Bitcoin Forum
April 30, 2024, 03:32:23 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 [281] 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 ... 362 »
  Print  
Author Topic: rpietila Wall Observer - the Quality TA Thread ;)  (Read 907160 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3696
Merit: 10188


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
October 13, 2014, 07:42:23 PM
 #5601

Pelase, remember, this is THE QUALITY TECHNICAL ANALYSIS thread.

Thank you.

1. Still coming off a bubble.
2. There are 650,000 BTC ($221,000,000 USD @ $340) stolen MTGOX coins being sold off not so slowly
3. The mining community is done.  They cant compete with the big guys.  Centralization
4. 3600 bitcoins are created each day.  @ $340 USD that is $1,224,000 that needs to come in to the market each day just to stay @ $340.

Analysis this
I know from first hand big players that are buying directly from miners like crazy. I am talking about billion budget entities..

How much of their billion dollar budgets are going into BTC?  .1%, 1% 10%?  Makes a difference, no?
2bn

At this time, no one is investing $2 billion into bitcoin b/c otherwise BTC prices would be going through the roof.  $2 billion is more than 40% of bitcoin's current market cap.

Even attempting to currently invest $500 million into BTC would probably have a very considerable upward pressure on BTC prices.  I am NOT sure how such an investment of let's say $500 million would be able to be hidden or to NOT cause upward BTC price slippage.

Let's say that the company is a $2billion company, and they decide to invest 10% into bitcoin (that would be fairly aggressive), then that would be $200 million.  Still I would find it difficult to hide or NOT to cause upward BTC price slippage with that amount.  So maybe they are investing 1%, which would be $20million?  Still bullish, but possible to hide, in my humble opinion.
S. America bank will buy slowly on behalf of a very known one (they don't want to be seen).
Can't say more nor I am 100% sure, though my source is very reliable.

They will invest 2bn.

Maybe it is not true, who knows?

I can see why you are being a little non-specific here; however, if this information is true, then this would be humungous for bitcoin and there would be NO way from stopping upward slippage (unless there is some kinds of fractional reserve banking going on with some of the bitcoin exchanges). 

It would be good to know the timeline for such investment(s) b/c it would make a difference if an attempt were made to accomplish such investments in the next few months or if such investments were going to be spread over the next year or longer.  For example, if they chose to spread their investment into BTC over the next two years, then it is possible that the later half of their investment would NOT have very much of an affect on bitcoin prices, if BTC's market cap has sufficiently gone up by that time. 

1) Self-Custody is a right.  There is no such thing as "non-custodial" or "un-hosted."  2) ESG, KYC & AML are attack-vectors on Bitcoin to be avoided or minimized.  3) How much alt (shit)coin diversification is necessary? if you are into Bitcoin, then 0%......if you cannot control your gambling, then perhaps limit your alt(shit)coin exposure to less than 10% of your bitcoin size...Put BTC here: bc1q49wt0ddnj07wzzp6z7affw9ven7fztyhevqu9k
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714491143
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714491143

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714491143
Reply with quote  #2

1714491143
Report to moderator
1714491143
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714491143

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714491143
Reply with quote  #2

1714491143
Report to moderator
1714491143
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714491143

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714491143
Reply with quote  #2

1714491143
Report to moderator
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3738
Merit: 3848



View Profile
October 13, 2014, 07:58:20 PM
Last edit: October 13, 2014, 08:22:05 PM by Biodom
 #5602

Pelase, remember, this is THE QUALITY TECHNICAL ANALYSIS thread.

Thank you.

1. Still coming off a bubble.
2. There are 650,000 BTC ($221,000,000 USD @ $340) stolen MTGOX coins being sold off not so slowly
3. The mining community is done.  They cant compete with the big guys.  Centralization
4. 3600 bitcoins are created each day.  @ $340 USD that is $1,224,000 that needs to come in to the market each day just to stay @ $340.

Analysis this
I know from first hand big players that are buying directly from miners like crazy. I am talking about billion budget entities..

How much of their billion dollar budgets are going into BTC?  .1%, 1% 10%?  Makes a difference, no?
2bn

At this time, no one is investing $2 billion into bitcoin b/c otherwise BTC prices would be going through the roof.  $2 billion is more than 40% of bitcoin's current market cap.

