rpietila Wall Observer - the Quality TA Thread ;)

[rpietila]

This affords an opportunity to distill my investment strategy more:

- Regard every investment such that you assume your understanding concerning it is totally incorrect. (Typically a total loss is a good approximation, though in some you increase your chances of going to jail as well.)
- Find out the greatest intercorrelation of total loss (which event would cause you to be totally incorrect in the largest number of investments at the same time)
- Make sure you are OK even in the case when you have been as incorrect as logically is possible.
- Invest all the remainder as profitably as possible (Expected Value analysis) with no regard to conventional guidance. You are free to do whatever you want as you are covered against the highest theoretical negative scenario already. Here it helps to be correct in your analysis of course, because that determines the upside

[rpietila]

Anti-gravity field induced levitation of a kettlebell

Experiment report


Conclusion: Two people were able to cause an apparent 33% temporary weight (gravity) reduction on an iron kettlebell.

Background: Earlier experiments with a ~20 kg girl had ended inconclusive whether gravity reduction had been achieved. Further experiments were conducted in earth surface level with objects of known weight.

Setting:
Two iron kettlebells, 16 kg and 24 kg were tested if two people can lift them by extending the arm and placing two extended fingers below the handle from opposite sides and then lifting vertically. It was possible to lift the 16 kg using considerable effort, the 24 kg was too heavy to be moved.

Experiment:
The 24 kg kettlebell (henceforth called "object") was put on a stand about 70 cm high and confirmed that it cannot be moved with the technique described.

Two males constructed an antigravity field by positioning themselves to the NE and SW directions from the object. No special preparations were made except the positioning. There were metal items on the levitators and around the room. The room was earth surface level, with a basement floor beneath.

The antigravity field was vested on the object by person "A" putting his left hand upon the handle, then person "B" left hand, then "A" right hand, then "B" right hand. The hands of the same person did not touch each other. The object was pressed down with moderate force while the levitators counted to 10 in Finnish.

After "10" sounded, the levitators removed the hands from the object and put two fingers each through the handle of the object. They then proceeded to lift it about 40 cm from the stand, using considerable effort, and then returned it into the stand with ease.

Then they danced around for about 30 seconds touching each other, the object and other objects randomly and tried to lift it up again. It was not possible.

Result:
The method described had caused the 24 kg kettlebell to temporarily lose so much weight that it was possible to lift it, as had been possible for the 16 kg kettlebell. The effort required felt approximately equal to that of lifting the 16 kg kettlebell, so the object had apparently lost 33% of its weight.

Discussion:
The result is significant as it was a product of pure experiment. We did not have any guide on how to construct the antigravity field with only 2 people. There are possibly loads of things in the preparations that could have been done, and when done properly, can increase the strength of the field and the gravity reduction.

Also the goal to achieve zero or negative gravity when the circumstances are correct seems achievable.

Further tests:
To efficiently measure the antigravity, the next experiment will include a scale.

[rjclarke2000]

Okay,

Interesting

[Whtwabbit]

I would like to see that experiment performed, (along with a real photo of a satellite in space)

[rpietila]

I would like to see that experiment performed, (along with a real photo of a satellite in space)

The report is detailed enough to replicate it at home. The main source for instructions in this case.

Youtube is also full of videos under "party levitation".

The quest is to increase the antigravity field strength by a factor of 3, so that the object becomes weightless.

[jehst]

I would like to see that experiment performed, (along with a real photo of a satellite in space)

The report is detailed enough to replicate it at home. The main source for instructions in this case.

Youtube is also full of videos under "party levitation".

The quest is to increase the antigravity field strength by a factor of 3, so that the object becomes weightless.

have you attempted this?

[ssmc2]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_as_a_feather,_stiff_as_a_board

[Cconvert2G36]

...
Youtube is also full of videos under "party levitation".

The quest is to increase the antigravity field strength by a factor of 3, so that the object becomes weightless.

Laws of physics be damned, we're innovating over here.

[BlindMayorBitcorn]

...
Youtube is also full of videos under "party levitation".

