Bitcoin Forum
August 25, 2019, 11:45:12 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 [46] 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 »
  Print  
Author Topic: DefaultTrust changes  (Read 47784 times)
cryptohunter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1155

MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG


View Profile
January 29, 2019, 05:54:39 PM
 #901

I don’t think you can give negative trust to yourself.
Shorena's rating on me is fake and a result of him working with you for many years prior to any of this. Going through all his ratings (many of which are effectively useless) has given me more information about the history. Kiss


Really. That sounds a lot like you, tman and owlcatz giving me fake red trust. We all know how you 3 like to extort work together under cover.

I have proof you have nothing.

Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1566776712
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1566776712

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1566776712
Reply with quote  #2

1566776712
Report to moderator
1566776712
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1566776712

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1566776712
Reply with quote  #2

1566776712
Report to moderator
owlcatz
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1224


BTC, XMR & VIA FTW


View Profile WWW
January 29, 2019, 05:57:26 PM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1)
 #902

I don’t think you can give negative trust to yourself.
Shorena's rating on me is fake and a result of him working with you for many years prior to any of this. Going through all his ratings (many of which are effectively useless) has given me more information about the history. Kiss


Really. That sounds a lot like you, tman and owlcatz giving me fake red trust. We all know how you 3 like to extort work together under cover.

I have proof you have nothing.

You are fucking delusional. You earned those ratings you wackjob fuck.

Also, you have nothing, no proof of shit - because nothing ever happened, you fool. Roll Eyes

Anyone use coinsource lately???

What? Wrong thread, knucklehead.... Roll Eyes
OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3010
Merit: 1709


I 💚 Bitcoin


View Profile
January 29, 2019, 06:57:12 PM
 #903

You are fucking delusional. You earned those ratings you wackjob fuck.

Also, you have nothing, no proof of shit - because nothing ever happened, you fool.

Your new DT1 member folks!  This site is slowly turning into a home for 4chan rejects.

cryptohunter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1155

MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG


View Profile
January 29, 2019, 07:08:45 PM
Last edit: January 29, 2019, 08:06:27 PM by cryptohunter
 #904

I don’t think you can give negative trust to yourself.
Shorena's rating on me is fake and a result of him working with you for many years prior to any of this. Going through all his ratings (many of which are effectively useless) has given me more information about the history. Kiss


Really. That sounds a lot like you, tman and owlcatz giving me fake red trust. We all know how you 3 like to extort work together under cover.

I have proof you have nothing.

You are fucking delusional. You earned those ratings you wackjob fuck.

Also, you have nothing, no proof of shit - because nothing ever happened, you fool. Roll Eyes

Anyone use coinsource lately???

What? Wrong thread, knucklehead.... Roll Eyes

I am referring to the FACT that I have PROOF lauda is a liar. I have PROOF that  lauda left me red trust (after calling me a liar 3x and could never produce any evidence)  after I said that  if he called me a liar again without evidence I would encourage people to review his post history where I can PROVE that he was a LIAR.

That is called evidence and proof.  Do you wish me to present it again.

I have PROOF tman himself admitted giving me red trust for presenting those FACTS.

You owlcatz the 3rd member of the extortion undercover agents scheme lol  gave me red trust for that same facts based post.

Now please stop trying to say that I am insane because I can present facts that you DT members do not want known.

It is simply called presenting the TRUTH.

Now stop diverting and trying to hide the FACTS by calling me crazy. Sorry but it does not change the FACT that those are observable events that took place.

I do not trust any of you and I will not accept red trust for presenting facts regarding your prior wrong doing.  That is total and utter abuse of what DT was intended for.

TECSHARE
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2968
Merit: 1395


First Exclusion Ever


View Profile WWW
January 29, 2019, 07:50:50 PM
 #905

You are fucking delusional. You earned those ratings you wackjob fuck.

Also, you have nothing, no proof of shit - because nothing ever happened, you fool.

Your new DT1 member folks!  This site is slowly turning into a home for 4chan rejects.

I prefer to describe this forum as 4chan with an extensive research library.

