[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency

[Strugg]

Hi guys
Sorry for noob question, but I'm new here and don't know how everything's going on now. I was thinking about investing in DarkCoin.
What are You prognosis for DRK price next ~10 days?
I see that there's going to be a Hard Fork 14 May. Will that make price go up?
Thanks in advance for  argumentative and realistic opinions
Cheers

[1714601162]

1714601162

[1714601162]

1714601162

[GhostPlayer]

About the remote/local masternode setup

I just found out that darkcoind can generate more that 1 getaccountaddress 0.As long as that address is not funded, darkcoind keeps giving out the same address. But once funded, it generates a new account 0

 Does that mean we can run multiple masternodes from the same local wallet?

[coins101]

Hi guys
Sorry for noob question, but I'm new here and don't know how everything's going on now. I was thinking about investing in DarkCoin.
What are You prognosis for DRK price next ~10 days?
I see that there's going to be a Hard Fork 14 May. Will that make price go up?
Thanks in advance for  argumentative and realistic opinions
Cheers

There is an app for that:



https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=579976.msg6335710#msg6335710

[illodin]

Does that mean we can run multiple masternodes from the same local wallet?

Dunno, but running multiple "nodes" from one wallet / computer kind of goes against the distributed mixing network idea. So I hope the answer is "no".

[GhostPlayer]

Does that mean we can run multiple masternodes from the same local wallet?

Dunno, but running multiple "nodes" from one wallet / computer kind of goes against the distributed mixing network idea. So I hope the answer is "no".

That is absolutely not the idea. Its for the remote/local setup. the remote masternodes would still do the mixing, authored by the local wallet. At least that my understanding of it.

[aleix]

What are You prognosis for DRK price next ~10 days?
I see that there's going to be a Hard Fork 14 May. Will that make price go up?
Thanks in advance for  argumentative and realistic opinions

1.- I dont care, I play long term only (in a few months darkcoin will be huge)
2.- I dont care, I play long term only (in a few months darkcoin will be huge)

you are welcome! 

[BitcoinFX]

...

+1 for lowendbox. it is website where hosting services post their specials for plans that don't require lots of resources.

Lowendbox has some reasonable options. Some alternatives;

http://www.orangewebsite.com/vps.php - accepts Bitcoin - hosted in Iceland

http://www.ccihosting.com/vps.php - accepts Bitcoin - hosted in Panama

http://www.anonymoushosting.in/vps.php - hosted in the Netherlands

http://www.yohost.org/offshore-hosting.html - accepts Bitcoin - hosted in the Netherlands

http://www.securehost.com/dedicated-servers/ - hosted in The Bahamas and Bermuda

http://www.cinipac.com - accepts Bitcoin - various locations including Iceland and Romania

https://www.1984hosting.com/ - hosted in Iceland

Most of these companies have been in business for a good while and have competitive pricing.

They should really consider accepting Darkcoin !

[Kai Proctor]

Does that mean we can run multiple masternodes from the same local wallet?

Dunno, but running multiple "nodes" from one wallet / computer kind of goes against the distributed mixing network idea. So I hope the answer is "no".

That is absolutely not the idea. Its for the remote/local setup. the masternodes would still do the mixing, authored by the local wallet. At least that my understanding of it.

1000 DRK, one masternode @illodin is right, the idea is to make it costly to run a masternode.

[illodin]

Does that mean we can run multiple masternodes from the same local wallet?

Dunno, but running multiple "nodes" from one wallet / computer kind of goes against the distributed mixing network idea. So I hope the answer is "no".

That is absolutely not the idea. Its for the remote/local setup. the remote masternodes would still do the mixing, authored by the local wallet. At least that my understanding of it.

Ok I misundersood - now that what you are saying would be awesome.

EDIT: Kai Proctor - you'd still need 5000 DRK to run 5 nodes, I think.

[thelonecrouton]

Does that mean we can run multiple masternodes from the same local wallet?

Dunno, but running multiple "nodes" from one wallet / computer kind of goes against the distributed mixing network idea. So I hope the answer is "no".

That is absolutely not the idea. Its for the remote/local setup. the masternodes would still do the mixing, authored by the local wallet. At least that my understanding of it.

1000 DRK, one masternode @illodin is right, the idea is to make it costly to run a masternode.

You'd still need 4000 DRK to run 4 MNs, just each 1000 in it's own addr 0.

Bit of a tradeoff security wise though, I prefer keeping my wallets separate, with separate passwords, in separate physical locations, with separate backups. Guarded by separate assault-crocodiles. Then again I'm both paranoid and inept.  

Wouldn't surprise me if eduffield made this possible weeks/months ago and just forgot to mention it to anyone.  

[humanitee]

...

+1 for lowendbox. it is website where hosting services post their specials for plans that don't require lots of resources.

Lowendbox has some reasonable options. Some alternatives;

http://www.orangewebsite.com/vps.php - accepts Bitcoin - hosted in Iceland

http://www.ccihosting.com/vps.php - accepts Bitcoin - hosted in Panama

http://www.anonymoushosting.in/vps.php - hosted in the Netherlands

http://www.yohost.org/offshore-hosting.html - accepts Bitcoin - hosted in the Netherlands

http://www.securehost.com/dedicated-servers/ - hosted in The Bahamas and Bermuda

http://www.cinipac.com - accepts Bitcoin - various locations including Iceland and Romania

https://www.1984hosting.com/ - hosted in Iceland

Most of these companies have been in business for a good while and have competitive pricing.

