Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2018, 02:04:40 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.0  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 [697] 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 ... 1031 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] [MINT] Mintcoin (POS / 5%) [NO ICO] [Fair distro, community maintained]  (Read 1331426 times)
deadmanwalking
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 25, 2014, 12:18:29 AM
 #13921

Edit: Some of the other coin threads creep me out for real. I'm just gonna stick with Mint and our sane community.
You summed it up much better than I could. We have a sane community. Of course one part of this is that the price is low, but I expect the community will remain sane even when the price will rise.

I really like this community. It's friendly in the same vein as Doge, and we have an important cause that we stand for   http://mintcoinfund.org/

The spirit of this community will grow stronger as the price rises, and I'm looking forward to the days ahead.

171XPWLy36oDmQfMdnPYWHfQgkfRoYGjHd
1524794680
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524794680

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524794680
Reply with quote  #2

1524794680
Report to moderator
1524794680
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524794680

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524794680
Reply with quote  #2

1524794680
Report to moderator
1524794680
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524794680

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524794680
Reply with quote  #2

1524794680
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1524794680
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524794680

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524794680
Reply with quote  #2

1524794680
Report to moderator
1524794680
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524794680

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524794680
Reply with quote  #2

1524794680
Report to moderator
1524794680
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524794680

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524794680
Reply with quote  #2

1524794680
Report to moderator
rbizz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 211
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 25, 2014, 12:25:04 AM
 #13922

lol IconicExpert and Wolong should hang out and see who has the biggest inferiority complex.
atronite
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 319
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 25, 2014, 12:28:20 AM
 #13923

Edit: Some of the other coin threads creep me out for real. I'm just gonna stick with Mint and our sane community.
You summed it up much better than I could. We have a sane community. Of course one part of this is that the price is low, but I expect the community will remain sane even when the price will rise.

No shout out for Zeitcoin? Community there is great too. Tongue

Although seriously I wonder if that's the real reason why Zeit, ECC, Mint and others has so many sell walls now.

Anyways, I don't feel like reading 700 pages worth of threads. What's the deal with Mint and BC, and now WC? Seriously.

David Latapie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500


Monero Core Team


View Profile WWW
April 25, 2014, 12:42:48 AM
 #13924

Anyways, I don't feel like reading 700 pages worth of threads. What's the deal with Mint and BC, and now WC? Seriously.
To make it short (and possible not completely accurate):

1. IconicExpert was an MINT holder.
2. He became the BC CM. The more it went, the harsher he was against MINT, for no apparent reason (but he was not the only one).
3. The more BC grew in price, the more incontrollable he was (first exclamation marks, then bold, then caps, then huge caps, the red huge caps).
4. WC came in. First reaction was disdain.
5. Then BC started to fall down.
6. Now that the mirage of money (1 BC = 1 Lamborghini) started to disappear, the community started to regain some kind of critical thinking.
7. He was trapped in his role (and his complex of superiority)?
8. Then CINNI came in and rat4 (BC's original developper) helped CINNI. I would not be surprised if IconicExpert resents about rat4 being a "traitor".

Between 2 and 6, various MINT holders (me, gonzoucab, stormia, moderndezign) regularly posted on BC thread to enquire about some things, to try to tone down or to call for more courtesy.. and also to defend ourselves against BC trolls (some of them havng recently flip-floped, by the way). And today stormia hit the jackpot: IE boasted about manipulating MINT prices.

Correct me if I'm wrong in this summary.

