DefaultTrust changes

[Lauda]

BitcoinTalk Rules = are you and your words only?

Yes, theymos is my master and I created a cult.

Hi

my question: may need to prohibit the registration of names like this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2526482

Already DefaultTrust (22). Nevermind, this doesn't work (tested by creating my own account prefixed; sorry theymos you will have to kill them). I agree that he should prohibit '~' + existing username (PM sent).

[1714237172]

1714237172

[1714237172]

1714237172

[1714237172]

1714237172

[1714237172]

1714237172

[1714237172]

1714237172

[S_Therapist]

ps: Perhaps a thread with recommendations will be useful to many users

The trust system is here for almost 5 years, afaik and you are here for 1 year almost.
Everything can be found here if you use search option and will get a better result if you use google for searching.

[asche]

Damn, I'm found out. While personally training Lauda in the dark arts of forum moderation, we fell deeply in love. I couldn't bear to see her endure the torture of trust drama while doing unspeakable deeds for me, so I invented this complicated algorithm as an excuse to add her back in even though I could've just unilaterally added her to DT at any second. Truly, my cowardice knows no bounds.

All I see is the confirmation Lauda is a she.

[Slow death]

Damn, I'm found out. While personally training Lauda in the dark arts of forum moderation, we fell deeply in love. I couldn't bear to see her endure the torture of trust drama while doing unspeakable deeds for me, so I invented this complicated algorithm as an excuse to add her back in even though I could've just unilaterally added her to DT at any second. Truly, my cowardice knows no bounds.

All I see is the confirmation Lauda is a she.

[marlboroza]

~

Please add reference links to all your negative ratings.

~

Report correct post(you will figure which one) to moderator. Write this in comment: "Selling Serbian documents is illegal".

~

No one here should take advice from account farmer, bounty abuser and deep onion shill.

[Slow death]

~

Report correct post(you will figure which one) to moderator. Write this in comment: "Selling Serbian documents is illegal".

Done, the guy sells everything, maybe one day he will sell his own family

[Alex_Sr]

~

Please add reference links to all your negative ratings.

Thank you for correcting me! I'm not experienced yet, but I'm learning fast!

Done! All negative ratings now with links!

[DarkStar_]

...
taikuri13 - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1855828 | some random who sent 16 positive trusts today, with no previous feedbacks left
...

DarkStar_ 
we know each other a little bit, I translated your thread into Russian.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5047016.0 (Original topic: Overview of Bitcoin Accepting Sportsbooks (with margin/house edge comparisons))

I've never left a review on this forum.
If I did something wrong, tell me.

My feedback to people I have known for more than six months.
Yes, they write in Russian.

My list includes a moderator, experts who help forum participants, people who investigate fraud.

If you've been helping xtraelv with investigations and plan on leaving negative trusts, that's fine with me. I've removed you from my suggested exclusions list after xtraelv stated it.
It's just a bit unusual for someone to not leave a single trust rating, and all of a sudden leave 16 on the day they were added to DT2.

You might be confusing trust list with trust feedback too. You don't have to leave someone trust feedback if you want to add them to your trust list.

[taikuri13]

...
If you've been helping xtraelv with investigations and plan on leaving negative trusts, that's fine with me. I've removed you from my suggested exclusions list after xtraelv stated it.
It's just a bit unusual for someone to not leave a single trust rating, and all of a sudden leave 16 on the day they were added to DT2.

You might be confusing trust list with trust feedback too. You don't have to leave someone trust feedback if you want to add them to your trust list.

Yeah, I was able to figure it out.
And I understood my mistake.

I deleted 10 feedbacks.
Now I understand that every feedback from DT2 participants is a big responsibility.

ps: I have helped and will continue to help xtraelv regardless of whether I am at DT2 or not.

[The Cryptovator]

Since lot of new face on DT network, I am expecting a suggestion's/motivational post from old DT members. To be honest lot of here even don't know where should leave what kind of feedback. So if there is few suggestion's then we can learn from it especially who is totally new.   

[Lauda]

Since lot of new face on DT network, I am expecting a suggestion's/motivational post from old DT members. To be honest lot of here even don't know where should leave what kind of feedback. So if there is few suggestion's then we can learn from it especially who is totally new.   

Here's some quick advice:
1) For positive feedback: Be very conservative.
2) For negative feedback: Be strict and follow the general standards (what we tag for and what we don't tag for).
3) For trust lists: Not that important unless you are DT1, but I'd say be even more conservative than 1).

[OgNasty]

Well, we almost made it a week with the new trust system before newly appointed DT members were connected to a large scam (>$70,000)...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5097164.0

20 BTC jackpot not paid out to a user playing by the rules. DT member wearing a paid signature from the accused scam site rushing to defend it in spite of having the exact opposite opinion on previous similar cases.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Now I understand that every feedback from DT2 participants is a big responsibility.