Even attempting to currently invest $500 million into BTC would probably have a very considerable upward pressure on BTC prices.  I am NOT sure how such an investment of let's say $500 million would be able to be hidden or to NOT cause upward BTC price slippage.

Let's say that the company is a $2billion company, and they decide to invest 10% into bitcoin (that would be fairly aggressive), then that would be $200 million.  Still I would find it difficult to hide or NOT to cause upward BTC price slippage with that amount.  So maybe they are investing 1%, which would be $20million?  Still bullish, but possible to hide, in my humble opinion.
S. America bank will buy slowly on behalf of a very known one (they don't want to be seen).
Can't say more nor I am 100% sure, though my source is very reliable.

They will invest 2bn.

Maybe it is not true, who knows?


As you know, nobody can invest $2 bil in bitcoin at these prices. The yearly production is only ~0.5bil.
If it is $3840/BTC, then, yes, of course.
I wonder if bitcoin will have it's Hunt's brothers moment. As it is still completely unregulated  by CFTC, it is entirely possible that someone may try to produce a "corner". It is probably trivial for a large player to provide or borrow sufficient funds (less than ~$1.4 mil daily)
http://www.investopedia.com/articles/optioninvestor/09/silver-thursday-hunt-brothers.asp
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silver_Thursday
nakaone
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


View Profile
October 13, 2014, 08:15:02 PM
 #5603

Pelase, remember, this is THE QUALITY TECHNICAL ANALYSIS thread.

Thank you.

1. Still coming off a bubble.
2. There are 650,000 BTC ($221,000,000 USD @ $340) stolen MTGOX coins being sold off not so slowly
3. The mining community is done.  They cant compete with the big guys.  Centralization
4. 3600 bitcoins are created each day.  @ $340 USD that is $1,224,000 that needs to come in to the market each day just to stay @ $340.

Analysis this
I know from first hand big players that are buying directly from miners like crazy. I am talking about billion budget entities..

How much of their billion dollar budgets are going into BTC?  .1%, 1% 10%?  Makes a difference, no?
2bn

At this time, no one is investing $2 billion into bitcoin b/c otherwise BTC prices would be going through the roof.  $2 billion is more than 40% of bitcoin's current market cap.

Even attempting to currently invest $500 million into BTC would probably have a very considerable upward pressure on BTC prices.  I am NOT sure how such an investment of let's say $500 million would be able to be hidden or to NOT cause upward BTC price slippage.

Let's say that the company is a $2billion company, and they decide to invest 10% into bitcoin (that would be fairly aggressive), then that would be $200 million.  Still I would find it difficult to hide or NOT to cause upward BTC price slippage with that amount.  So maybe they are investing 1%, which would be $20million?  Still bullish, but possible to hide, in my humble opinion.
S. America bank will buy slowly on behalf of a very known one (they don't want to be seen).
Can't say more nor I am 100% sure, though my source is very reliable.

They will invest 2bn.

Maybe it is not true, who knows?

maybe I am overly naive but how do you hide investing 2bn from a balance sheet and much more important why should you?
piramida
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1010


Borsche


View Profile
October 13, 2014, 08:53:12 PM
 #5604


maybe I am overly naive but how do you hide investing 2bn from a balance sheet and much more important why should you?

imagine you are a big player late to the game. you see potential and low prices. if you announce your plans, no more low prices. makes perfect sense to buy as much as possible directly on OTC , while spreading fear and pushing price down on exchanges, no? that way insufficient liquidity will not be as obvious since many weak hands will get rid of their coins while panicking. of course, you can't hide that forever and at some point there are just no more sellers available; then it explodes.

i am satoshi
SlipperySlope
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 501

Stephen Reed


View Profile
October 13, 2014, 10:06:54 PM
 #5605

Here is recent evidence of the tendency for gold and bitcoin prices to move in the same direction, and have similar trend reversals.

This is a chart of gold prices at a one-day resolution...



And here is a chart of bitcoin prices, likewise with one-day resolution...

JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3696
Merit: 10188


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
October 13, 2014, 10:57:22 PM
 #5606

Pelase, remember, this is THE QUALITY TECHNICAL ANALYSIS thread.