Monero: the first crytocurrency to bring bank secrecy and net neutrality to the blockchain.HyperStake: pushing the limits of staking.
Reputation threadFree bitcoins: reviews, hints…: freebitco.in, freedoge.co.in, qoinpro
moderndezigns
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 25, 2014, 12:50:37 AM
 #13925

Anyways, I don't feel like reading 700 pages worth of threads. What's the deal with Mint and BC, and now WC? Seriously.
To make it short (and possible not completely accurate):

1. IconicExpert was an MINT holder
2. He became the BC CM. The more it went, the harsher he was against MINT, for no apparent reason (but he was not the only one).
3. The more BC grew in price, the more incontrollable he was (first exclamation marks, then bold, this caps, then huge caps, the red huge caps).
4. WC came in. First reaction was disdain
5. Then BC started to fall down.
6. Now that the mirage of money (1 BC = 1 Lamborghini) started to disappear, the community started to regain some kind of critical thinking
7. He was trapped in his role and is complex of superiority?
8. Then CINI came in and rat4 (BC's original developper) helped CINI. I would not be surprised if IconicExpert resents about rat4 being a "traitor"

Between 2 and 6, various MINT holders (me, gonzoucab, stormia, moderndezign) regularly posted on BC thread to enquire about some things, to try to tone down or to call for more courtesy.. and also to defend ourselves against BC trolls (some of them havng recently flip-floped, by the way). And today stormia hit the jackpot: IE boasted about manipulating MINT prices.

Correct me if I'm wrong in this summary.

Yup.. that's about the jist of it
moderndezigns
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 25, 2014, 12:52:58 AM
 #13926

DON'T FORGET TO JOIN THE THUNDERCLAP CAMPAIGN!






https://www.thunderclap.it/projects/10998-sonoma-county-redwood-reforest
Posted on: Today at 12


Please help support the Redwood Reforest thunderclap. This will help get information out to the public about some of The Mintcoin Funds short and log term goals
atronite
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 319
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 25, 2014, 12:58:04 AM
 #13927

Anyways, I don't feel like reading 700 pages worth of threads. What's the deal with Mint and BC, and now WC? Seriously.
To make it short (and possible not completely accurate):

1. IconicExpert was an MINT holder
2. He became the BC CM. The more it went, the harsher he was against MINT, for no apparent reason (but he was not the only one).
3. The more BC grew in price, the more incontrollable he was (first exclamation marks, then bold, this caps, then huge caps, the red huge caps).
4. WC came in. First reaction was disdain
5. Then BC started to fall down.
6. Now that the mirage of money (1 BC = 1 Lamborghini) started to disappear, the community started to regain some kind of critical thinking
7. He was trapped in his role and is complex of superiority?
8. Then CINI came in and rat4 (BC's original developper) helped CINI. I would not be surprised if IconicExpert resents about rat4 being a "traitor"

Between 2 and 6, various MINT holders (me, gonzoucab, stormia, moderndezign) regularly posted on BC thread to enquire about some things, to try to tone down or to call for more courtesy.. and also to defend ourselves against BC trolls (some of them havng recently flip-floped, by the way). And today stormia hit the jackpot: IE boasted about manipulating MINT prices.

Correct me if I'm wrong in this summary.

Seems like even in the crypto world, elites are already starting to appear, and they be fighting each other because ego, because testosterone, because greed.

This is the sort of madness that pervades the highest levels of power, but it's unfortunately a "bug" of human nature that can never truly be "patched" in the long term. But what ALSO makes us human is that if we become aware of such tendencies and problems, then we can go counter to our natural tendencies, given the will, strength and knowledge. Even so, our consciousness is but a tiny flashlight and in a very huge dark room that is our subconscious and human tendencies, and sometimes even that all-powerful light of humanity is not that bright.

Ximp
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250

CS Student - BC Logo Guy


View Profile
April 25, 2014, 02:39:13 AM
 #13928

Anyways, I don't feel like reading 700 pages worth of threads. What's the deal with Mint and BC, and now WC? Seriously.
To make it short (and possible not completely accurate):

1. IconicExpert was an MINT holder
2. He became the BC CM. The more it went, the harsher he was against MINT, for no apparent reason (but he was not the only one).
3. The more BC grew in price, the more incontrollable he was (first exclamation marks, then bold, this caps, then huge caps, the red huge caps).
4. WC came in. First reaction was disdain
5. Then BC started to fall down.
6. Now that the mirage of money (1 BC = 1 Lamborghini) started to disappear, the community started to regain some kind of critical thinking
7. He was trapped in his role and is complex of superiority?
8. Then CINI came in and rat4 (BC's original developper) helped CINI. I would not be surprised if IconicExpert resents about rat4 being a "traitor"

Between 2 and 6, various MINT holders (me, gonzoucab, stormia, moderndezign) regularly posted on BC thread to enquire about some things, to try to tone down or to call for more courtesy.. and also to defend ourselves against BC trolls (some of them havng recently flip-floped, by the way). And today stormia hit the jackpot: IE boasted about manipulating MINT prices.