THIS SPACE FOR RENT  Did I post something you found helpful? Send me a tip: 1Hz3HZT4v8qxtyYiRQ66UHTUSK3dKCnVMW
owlcatz
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1224


BTC, XMR & VIA FTW


View Profile WWW
January 29, 2019, 09:38:53 PM
 #906

You are fucking delusional. You earned those ratings you wackjob fuck.

Also, you have nothing, no proof of shit - because nothing ever happened, you fool.

Your new DT1 member folks!  This site is slowly turning into a home for 4chan rejects.



BTW, what is 4chan? I only know reddit. Grin
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1988
Merit: 1928


How much alt coin diversification is needed? 0%?


View Profile
January 29, 2019, 09:49:20 PM
Merited by Coin-1 (1), KingZee (1)
 #907

You are fucking delusional. You earned those ratings you wackjob fuck.

Also, you have nothing, no proof of shit - because nothing ever happened, you fool.

Your new DT1 member folks!  This site is slowly turning into a home for 4chan rejects.

I prefer to describe this forum as 4chan with an extensive research library.

I am not sure if I understand the 4chan reference, at all.

Is there some kind of implication that 4chan is an out of control (or wild and unwieldy) place in part due to its size?  And therefore the changes to this forum's trust system has moved this forum in that chaotic and wild direction?

At this point, I see the changes in DT to be causing: 1) more input from regular members regarding which members might get on DT1 (specifically through the weighted merit voting), which thereafter affects DT2 and subsequent DT layers and 2) a likely expansion to the number of members who are on DT1 (and by implication increasing the number of members on DT2 and subsequent DT layers - moving more members up to higher levels of DT).

So, in that regard, if I am correct in my above guess about what OgNasty and you mean to imply by the 4chan comment, then there could be some truth to your statement that this forum is moving more in a direction of a more dispersed power structure, yet there seems to be some attempts at systemizing this place in a kind of way that attempts to organize the chaos and therefore the changes to DT may not go so far as having the level of chaos that is implied by OgNasty's above quoted (and seemingly exaggerated) attempted comparison about the current situation.

By the way, to me, it seems that sometimes strong comments and perhaps harsh language might be needed and useful in order to clearly and unambiguously make certain points.

Put BTC here: 35EVP8EePt8dyvKHaB7bXaRmKLm22YgRCA

How much alt coin diversification is necessary? if you are investing in Bitcoin, then perhaps 0%?
KingZee
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 419


Check your coin privilege


View Profile
January 29, 2019, 10:01:11 PM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1)
 #908


I am not sure if I understand the 4chan reference, at all.

Is there some kind of implication that 4chan is an out of control (or wild and unwieldy) place in part due to its size?  And therefore the changes to this forum's trust system has moved this forum in that chaotic and wild direction?

At this point, I see the changes in DT to be causing: 1) more input from regular members regarding which members might get on DT1 (specifically through the weighted merit voting), which thereafter affects DT2 and subsequent DT layers and 2) a likely expansion to the number of members who are on DT1 (and by implication increasing the number of members on DT2 and subsequent DT layers - moving more members up to higher levels of DT).

So, in that regard, if I am correct in my above guess about what OgNasty and you mean to imply by the 4chan comment, then there could be some truth to your statement that this forum is moving more in a direction of a more dispersed power structure, yet there seems to be some attempts at systemizing this place in a kind of way that attempts to organize the chaos and therefore the changes to DT may not go so far as having the level of chaos that is implied by OgNasty's above quoted (and seemingly exaggerated) attempted comparison about the current situation.

By the way, to me, it seems that sometimes strong comments and perhaps harsh language might be needed and useful in order to clearly and unambiguously make certain points.

Calling it chaos is a bit out of touch. If the DT member fills this criteria :

Quote
I will periodically (maybe every month) be reconstructing the default trust list to include everyone who matches these criteria:
 - If rank was determined solely using earned merit, then you must be of at least Member rank.
 - You must have been online sometime within the last 3 days.
 - Your trust list must include at least 10 users, not including ~distrust entries.
 - You must not be banned or manually blacklisted from selection.
 - You must have posted sometime within the last 30 days.
 - You must have at least 10 people directly trusting you each with an earned merit of at least 10, not including merit you yourself sent. These "votes" are limited.
 - You must have at least 2 people directly trusting you with an earned merit of at least 250, not including merit you yourself sent. These "votes" are limited.