Thank you.

1. Still coming off a bubble.
2. There are 650,000 BTC ($221,000,000 USD @ $340) stolen MTGOX coins being sold off not so slowly
3. The mining community is done.  They cant compete with the big guys.  Centralization
4. 3600 bitcoins are created each day.  @ $340 USD that is $1,224,000 that needs to come in to the market each day just to stay @ $340.

Analysis this
I know from first hand big players that are buying directly from miners like crazy. I am talking about billion budget entities..

How much of their billion dollar budgets are going into BTC?  .1%, 1% 10%?  Makes a difference, no?
2bn

At this time, no one is investing $2 billion into bitcoin b/c otherwise BTC prices would be going through the roof.  $2 billion is more than 40% of bitcoin's current market cap.

Even attempting to currently invest $500 million into BTC would probably have a very considerable upward pressure on BTC prices.  I am NOT sure how such an investment of let's say $500 million would be able to be hidden or to NOT cause upward BTC price slippage.

Let's say that the company is a $2billion company, and they decide to invest 10% into bitcoin (that would be fairly aggressive), then that would be $200 million.  Still I would find it difficult to hide or NOT to cause upward BTC price slippage with that amount.  So maybe they are investing 1%, which would be $20million?  Still bullish, but possible to hide, in my humble opinion.
S. America bank will buy slowly on behalf of a very known one (they don't want to be seen).
Can't say more nor I am 100% sure, though my source is very reliable.

They will invest 2bn.

Maybe it is not true, who knows?

maybe I am overly naive but how do you hide investing 2bn from a balance sheet and much more important why should you?

Nakaone:

I believe that you are misunderstanding our use of the term "hide" in this context.... but Klee can clarify what he meant by hide.

I think that in one sense the term hide is being used to refer to the practice or attempt to invest without moving the price.. Therefore to accumulate as much as you can while the price is down. 

Regarding the mechanics and or obligations to either shareholders, or to managers or to owners, that would be a different question, and I am sure such disclosure to the extent that they are necessary can be carried out in a wide variety of ways.  For example, an investment balance sheet can show an investment (but might not specify what it is for, even though the amount is clearly contained therein), and later, after the accumulation has occurred there may be clarifications of the exact investment(s).







1) Self-Custody is a right.  There is no such thing as "non-custodial" or "un-hosted."  2) ESG, KYC & AML are attack-vectors on Bitcoin to be avoided or minimized.  3) How much alt (shit)coin diversification is necessary? if you are into Bitcoin, then 0%......if you cannot control your gambling, then perhaps limit your alt(shit)coin exposure to less than 10% of your bitcoin size...Put BTC here: bc1q49wt0ddnj07wzzp6z7affw9ven7fztyhevqu9k
nioc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1624
Merit: 1008


View Profile
October 14, 2014, 02:01:09 AM
 #5607

What settings are you guys using?

I keep seeing this.............


This user is currently ignored.


.........but when you quote I see something else.
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3738
Merit: 3848



View Profile
October 14, 2014, 10:52:31 PM
 #5608

New global wealth numbers:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/11161150/Are-you-among-the-worlds-wealthiest.html
https://publications.credit-suisse.com/tasks/render/file/?fileID=60931FDE-A2D2-F568-B041B58C5EA591A4

total wealth-$263 trl (263x1,000,000,000,000)
You need $798,000 to be top 1%
You need just $77,000 to be top 10%

All bitcoin-~$5.2-5.3bil (0.002% of worlds wealth).
If 0.1% of worlds wealth will be allocated to bitcoin, it would reach ~$20,000/BTC, and if 0.5%, then it is $100,000/BTC
In my opinion, it makes $20-100K/BTC a quite reasonable expectation.
njcarlos
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 15, 2014, 12:09:20 AM
 #5609

What settings are you guys using?

I keep seeing this.............


This user is currently ignored.


.........but when you quote I see something else.
Yes quoting does bleed the ignored user's content. The content is there, it's just collapsed (show/hide in the corner).
rpietila (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1036



View Profile
October 17, 2014, 11:53:36 AM
Last edit: October 17, 2014, 04:46:25 PM by rpietila
 #5610

A D V E R T I S E M E N T  -  O P P O R T U N I T Y

The early adopter phase of my virtual world - Crypto Kingdom is starting NOW.

