ripper234
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1003
Ron Gross
|
 |
March 30, 2013, 08:49:45 PM |
|
I can't seem to pair my Yubikey with My Wallet.
I press the button, get a standard Yubikey code, and then get "Authentication code is incorrect"
I see now that Mt. Gox Yubikeys are not supported. Perhaps you can specify this somewhere on the Yubikey auth form (perhaps only in case of error) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"There should not be any signed int. If you've found a signed int
somewhere, please tell me (within the next 25 years please) and I'll
change it to unsigned int." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
molecular
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019
|
|
April 01, 2013, 09:42:44 PM |
|
Those transaction costs seem high:  |
PGP key molecular F9B70769 fingerprint 9CDD C0D3 20F8 279F 6BE0 3F39 FC49 2362 F9B7 0769
|
|
|
SgtSpike
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1005
|
|
April 01, 2013, 11:17:39 PM |
|
Those transaction costs seem high: That chart is based off of what miners are supposedly spending on electricity divided by number of transactions, correct? I'd guess that the chart is still estimating electricity used based on GPUs/FPGAs, and not taking into account the much more energy-efficient Avalons that make up a large part of the hashing power now. |
|
|
|
|
DannyHamilton
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3360
Merit: 4570
|
|
April 02, 2013, 01:12:14 AM |
|
That chart is based off of what miners are supposedly spending on electricity divided by number of transactions, correct? I'd guess that the chart is still estimating electricity used based on GPUs/FPGAs, and not taking into account the much more energy-efficient Avalons that make up a large part of the hashing power now.
 Based on that statement, "miners revenue divided by the number of transactions", it would seem that the chart makes the assumption that market forces drive up mining costs until they approach break-even with revenue. So the chart takes the total block reward expressed in U.S. dollars (subsidy + fees) and divides it by the total number of transactions in the block. If the reward is high, and mining costs have not grown fast enough to keep up, then the "cost per transaction" will appear artificially high. If the mining reward does not keep up with costs, but miners continue to mine at a loss (perhaps with visions of future value?) then the "cost per transaction" will appear artificially low. |
|
|
|
|
|
techwtf
|
|
April 03, 2013, 09:47:43 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
malevolent
can into space
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3472
Merit: 1721
|
|
April 03, 2013, 09:53:00 AM |
|
Basically what your nickname says. Technical WTF |
Signature space available for rent.
|
|
|
giantdragon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1002
|
|
April 03, 2013, 04:26:53 PM |
|
Why payments, received via your "Receive Payment API" stay unconfirmed for a long time (up to few days) even if the payer have included transaction fee?
|
|
|
|
|
|
picobit
|
|
April 03, 2013, 04:48:34 PM |
|
Why payments, received via your "Receive Payment API" stay unconfirmed for a long time (up to few days) even if the payer have included transaction fee?
In particular if they are nonstandard as the one mentioned in the link above (tries to send a negative amount!). Then they will never propagate nor confirm. |
|
|
|
|
JonSnow
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
April 03, 2013, 05:05:29 PM |
|
What happens if someone send bitcoins to one of the Shared Send addresses that is no longer valid?
|
|
|
|
|
giantdragon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1002
|
|
April 03, 2013, 07:37:22 PM |
|
In particular if they are nonstandard as the one mentioned in the link above (tries to send a negative amount!). Then they will never propagate nor confirm.
I am telling about standard payments and tried myself - small transactions even with miner's fee included can wait confirmations for days. |
|
|
|
|
2weiX
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1005
this space intentionally left blank
|
|
April 03, 2013, 08:13:37 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
deadweasel
|
|
April 03, 2013, 08:17:31 PM |
|
In particular if they are nonstandard as the one mentioned in the link above (tries to send a negative amount!). Then they will never propagate nor confirm.
small transactions even with miner's fee included can wait confirmations for days. why is it happening now? |
|
|
|
TheButterZone
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1031
RIP Mommy
|
|
April 03, 2013, 09:10:39 PM |
|
Boycott:
blockchain.info for everything but informational purposes
mtgox.com for getting intermittently DDOSd in order to tank the price, most recently ~$34 in about 12 hours
|
Saying that you don't trust someone because of their behavior is completely valid.
|
|
|
JonSnow
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
April 03, 2013, 09:10:54 PM |
|
Apparently in spite of having our wallet set to include the highest fee possible, the two "unconfirmed" transactions were broadcast without any fee whatsoever.
|
|
|
|
|
JonSnow
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
April 03, 2013, 09:58:05 PM |
|
Will we ever receive a response? Will the unconfirmed transactions ever go through? Will we ever receive our $20k transaction sent to an old address of ours? Who knows. Only Ben knows and he is nowhere to be found today, it seems.
|
|
|
|
|
mcris444
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
|
|
April 03, 2013, 10:00:48 PM |
|
Will we ever receive a response? Will the unconfirmed transactions ever go through? Will we ever receive our $20k transaction sent to an old address of ours? Who knows. Only Ben knows and he is nowhere to be found today, it seems.
The questions you are asking is not blockchain.info specific, but bitcoin protocol specific. So he is not the only one who can answer your questions. |
|
|
|
|
JonSnow
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
April 03, 2013, 10:03:08 PM |
|
It is blockchain specific - it involves my blockchain wallet and a transaction someone mistakenly sent to one of the "one time use only" Shared Send addresses associated with our account.
|
|
|
|
|
jamesg
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000
AKA: gigavps
|
|
April 03, 2013, 10:14:01 PM |
|
Will we ever receive a response? Will the unconfirmed transactions ever go through? Will we ever receive our $20k transaction sent to an old address of ours? Who knows. Only Ben knows and he is nowhere to be found today, it seems.
The transaction will eventually go through. If you would like to speed it up, Luke-jr, the owner of the eligius.st mining pool has a way to prioritize a specific transaction. You can PM him on the forums and ask for his help. As for blockchain.info not including a fee, I'm sure Ben will look into it and get it resolved. |
|
|
|
|
|
willphase
|
|
April 03, 2013, 10:33:39 PM |
|
Do you happen to know what happens when btc is sent to an expired "Shared Send" address? My bitcoin supplier sent a large amount without confirming the btc address with me, and ended up sending it to an expired "Shared Send" address of mine ... so now he's threatening my life and I'd really like to hear from Ben/piuk about that. lol. Annnnnddddddd stress level 1000000!
Piuk reads this thread so this is probably the best way to get in contact with him. Are the transactions confirmed on the expired address - or are they not confirming? If the latter, I would just wait for them to confirm, I've recently had some tx that take a day to confirm, even with a fee... the network is just very overloaded at the moment. Will |
|
|
|
|
