Bitcoin Forum
September 29, 2020, 05:43:05 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.20.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 [30] 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 ... 121 »
  Print  
Author Topic: DefaultTrust changes  (Read 70331 times)
LeGaulois
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1752

Bitcoin Ninja Unregulated Banker Unbanking Folks


View Profile
January 14, 2019, 05:29:43 PM
 #581

@tmfp
I can "trust" a DT1 because I think he has good judgment but not his buddies added just for fun.
I can trust a user for money but that doesn't stop me from thinking that his judgment is borderline.
@Lauda @Dmrdmr
thanks a lot

1601358185
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1601358185

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1601358185
Reply with quote  #2

1601358185
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1601358185
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1601358185

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1601358185
Reply with quote  #2

1601358185
Report to moderator
1601358185
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1601358185

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1601358185
Reply with quote  #2

1601358185
Report to moderator
Coolcryptovator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1428


Need Campaign Manager? https://bit.ly/3eFIP1a


View Profile WWW
January 14, 2019, 05:31:13 PM
Last edit: January 14, 2019, 05:46:45 PM by Coolcryptovator
 #582

Just got more then what I expected. Surprised to see my name on DT1 final list. I will revise my custom list once again. I believe no one will misuse his/her feedback from my custom list. Almost them was DT2 from beginning except few. And obviously I will exclude from my trust list if I found any valid accusation against any of them.

I will try my best to prevent scam/abuse like I am doing from beginning. Since I am really very new on trust network especially on DT1, I am expecting all old and seniors DT will help me always same like before. Thanks to theymos and who have voted me for DT1. And I think this is the opportunity to prove myself and help reduce scam/abuse from forum.  

Congrats.. to all whoever on DT1 list. Let's work together to make a decent forum.  

Edit:
Just remember now one suggestion. I believe its applicable for all DT network.
My suggestion is for OP to grow a thicker skin about these things. 





.
.




░██████████████████░
████████████████████
█████████▀░░░███████
█████████░░▄████████
███████▀▀░░▀▀███████
███████▄▄░░▄▄███████
█████████░░█████████

█████████░░█████████

█████████▄▄█████████

████████████████████

░██████████████████░
░██████████████████░
████████████████████
████████████▀▀▀█▀███
███░▀█████▀░░░░░▀███
███▌░░░▀▀▀░░░░░░████
████▄░░░░░░░░░░░████
█████▀░░░░░░░░░█████

██████▄░░░░░▄▄██████

█████▄▄▄▄███████████

████████████████████

░██████████████████░
░██████████████████░
████████████████████
████████████████████
███████████▀▀░░▐████
███████▀▀░░░░░█████
████▀░░░▄█▀░░░▐█████
█████▄▄█▀░░░░░██████

███████▌▄▄▄▐██████

████████████████████

████████████████████

░██████████████████░
ibminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1513
Merit: 1818


Goonies never say die.


View Profile
January 14, 2019, 05:33:49 PM
 #583

Am I understanding the 'random subset of 100 users' statement correctly?... that we will ultimately end up with a DT1 list of 100, before exclusions, when more people fall into the criteria?

:-: Bitcointalk Public Information Project (BPIP) :-: New stats, new reports, new design, new parsers, and more!
Don't be obsessed with your desires. The Zen philosopher Basho once wrote, 'A flute with no holes, is not a flute... and a donut with no hole, is a Danish.' He was a funny guy.
Foxpup
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3052
Merit: 2020


Vile Vixen


View Profile
January 14, 2019, 05:38:04 PM
 #584

Whelp. Looks like I'm on DT2 now. Does that mean all the merit beggars I negged for shadily propositioning me (and failing at it) are going to be out for my blood? (And also cryptohunter, who can't seem to stop chasing my tail for some reason, and who is no doubt going to somehow integrate this new development into the existing foxhole butt-sniffing pussy-petting conspiracy/orgy that I could never keep track of.)

Guess this is my life now: youtube.com/watch?v=316AzLYfAzw Undecided

Will pretend to do unspeakable things (while actually eating a taco) for bitcoins: 1K6d1EviQKX3SVKjPYmJGyWBb1avbmCFM4
I am not on the scammers' paradise known as Telegram! Do not believe anyone claiming to be me off-forum without a signed message from the above address! Accept no excuses and make no exceptions!
Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2660
Merit: 2643


Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do


View Profile WWW
January 14, 2019, 05:39:18 PM
 #585

Am I understanding the 'random subset of 100 users' statement correctly?... that we will ultimately end up with a DT1 list of 100, before exclusions, when more people fall into the criteria?
I think so? Theymos needs to add some of the newer vital information into the first post.

