Bitcoin Forum
August 07, 2026, 05:36:35 PM *
News: COLDCARD users only: critical vulnerability risks funds stored on COLDCARD devices; immediate action required
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 [68]
  Print  
Author Topic: SRBMiner-MULTI AMD & NVIDIA & INTEL & CPU miner  (Read 50082 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (3 posts by 1+ user deleted.)
dd341
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 06, 2026, 09:51:13 PM
 #1341

Pearlhash
2080ti went from 82TH to 63 TH overnight Huh

P\s are there any chances for future Pascal support?
Seems like there are some miners already available but non are optimized or updated for past couple months and hash is 7-10TH for 1080.
Everybody who still has 1080\1080ti\P40\P102-100\p104-100 probably still searching for decent pearl miner...
maXonja
Newbie
*
Online Online

Activity: 83
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 06, 2026, 10:02:33 PM
 #1342

V3.5.1
+ Improved algorithm 'pearlhash' for all NVIDIA GPUs (except Turing architecture)

Nice, that's it Smiley
MinerGuy82
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 6
Merit: 0


View Profile
Today at 06:22:46 AM
 #1343

V3.5.1
+ Improved algorithm 'pearlhash' for all NVIDIA GPUs (except Turing architecture)

Now some hashrate recover, but 10% more powerdraw. Best Efficency form me on 3070 was with 3.4.8 version.
1971ECPT
Jr. Member
*
Offline

Activity: 86
Merit: 3


View Profile
Today at 09:20:22 AM
 #1344

This printscreen is after fork with SRB 3.5.1.
With yellow, I wrote what was BEFORE fork with SRB 3.4.8

https://i.postimg.cc/63HCPP80/SRB-3-3-1.jpg



Now, 4-5Watts more consumption for each card and less 4MH less for each card.

I think is acceptable.
MinerGuy82
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 6
Merit: 0


View Profile
Today at 01:29:11 PM
 #1345

This printscreen is after fork with SRB 3.5.1.
With yellow, I wrote what was BEFORE fork with SRB 3.4.8

https://i.postimg.cc/63HCPP80/SRB-3-3-1.jpg

https://i.postimg.cc/MMQcMdbM/SRB-3-3-1.jpg

Now, 4-5Watts more consumption for each card and less 4MH less for each card.

I think is acceptable.

Depend how many GPU you need.
Ive got More 100watt per Rig. In 24 Hours are 2,4kw more per Rig. But if this a a consequence of the need of the new version after 4.8 ok... and however with the 4.5.1 I recoverd only 5% of hashrate, not 10%.
marihome
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
Today at 03:55:43 PM
 #1346

I found a bug in version 3.5.1 on Windows 10. When starting up, only the first three cards can be activated successfully, even though there are five cards in total. It shows a “CFX initialization failed” error.

Version 3.5.0 works normally. I think increasing the virtual memory might solve the problem, but my hard drive only has a few dozen GB of free space, which is not enough.

I am only using PRL. Why does it show CFX? Is this a bug? Version 3.5.0 works fine, but version 5.0 has much lower hash rate.
Metroid
Sr. Member
****
Offline

Activity: 2170
Merit: 353


Xtreme Monster


View Profile
Today at 04:03:04 PM
 #1347

3060ti rig is showing strange power consumption on prl, at software level is showing 1660w, at wall is showing around 2000w, 3070 rig at software level is showing 1830w, at wall 2050w.

BTC Address: 1DH4ok85VdFAe47fSVXNVctxkFhUv4ujbR
Pages: « 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 [68]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!