[NEM] NEM -New Economy Movement - No Envy Movement - Updates+Discussion thread

[gd_kuaile]

NEM to da moon..

[Schultereisen]

Hello all!
I suggest using this logo for NEM. This is not a coin, it is necessary to deviate from a circular shape.

YES!!

looks good!

[snr]

ournem.com is now online!

[randombit]

Hello Nemunity,  this is my suggestion for a NEM LOGO,

i created it last night, maybe you like it. All colours can be changed.



@randombit

http://www.bildercache.de/bild/20140221-180553-357.png

Please klick link to see it in full size.

Greetings

[EvilDave]

Just thought I'd show my face around here.......sorry I haven't been all that active since the start-up, but it looks like u guys are doing fine without me.  

So: hi, guys, keep up the good work!

[erkki12]

2Kool4Skewl is trying his best to destroy NEM,see
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=448643.msg5246728#msg5246728
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=446175.msg5240892#msg5240892

Direct quote from 2kool4skewl (link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=446175.msg5240892#msg5240892):

No, there is no conspiracy.  Nem's whole concept is ridiculous.  Even its slogan was copied from Nxt.  It claims it is a "new economic movement", but they got that concept from my quote about Nxt being "not just another cryptocurrency, but a movement".  Nxt is the true "new economic movement".

It claims it is a "no envy movement", but the only reason it exists is for people to try to replicate Nxt's monetary success.

Nem's distribution is highly concentrated.  Currently, Nxt is even more distributed than Bitcoin.

Everyone who is "investing in Nem" is wasting their money imo, but people can make their own decision.

That's it for me with 2kool4skewl. You know before I wrote that he would be a valuable member to this community, but it's time to face facts: 2kool4skewl is denouncing NEM in many threads. After this he can not just simply say that he was only questioning NEM. He is trying to make it look bad!

I want him removed as a stakeholder. There can not possibly be any value in having a stakeholder among us who is going around and telling people that NEM is a waste of money and that it is created only by envious people trying to feed their greed.

Now I am suggesting a democratic vote on behalf of the community to remove 2kool4skewl from the stakeholder list. This will end any possible accusations made against Utopian future for removing 2kool4skewl about him being a dictator. The community has the right to remove members that it does not want to have!

You can vote about him being a member of the community here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=480290.0

The vote will be open for the next 3 days. After this the community will have made it's decision, no matter the result of the vote.

[TechKing]

ournem.com is now online!

got it, thanks.

[pheromone]

2Kool4Skewl is trying his best to destroy NEM,see
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=448643.msg5246728#msg5246728
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=446175.msg5240892#msg5240892

Direct quote from 2kool4skewl (link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=446175.msg5240892#msg5240892):

No, there is no conspiracy.  Nem's whole concept is ridiculous.  Even its slogan was copied from Nxt.  It claims it is a "new economic movement", but they got that concept from my quote about Nxt being "not just another cryptocurrency, but a movement".  Nxt is the true "new economic movement".

It claims it is a "no envy movement", but the only reason it exists is for people to try to replicate Nxt's monetary success.

Nem's distribution is highly concentrated.  Currently, Nxt is even more distributed than Bitcoin.

Everyone who is "investing in Nem" is wasting their money imo, but people can make their own decision.

That's it for me with 2kool4skewl. You know before I wrote that he would be a valuable member to this community, but it's time to face facts: 2kool4skewl is denouncing NEM in many threads. After this he can not just simply say that he was only questioning NEM. He is trying to make it look bad!

I want him removed as a stakeholder. There can not possibly be any value in having a stakeholder among us who is going around and telling people that NEM is a waste of money and that it is created only by envious people trying to feed their greed.

Now I am suggesting a democratic vote on behalf of the community to remove 2kool4skewl from the stakeholder list. This will end any possible accusations made against Utopian future for removing 2kool4skewl about him being a dictator. The community has the right to remove members that it does not want to have!

You can vote about him being a member of the community here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=480290.0

The vote will be open for the next 3 days. After this the community will have made it's decision, no matter the result of the vote.

I think his opinion should not in any way effect his stake in NEM development. Just because someone doesn't like the company, it didn't mean they cannot own/purchase any shares. What he did is part of the ecosystem, even in an organization you can find someone highly negativity still working in it. Because they have interest, awe, doesn't have choices, don't want to be left behind. Whatever the reasons, I think he/she should be entitled to their opinion regardless of their stake. It's just a tiny %, and is good for marketing too.  