Whelp. Looks like I'm on DT2 now. Does that mean all the merit beggars I negged for shadily propositioning me (and failing at it) are going to be out for my blood? (And also cryptohunter, who can't seem to stop chasing my tail for some reason, and who is no doubt going to somehow integrate this new development into the existing foxhole butt-sniffing pussy-petting conspiracy/orgy that I could never keep track of.)
That is correct. Welcome to the club. Actually, I will probably recruit you into the Cult of Lauda too. Wink
actmyname
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890
Merit: 2168


Ennui for the many


View Profile WWW
January 14, 2019, 05:48:00 PM
Merited by OgNasty (1), redsn0w (1), Anduck (1)
 #586

It's a good thing that there are way more DT members. This incentivizes users to properly develop their own trust list rather than stumbling on a path of lunacy as we have scores of users sloshing about the feedback sewers. Beyond that, the value of DT has been diluted immensely and thus reliance upon it as a proper vector for trust isn't the most brilliant idea.

Anduck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1505
Merit: 1070


quack


View Profile
January 14, 2019, 05:53:08 PM
 #587

Beyond that, the value of DT has been diluted immensely and thus reliance upon it as a proper vector for trust isn't the most brilliant idea.

An important thing to realize here is that it never really was a good idea to rely on DT. It was just a perceived view of a trust, not too well aligned with reality. There had been many scammers in the DT, so how trustable was it after all? So many reasons why relying solely on DT was and remains to be a bad idea.
It's just more obvious now why relying on DT is a bad idea, but DT still has use cases due to this forums nature of e.g. not moderating scams.

Edit: reworded etc.

OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3416
Merit: 2009


I 💚 Bitcoin


View Profile
January 14, 2019, 05:55:26 PM
 #588

Beyond that, the value of DT has been diluted immensely and thus reliance upon it as a proper vector for trust isn't the most brilliant idea.

An important thing to realize here is that it never really was a good idea to rely on DT. It was just a perceived view of a trust. There were many scammers in the DT, so how trusted was it after all? So many reasons why relying on a DT was and remains to be a bad idea.
It's just more obvious now why relying on DT is a bad idea.

I think the % of scammers on DT went up dramatically with this new system, but it’s still early. I’m sure at some point things will work themselves out and this will be a positive for everyone. If not, it definitely encourages people to rely on their own lists, so mission accomplished.

Anduck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1505
Merit: 1070


quack


View Profile
January 14, 2019, 05:58:51 PM
Last edit: January 14, 2019, 06:15:32 PM by Anduck
 #589

Beyond that, the value of DT has been diluted immensely and thus reliance upon it as a proper vector for trust isn't the most brilliant idea.

An important thing to realize here is that it never really was a good idea to rely on DT. It was just a perceived view of a trust. There were many scammers in the DT, so how trusted was it after all? So many reasons why relying on a DT was and remains to be a bad idea.
It's just more obvious now why relying on DT is a bad idea.

I think the % of scammers on DT went up dramatically with this new system, but it’s still early. I’m sure at some point things will work themselves out and this will be a positive for everyone. If not, it definitely encourages people to rely on their own lists, so mission accomplished.

My point is that this new DT perceived trustworthiness is better aligned with real trustworthiness. (Regardless of real trustworthiness being low or high).

theymos
Administrator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3892
Merit: 7919


View Profile
January 14, 2019, 06:01:28 PM
 #590

Am I understanding the 'random subset of 100 users' statement correctly?... that we will ultimately end up with a DT1 list of 100, before exclusions, when more people fall into the criteria?

Once there's more than 100 users who would be selected to DT1, a random subset of those eligible will be selected each month. Or that's my current thinking, at least.

This will help prevent people from being unfairly attacked by even a majority of DT1, since some month you might lose the dice roll and find yourself in the minority for a while. As I mentioned in the OP, it creates more of a credible threat of retaliation, which I believe will have a moderating effect overall.