The quest is to increase the antigravity field strength by a factor of 3, so that the object becomes weightless.

Laws of physics be damned, we're innovating over here.

Gravity is a part of the corrupt legacy physics system. Throw off the shackles of banksters and sciencers nao!

[rpietila]

I would like to see that experiment performed, (along with a real photo of a satellite in space)

The report is detailed enough to replicate it at home. The main source for instructions in this case.

Youtube is also full of videos under "party levitation".

The quest is to increase the antigravity field strength by a factor of 3, so that the object becomes weightless.

have you attempted this?

So far my only scientific experiment was the one with the report attached (above). The next one will be with precision scale and at least one guy videoing the experiment, which requires a 5-6 member team in total. It has been theoretized in the 'net that a 33% reduction in apparent weight can be achieved by mind over matter tricks, which of course is fascinating, but I'd like to see a measurable reduction in gravity rather.

[Wexlike]

As a rocket science engineer, i dont even know what to say anymore.

[phoenix1]

As a rocket science engineer, i dont even know what to say anymore.

A song might say it better :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jh4HMl4rXlw

[Mervyn_Pumpkinhead]

Just to clarify things to those who are new. Rpietilia has been involuntarily institutionalized in the past and is suffering from bipolar disorder.
So, I don't think that he is joking with these new and exciting endeavors in the field of paranormal.

[Whtwabbit]

Just to clarify things to those who are new. Rpietilia has been involuntarily institutionalized in the past and is suffering from bipolar disorder.
So, I don't think that he is joking with these new and exciting endeavors in the field of paranormal.

The only things that are real are what the authorities say are real. I guess you won't be looking into the Flat Earth theory. Back to your thought box

[medialab101]

I was told there would be TA...?

[Whtwabbit]

This is a wall observer parody thread,if you look back a few pages its explained

[birr]

I would like to see that experiment performed, (along with a real photo of a satellite in space)

The report is detailed enough to replicate it at home. The main source for instructions in this case.

Youtube is also full of videos under "party levitation".

The quest is to increase the antigravity field strength by a factor of 3, so that the object becomes weightless.

have you attempted this?

So far my only scientific experiment was the one with the report attached (above). The next one will be with precision scale and at least one guy videoing the experiment, which requires a 5-6 member team in total. It has been theoretized in the 'net that a 33% reduction in apparent weight can be achieved by mind over matter tricks, which of course is fascinating, but I'd like to see a measurable reduction in gravity rather.

So you'll have the object sit on the scale, and the people lift the scale, right?  That's the only way to find out if the weight of the object changed.

As a rocket science engineer, i dont even know what to say anymore.

Empiricism trumps all, and I do mean all.

[rpietila]

I would like to see that experiment performed, (along with a real photo of a satellite in space)

The report is detailed enough to replicate it at home. The main source for instructions in this case.

Youtube is also full of videos under "party levitation".

The quest is to increase the antigravity field strength by a factor of 3, so that the object becomes weightless.

have you attempted this?

So far my only scientific experiment was the one with the report attached (above). The next one will be with precision scale and at least one guy videoing the experiment, which requires a 5-6 member team in total. It has been theoretized in the 'net that a 33% reduction in apparent weight can be achieved by mind over matter tricks, which of course is fascinating, but I'd like to see a measurable reduction in gravity rather.

So you'll have the object sit on the scale, and the people lift the scale, right?  That's the only way to find out if the weight of the object changed.

The theory says that the antigravity "beam" is about 30 cm in diameter, so it should be well enough to just let the object be on the scale and construct the field. No need to touch anything. (If nothing happens to the scale, yet the apparent weight is still decreased, we need to check what's going on but that's the nature of lab experiments.)

[RoadStress]

Are you trying to find ways to go to the moon with this levitation talk?

[rpietila]

The difference between basic and applied research is that the former aims to make discoveries without prejudice as to whether they might be useful.

Ever since I learned that every facet of the cloud surrounding us is a lie, finding the truth became much more interesting.