Correct me if I'm wrong in this summary.


IconicExpert is not the BC CM in any official capacity. Soepkip is the CM. IconicExpert is simply a very vocal supporter of BlackCoin. Also, Rat4 is a great developer and has helped two PoS coins (Mint and Cinni) for free. Rat is a really cool guy! Carry on Smiley
mgburks77
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 25, 2014, 02:39:48 AM
 #13929

pffft those guys aren't "elite" nor do they have any power  Cool

they are a bunch of kids who think they are James Bond and shit
it was only a matter of time until that crashed and burned.
moderndezigns
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 25, 2014, 02:53:49 AM
 #13930

Anyways, I don't feel like reading 700 pages worth of threads. What's the deal with Mint and BC, and now WC? Seriously.
To make it short (and possible not completely accurate):

1. IconicExpert was an MINT holder
2. He became the BC CM. The more it went, the harsher he was against MINT, for no apparent reason (but he was not the only one).
3. The more BC grew in price, the more incontrollable he was (first exclamation marks, then bold, this caps, then huge caps, the red huge caps).
4. WC came in. First reaction was disdain
5. Then BC started to fall down.
6. Now that the mirage of money (1 BC = 1 Lamborghini) started to disappear, the community started to regain some kind of critical thinking
7. He was trapped in his role and is complex of superiority?
8. Then CINI came in and rat4 (BC's original developper) helped CINI. I would not be surprised if IconicExpert resents about rat4 being a "traitor"

Between 2 and 6, various MINT holders (me, gonzoucab, stormia, moderndezign) regularly posted on BC thread to enquire about some things, to try to tone down or to call for more courtesy.. and also to defend ourselves against BC trolls (some of them havng recently flip-floped, by the way). And today stormia hit the jackpot: IE boasted about manipulating MINT prices.

Correct me if I'm wrong in this summary.


IconicExpert is not the BC CM in any official capacity. Soepkip is the CM. IconicExpert is simply a very vocal supporter of BlackCoin. Also, Rat4 is a great developer and has helped two PoS coins (Mint and Cinni) for free. Rat is a really cool guy! Carry on Smiley

ya.. sure keep up with the Propaganda maybe someone will believe it
pristontale
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 25, 2014, 03:33:05 AM
 #13931

Hey everybody. I seem to have a problem with my wallet. I upgraded to the latest version (1.Cool and when I opened it, I saw that I zero coins. I have 350k mintcoins and I don't know what happened to them. Anyone know the solution to this? Thank you very much.
Which version did you upgrade from, 1.6 or 1.7? First backup your wallet.dat just in case.

Please open debug console (Help -> Debug Window -> Console), and run "checkwallet" to see what it returns. It may be related to that if your previous wallet was on a wrong fork. If it reports missing/extra coins, you can run "repairwallet" there and it will resync your wallet with the downloaded blockchain.


I upgraded from 1.5 to 1.8. I'm back to 1.5 again because i was hoping that I'd get my coins back if I returned to the old version. I ran "checkwallet" and got this response: {
"wallet check passed" : true
}. Kinda sucks that I lost all my coins for some unknown reason >.<


1.5 and 1.6 are following a wrong chain. 1.7 update was mandatory.