Btw, not everything he/she said is true. As utopianfuture said, at this moment, NEM system is totally rewrite from scratch and will includes many other functions that other crypto don't have. So...

[ashapasa]

2Kool4Skewl is trying his best to destroy NEM,see
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=448643.msg5246728#msg5246728
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=446175.msg5240892#msg5240892

Direct quote from 2kool4skewl (link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=446175.msg5240892#msg5240892):

No, there is no conspiracy.  Nem's whole concept is ridiculous.  Even its slogan was copied from Nxt.  It claims it is a "new economic movement", but they got that concept from my quote about Nxt being "not just another cryptocurrency, but a movement".  Nxt is the true "new economic movement".

It claims it is a "no envy movement", but the only reason it exists is for people to try to replicate Nxt's monetary success.

Nem's distribution is highly concentrated.  Currently, Nxt is even more distributed than Bitcoin.

Everyone who is "investing in Nem" is wasting their money imo, but people can make their own decision.

That's it for me with 2kool4skewl. You know before I wrote that he would be a valuable member to this community, but it's time to face facts: 2kool4skewl is denouncing NEM in many threads. After this he can not just simply say that he was only questioning NEM. He is trying to make it look bad!

I want him removed as a stakeholder. There can not possibly be any value in having a stakeholder among us who is going around and telling people that NEM is a waste of money and that it is created only by envious people trying to feed their greed.

Now I am suggesting a democratic vote on behalf of the community to remove 2kool4skewl from the stakeholder list. This will end any possible accusations made against Utopian future for removing 2kool4skewl about him being a dictator. The community has the right to remove members that it does not want to have!

You can vote about him being a member of the community here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=480290.0

The vote will be open for the next 3 days. After this the community will have made it's decision, no matter the result of the vote.

This is not good, yes he is a troll, but he is also a stakeholder. We don't have the right to remove him, if he wants to stay. You are trying to set a dangerous precedent, once we vote out one member it becomes really easy to vote out a second and then a third. We will be endorsing mob rule and I dont want that. Its not about that jerk, its about the values of this movement.

[patmast3r]

2Kool4Skewl is trying his best to destroy NEM,see
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=448643.msg5246728#msg5246728
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=446175.msg5240892#msg5240892

Direct quote from 2kool4skewl (link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=446175.msg5240892#msg5240892):

No, there is no conspiracy.  Nem's whole concept is ridiculous.  Even its slogan was copied from Nxt.  It claims it is a "new economic movement", but they got that concept from my quote about Nxt being "not just another cryptocurrency, but a movement".  Nxt is the true "new economic movement".

It claims it is a "no envy movement", but the only reason it exists is for people to try to replicate Nxt's monetary success.

Nem's distribution is highly concentrated.  Currently, Nxt is even more distributed than Bitcoin.

Everyone who is "investing in Nem" is wasting their money imo, but people can make their own decision.

That's it for me with 2kool4skewl. You know before I wrote that he would be a valuable member to this community, but it's time to face facts: 2kool4skewl is denouncing NEM in many threads. After this he can not just simply say that he was only questioning NEM. He is trying to make it look bad!

I want him removed as a stakeholder. There can not possibly be any value in having a stakeholder among us who is going around and telling people that NEM is a waste of money and that it is created only by envious people trying to feed their greed.

Now I am suggesting a democratic vote on behalf of the community to remove 2kool4skewl from the stakeholder list. This will end any possible accusations made against Utopian future for removing 2kool4skewl about him being a dictator. The community has the right to remove members that it does not want to have!

You can vote about him being a member of the community here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=480290.0

The vote will be open for the next 3 days. After this the community will have made it's decision, no matter the result of the vote.

This is not good, yes he is a troll, but he is also a stakeholder. We don't have the right to remove him, if he wants to stay. You are trying to set a dangerous precedent, once we vote out one member it becomes really easy to vote out a second and then a third. We will be endorsing mob rule and I dont want that. Its not about that jerk, its about the values of this movement.

Yeah that's a good point
The more fuzz you guys make about this the more it's going to harm NEM.
Let's just move on.

[ashapasa]

 

[Thingamajig]

This is not good, yes he is a troll, but he is also a stakeholder. We don't have the right to remove him, if he wants to stay. You are trying to set a dangerous precedent, once we vote out one member it becomes really easy to vote out a second and then a third. We will be endorsing mob rule and I dont want that. Its not about that jerk, its about the values of this movement.