It's a good thing that there are way more DT members. This incentivizes users to properly develop their own trust list rather than stumbling on a path of lunacy as we have scores of users sloshing about the feedback sewers. Beyond that, the value of DT has been diluted immensely and thus reliance upon it as a proper vector for trust isn't the most brilliant idea.

Yes, that's my intention. Once someone thinks, "DT is basically OK, but it's a bit chaotic, and every now and then I see something that I disagree with," then they've graduated from trust-newbie and are ready to build their own list. The old system was too safe/static/universal/untouchable.

(But I don't want DT to be absolute garbage, either, since trust-newbies need some guidance.)

1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3416
Merit: 2009


I 💚 Bitcoin


View Profile
January 14, 2019, 06:03:13 PM
 #591

Beyond that, the value of DT has been diluted immensely and thus reliance upon it as a proper vector for trust isn't the most brilliant idea.

An important thing to realize here is that it never really was a good idea to rely on DT. It was just a perceived view of a trust. There were many scammers in the DT, so how trusted was it after all? So many reasons why relying on a DT was and remains to be a bad idea.
It's just more obvious now why relying on DT is a bad idea.

I think the % of scammers on DT went up dramatically with this new system, but it’s still early. I’m sure at some point things will work themselves out and this will be a positive for everyone. If not, it definitely encourages people to rely on their own lists, so mission accomplished.

My point is that this new DT perceived trustworthiness is better aligned with real trustworthiness.

I disagree, but I have no desire to sling mud as I’ve already made my opinions on certain users and events known. Ultimately, it’s just a rating system. If it makes more people happy than it does upset, which it appears to, then it’s hard to not see it as a success for the forum.  

bill gator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 1042



View Profile
January 14, 2019, 06:04:30 PM
Merited by OgNasty (1)
 #592

The New DT2, as we know is constantly shifting and changing. Definitely too early to start drawing conclusions, in my opinion, as people are still scrambling to update their list to be more appropriate for the changed system. For example, I was on DT2 this morning and now I am no longer on DT2 at the time of writing this; give it some time for the dust to settle before formulating judgement based on who is currently in DT.

We've had dozens of people in and out of DT within the past couple of days and I doubt the current users are going to be the same users tomorrow.

A lot of people are being forced to rethink the way they structure their custom trust lists, then rethink them again and then realize someone they thought was their friend actually excludes them. Something we can all relate to is volatility, and all I can say is buckle up.
Jet Cash
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 2032


https://fittotalk.com/english-talk/


View Profile WWW
January 14, 2019, 06:09:12 PM
 #593

Whelp. Looks like I'm on DT2 now.

Well don't blame me - I put you on my trust list before all this happened.
I put TMAN on there as well, but only because I don't want him calling me a Flash Cunt.

GuardPets.com - guard pets are more than just dogs - this is my latest "domains for Bitcoin" project.
r1s2g3
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 392


I am alive but in hibernation.


View Profile
January 14, 2019, 06:14:48 PM
 #594

Just got more then what I expected. Surprised to see my name on DT1 final list. I will revise my custom list once again. I believe no one will misuse his/her feedback from my custom list. Almost them was DT2 from beginning except few.

Congrats buddy. You deserved it.  I have no idea that my wish can come true so soon.


I will like to see you in DT as well.


Congrats to everybody who got in DT1/DT2.

I am alive
bill gator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 1042



View Profile
January 14, 2019, 06:21:24 PM
 #595

Just started to paint the farmers account

In my opinion, the way you leave trust ratings shouldn't change depending on your inclusion of exclusion from Default Trust. That would seem to be an indication of exactly the kind of user I wouldn't want in DT. What makes you all of the sudden want to go around tagging people that you otherwise wouldn't? What is stopping you from continuing to tag people that you believe should be tagged? DT comes with more problems than perks, don't be upset.
DdmrDdmr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 4244


There are lies, damned lies and statistics. MTwain


View Profile WWW
January 14, 2019, 06:25:57 PM
 #596

I’ve just posted on another thread on some concerns on how red-tagged accounts may vary in accordance to the monthly DT composition from a user’s perspective, and if that could lead to a red-tagged account being so one month, but off the hook the next (if accordance to DT composition).