Now, you have a few options;

If you received your coins while on 1.5 ; the transaction should be confirmed on both chains. So your coins should still be available. To be sure you can check your address with the block explorer. But; if the person that sent you the coins was also on the wrong chain, and his transaction contained invalid coins, then that transaction was not included in the main chain, because the main chain would reject it as it is invalid in the first place. You should contact your payer, and request he updates his client, and pays you again. Because the coins were not sent in the first place (Even if he's using old client that follows a wrong chain; when he switches to the new version, he will see that the transaction was not accepted and his coins are still in his wallet)

If your received coins are there, but your minted coins are lost : This is normal as your client announced the transactions to the wrong chain. But your coinage is not lost in this case (because your stake was just denied, nothing changes in your accounts). Just wait until it creates coinstake again, and you will receive the same amount.




Welp. I don't have any of my coins anymore. Even at 1.5 I don't have the same address as before. I lost all my transaction history too. I have 0 coins now  Sad I only got my coins from mintpal and poloniex. I don't know if they'll give me coins again. Sigh. Such misfortune.

It really sounds like your wallet.dat file got deleted or overwritten.  You did back up before you upgraded your wallet right? I sure hope so.... BACKUP ALWAYS!!!
Restore the backed up wallet.dat to C:\Users\"YOURUSERNAME"\AppData\Roaming\MintCoin\

If you don't have the same address it means that the wallet.dat file is not the same one you sent the coins to. IMHO.

That's exactly what happened. Once I upgraded to 1.8 my previous wallet.dat file was overwritten for some reason. Right before I upgraded I had my coins... I have no idea what could have caused this. I've upgraded before and this never happened. I didn't back up my wallet, unfortunately. That's my fault.
coolbeans94
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 613
Merit: 500


Mintcoin: Get some


View Profile
April 25, 2014, 03:51:54 AM
 #13932

DON'T FORGET TO JOIN THE THUNDERCLAP CAMPAIGN!






https://www.thunderclap.it/projects/10998-sonoma-county-redwood-reforest
Posted on: Today at 12


Please help support the Redwood Reforest thunderclap. This will help get information out to the public about some of The Mintcoin Funds short and log term goals

+1

I agree. I believe Mintcoin could really be marketed very very well if we as a community focus our marketing efforts on the environmental aspect. We need to build Mintcoin's image around being the most energy efficient, green crypto, committed to environmental sustainability and pure humanitarian efforts. All Mintcoin marketing should focus on building the ambiance of environmental sustainability. - If Mintcoin does this, it will draw in the huge crowds of newcomers for the various environmental interests.

(1.) Moral happiness depends upon moral order.
(2.) Moral order depends upon the harmonious action of all our powers, as
individuals and as members of society.
moderndezigns
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 25, 2014, 03:54:16 AM
 #13933

Hey everybody. I seem to have a problem with my wallet. I upgraded to the latest version (1.Cool and when I opened it, I saw that I zero coins. I have 350k mintcoins and I don't know what happened to them. Anyone know the solution to this? Thank you very much.
Which version did you upgrade from, 1.6 or 1.7? First backup your wallet.dat just in case.

Please open debug console (Help -> Debug Window -> Console), and run "checkwallet" to see what it returns. It may be related to that if your previous wallet was on a wrong fork. If it reports missing/extra coins, you can run "repairwallet" there and it will resync your wallet with the downloaded blockchain.


I upgraded from 1.5 to 1.8. I'm back to 1.5 again because i was hoping that I'd get my coins back if I returned to the old version. I ran "checkwallet" and got this response: {
"wallet check passed" : true
}. Kinda sucks that I lost all my coins for some unknown reason >.<


1.5 and 1.6 are following a wrong chain. 1.7 update was mandatory.

Now, you have a few options;

If you received your coins while on 1.5 ; the transaction should be confirmed on both chains. So your coins should still be available. To be sure you can check your address with the block explorer. But; if the person that sent you the coins was also on the wrong chain, and his transaction contained invalid coins, then that transaction was not included in the main chain, because the main chain would reject it as it is invalid in the first place. You should contact your payer, and request he updates his client, and pays you again. Because the coins were not sent in the first place (Even if he's using old client that follows a wrong chain; when he switches to the new version, he will see that the transaction was not accepted and his coins are still in his wallet)

If your received coins are there, but your minted coins are lost : This is normal as your client announced the transactions to the wrong chain. But your coinage is not lost in this case (because your stake was just denied, nothing changes in your accounts). Just wait until it creates coinstake again, and you will receive the same amount.