If you are interested in the game, want to fund its development, and enjoy a bit of speculation, now it is possible to buy ingame gold. Minimum at this point is for 100 XMR (about BTC0.25) but it will be listed soon and then smaller lots become possible.

HIM TVA Dragon, AOK-GM, Emperor of the Earth, Creator of the World, King of Crypto Kingdom, Lord of Malla, AOD-GEN, SA-GEN5, Ministry of Plenty (Join NOW!), Professor of Economics and Theology, Ph.D, AM, Chairman, Treasurer, Founder, CEO, 3*MG-2, 82*OHK, NKP, WTF, FFF, etc(x3)
nioc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1624
Merit: 1008


View Profile
October 17, 2014, 04:41:37 PM
 #5611

A D V E R T I S E M E N T  -  O P P O R T U N I T Y

The early adopter phase of my virtual world - Crypto Kingdom is starting NOW.

If you are interested in the game, want to fund its development, and enjoy a bit of speculation, now it is possible to buy ingame gold. Minimum at this point is for 100 XMR (about BTC2.5) but it will be listed soon and then smaller lots become possible.


I think you mean BTC0.25 Embarrassed
rpietila (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1036



View Profile
October 17, 2014, 04:47:10 PM
 #5612

A D V E R T I S E M E N T  -  O P P O R T U N I T Y

The early adopter phase of my virtual world - Crypto Kingdom is starting NOW.

If you are interested in the game, want to fund its development, and enjoy a bit of speculation, now it is possible to buy ingame gold. Minimum at this point is for 100 XMR (about BTC2.5) but it will be listed soon and then smaller lots become possible.

I think you mean BTC0.25 Embarrassed

Just wanted to see if anyone reads my posts   Cheesy

HIM TVA Dragon, AOK-GM, Emperor of the Earth, Creator of the World, King of Crypto Kingdom, Lord of Malla, AOD-GEN, SA-GEN5, Ministry of Plenty (Join NOW!), Professor of Economics and Theology, Ph.D, AM, Chairman, Treasurer, Founder, CEO, 3*MG-2, 82*OHK, NKP, WTF, FFF, etc(x3)
wachtwoord
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125


View Profile
October 17, 2014, 06:24:10 PM
 #5613

A D V E R T I S E M E N T  -  O P P O R T U N I T Y

The early adopter phase of my virtual world - Crypto Kingdom is starting NOW.

If you are interested in the game, want to fund its development, and enjoy a bit of speculation, now it is possible to buy ingame gold. Minimum at this point is for 100 XMR (about BTC2.5) but it will be listed soon and then smaller lots become possible.

I think you mean BTC0.25 Embarrassed

Just wanted to see if anyone reads my posts   Cheesy

I saw it but didn't fix it because I was in a hurry. See 2 people read your posts Tongue
BitDreams
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 503
Merit: 501



View Profile
October 17, 2014, 06:39:14 PM
 #5614

Here is recent evidence of the tendency for gold and bitcoin prices to move in the same direction, and have similar trend reversals.

This is a chart of gold prices at a one-day resolution...



And here is a chart of bitcoin prices, likewise with one-day resolution...



Here is a link to a daily GLD (etf) and BTC, the correlation has been good from daily perspective since July: https://www.tradingview.com/e/A9moXR92/
This implies to me that the mindset of speculative buyers is weighted towards Bitcoin as an asset these past few months.

JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3696
Merit: 10188


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
October 17, 2014, 07:36:26 PM
 #5615

Here is recent evidence of the tendency for gold and bitcoin prices to move in the same direction, and have similar trend reversals.

This is a chart of gold prices at a one-day resolution...

https://i.imgur.com/2Hj8P4N.png[/img]

And here is a chart of bitcoin prices, likewise with one-day resolution...

https://i.imgur.com/IHGFHLD.png[/img]

Here is a link to a daily GLD (etf) and BTC, the correlation has been good from daily perspective since July: https://www.tradingview.com/e/A9moXR92/
This implies to me that the mindset of speculative buyers is weighted towards Bitcoin as an asset these past few months.



