Pale Phoenix
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:11:02 AM |
|
I think it's because everyone who is having no problems has less than 900DRK in their wallet.
That could be. I've been testing with 100DRK moving between wallets. I'll transfer a few thousand from the stable wallet and see what happens.
|
|
|
|
Ozziecoin
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:12:38 AM |
|
So basically what is happening is that all of his MN payments are going to a Personal Wallet instead of his MN wallet?
Nice trick. Would simplify splitting MN income.
|
|
|
|
camosoul
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:13:21 AM |
|
This is a total clusterfuck and so far I get blank stares or told I'm lying.
It just keeps NOT doing 8 rounds, doing 1 instead, then starting over and charing me fees again... Eventually, the wallet will be empty from fees.
I had the exact same issue I kept getting hit with denominate fees. Upon installing .31 it stopped. I'm using .31 I think it's because everyone who is having no problems has less than 900DRK in their wallet. Mine is broken up and denomed only 900 at a time, and it never does the 8 like it's set to do. It does 1. Then starts all over again.... Sorry, but you are not giving out the details we need to troubleshoot. Can you please post a screenshot of your: * transaction tab * inputs tab(using list view) * your main tab showing anonymized / non anonymized. * Link to the Pastebin of your debug.log * Your options window Make sure you blur out any addresses / info you dont want us to see though. I posted it in IRC and sent it to evan. PMed it to some people... Told me it's shopped, lols. Yeah, I'm totally making this shit up... These are a little old now, but they reflect the issue. Look up the incoming TX on chainz... It looks like it's been denomed, but my client just isn't interpreting it correctly......
|
. .OROCOIN. ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ | | █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ | | █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ | | █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ |
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:14:42 AM |
|
um, how did this happen? after opening up .31 stable wallet for the first time, I notice that somehow I got paid three times for mining? I'm not a miner, there's no way this wallet mined any coins.... (click to view the image) Do you own a MasterNode - because they look like MN payments and if not - What are TX id's? this wallet is not used for a masternode and doesn't have 1,000 coins. since I'm sort of a noob, I hesitate to put info like transaction ids on here for people to look at... Is this yours ? XhsXZYxpuKGYC7pRZRkusdbTSJ7DWZek7z How did you make your cold wallet ? dumpprivkey ? validateaddress is the command to check if the address is in your wallet . that's the address that two of the payments were sent from, yes. how did you know? yea, is there anything wrong with using dumpprivkey? edit: I just got another 0.5 DRK mining payment! haha this is awesome! my wallet's balance is 0.0 DRK and 0.5 DRK immature. where are these payments coming from? Haha, the network thinks your wallet is a masternode. A very lucky one too. well that's good news for me I guess, but bad news for Darkcoin if the mining network can be exploited.... I'll happily take some free coins until they fix it though!! Xvw9pkaz4h54L8m6w6ZmpuFWWuX2m2aaQG XseDD7DrLzQGpWLJS1BDcVPrFAkH1ej22N Is this yours ? no If XhsXZYxpuKGYC7pRZRkusdbTSJ7DWZek7z is yours, the address is linked to XseDD7DrLzQGpWLJS1BDcVPrFAkH1ej22N . https://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/tx.dws?474721.htmXseDD7DrLzQGpWLJS1BDcVPrFAkH1ej22N is a masternode. So basically what is happening is that all of his MN payments are going to a Personal Wallet instead of his MN wallet? I think we squashed this bug once in testnet. Anyway I will report.
|
|
|
|
Ozziecoin
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:23:13 AM |
|
Camo, looks like denom is happening but your wallet is not recording the denom rounds.
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:23:30 AM |
|
um, how did this happen? after opening up .31 stable wallet for the first time, I notice that somehow I got paid three times for mining? I'm not a miner, there's no way this wallet mined any coins.... (click to view the image) Do you own a MasterNode - because they look like MN payments and if not - What are TX id's? this wallet is not used for a masternode and doesn't have 1,000 coins. since I'm sort of a noob, I hesitate to put info like transaction ids on here for people to look at... Is this yours ? XhsXZYxpuKGYC7pRZRkusdbTSJ7DWZek7z How did you make your cold wallet ? dumpprivkey ? validateaddress is the command to check if the address is in your wallet . that's the address that two of the payments were sent from, yes. how did you know? yea, is there anything wrong with using dumpprivkey? edit: I just got another 0.5 DRK mining payment! haha this is awesome! my wallet's balance is 0.0 DRK and 0.5 DRK immature. where are these payments coming from? Haha, the network thinks your wallet is a masternode. A very lucky one too. well that's good news for me I guess, but bad news for Darkcoin if the mining network can be exploited.... I'll happily take some free coins until they fix it though!! Xvw9pkaz4h54L8m6w6ZmpuFWWuX2m2aaQG XseDD7DrLzQGpWLJS1BDcVPrFAkH1ej22N Is this yours ? no If XhsXZYxpuKGYC7pRZRkusdbTSJ7DWZek7z is yours, the address is linked to XseDD7DrLzQGpWLJS1BDcVPrFAkH1ej22N . https://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/tx.dws?474721.htmXseDD7DrLzQGpWLJS1BDcVPrFAkH1ej22N is a masternode. So basically what is happening is that all of his MN payments are going to a Personal Wallet instead of his MN wallet? Nice trick. Would simplify splitting MN income. If that is the case then he has not only admitted to dumping DRK as soon as he get's it. But he comes in here to try to make it look like DRK is broken. More fucking BULLSHIT from the FUCKING peanut gallery - nice try kid. Well I think he can't admit, his wallet. Actually he found a bug. In testnet, payment was fixed to vout[0] address and fixed. This one was paid to vin[0].