Then it's safe to say that the included users at least have some basic understanding of the forum rules, etiquette, and the fact that they are trusted by a handful of others means they at least managed to convince a small group to include them.

Let's say that this list includes 50 users, the fact that they fill the criteria means they won't think in the detriment of the forums to purposely create chaos, simply for their own sake. They ARE trusted members after all.

So in the end, disagreements will only come out of conflicting subjective opinions on other users. Is it chaos? No. It's decentralization. If half the default trust or more agrees that X is good or bad, and IF all their opinions are their own, then the trust system is working great, and that user is objectively judged by the network.

Any attempt at monitoring, investigating, modifying, or judging a DT member's choices by other members, creates room for manipulation. It's not an attempt at organizing it, it's an attempt at centralizing it.

marlboroza
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1606

clown car member


View Profile
January 29, 2019, 11:21:52 PM
 #909

You are fucking delusional. You earned those ratings you wackjob fuck.

Also, you have nothing, no proof of shit - because nothing ever happened, you fool.

Your new DT1 member folks!  This site is slowly turning into a home for 4chan rejects.

Oh, please! Don't make me start...



Quote
WHY DON'T I JUST USE BITCOIN SAVINGS & TRUST?
You should.  pirateat40 is a great asset to the community and if you have the BTC to establish an account, a current member willing to refer you, and are willing to wait for your invite, please do.

OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3010
Merit: 1709


I 💚 Bitcoin


View Profile
January 29, 2019, 11:31:43 PM
 #910

By the way, to me, it seems that sometimes strong comments and perhaps harsh language might be needed and useful in order to clearly and unambiguously make certain points.

Where that line is drawn is up to the community, and I like that.  I can accept currently the view is that unprofessionally battering users with harsh language is acceptable among those we wish to be pillars of the community.  I'm not sure that the majority is currently represented accurately and change is made by voicing opinions.  I'd like to believe a majority of this forum would think the below quoted feedback should be considered unacceptable standards for the DT network.  The below was left because I asked another user a question and gave examples of why I asked the question.

Quote from: owlcatz left trust rating
More made up fucking lies and bullshit by this serial scammer with no life who thinks he's a fucking speech pattern expert like his window-licking sidekick Quickscammer.

Keep it up green faggot... Just keep it up.... You will fall from grace someday.... Grin


Oh, please! Don't make me start...

You want to blame me for pirateat40?  Get real.  This is the sort of ignorant nonsense that amazes me and why intelligent members who have been around for a long time are valuable, while members who came years later showing themselves as susceptible to believing wrong information getting into positions of trust is dangerous.  I'm the only person who insured against pirateat40's exit and paid out everyone.  No other person involved lived up to their promises and that was what, like 4 years before you discovered Bitcoin?

suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2044
Merit: 3838


Pedal-powered plaguebot


View Profile
January 29, 2019, 11:58:13 PM
 #911

Where that line is drawn is up to the community, and I like that.  I can accept currently the view is that unprofessionally battering users with harsh language is acceptable among those we wish to be pillars of the community.  I'm not sure that the majority is currently represented accurately and change is made by voicing opinions.

As opposed to sleazy backroom threats that you prefer? I'll take owl's foul language any day.

You, St. Nasty, are in no position to judge. Lovely contradiction though. Community draws the line but the current line is not accurate... I bet it would become accurate as soon as you find yourself in DT again.

OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3010
Merit: 1709


I 💚 Bitcoin


View Profile
January 30, 2019, 12:11:13 AM
 #912

As opposed to sleazy backroom threats that you prefer? I'll take owl's foul language any day.

You, St. Nasty, are in no position to judge. Lovely contradiction though. Community draws the line but the current line is not accurate... I bet it would become accurate as soon as you find yourself in DT again.