Maybe I am a bit too bullish about the potentials of BTC, but merely because BTC has tracked fairly consistently with Gold for a short period of time, should NOT in any way be considered as BTC's potential..

In other words, it seems that BTC has way more exponential potential than Gold .. for a variety of reasons - just the mere fact that BTC is a new asset class, as compared with Gold, should demonstrate that it has much more space for growth as compared with the various limitations of Gold and some of the problems with historical Gold manipulation and hoarding by the status quo wealthy and by governments.



1) Self-Custody is a right.  There is no such thing as "non-custodial" or "un-hosted."  2) ESG, KYC & AML are attack-vectors on Bitcoin to be avoided or minimized.  3) How much alt (shit)coin diversification is necessary? if you are into Bitcoin, then 0%......if you cannot control your gambling, then perhaps limit your alt(shit)coin exposure to less than 10% of your bitcoin size...Put BTC here: bc1q49wt0ddnj07wzzp6z7affw9ven7fztyhevqu9k
NotLambchop
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 254


View Profile
October 17, 2014, 07:43:47 PM
 #5616

Here is recent evidence of the tendency for gold and bitcoin prices to move in the same direction, and have similar trend reversals.

This is a chart of gold prices at a one-day resolution...



And here is a chart of bitcoin prices, likewise with one-day resolution...



Here is a link to a daily GLD (etf) and BTC, the correlation has been good from daily perspective since July: https://www.tradingview.com/e/A9moXR92/
This implies to me that the mindset of speculative buyers is weighted towards Bitcoin as an asset these past few months.

Not to nitpick, but while the resolution on both charts is daily candles...  the top chart covers ~66 days, while the bottom ~90.  This is what it looks like when the time scale is adjusted, with most liberal curve-fitting:


*Blue candles: BTC price, red: gold.

/nerdage


JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3696
Merit: 10188


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
October 17, 2014, 08:27:32 PM
 #5617

Here is recent evidence of the tendency for gold and bitcoin prices to move in the same direction, and have similar trend reversals.

This is a chart of gold prices at a one-day resolution...

https://i.imgur.com/2Hj8P4N.png[/img]

And here is a chart of bitcoin prices, likewise with one-day resolution...
https://i.imgur.com/IHGFHLD.png[/img]

Here is a link to a daily GLD (etf) and BTC, the correlation has been good from daily perspective since July: https://www.tradingview.com/e/A9moXR92/
This implies to me that the mindset of speculative buyers is weighted towards Bitcoin as an asset these past few months.

Not to nitpick, but while the resolution on both charts is daily candles...  the top chart covers ~66 days, while the bottom ~90.  This is what it looks like when the time scale is adjusted, with most liberal curve-fitting:

http://s22.postimg.org/5vsh8j1oh/chart11.png[/img]
*Blue candles: BTC price, red: gold.

/nerdage



Thanks NOT NotPork.    Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

1) Self-Custody is a right.  There is no such thing as "non-custodial" or "un-hosted."  2) ESG, KYC & AML are attack-vectors on Bitcoin to be avoided or minimized.  3) How much alt (shit)coin diversification is necessary? if you are into Bitcoin, then 0%......if you cannot control your gambling, then perhaps limit your alt(shit)coin exposure to less than 10% of your bitcoin size...Put BTC here: bc1q49wt0ddnj07wzzp6z7affw9ven7fztyhevqu9k
fewcoins
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
October 17, 2014, 11:58:40 PM
 #5618

So wait you guys are trying to prove bitcoin is being manipulated as much as gold??? I don't think that's a selling point at all gold will probably near $1,000 soon, so btc to 100?  Cry
nioc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1624
Merit: 1008


View Profile
October 18, 2014, 12:27:31 AM
 #5619

To keep the list short name those things of value that are not "manipulated".
BitDreams
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 503
Merit: 501



View Profile
October 18, 2014, 12:31:16 AM
 #5620

So wait you guys are trying to prove bitcoin is being manipulated as much as gold??? I don't think that's a selling point at all gold will probably near $1,000 soon, so btc to 100?  Cry

Personally i think bitcoin price action has gotten boring so it's trading like gold for the past few months is all.
Pages: « 1 ... 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 [281] 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 ... 362 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!