|
|
|
|
Ozziecoin
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:26:24 AM |
|
Should transact fee be -0.0125 or -0.00125? Seems like its 5 cents per round now at -0.0125.
|
|
|
|
sharkbyte093
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:27:32 AM |
|
Should transact fee be -0.0125 or -0.00125? Seems like its 5 cents per round now at -0.0125.
Nvm.
|
|
|
|
camosoul
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:28:29 AM |
|
Camo, looks like denom is happening but your wallet is not recording the denom rounds.
That's what I'm suspecting now... I figured out what was wrong earlier when it made no goddamn sense at all, and you're not going to believe this shit... I was being man-in-the-middled and fed a fake blockchain. Soon as I enabled tor proxying, this is the only problem I have. Now, name an entity that would be able to intercept explicitly DRK protocol data and send counterfeit data in it's place, no matter how many times I release and renew my IP, or reset it completely... My ISP. And why the hell would my ISP want to do that? Perhaps, being coerced to do so, or worse, handing off control to another party... Now who would they want to do that for? traceroute. Yup. These IPs are nothing like what I recoded last month...
|
. .OROCOIN. ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ | | █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ | | █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ | | █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ |
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:28:46 AM |
|
Should transact fee be -0.0125 or -0.00125? Seems like its 5 cents per round now at -0.0125.
Darksend : 0.0125 Denom : 0.001
|
|
|
|
onetime
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:29:25 AM |
|
um, how did this happen? after opening up .31 stable wallet for the first time, I notice that somehow I got paid three times for mining? I'm not a miner, there's no way this wallet mined any coins.... (click to view the image) Do you own a MasterNode - because they look like MN payments and if not - What are TX id's? this wallet is not used for a masternode and doesn't have 1,000 coins. since I'm sort of a noob, I hesitate to put info like transaction ids on here for people to look at... Is this yours ? XhsXZYxpuKGYC7pRZRkusdbTSJ7DWZek7z How did you make your cold wallet ? dumpprivkey ? validateaddress is the command to check if the address is in your wallet . that's the address that two of the payments were sent from, yes. how did you know? yea, is there anything wrong with using dumpprivkey? edit: I just got another 0.5 DRK mining payment! haha this is awesome! my wallet's balance is 0.0 DRK and 0.5 DRK immature. where are these payments coming from? Haha, the network thinks your wallet is a masternode. A very lucky one too. well that's good news for me I guess, but bad news for Darkcoin if the mining network can be exploited.... I'll happily take some free coins until they fix it though!! Xvw9pkaz4h54L8m6w6ZmpuFWWuX2m2aaQG XseDD7DrLzQGpWLJS1BDcVPrFAkH1ej22N Is this yours ? no edit: yesIf XhsXZYxpuKGYC7pRZRkusdbTSJ7DWZek7z is yours, the address is linked to XseDD7DrLzQGpWLJS1BDcVPrFAkH1ej22N . https://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/tx.dws?474721.htmXseDD7DrLzQGpWLJS1BDcVPrFAkH1ej22N is a masternode. So basically what is happening is that all of his MN payments are going to a Personal Wallet instead of his MN wallet? damn it! yea, that address is one of my MNs, so I'm not getting extra coins for free. but this wallet (with 0 balance) never imported that MN's key. did something weird happen when I tried using darksend yesterday after having sent coins to this wallet from the MN wallet? what if I send somebody else coins and then they use darksend, will there be a danger of all my masternode payments going straight to them?? If that is the case then he has not only admitted to dumping DRK as soon as he get's it. But he comes in here to try to make it look like DRK is broken. More fucking BULLSHIT from the FUCKING peanut gallery - nice try kid. I sold the 3 DRK as soon as I got them, yes. you have a problem with that? if a masternode payment gets sent to a wallet with 0 balance, there's something weird going on. if DRK is "broken" you're god damn right I'm going to tell people, not keep it a secret. I absolutely want Darkcoin to succeed, I want it to be flawless and robust. peanut gallery bullshit? wtf??
|
|
|
|
Ozziecoin
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:32:53 AM |
|
Camo, looks like denom is happening but your wallet is not recording the denom rounds.
