Bitcoin Forum
August 17, 2018, 05:27:27 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.2  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 6475 6476 6477 6478 6479 6480 6481 6482 6483 6484 6485 6486 6487 6488 6489 6490 6491 6492 6493 6494 6495 6496 6497 6498 6499 6500 6501 6502 6503 6504 6505 6506 6507 6508 6509 6510 6511 6512 6513 6514 6515 6516 6517 6518 6519 6520 6521 6522 6523 6524 [6525] 6526 6527 6528 6529 6530 6531 6532 6533 6534 6535 6536 6537 6538 6539 6540 6541 6542 6543 6544 6545 6546 6547 6548 6549 6550 6551 6552 6553 6554 6555 6556 6557 6558 6559 6560 6561 6562 6563 6564 6565 6566 6567 6568 6569 6570 6571 6572 6573 6574 6575 ... 6683 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency  (Read 9301695 times)
Cryptorials
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 670
Merit: 504


Cryptorials.io


View Profile
November 19, 2017, 04:19:04 PM

Anybody playing with latest 012.2 branch notice that the mn sync list wont work on startup? Noticed bugs in the code.


............................... show us the code with the bugs.......... or stop being a Troll......


Can't believe I'm actually responding to trolls that will never actually respond with code that does not exist - breath-taking - I know :-P

gosh and gee-whiz guys
Sure. Syscoin used dashes 0.12.2 code as v1 masternodes. In v2 im going to redo masternode design more like what evolution is about but better. Im finding the p2p design of dash is overly complex for what it needs to do and theres a better way to solve the same problem and scale across new services.

https://github.com/syscoin/syscoin2/commit/f248473f50490367563af85eb116e346ee8dcacd

Im finding mnsync list doesnt give enough time before mnw starts being requested causing incorrect sig errors for votes coming in.

https://github.com/syscoin/syscoin2/commit/90216592da0afcf1429aec60cc077fb328f27272

Here setAskFor is not cleared on initial requests before mn list is requested. Therefor on subsequent requests during mn list sync state the invs on those mns are not requested because setAskFor already has the objects.

Ok your turn.

Lol. I know there's a lot of trolls here so there's maybe some reason to be so short, but I still love to see someone getting a pin stuck in their arrogance bubble. Also Syscoin is awesome, great work Sidhujag.

1534483647
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1534483647

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1534483647
Reply with quote  #2

1534483647
Report to moderator
BOUNTY PORTALS
BLOG
WHERE BOUNTY MANAGEMENT
MEETS AUTOMATION
SIGNATURE CAMPAIGNS
TWITTER
FACEBOOK
MEDIA CAMPAIGNS
AND MORE!
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1534483647
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1534483647

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1534483647
Reply with quote  #2

1534483647
Report to moderator
NibiruHybrid
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 256


View Profile
November 19, 2017, 04:27:21 PM

Dash News Weekly Recap E13 📈🚀👀 Dash 12.2 Update, New Exchanges, Dash Core Q3 Report & More!


This is a repost of this weeks edition of the Dash Force News Weekly Recap video from our YouTube channel. This show is dedicated to keeping you up to date with Dash news highlights from the past week.

Press That Like Button! Smash For DASH!
Thanks For Watching Please Hit Subscribe & Share Video!



sidhujag
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1002


View Profile
November 19, 2017, 04:44:51 PM

Anybody playing with latest 012.2 branch notice that the mn sync list wont work on startup? Noticed bugs in the code.


............................... show us the code with the bugs.......... or stop being a Troll......


Can't believe I'm actually responding to trolls that will never actually respond with code that does not exist - breath-taking - I know :-P

gosh and gee-whiz guys
Sure. Syscoin used dashes 0.12.2 code as v1 masternodes. In v2 im going to redo masternode design more like what evolution is about but better. Im finding the p2p design of dash is overly complex for what it needs to do and theres a better way to solve the same problem and scale across new services.

https://github.com/syscoin/syscoin2/commit/f248473f50490367563af85eb116e346ee8dcacd

Im finding mnsync list doesnt give enough time before mnw starts being requested causing incorrect sig errors for votes coming in.

https://github.com/syscoin/syscoin2/commit/90216592da0afcf1429aec60cc077fb328f27272

Here setAskFor is not cleared on initial requests before mn list is requested. Therefor on subsequent requests during mn list sync state the invs on those mns are not requested because setAskFor already has the objects.