I point out bad behavior and then the crew comes out to get me.  Typical...  Always trying to bury legitimate concerns as quickly as possible...  It would take a lot more than just me being included in the DT network to bring the DT ratings up to my standards of accurate.  That's why custom trust networks are encouraged in the first place.  You shouldn't be threatened by me wanting a certain level of professionalism in Bitcointalk's default trust network.  I imagine many users want that.

marlboroza
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1606

clown car member


View Profile
January 30, 2019, 12:14:22 AM
 #913

This is the sort of ignorant nonsense that amazes me and why intelligent members who have been around for a long time are valuable, while members who came years later showing themselves as susceptible to believing wrong information getting into positions of trust is dangerous.
Interesting choice of words.

Investing investment in obvious ponzi. That is what you did. You don't have problem with that but you seems have problem when people say that out loud.

pirateat40 offered 7% weekly, or, 30% monthly, rumor says you arranged higher returns:
Quote
HOW CAN YOU PAY MONTHLY INTEREST ON DEPOSITS?
I am running a pass-through operation for pirateat40's Bitcoin Savings & Trust for lenders looking to receive interest on their BTC.  I receive a higher interest rate from BS&T and I pass a portion of that to lenders as a monthly interest payment.
So you returned all deposits, payed 8-10-12% monthly interest, reserve funds ( 2.5%? ). Well done on that, it was pure luck that ponzi scammer sent deposit back.

What happened to remaining interest? Smiley
that was what, like 4 years before you discovered Bitcoin?
Yep, you got me.

I point out bad behavior and then the crew comes out to get me.
Oh, OGNasty is allowed to point out "bad behavior" but others are not.

OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3010
Merit: 1709


I 💚 Bitcoin


View Profile
January 30, 2019, 12:28:10 AM
 #914

Oh, OGNasty is allowed to point out "bad behavior" but others are not.

You don't even know what you're talking about...  Spreading lies that you weren't involved with, before you discovered Bitcoin, is the only way I'm aware of you.  I insured against deposits and then paid out what I insured them for in the face of everyone else walking away from their commitments.  That is good behavior.  You not being able to judge the difference is only evidence you don't belong in a position to judge trust.  My post quoted below is a valid one about professionalism as it pertains to the subject at hand and shouldn't be buried with off topic nonsense.  


By the way, to me, it seems that sometimes strong comments and perhaps harsh language might be needed and useful in order to clearly and unambiguously make certain points.

Where that line is drawn is up to the community, and I like that.  I can accept currently the view is that unprofessionally battering users with harsh language is acceptable among those we wish to be pillars of the community.  I'm not sure that the majority is currently represented accurately and change is made by voicing opinions.  I'd like to believe a majority of this forum would think the below quoted feedback should be considered unacceptable standards for the DT network.  The below was left because I asked another user a question and gave examples of why I asked the question.

Quote from: owlcatz left trust rating
More made up fucking lies and bullshit by this serial scammer with no life who thinks he's a fucking speech pattern expert like his window-licking sidekick Quickscammer.

Keep it up green faggot... Just keep it up.... You will fall from grace someday.... Grin


Oh, please! Don't make me start...

You want to blame me for pirateat40?  Get real.  This is the sort of ignorant nonsense that amazes me and why intelligent members who have been around for a long time are valuable, while members who came years later showing themselves as susceptible to believing wrong information getting into positions of trust is dangerous.  I'm the only person who insured against pirateat40's exit and paid out everyone.  No other person involved lived up to their promises and that was what, like 4 years before you discovered Bitcoin?

marlboroza
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1606

clown car member


View Profile
January 30, 2019, 12:31:33 AM
 #915

You don't even know what you're talking about...  I insured against deposits and then paid out what I insured them for in the face of everyone else walking away from their commitments.  That is good behavior.  You not being able to judge the difference is only evidence you don't belong in a position to judge trust.  My post quoted below is a valid one about professionalism as it pertains to the subject at hand and shouldn't be buried with off topic nonsense. 
And my post above yours, where I mentioned that you invested investments in obvious ponzi is also valid post.
Quote
What happened to remaining interest?  Smiley

suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2044
Merit: 3838


Pedal-powered plaguebot


View Profile
January 30, 2019, 12:33:20 AM
 #916

I point out bad behavior and then the crew comes out to get me.  Typical...  Always trying to bury legitimate concerns as quickly as possible...  It would take a lot more than just me being included in the DT network to bring the DT ratings up to my standards of accurate.  That's why custom trust networks are encouraged in the first place.  You shouldn't be threatened by me wanting a certain level of professionalism in Bitcointalk's default trust network.  I imagine many users want that.