Welp. I don't have any of my coins anymore. Even at 1.5 I don't have the same address as before. I lost all my transaction history too. I have 0 coins now  Sad I only got my coins from mintpal and poloniex. I don't know if they'll give me coins again. Sigh. Such misfortune.

It really sounds like your wallet.dat file got deleted or overwritten.  You did back up before you upgraded your wallet right? I sure hope so.... BACKUP ALWAYS!!!
Restore the backed up wallet.dat to C:\Users\"YOURUSERNAME"\AppData\Roaming\MintCoin\

If you don't have the same address it means that the wallet.dat file is not the same one you sent the coins to. IMHO.

That's exactly what happened. Once I upgraded to 1.8 my previous wallet.dat file was overwritten for some reason. Right before I upgraded I had my coins... I have no idea what could have caused this. I've upgraded before and this never happened. I didn't back up my wallet, unfortunately. That's my fault.

sorry to hear about this. whats your Mintcoin address?
moderndezigns
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 25, 2014, 03:56:23 AM
 #13934

DON'T FORGET TO JOIN THE THUNDERCLAP CAMPAIGN!






https://www.thunderclap.it/projects/10998-sonoma-county-redwood-reforest
Posted on: Today at 12


Please help support the Redwood Reforest thunderclap. This will help get information out to the public about some of The Mintcoin Funds short and log term goals

+1

I agree. I believe Mintcoin could really be marketed very very well if we as a community focus our marketing efforts on the environmental aspect. We need to build Mintcoin's image around being the most energy efficient, green crypto, committed to environmental sustainability and pure humanitarian efforts. All Mintcoin marketing should focus on building the ambiance of environmental sustainability. - If Mintcoin does this, it will draw in the huge crowds of newcomers for the various environmental interests.

I agree with you on this
Beaverslayer
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 230
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 25, 2014, 04:12:19 AM
 #13935

Hey everybody. I seem to have a problem with my wallet. I upgraded to the latest version (1.Cool and when I opened it, I saw that I zero coins. I have 350k mintcoins and I don't know what happened to them. Anyone know the solution to this? Thank you very much.
Which version did you upgrade from, 1.6 or 1.7? First backup your wallet.dat just in case.

Please open debug console (Help -> Debug Window -> Console), and run "checkwallet" to see what it returns. It may be related to that if your previous wallet was on a wrong fork. If it reports missing/extra coins, you can run "repairwallet" there and it will resync your wallet with the downloaded blockchain.


I upgraded from 1.5 to 1.8. I'm back to 1.5 again because i was hoping that I'd get my coins back if I returned to the old version. I ran "checkwallet" and got this response: {
"wallet check passed" : true
}. Kinda sucks that I lost all my coins for some unknown reason >.<


1.5 and 1.6 are following a wrong chain. 1.7 update was mandatory.

Now, you have a few options;

If you received your coins while on 1.5 ; the transaction should be confirmed on both chains. So your coins should still be available. To be sure you can check your address with the block explorer. But; if the person that sent you the coins was also on the wrong chain, and his transaction contained invalid coins, then that transaction was not included in the main chain, because the main chain would reject it as it is invalid in the first place. You should contact your payer, and request he updates his client, and pays you again. Because the coins were not sent in the first place (Even if he's using old client that follows a wrong chain; when he switches to the new version, he will see that the transaction was not accepted and his coins are still in his wallet)

If your received coins are there, but your minted coins are lost : This is normal as your client announced the transactions to the wrong chain. But your coinage is not lost in this case (because your stake was just denied, nothing changes in your accounts). Just wait until it creates coinstake again, and you will receive the same amount.




Welp. I don't have any of my coins anymore. Even at 1.5 I don't have the same address as before. I lost all my transaction history too. I have 0 coins now  Sad I only got my coins from mintpal and poloniex. I don't know if they'll give me coins again. Sigh. Such misfortune.