Ok your turn.

Lol. I know there's a lot of trolls here so there's maybe some reason to be so short, but I still love to see someone getting a pin stuck in their arrogance bubble. Also Syscoin is awesome, great work Sidhujag.
Thanks I gotta give credit to evan for having the vision. Now I take that vision and build upon it with my own. I feel like evolution will be big if and only if they design it so masternodes are onchain and rid of all this p2p mess. It will help with many things and make consensus code so much easier and safer. Either way thr pow+bonded validator system is probably the ideal nakamoto consensus design. Lets enjoy it because going fwd money will be in our corners.

I had hoped he was at the dash booth at money2020 but he wasnt there. Maybe some other time.

★☆★Syscoin - Decentralized Marketplace and Multisig Platform
Pay with Bitcoin, ZCash and many more
For more visit Syscoin.org  ★☆★
qwizzie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1033



View Profile
November 19, 2017, 08:01:48 PM

Anybody playing with latest 012.2 branch notice that the mn sync list wont work on startup? Noticed bugs in the code.


............................... show us the code with the bugs.......... or stop being a Troll......


Can't believe I'm actually responding to trolls that will never actually respond with code that does not exist - breath-taking - I know :-P

gosh and gee-whiz guys
Sure. Syscoin used dashes 0.12.2 code as v1 masternodes. In v2 im going to redo masternode design more like what evolution is about but better. Im finding the p2p design of dash is overly complex for what it needs to do and theres a better way to solve the same problem and scale across new services.

https://github.com/syscoin/syscoin2/commit/f248473f50490367563af85eb116e346ee8dcacd

Im finding mnsync list doesnt give enough time before mnw starts being requested causing incorrect sig errors for votes coming in.

https://github.com/syscoin/syscoin2/commit/90216592da0afcf1429aec60cc077fb328f27272

Here setAskFor is not cleared on initial requests before mn list is requested. Therefor on subsequent requests during mn list sync state the invs on those mns are not requested because setAskFor already has the objects.

Ok your turn.

I'm a little confused, all i see in the mentioned commits for syscoin is either the adding of the SYSCOIN name (which is definetely not something to brag about) and giving the sync more time with the *2
in the line if(GetTime() - nTimeLastBumped > MASTERNODE_SYNC_TIMEOUT_SECONDS*2) {  (which i'm not sure is even needed for Dash)

That is literally all you did with the Dash code. So where are exactly the bugs you found and why are we not noticing the effects of your discovered bugs on Dash mainnet ?
Current code v0.12.2.1 is running pretty stable and masternodes are kept in good synchronisation, so far i can tell from the number of active masternodes and from my own masternodes.


Edit 1 : okay, i think i found the piece of code you are referring to :



I will give someone from the Dash core-team the chance to confirm if you found a valid bug or not.

Edit 2 : seeing UdjinM6 reply it looks like you were correct and found a valid bug, my apologies and my thanks.


 

Learn from the past, set detailed and vivid goals for the future and live in the only moment of time over which you have any control : now
UdjinM6
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1304
Merit: 1026



View Profile WWW
November 19, 2017, 08:27:54 PM

Anybody playing with latest 012.2 branch notice that the mn sync list wont work on startup? Noticed bugs in the code.


............................... show us the code with the bugs.......... or stop being a Troll......


Can't believe I'm actually responding to trolls that will never actually respond with code that does not exist - breath-taking - I know :-P

gosh and gee-whiz guys
Sure. Syscoin used dashes 0.12.2 code as v1 masternodes. In v2 im going to redo masternode design more like what evolution is about but better. Im finding the p2p design of dash is overly complex for what it needs to do and theres a better way to solve the same problem and scale across new services.

https://github.com/syscoin/syscoin2/commit/f248473f50490367563af85eb116e346ee8dcacd

Im finding mnsync list doesnt give enough time before mnw starts being requested causing incorrect sig errors for votes coming in.

https://github.com/syscoin/syscoin2/commit/90216592da0afcf1429aec60cc077fb328f27272

Here setAskFor is not cleared on initial requests before mn list is requested. Therefor on subsequent requests during mn list sync state the invs on those mns are not requested because setAskFor already has the objects.