No, I'm not threatened by your high horseshit, nor am I impressed by your victim card. As I said, I trust owl's direct if somewhat NSFW prose much more than your fake public displays of righteousness. I wouldn't be surprised if you're actually sufficiently deluded to believe that "many users" prefer your "standards" and "professionalism" of using DT to adjudicate your personal quarrels. To each their own.

JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1988
Merit: 1928


How much alt coin diversification is needed? 0%?


View Profile
January 30, 2019, 12:34:14 AM
 #917

that was what, like 4 years before you discovered Bitcoin?
Yep, you got me.

I find the longevity dynamic in bitcoin to be interesting, as well.  Even though I recognize some utility in non-bitcoin projects, frequently I am skeptical about why, frequently, they need their own tokens and cannot merely just build upon bitcoin rather than fragmenting into some separate money printing project.

There seems to be an ongoing mixed bag of outcomes regarding longevity of members, and of course, the very oldest of forum members would have only been involved in bitcoin because bitcoin was largely the ONLY game in town, yet merely being an "oldtimer" does not seem to immune folks from ending up on the scamming side of the ledger, whether there was a long con involved or if merely the short-term opportunity to scam presents itself.

Surely, longevity can allow opportunities to build credibility, yet for scammers to be shown by their behaviors in certain opportunistic situations, regarding which shit projects they end up pumping and whether or not they know those projects to be shit.

Put BTC here: 35EVP8EePt8dyvKHaB7bXaRmKLm22YgRCA

How much alt coin diversification is necessary? if you are investing in Bitcoin, then perhaps 0%?
OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3010
Merit: 1709


I 💚 Bitcoin


View Profile
January 30, 2019, 12:41:46 AM
 #918

As I said, I trust owl's direct if somewhat NSFW prose much more than your fake public displays of righteousness. I wouldn't be surprised if you're actually sufficiently deluded to believe that "many users" prefer your "standards" and "professionalism" of using DT to adjudicate your personal quarrels. To each their own.

It's funny that you think my personality equates to "fake public displays of righteousness" instead of me just being a genuinely honest person who wants to see other honest people do well.  Given all the good I've worked almost daily to do here for nearly a decade now, if you still hold that opinion it says more about you than me.

I don't believe trust ratings like the below that use a slur like "faggot" have any place in the DT network.  Convince me I'm wrong.

Quote from: owlcatz left trust rating
Keep it up green faggot...


suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2044
Merit: 3838


Pedal-powered plaguebot


View Profile
January 30, 2019, 12:55:20 AM
 #919

As I said, I trust owl's direct if somewhat NSFW prose much more than your fake public displays of righteousness. I wouldn't be surprised if you're actually sufficiently deluded to believe that "many users" prefer your "standards" and "professionalism" of using DT to adjudicate your personal quarrels. To each their own.

It's funny that you think my personality equates to "fake public displays of righteousness" instead of me just being a genuinely honest person who wants to see other honest people do well.  Given all the good I've worked almost daily to do here for nearly a decade now, if you still hold that opinion it says more about you than me.

I've seen enough of your "personality" in the off-forum chatrooms, PMs, and other places where you think nobody is watching. You're not a genuinely honest person by a long shot. Genuinely honest people don't do go around threatening others like that. Also - genuinely honest people typically don't feel that much need to espouse their own good deeds. Usually those speak for themselves.

marlboroza
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1606

clown car member


View Profile
January 30, 2019, 12:59:14 AM
 #920

I noticed OGNasty edited post with this line:

Spreading lies that you weren't involved with, before you discovered Bitcoin, is the only way I'm aware of you.

http://web.archive.org/web/20140429234623/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=75843.0
http://web.archive.org/web/20140429234523/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=75843.20
http://web.archive.org/web/20140429234619/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=75843.40
http://web.archive.org/web/20140429234549/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=75843.60

Now, imagine I am someone who discovered bitcoin in 2011. and point me lies.

post number #23   Cheesy

Quote
What happened to remaining interest? Smiley

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 [46] 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!