Thing is, he's not even answering that question. Although i do agree with everything that you say.


But yes, certainly i'd much rather see us move on from this and pay him as little mind as possible. If he has valid contributions, i'd be all ears, otherwise he can continue his campaign of negativity without any further acknowledgement from me.

[ashapasa]

Please help promote NEM

Dear friends and fellow stakeholders,

Please help promote/support NEM by using your unused signature/tag space by using it to promote the NEM movement. It can easily be done and if we all do it, will be very good promotion for NEM. Each time anyone of posts anywhere in bitcointalk forum we will be promoting NEM too without any effort. It will only be effective if most of us start doing it , so please help NEM help yourself.

[ZeroTheGreat]

Just because someone doesn't like the company, it didn't mean they cannot own/purchase any shares.

It's always up to owner. But crypto - non-commercial structure, and owner can be considered as OP's (before code's published, community've almost nowhere to go, if they like concept, and sometime ago in Nxt BCNext held all power as well, besides full TF algo still don't revealed) and/or as community itself (like through Nxt-thread). Ofc, there's full-owning before launch and boundared owning after (correct "crystal palaces" in coredevs minds, common funds like in Nxt and so on).

[floriTor]

This is not good, yes he is a troll, but he is also a stakeholder. We don't have the right to remove him, if he wants to stay. You are trying to set a dangerous precedent, once we vote out one member it becomes really easy to vote out a second and then a third. We will be endorsing mob rule and I dont want that. Its not about that jerk, its about the values of this movement.

Yeah that's a good point
The more fuzz you guys make about this the more it's going to harm NEM.
Let's just move on.

Agree... He has an obvious conflict of interests and his opinion just reflect that. But, we will play his game if we continue reacting. Just, let's continue

[Chris001]

2Kool4Skewl is trying his best to destroy NEM,see
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=448643.msg5246728#msg5246728
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=446175.msg5240892#msg5240892

Direct quote from 2kool4skewl (link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=446175.msg5240892#msg5240892):

No, there is no conspiracy.  Nem's whole concept is ridiculous.  Even its slogan was copied from Nxt.  It claims it is a "new economic movement", but they got that concept from my quote about Nxt being "not just another cryptocurrency, but a movement".  Nxt is the true "new economic movement".

It claims it is a "no envy movement", but the only reason it exists is for people to try to replicate Nxt's monetary success.

Nem's distribution is highly concentrated.  Currently, Nxt is even more distributed than Bitcoin.

Everyone who is "investing in Nem" is wasting their money imo, but people can make their own decision.

That's it for me with 2kool4skewl. You know before I wrote that he would be a valuable member to this community, but it's time to face facts: 2kool4skewl is denouncing NEM in many threads. After this he can not just simply say that he was only questioning NEM. He is trying to make it look bad!

I want him removed as a stakeholder. There can not possibly be any value in having a stakeholder among us who is going around and telling people that NEM is a waste of money and that it is created only by envious people trying to feed their greed.

Now I am suggesting a democratic vote on behalf of the community to remove 2kool4skewl from the stakeholder list. This will end any possible accusations made against Utopian future for removing 2kool4skewl about him being a dictator. The community has the right to remove members that it does not want to have!

You can vote about him being a member of the community here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=480290.0

The vote will be open for the next 3 days. After this the community will have made it's decision, no matter the result of the vote.

Let's not do this. UP has already shown us the direction he wants to go with this. We should respect his decision.

2cool has to state that he still wants his stake, and he gets it.

We should not let 2school put us in a place where we go against a decision that was made by leadership. We need to support UPs decision!!

[contraband]

Let's not do this. UP has already shown us the direction he wants to go with this. We should respect his decision.

2cool has to state that he still wants his stake, and he gets it.

We should not let 2school put us in a place where we go against a decision that was made by leadership. We need to support UPs decision!!

YES TO THIS^^^

We have a leader, lets let him drive the car. As a matter of fact, you are grabing the wheel. Make suggestions but doing things like this will make us lose our way. We are going off the road here.

[lhuibin]

  ► NEW ECONOMY MOVEMENT ◄ 

100% built from scratch • revolutionary forging mechanism • fairly distributed

[anhonestman]

 

[lhuibin]

Is that right? my signature.