It really sounds like your wallet.dat file got deleted or overwritten.  You did back up before you upgraded your wallet right? I sure hope so.... BACKUP ALWAYS!!!
Restore the backed up wallet.dat to C:\Users\"YOURUSERNAME"\AppData\Roaming\MintCoin\

If you don't have the same address it means that the wallet.dat file is not the same one you sent the coins to. IMHO.

That's exactly what happened. Once I upgraded to 1.8 my previous wallet.dat file was overwritten for some reason. Right before I upgraded I had my coins... I have no idea what could have caused this. I've upgraded before and this never happened. I didn't back up my wallet, unfortunately. That's my fault.

sorry to hear about this. whats your Mintcoin address?


Yes, I as well am sorry to hear about this. Last night someone from who knows where just uped and sent me 4000 Mintcoins, PM me your wallet address and i will add those Mint to some more I have and send them to you to get you going again. It's kind of frowned on to post wallet addresses in posts on Bitcointalk, so a PM is best.
WALKEN-COIN
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 269
Merit: 250


Parsec Frontiers Pre-Sale 24.01.2018


View Profile WWW
April 25, 2014, 04:14:13 AM
 #13936

http://www.nation.co.ke/business/Deal-to-cut-cost-of-cash-transfer/-/996/2290770/-/5y68mbz/-/index.html

Who's gonna contact the Kenyan President and tell him about Mintcoin?

            ███
           ██▀██
          ██   ██
▄▄▄▄▄▄   ██     ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄       ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄    ▄▄▄▄▄
████████▄   ███    █████████▄   █████████  █████████▀  █████████
███   ▀██  █████   ███   ▀███  ████▀       ███        ███▀   ▀███
███   ▄█▀ ███▀███  ███   ▄███  ████▄▄▄     ███▄▄▄▄▄  ███       ▀
███████▀ ███   ███ ▀████████▀   ▀███████   ████████  ███
███▀▀▀  ███     ███ ▀█▀▀███     ▄   ▀▀███  ███       ███       ▄
███    ███       ███ ▀   ███   ███▄▄▄▄███  ███▄▄▄▄▄▄  ███▄   ▄███
███   ███ ▄█████▄ ███     ███  ▀███████▀   ██████████  █████████
                   ███                                   ▀▀▀▀▀
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄   ███  ▄▄▄▄       ▄▄▄     ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄       ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
███████████████████▄ ███ ▀██████    ████    █████████████████  ██████████  █████████▄   █████████
███        ███    ▀█▄ ███    ▀███   █████   ███    ███    ███  ███         ███   ▀███  ████▀
███        ███    ▄██  ███     ███  ██████  ███    ███    ███  ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄  ███   ▄███  ████▄▄▄
████████████████████▀ ▄ ███    ███  ███ ███ ███    ███    ███  ██████████  █████████▀   ▀███████
███▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███▀▀███   █▄ ███  ███   ███  ██████    ███    ███  ███         ███▀▀███     ▄   ▀▀███
███        ███   ███   █▄ ███ ▀█    ███   █████    ███    ███  ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄  ███   ███   ███▄▄▄▄███
███        ███    ███   ▀  ▀█▀      ███    ████    ███    ███  ██████████  ███    ███  ▀███████▀

    ███
    ███
███ ███ ███
    ▀▀▀  ██
███████████
██  ▄▄▄
███ ███ ███
    ▀▀▀  ██
███████████
██  ▄▄▄
███ ███ ███
    ███
    ███

    ███
    ███
███ ███ ███
██  ▀▀▀
███████████
    ▄▄▄  ██
███ ███ ███
██  ▀▀▀
███████████
    ▄▄▄  ██
███ ███ ███
    ███
    ███
[]
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
Discord
Facebook
Twitter
moderndezigns
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 25, 2014, 04:28:34 AM
 #13937

Hey everybody. I seem to have a problem with my wallet. I upgraded to the latest version (1.Cool and when I opened it, I saw that I zero coins. I have 350k mintcoins and I don't know what happened to them. Anyone know the solution to this? Thank you very much.
Which version did you upgrade from, 1.6 or 1.7? First backup your wallet.dat just in case.