That's what all new DT2 members need to know, and they need to be prepared to defend every feedback they leave.  It's an almost certainty that if you leave a neg on someone, it'll get challenged either by PM or in a thread, so all the new DT2 members should be prepared for that.  I'm pretty sure DT1 knows this stuff already.

To be honest lot of here even don't know where should leave what kind of feedback. So if there is few suggestion's then we can learn from it especially who is totally new.   

Leave appropriate feedback with a valid reference link if it's a neg, and be careful who you give positives to.  I've already said that, but it's the best advice IMO.  Nobody is forcing any new DT2 members to start leaving feedbacks, so hopefully none of you feel pressured to do so.

[TECSHARE]

Well, we almost made it a week with the new trust system before newly appointed DT members were connected to a large scam (>$70,000)...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5097164.0

20 BTC jackpot not paid out to a user playing by the rules. DT member wearing a paid signature from the accused scam site rushing to defend it in spite of having the exact opposite opinion on previous similar cases.

The trust system has become a popularity contest rather than a gauge of who will and will not rip you off, and con artists are usually quite charming by nature.

[TheNewAnon135246]

Well, we almost made it a week with the new trust system before newly appointed DT members were connected to a large scam (>$70,000)...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5097164.0

20 BTC jackpot not paid out to a user playing by the rules. DT member wearing a paid signature from the accused scam site rushing to defend it in spite of having the exact opposite opinion on previous similar cases.

I think it's a bit early to call that a scam or accusing people of defending a scam. Please try to refrain from starting more drama over nothing.

[OgNasty]

Well, we almost made it a week with the new trust system before newly appointed DT members were connected to a large scam (>$70,000)...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5097164.0

20 BTC jackpot not paid out to a user playing by the rules. DT member wearing a paid signature from the accused scam site rushing to defend it in spite of having the exact opposite opinion on previous similar cases.

I think it's a bit early to call that a scam or accusing people of defending a scam. Please try to refrain from starting more drama over nothing.

Not too early to defend your signature advertiser though, right?  Please try to refrain from downplaying someone's loss of >$70,000.

[Hhampuz]

Well, we almost made it a week with the new trust system before newly appointed DT members were connected to a large scam (>$70,000)...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5097164.0

20 BTC jackpot not paid out to a user playing by the rules. DT member wearing a paid signature from the accused scam site rushing to defend it in spite of having the exact opposite opinion on previous similar cases.

I think it's a bit early to call that a scam or accusing people of defending a scam. Please try to refrain from starting more drama over nothing.

Not too early to defend your signature advertiser though, right?  Please try to refrain from downplaying someone's loss of >$70,000.

Hmmm.... Betcoin.... Hmmm...

[vlom]

Well, we almost made it a week with the new trust system before newly appointed DT members were connected to a large scam (>$70,000)...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5097164.0

20 BTC jackpot not paid out to a user playing by the rules. DT member wearing a paid signature from the accused scam site rushing to defend it in spite of having the exact opposite opinion on previous similar cases.

The trust system has become a popularity contest rather than a gauge of who will and will not rip you off, and con artists are usually quite charming by nature.

wow. you got it. thank you for this conclusion. i think that after reading this most of the discussions about dt can be closed.

[Quickseller]

Well, we almost made it a week with the new trust system before newly appointed DT members were connected to a large scam (>$70,000)...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5097164.0

20 BTC jackpot not paid out to a user playing by the rules. DT member wearing a paid signature from the accused scam site rushing to defend it in spite of having the exact opposite opinion on previous similar cases.

I think it's a bit early to call that a scam or accusing people of defending a scam. Please try to refrain from starting more drama over nothing.

I wouldn’t jump out blindly saying everything is fine and dandy without reviewing the evidence.

Based on what I have seen so far, I think FJ is in the wrong.

[OgNasty]

Well, we almost made it a week with the new trust system before newly appointed DT members were connected to a large scam (>$70,000)...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5097164.0

20 BTC jackpot not paid out to a user playing by the rules. DT member wearing a paid signature from the accused scam site rushing to defend it in spite of having the exact opposite opinion on previous similar cases.

I think it's a bit early to call that a scam or accusing people of defending a scam. Please try to refrain from starting more drama over nothing.

Not too early to defend your signature advertiser though, right?  Please try to refrain from downplaying someone's loss of >$70,000.

Hmmm.... Betcoin.... Hmmm...

I actually agree with you, they were extremely similar.  I was harassed constantly by several members in multiple channels outside of this forum until I removed the signature, which I did before my agreed advertisement period.  Probably the only time I've ever gone against my word on this site.  Luckily, Betcoin was horrified by the allegations and understanding of me wanting to remove the signature for any perceived damage to my reputation that wearing it might have caused even though I only had it for a matter of days and they had positive trust when I agreed to it.

Betcoin maybe? Not even remotely similar.

Lauda however doesn't agree with you, because of the obvious hypocrisy.