014, 05:01:10 AM |
|
with 0.7.0e [2014-02-07 12:57:56.176] DEBUG: Database cache size set to 126720 kB [2014-02-07 12:57:58.927] Database is at level 6 [2014-02-07 12:57:58.928] Updated database is at level 6 [2014-02-07 12:57:59.077] Scanning blockchain...
stick the above for a moment ,then the cmd window disappear. any suggestion? TKS.
|
|
|
|
joefox
|
|
February 07, 2014, 05:28:24 AM |
|
The Nxt Crypto podcast, episode 1The RSS feed for the cast is NOT ready to go yet, but the first episode is done! Check it out here: https://soundcloud.com/whatsupnxt/the-nxt-crypto-podcast-ep001Contents: - a basic intro to cryptocurrency concepts, and to Nxt - an interview with Damelon about his involvement with the community - audio from Tai Zen's interview with Anon136 regarding transparent forging If all goes according to plan, we'll have it up on a nice, spiffy podcast feed sometime this weekend.
|
|
|
|
msin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1004
|
|
February 07, 2014, 05:34:19 AM |
|
I received this response from a Crypto expert after reviewing code, here was the response, need some clarification from CFB or devs:
"Thanks very much for sending me the code. I took a quick look and understood that it is an implementation of two well known crypto algorithms -- elliptic curve based key agreement scheme (ecdh) and digital signature scheme (ec-kcdsa). The code itself was ported from C to Java back in 2008, and so it has been around for quite a while.
I am wondering what you are looking for in the code review. If it is mainly the correctness of the implementation, then I would take a pass. I feel that what would be most helpful for Nxt is to review how the above crypto algorithms are utilized within the Nxt currency system to achieve the intended security goals. "
If anyone has an appropriate response, let me know.
It seems to me that his two categorizations are really the same thing and are what we are looking for Okay, is there something else I can send, perhaps more clarification to exactly what we are looking for? Also, it's a she, Lisa Yin, PHD in Cryptography from MIT. It is that C port to java that we are concerned with. I believe our issue is that we can not yet fully trust that this code we do have is in fact the authors original, and cannot get hold of him to ask questions. Its in lines 1414 - 2315 in the source that JLP posted early Jan. I think the proper language is "to audit the implementation of Curve25519 classes and EC-KCDSA classes and their implementation in transaction/block signing as used in NXT" to look for vulnerabilities. But dont commit the funds right now - I believe we may have found someone to take the funds for an audit. We'll need to figure out what is what. please get your source this info and see what she says. Okay, will do.
|
|
|
|
abctc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1038
|
|
February 07, 2014, 05:49:13 AM |
|
I received this response from a Crypto expert after reviewing code ...
- msin, thank you very much for your efforts!
|
██████████████████████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ | , the Next platform. Magis quam Moneta (More than a Coin) |
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
February 07, 2014, 06:41:51 AM |
|
I received this response from a Crypto expert after reviewing code, here was the response, need some clarification from CFB or devs:
"Thanks very much for sending me the code. I took a quick look and understood that it is an implementation of two well known crypto algorithms -- elliptic curve based key agreement scheme (ecdh) and digital signature scheme (ec-kcdsa). The code itself was ported from C to Java back in 2008, and so it has been around for quite a while.
I am wondering what you are looking for in the code review. If it is mainly the correctness of the implementation, then I would take a pass. I feel that what would be most helpful for Nxt is to review how the above crypto algorithms are utilized within the Nxt currency system to achieve the intended security goals. "
If anyone has an appropriate response, let me know.
U'll see a perfect example of how audit should be done in several hours when I disclose the critical bug description.
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
February 07, 2014, 06:43:06 AM |
|
Why are you making logos that looks like a tomb stone? Now i said it. Cheers Its a CfB private commission...he's gonna be handing out boxes of Chocolates-from-Beyond. LOL
|
|
|
|
coolfish
|
|
February 07, 2014, 06:46:02 AM |
|
with 0.7.0e [2014-02-07 12:57:56.176] DEBUG: Database cache size set to 126720 kB [2014-02-07 12:57:58.927] Database is at level 6 [2014-02-07 12:57:58.928] Updated database is at level 6 [2014-02-07 12:57:59.077] Scanning blockchain...
stick the above for a moment ,then the cmd window disappear. any suggestion? TKS. me too...!
|
Nxt:17482068461146780755
|
|
|
|