Please open debug console (Help -> Debug Window -> Console), and run "checkwallet" to see what it returns. It may be related to that if your previous wallet was on a wrong fork. If it reports missing/extra coins, you can run "repairwallet" there and it will resync your wallet with the downloaded blockchain.


I upgraded from 1.5 to 1.8. I'm back to 1.5 again because i was hoping that I'd get my coins back if I returned to the old version. I ran "checkwallet" and got this response: {
"wallet check passed" : true
}. Kinda sucks that I lost all my coins for some unknown reason >.<


1.5 and 1.6 are following a wrong chain. 1.7 update was mandatory.

Now, you have a few options;

If you received your coins while on 1.5 ; the transaction should be confirmed on both chains. So your coins should still be available. To be sure you can check your address with the block explorer. But; if the person that sent you the coins was also on the wrong chain, and his transaction contained invalid coins, then that transaction was not included in the main chain, because the main chain would reject it as it is invalid in the first place. You should contact your payer, and request he updates his client, and pays you again. Because the coins were not sent in the first place (Even if he's using old client that follows a wrong chain; when he switches to the new version, he will see that the transaction was not accepted and his coins are still in his wallet)

If your received coins are there, but your minted coins are lost : This is normal as your client announced the transactions to the wrong chain. But your coinage is not lost in this case (because your stake was just denied, nothing changes in your accounts). Just wait until it creates coinstake again, and you will receive the same amount.




Welp. I don't have any of my coins anymore. Even at 1.5 I don't have the same address as before. I lost all my transaction history too. I have 0 coins now  Sad I only got my coins from mintpal and poloniex. I don't know if they'll give me coins again. Sigh. Such misfortune.

It really sounds like your wallet.dat file got deleted or overwritten.  You did back up before you upgraded your wallet right? I sure hope so.... BACKUP ALWAYS!!!
Restore the backed up wallet.dat to C:\Users\"YOURUSERNAME"\AppData\Roaming\MintCoin\

If you don't have the same address it means that the wallet.dat file is not the same one you sent the coins to. IMHO.

That's exactly what happened. Once I upgraded to 1.8 my previous wallet.dat file was overwritten for some reason. Right before I upgraded I had my coins... I have no idea what could have caused this. I've upgraded before and this never happened. I didn't back up my wallet, unfortunately. That's my fault.

sorry to hear about this. whats your Mintcoin address?


Yes, I as well am sorry to hear about this. Last night someone from who knows where just uped and sent me 4000 Mintcoins, PM me your wallet address and i will add those Mint to some more I have and send them to you to get you going again. It's kind of frowned on to post wallet addresses in posts on Bitcointalk, so a PM is best.

OK I didn't know this so Ditto
coolbeans94
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 613
Merit: 500


Mintcoin: Get some


View Profile
April 25, 2014, 04:34:24 AM
 #13938

Is there anyway we can get this post stickied on reddit by a mod? It is the Thunderclap link to to the Sonoma County Reforestation

http://www.reddit.com/r/MintCoin/comments/23ohw0/sonoma_county_thunderclap_campaign_is_now_active/

Also maybe is there a way to link the Thunderclap campaign on the Mintcoin Fund website?

(1.) Moral happiness depends upon moral order.
(2.) Moral order depends upon the harmonious action of all our powers, as
individuals and as members of society.
moderndezigns
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 25, 2014, 04:42:56 AM
 #13939

http://www.nation.co.ke/business/Deal-to-cut-cost-of-cash-transfer/-/996/2290770/-/5y68mbz/-/index.html

Who's gonna contact the Kenyan President and tell him about Mintcoin?

Thanks for the advise. I sent him a couple emails
Beaverslayer
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 230
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 25, 2014, 04:48:26 AM
 #13940


Isn't Konen from Twitter already over there?
Pages: « 1 ... 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 [697] 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 ... 1031 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!