Ok your turn.
Nice, thanks! Smiley

DASH: XsV4GHVKGTjQFvwB7c6mYsGV3Mxf7iser6
sidhujag
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1002


View Profile
November 19, 2017, 08:30:34 PM

Anybody playing with latest 012.2 branch notice that the mn sync list wont work on startup? Noticed bugs in the code.


............................... show us the code with the bugs.......... or stop being a Troll......


Can't believe I'm actually responding to trolls that will never actually respond with code that does not exist - breath-taking - I know :-P

gosh and gee-whiz guys
Sure. Syscoin used dashes 0.12.2 code as v1 masternodes. In v2 im going to redo masternode design more like what evolution is about but better. Im finding the p2p design of dash is overly complex for what it needs to do and theres a better way to solve the same problem and scale across new services.

https://github.com/syscoin/syscoin2/commit/f248473f50490367563af85eb116e346ee8dcacd

Im finding mnsync list doesnt give enough time before mnw starts being requested causing incorrect sig errors for votes coming in.

https://github.com/syscoin/syscoin2/commit/90216592da0afcf1429aec60cc077fb328f27272

Here setAskFor is not cleared on initial requests before mn list is requested. Therefor on subsequent requests during mn list sync state the invs on those mns are not requested because setAskFor already has the objects.

Ok your turn.
Nice, thanks! Smiley

steps to reproduce, start a testnet with one masternode and notice in logs that you will get invalid message during mnw and also that setAskFor bug, it wont resync the list during mnsync but instead only try at the very beginning when headers are syncing, for some reason it skips asking for inv ther ebecause i think its still in waiting mode before list mode starts. I hope tha tmakes sense, do you want me to create a PR?

★☆★Syscoin - Decentralized Marketplace and Multisig Platform
Pay with Bitcoin, ZCash and many more
For more visit Syscoin.org  ★☆★
sidhujag
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1002


View Profile
November 19, 2017, 08:35:38 PM

Anybody playing with latest 012.2 branch notice that the mn sync list wont work on startup? Noticed bugs in the code.


............................... show us the code with the bugs.......... or stop being a Troll......


Can't believe I'm actually responding to trolls that will never actually respond with code that does not exist - breath-taking - I know :-P

gosh and gee-whiz guys
Sure. Syscoin used dashes 0.12.2 code as v1 masternodes. In v2 im going to redo masternode design more like what evolution is about but better. Im finding the p2p design of dash is overly complex for what it needs to do and theres a better way to solve the same problem and scale across new services.

https://github.com/syscoin/syscoin2/commit/f248473f50490367563af85eb116e346ee8dcacd

Im finding mnsync list doesnt give enough time before mnw starts being requested causing incorrect sig errors for votes coming in.

https://github.com/syscoin/syscoin2/commit/90216592da0afcf1429aec60cc077fb328f27272

Here setAskFor is not cleared on initial requests before mn list is requested. Therefor on subsequent requests during mn list sync state the invs on those mns are not requested because setAskFor already has the objects.

Ok your turn.

I'm a little confused, all i see in the mentioned commits for syscoin is either the adding of the SYSCOIN name (which is definetely not something to brag about) and giving the sync more time with the *2
in the line if(GetTime() - nTimeLastBumped > MASTERNODE_SYNC_TIMEOUT_SECONDS*2) {  (which i'm not sure is even needed for Dash)

That is literally all you did with the Dash code. So where are exactly the bugs you found and why are we not noticing the effects of your discovered bugs on Dash mainnet ?
Current code v0.12.2.1 is running pretty stable and masternodes are kept in good synchronisation, so far i can tell from the number of active masternodes and from my own masternodes.

Edit : okay, i think i found the piece of code you are referring to :



I will give someone from the Dash core-team the chance to confirm if you found a valid bug or not.


 

Sorry doesn't seem you are a coder. Look I never inteded to brag dont know where you got that from. Regarding the commits comments // SYSCOIN I am very glad you asked that since not many coders in alt land actually use that idea. It is a way for me to know which parts have changed so I can easily rebase from scratch by looking for all // SYSCOIN tags and updating code without costly merge conflicts. This way I can ensure I start from a good base (dash or btc) and then add my specific stuff on top. Hope that makes sense, its something Ive been using and creates very efficient reports from base without sacrificing security and wished more developers would do the same, after all we are dealing with peoples money.