<…> Once the account has been flagged as a bought account, it becomes worthless. <...>
I’ve been wondering if all the DT changes that are now taking place could have an on/off reading of red trust. I mean if people are now encouraged to create their own Trust lists (the vast majority won’t), and assuming a Campaign Manager decides to do so, the trust scores he will see (numbers on the user profile) will vary from that of the DT vision. One could, under the DT vision, have red trust and not under a specific Custom Trust List, or vice-versa.
One can always switch to see the DT view on a given profile (by adding ;dt to the URL), but the more the customized Trust lists extend, the more visions of the Trust numbers do we have on the forum.

The Feedback also I figure can change from the Trusted Feedback list to the Untrusted Feedback list, or vice-versa. If DT1 composition (the integrating DT members) changes noticeable from month to month, I think this could be somewhat a feature. Default Trust colours and numbers were rather stable until now on a tagged account, but I wonder if making the system rather dynamic will have weird side-effects such as the above hypothesized.

Can the above happen, or have I misinterpreted something here?


LFC_Bitcoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 3740


One of the world's leading Bitcoin-powered casinos


View Profile
January 14, 2019, 06:26:32 PM
Last edit: January 14, 2019, 06:38:23 PM by LFC_Bitcoin
 #597

I'm honoured and surprised that I have become a DT1. Thank you for the promotion.

You probably deserve it Jet Cash. You put a lot of time & effort into this place, I guess that hasj’t gone unnoticed & your name now resides amongst the forums big hitters.

You’re in my trust list, not that it’s a great feat but yes, well deserved.

Use your new found authority well my friend Smiley

bones261
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1823



View Profile
January 14, 2019, 06:28:00 PM
Merited by Alex_Sr (1)
 #598

I was on the DT2 list for a very short time. Just started to paint the farmers account - immediately disappeared from the list (probably due to the fact that dropped TheFuzzStone)  Cry

I hope this doesn't discourage you from continuing to leave valuable trust feedback. The lesson that I have learned is that making valuable trust feedback matters even if you are not on DT1 or DT2.
TMAN
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 1805


Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do


View Profile WWW
January 14, 2019, 06:33:27 PM
Merited by bones261 (1), Coolcryptovator (1), Alex_Sr (1)
 #599

I was on the DT2 list for a very short time. Just started to paint the farmers account - immediately disappeared from the list (probably due to the fact that dropped TheFuzzStone)  Cry

Added you in under me man, you should be on DT

███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
████████▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀████████
██████▀▄██▀▀▄▄ ████▄▀██████
█████ ███ ████ ▀▀████ █████
████ █████ ███▀▀▀▄████ ████
████ ███▀▀▀▄▄▄████████ ████
████ ██▄▄▀▀███████▀▄▄█ ████
█████ █████ █▀██▀▄███ █████
██████▄▀███▀▄█▀▄███▀▄██████
████████▄▄▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▄▄████████
██████████▀▄███████████████
██████████████████████████
.
.FORTUNEJACK   JOIN INVINCIBLE JACKMATE AND WIN......10 BTC........
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
██████▀▀▀       ▀▀▀██████
█████  ▄▄▄█████▄▄▄  █████
█████  █████ █████  █████
█████  ██▄     ▄██  █████
█████  ████   ████  █████
█████▄  ██▄▄█▄▄██  ▄█████
██████▄  ███████  ▄██████
███████▄   ▀▀▀   ▄███████
██████████▄▄ ▄▄██████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
.
..
Alex_Sr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 938


HOLD BITCOIN! Fiat - SCAM!


View Profile WWW
January 14, 2019, 06:36:06 PM
 #600

I was on the DT2 list for a very short time. Just started to paint the farmers account - immediately disappeared from the list (probably due to the fact that dropped TheFuzzStone)  Cry

Added you in under me man, you should be on DT

Unexpectedly! And very nice! Thank you man!


░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄▄▄
░░░░▄██████████▄
░░░██████████████
░░██████▐▌██████
█████░░░░░░░▀█████
██████▄▄░░▄▄░░██████
████████░░▀▀▄██████
████████░░▄▄▄░░█████
██████▀▀░░▀▀▀░░█████
█████░░░░░░░░█████
░░██████▐▌██████
░░░██████████████
░░░░▀██████████▀
░░░░░░░▀▀▀▀▀▀
░░░
||
|
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 [30] 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 ... 121 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!