They should really consider accepting Darkcoin !

Thank you for this list!

[Kai Proctor]

Ok I misundersood - now that what you are saying would be awesome.

EDIT: Kai Proctor - you'd still need 5000 DRK to run 5 nodes, I think.

So I misunderstood too  

You'd still need 4000 DRK to run 4 MNs, just each 1000 in it's own addr 0.

Bit of a tradeoff security wise though, I prefer keeping my wallets separate, with separate passwords, in sepatate physical locations, with sepatate backups. Then again I'm both paranoid and inept.

Me too

[JGCMiner]

Does that mean we can run multiple masternodes from the same local wallet?

Dunno, but running multiple "nodes" from one wallet / computer kind of goes against the distributed mixing network idea. So I hope the answer is "no".

That is absolutely not the idea. Its for the remote/local setup. the masternodes would still do the mixing, authored by the local wallet. At least that my understanding of it.

1000 DRK, one masternode @illodin is right, the idea is to make it costly to run a masternode.

You'd still need 4000 DRK to run 4 MNs, just each 1000 in it's own addr 0.

Bit of a tradeoff security wise though, I prefer keeping my wallets separate, with separate passwords, in sepatate physical locations, with sepatate backups. Guarded by separate assault-crocodiles. Then again I'm both paranoid and inept.  

Wouldn't surprise me if eduffield made this possible weeks/months ago and just forgot to mention it to anyone.  

I thought each masternode needed it's own static ip

[coins101]

Bit of a tradeoff security wise though, I prefer keeping my wallets separate, with separate passwords, in separate physical locations, with separate backups. Guarded by separate assault-crocodiles. Then again I'm both paranoid and inept.  

I just have regular crocodiles. Where do you get them trained to become assault crocs? WI?

[thelonecrouton]

Does that mean we can run multiple masternodes from the same local wallet?

Dunno, but running multiple "nodes" from one wallet / computer kind of goes against the distributed mixing network idea. So I hope the answer is "no".

That is absolutely not the idea. Its for the remote/local setup. the masternodes would still do the mixing, authored by the local wallet. At least that my understanding of it.

1000 DRK, one masternode @illodin is right, the idea is to make it costly to run a masternode.

You'd still need 4000 DRK to run 4 MNs, just each 1000 in it's own addr 0.

Bit of a tradeoff security wise though, I prefer keeping my wallets separate, with separate passwords, in sepatate physical locations, with sepatate backups. Guarded by separate assault-crocodiles. Then again I'm both paranoid and inept.  

Wouldn't surprise me if eduffield made this possible weeks/months ago and just forgot to mention it to anyone.  

I thought each masternode needed it's own static ip

It still would have, this is for setups where the 1000 DRK MN balance is stored remotely, each MN still runs on a unique box/VM/IP

[GhostPlayer]

Ok, hold on, another idea.

Lets say 3 masternodes, 1 local wallet.

1) local wallet - address 0 -> 1k DRK -> Masternode 1 start -> close local wallet -> backup_wallet_MN1.dat -> cold storage
2) stop local daemon, delete local wallet.dat
3) start daemon -> address 0 -> 1k DRK -> Masternode 2 start -> close local wallet -> backup_wallet_MN2.dat -> cold storage
4) stop local daemon, delete local wallet.dat
5) etc etc...

 This should work too, right? Better even.

[thelonecrouton]

Bit of a tradeoff security wise though, I prefer keeping my wallets separate, with separate passwords, in separate physical locations, with separate backups. Guarded by separate assault-crocodiles. Then again I'm both paranoid and inept.  

I just have regular crocodiles. Where do you get them trained to become assault crocs? WI?

My regimen includes forced viewing of X Factor and daily injections of supplemental crocosterone, about 300mg/half-ton of bodymass.

[thelonecrouton]

Ok, hold on, another idea.

Lets say 3 masternodes, 1 local wallet.

1) local wallet - address 0 -> 1k DRK -> Masternode 1 start -> close local wallet -> backup_wallet_MN1.dat -> cold storage
2) stop local daemon, delete local wallet.dat
3) start daemon -> address 0 -> 1k DRK -> Masternode 2 start -> close local wallet -> backup_wallet_MN2.dat -> cold storage
4) stop local daemon, delete local wallet.dat
5) etc etc...

 This should work too, right? Better even.

That's basically the current procedure. Being able to hold all the MN balances in one wallet would save a little faffing about though.

[sylwt]

mark

[Kai Proctor]

Bit of a tradeoff security wise though, I prefer keeping my wallets separate, with separate passwords, in separate physical locations, with separate backups. Guarded by separate assault-crocodiles. Then again I'm both paranoid and inept.  

I just have regular crocodiles. Where do you get them trained to become assault crocs? WI?

My regimen includes forced viewing of X Factor and daily injections of supplemental crocosterone, about 300mg/half-ton of bodymass.

Mine are in very cold storage and guarded by :