So the two bugs I reproduced by creating a simple testnet and noticing that lists wont sync deterministically, there is a codepath that sometimes syncs up MNs but the normal path of execution skips over it. Maybe having more masternodes helps fix the problem but a problem is a problem to me, with 1 MN or with more, so I think its a valid bug. I had to fix the setAskFor issue first then the increase the timeout which finally got me to sync properly in a stable manor. Anyways I will work with the developers who wrote the code, I prefer Dash makes the changes IFF they see it is a valid issue or can respond with appropriate comments.

★☆★Syscoin - Decentralized Marketplace and Multisig Platform
Pay with Bitcoin, ZCash and many more
For more visit Syscoin.org  ★☆★
qwizzie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1033



View Profile
November 19, 2017, 08:47:44 PM

Anybody playing with latest 012.2 branch notice that the mn sync list wont work on startup? Noticed bugs in the code.


............................... show us the code with the bugs.......... or stop being a Troll......


Can't believe I'm actually responding to trolls that will never actually respond with code that does not exist - breath-taking - I know :-P

gosh and gee-whiz guys
Sure. Syscoin used dashes 0.12.2 code as v1 masternodes. In v2 im going to redo masternode design more like what evolution is about but better. Im finding the p2p design of dash is overly complex for what it needs to do and theres a better way to solve the same problem and scale across new services.

https://github.com/syscoin/syscoin2/commit/f248473f50490367563af85eb116e346ee8dcacd

Im finding mnsync list doesnt give enough time before mnw starts being requested causing incorrect sig errors for votes coming in.

https://github.com/syscoin/syscoin2/commit/90216592da0afcf1429aec60cc077fb328f27272

Here setAskFor is not cleared on initial requests before mn list is requested. Therefor on subsequent requests during mn list sync state the invs on those mns are not requested because setAskFor already has the objects.

Ok your turn.

I'm a little confused, all i see in the mentioned commits for syscoin is either the adding of the SYSCOIN name (which is definetely not something to brag about) and giving the sync more time with the *2
in the line if(GetTime() - nTimeLastBumped > MASTERNODE_SYNC_TIMEOUT_SECONDS*2) {  (which i'm not sure is even needed for Dash)

That is literally all you did with the Dash code. So where are exactly the bugs you found and why are we not noticing the effects of your discovered bugs on Dash mainnet ?
Current code v0.12.2.1 is running pretty stable and masternodes are kept in good synchronisation, so far i can tell from the number of active masternodes and from my own masternodes.

Edit : okay, i think i found the piece of code you are referring to :



I will give someone from the Dash core-team the chance to confirm if you found a valid bug or not.


 

Sorry doesn't seem you are a coder. Look I never inteded to brag dont know where you got that from. Regarding the commits comments // SYSCOIN I am very glad you asked that since not many coders in alt land actually use that idea. It is a way for me to know which parts have changed so I can easily rebase from scratch by looking for all // SYSCOIN tags and updating code without costly merge conflicts. This way I can ensure I start from a good base (dash or btc) and then add my specific stuff on top. Hope that makes sense, its something Ive been using and creates very efficient reports from base without sacrificing security and wished more developers would do the same, after all we are dealing with peoples money.

So the two bugs I reproduced by creating a simple testnet and noticing that lists wont sync deterministically, there is a codepath that sometimes syncs up MNs but the normal path of execution skips over it. Maybe having more masternodes helps fix the problem but a problem is a problem to me, with 1 MN or with more, so I think its a valid bug. I had to fix the setAskFor issue first then the increase the timeout which finally got me to sync properly in a stable manor. Anyways I will work with the developers who wrote the code, I prefer Dash makes the changes IFF they see it is a valid issue or can respond with appropriate comments.

Thank you for your reply, i'm indeed not a coder and i overlooked at first the code part that actually contained your mentioned bug and your implemented fix.
My apologies for my post, i overreacted and the use of the // SYSCOIN tags makes much more sense now. Also thank you for describing the two bugs in more detail.

Edit : looks like your discovered bugs gets addressed here :



FYI

Learn from the past, set detailed and vivid goals for the future and live in the only moment of time over which you have any control : now
UdjinM6
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1304
Merit: 1026



View Profile WWW
November 19, 2017, 09:18:41 PM

Anybody playing with latest 012.2 branch notice that the mn sync list wont work on startup? Noticed bugs in the code.