That's what I'm suspecting now... I figured out what was wrong earlier when it made no goddamn sense at all, and you're not going to believe this shit... I was being man-in-the-middled and fed a fake blockchain. Soon as I enabled tor proxying, this is the only problem I have. Now, name an entity that would be able to intercept explicitly DRK protocol data and send counterfeit data in it's place, no matter how many times I release and renew my IP, or reset it completely... My ISP. And why the hell would my ISP want to do that? Perhaps, being coerced to do so, or worse, handing off control to another party... Now who would they want to do that for? traceroute. Yup. These IPs are nothing like what I recoded last month... That's pretty crazy stuff there. Would be interested in follow up.
|
|
|
|
Ozziecoin
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:33:51 AM |
|
Should transact fee be -0.0125 or -0.00125? Seems like its 5 cents per round now at -0.0125.
Darksend : 0.0125 Denom : 0.001 Well, looks to me like denom was costing camo -0.0125. Maybe I read that wrong.
|
|
|
|
placebo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:36:07 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
stealth923
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:37:27 AM |
|
Should transact fee be -0.0125 or -0.00125? Seems like its 5 cents per round now at -0.0125.
Darksend : 0.0125 Denom : 0.001 Well, looks to me like denom was costing camo -0.0125. Maybe I read that wrong. Darksend Denominate was costing me 0.0125 each time for my 8 rounds worth
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:38:02 AM |
|
Camo, looks like denom is happening but your wallet is not recording the denom rounds.
That's what I'm suspecting now... I figured out what was wrong earlier when it made no goddamn sense at all, and you're not going to believe this shit... I was being man-in-the-middled and fed a fake blockchain. Soon as I enabled tor proxying, this is the only problem I have. Now, name an entity that would be able to intercept explicitly DRK protocol data and send counterfeit data in it's place, no matter how many times I release and renew my IP, or reset it completely... My ISP. And why the hell would my ISP want to do that? Perhaps, being coerced to do so, or worse, handing off control to another party... Now who would they want to do that for? traceroute. Yup. These IPs are nothing like what I recoded last month... Denomination is a tx to split. After that Darksend is done by connecting selected Masternode directely. My masternode guide limit concurrent connection from a ip to 2. That might be a problem.
|
|
|
|
camosoul
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:38:07 AM |
|
Camo, looks like denom is happening but your wallet is not recording the denom rounds.
That's what I'm suspecting now... I figured out what was wrong earlier when it made no goddamn sense at all, and you're not going to believe this shit... I was being man-in-the-middled and fed a fake blockchain. Soon as I enabled tor proxying, this is the only problem I have. Now, name an entity that would be able to intercept explicitly DRK protocol data and send counterfeit data in it's place, no matter how many times I release and renew my IP, or reset it completely... My ISP. And why the hell would my ISP want to do that? Perhaps, being coerced to do so, or worse, handing off control to another party... Now who would they want to do that for? traceroute. Yup. These IPs are nothing like what I recoded last month... That's pretty crazy stuff there. Would be interested in follow up. For all of TOR's faults, I find a lot of use for it... It tunnels end to end like VPN, but obfuscated as it goes. Nobody knows where I am pulling now, so they can't fake my chain data. Maybe they can traffic analyze, but I'm not using it to hide like that... It's awesome for TORifying server services, too. sshd listens to local port and only renzdevous with a specific .onion that I have never published. And, it's also port-knocked. It's difficult to prove my server is even working, or exists, much less try to brute-force your way into a service you can't talk to without the .onion.... People who mock TOR aren't really trying that hard to see what it can be used for...
|
. .OROCOIN. ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ | | █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ | | █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ | | █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ |
|
|
|
shojayxt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1001
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:39:51 AM |
|
Should transact fee be -0.0125 or -0.00125? Seems like its 5 cents per round now at -0.0125.
Darksend : 0.0125 Denom : 0.001 Well, looks to me like denom was costing camo -0.0125. Maybe I read that wrong. It cost me 0.125 as well for a total of 0.356 drk to denominate a measly 17.999 DRK. Kind of expensive don't you think. And if denom is supposed to be .001 then why is it .0125 for some users? Another bug? Here's a screenshot. And no it's not photoshopped.
|
|
|
|
|
placebo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:42:51 AM |
|
Yes, those numbers are not really correct
|
|
|
|
|