............................... show us the code with the bugs.......... or stop being a Troll......


Can't believe I'm actually responding to trolls that will never actually respond with code that does not exist - breath-taking - I know :-P

gosh and gee-whiz guys
Sure. Syscoin used dashes 0.12.2 code as v1 masternodes. In v2 im going to redo masternode design more like what evolution is about but better. Im finding the p2p design of dash is overly complex for what it needs to do and theres a better way to solve the same problem and scale across new services.

https://github.com/syscoin/syscoin2/commit/f248473f50490367563af85eb116e346ee8dcacd

Im finding mnsync list doesnt give enough time before mnw starts being requested causing incorrect sig errors for votes coming in.

https://github.com/syscoin/syscoin2/commit/90216592da0afcf1429aec60cc077fb328f27272

Here setAskFor is not cleared on initial requests before mn list is requested. Therefor on subsequent requests during mn list sync state the invs on those mns are not requested because setAskFor already has the objects.

Ok your turn.
Nice, thanks! Smiley

steps to reproduce, start a testnet with one masternode and notice in logs that you will get invalid message during mnw and also that setAskFor bug, it wont resync the list during mnsync but instead only try at the very beginning when headers are syncing, for some reason it skips asking for inv ther ebecause i think its still in waiting mode before list mode starts. I hope tha tmakes sense, do you want me to create a PR?

Yep, I see. The fix is self-explanatory itself actually but thanks for additional info about steps to reproduce.

re PR: oops, I already created one https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/1730, please review. In general, if you see anything that can be fixed/improved (especially in Dash-specific code, and doesn't conflict with bitcoin PRs) - please feel free to submit a fix, PRs are highly welcome Smiley
Note: there is also a part for "mnv" invs/messages which is missing in your fix, and a TODO for payment blocks inv which I'd like to fix later changing the way its hash is represented first (in some another PR). These two are not that critical but probably worth fixing too to make code a bit more consistent.

re Dash network code is overly complex: agree, that's a legacy thing and one of our major goals now is to incrementally refactor all this stuff to make code easier to read/review but this takes time.

DASH: XsV4GHVKGTjQFvwB7c6mYsGV3Mxf7iser6
yejuveteftoke
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 20, 2017, 12:33:48 AM

Is there a bootstrap file? Could somebody post the latest bootstrap or blockchain dat file thanx .its 3 years behind .
UdjinM6
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1304
Merit: 1026



View Profile WWW
November 20, 2017, 02:05:15 AM

Is there a bootstrap file? Could somebody post the latest bootstrap or blockchain dat file thanx .its 3 years behind .

You can pick one at https://github.com/udjinm6/dash-bootstrap

DASH: XsV4GHVKGTjQFvwB7c6mYsGV3Mxf7iser6
underscored31
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 20, 2017, 08:48:42 AM

Is there a bootstrap file? Could somebody post the latest bootstrap or blockchain dat file thanx .its 3 years behind .

You can pick one at https://github.com/udjinm6/dash-bootstrap

Thank you man, I have been looking for that for a while
e-Chat
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 100


Contact the world - anytime, anywhere


View Profile
November 20, 2017, 08:58:17 AM



Hello, friends.
We accept DASH.
You are welcome!

LoveKamil
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 189
Merit: 10

DINO - The Smart Contract Ecosystem for Everyone


View Profile
November 20, 2017, 01:28:42 PM

Hello!! would like to see Dash on the opinion of analysts,will grow?I would like a profitable and reliable option!

Hi, the Camille. So far, DASH has not come up with anything safer or more reliable. Growth is guaranteed
Hello! thank you I agree with you completely!

NibiruHybrid
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 256


View Profile
November 20, 2017, 02:17:51 PM

Dash Documentary Pre-Proposal Review


From the initial release date at: 11PM EST, 18th January 2014 are there things that the Dash community should be proud of?  Dash has not yet overtaken the first mover advantage of Bitcoin, it doesn’t have the cool “program the world” factor of Ethereum and its not the bankers friend like Ripple but I think there is a great story to tell.

Where would you go to learn more about the impact Dash has had on the cryptocurrency universe?  I didn’t really find a good succinct “story of Dash” on dash.org or dashforcenews.com. There are a number of YouTube videos out there that discuss the strengths of Dash and big announcements – maybe someone has a “playlist” of Dash’s significant moments but I don’t know where that is.



bigrcanada1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 626
Merit: 523


Proud Lifetime DASH Foundation Member


View Profile WWW
November 20, 2017, 05:35:42 PM

Throwing of bitcoin i better time to purchase. Bitcoin is really a crypto currency and value of it is not fixed. But when cost will lower quickly for many reasons, you can purchase it. Besides it is proper time to catch bitcoin. If you don't buy bitcoin with this particular flexible price, it would be your mistake.s



Hahahahahahahaha!  Right...you do realize that this is the DASH forum, right?  Are you getting nervous holding high priced BTC at the moment with solutions like DASH starting to get recognition?   Wink
NibiruHybrid
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 256


View Profile
November 20, 2017, 06:19:37 PM

Bank of America Adds $60 Annual Savings Account Fee, Dash Alternative Looks Much Brighter


Bank of America has begun charging a $60 annual fee for maintaining a savings account, making saving in Dash an even more attractive option.

As announced by Reddit user RicoCat, a new $5 monthly fee has been added to Bank of America savings accounts. The user called the bank to confirm, and the service associate did confirm that a $60 annual fee for maintaining a savings accounts was indeed a new policy. She also confirmed that many customers had similarly been upset by the change.



denysrodman
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 11


View Profile
November 20, 2017, 06:53:43 PM

I believe that the price will come close to the level of 1000 after DashPay Evolution Wallet Livenet Release
MuffinMaster
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 251


Blockchain with a Purpose


View Profile
November 20, 2017, 09:56:21 PM

I believe that the price will come close to the level of 1000 after DashPay Evolution Wallet Livenet Release

With so many positive news that are showing up everyday i think that level of $1000 is closer than you even think Wink


      ▄▄█████████▄▄██
   ▄███▀▀       ▀▀███▄██
  ██▀   ▄        ▄▄ ▀██▀
 ██    ██        ██   ██
██     ██        ██    ██
██     ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██    ██
██    ██  ▀▀▀▀▀▀██     ██
██    ██        ██     ██
 ██   ██        ██    ██
 ▄██▄ ▀▀        ▀   ▄██
 ██▀███▄▄       ▄▄███▀
    ██▀▀█████████▀▀
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
BLOCKCHAIN WITH A PURPOSE
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Telegram    Twitter    Medium    Reddit    Youtube
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
      ▄▄█████████▄▄██
   ▄███▀▀       ▀▀███▄██
  ██▀   ▄        ▄▄ ▀██▀
 ██    ██        ██   ██
██     ██        ██    ██
██     ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██    ██
██    ██  ▀▀▀▀▀▀██     ██
██    ██        ██     ██
 ██   ██        ██    ██
 ▄██▄ ▀▀        ▀   ▄██
 ██▀███▄▄       ▄▄███▀
    ██▀▀█████████▀▀
chilly2k
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1007
Merit: 1000


View Profile
November 21, 2017, 01:34:58 AM

I believe that the price will come close to the level of 1000 after DashPay Evolution Wallet Livenet Release

With so many positive news that are showing up everyday i think that level of $1000 is closer than you even think Wink

It wouldn't surprise me, to see us hit it before the end of year.  I'm not expecting it, but it wouldn't surprise either.     

Pages: « 1 ... 6475 6476 6477 6478 6479 6480 6481 6482 6483 6484 6485 6486 6487 6488 6489 6490 6491 6492 6493 6494 6495 6496 6497 6498 6499 6500 6501 6502 6503 6504 6505 6506 6507 6508 6509 6510 6511 6512 6513 6514 6515 6516 6517 6518 6519 6520 6521 6522 6523 6524 [6525] 6526 6527 6528 6529 6530 6531 6532 6533 6534 6535 6536 6537 6538 6539 6540 6541 6542 6543 6544 6545 6546 6547 6548 6549 6550 6551 6552 6553 6554 6555 6556 6557 6558 6559 6560 6561 6562 6563 6564 6565 6566 6567 6568 6569 6570 6571 6572 6573 6574 6575 ... 6683 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!