zvisha
|
|
March 04, 2015, 10:15:00 PM |
|
Zvi --- I am really enjoying 2.6.14 on my SP20s; One thing is needed to make the scheduling work well for many of us home miners;
Can you please add an option to set the fan speed, rather than just leaving it as auto
You can do it manually via ssh in the crond. There was a post about it here a while ago. maybe someone has a link here ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
bigblind
|
|
March 04, 2015, 11:37:28 PM |
|
can anybody tell me please step by step, how to change it via ssh?
cd /var/www/SP2x/ sed -i 's/($i = 10; $i < 101; $i += 10)/($i = 01; $i < 101; $i += 01)/' settings.php [/quote
SSH into your miner (password is "root") and paste both commands. After that you can set any fan speed (1-100) in the settings tab. But after a hard restart of the device the fan setting will be kept, though you have to execute the commands again to access the settings again. Otherwise you will just have the stock fanspeed options available again.
Credits are not going to me ^^
|
|
|
|
darzhel
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
March 05, 2015, 06:17:24 AM |
|
I received my SP31 Yukon this day but it came with this problem, which of you here can help me.
2.6.7 Uptime:1582 | FPGA ver:62 | BIST in 172 -----BOARD-0----- PSU[EMERSON1200]: 768->(656w/656w)[656 656 656] (->604w[604 604 604]) (lim=1290) 0c 1059GH cooling:0/0x0 -----BOARD-1----- PSU[EMERSON1200]: 1440->(1288w/1288w)[1284 1284 1288] (->1172w[1170 1171 1172]) (lim=1290) 0c 2325GH cooling:0/0x0 LOOP[0] OFF TO:0 (test serial failed or something) 0: disabled (serial problem) 1: disabled (serial problem) 2: disabled (serial problem) LOOP[1] OFF TO:0 (test serial failed or something) 3: disabled (serial problem) 4: disabled (serial problem) 5: disabled (serial problem) LOOP[2] OFF TO:0 (test serial failed or something) 6: disabled (serial problem) 7: disabled (serial problem) 8: disabled (serial problem) LOOP[3] ON TO:0 (w:202) 9: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:681 vlt2:685(DCl:685 Tl:794 Ul:789) 83W 121A 97c] ASIC:[ 85c (125c) 950hz(BL: 950) 67 (E:192) F:0 L:0] 10: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:687 vlt2:690(DCl:690 Tl:794 Ul:789) 81W 118A 96c] ASIC:[ 85c (125c) 910hz(BL: 910) 71 (E:192) F:0 L:0] 11: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:677 vlt2:682(DCl:682 Tl:794 Ul:789) 85W 124A 97c] ASIC:[ 85c (125c) 950hz(BL: 950) 64 (E:192) F:0 L:0] LOOP[4] ON TO:0 (w:164) 12: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:707 vlt2:709(DCl:709 Tl:794 Ul:789) 82W 115A 97c] ASIC:[ 85c (125c) 870hz(BL: 870) 52 (E:193) F:0 L:0] 13: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:646 vlt2:650(DCl:650 Tl:794 Ul:789) 73W 113A 96c] ASIC:[ 95c (125c) 900hz(BL: 900) 60 (E:193) F:0 L:0] 14: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:687 vlt2:693(DCl:693 Tl:794 Ul:789) 83W 120A 92c] ASIC:[100c (125c) 910hz(BL: 910) 52 (E:193) F:0 L:0] LOOP[5] ON TO:3 (w:155) 15: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:650 vlt2:656(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:789) 62W 95A 71c] ASIC:[ 85c (125c) 800hz(BL: 800) 53 (E:193) F:0 L:0] 16: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:652 vlt2:656(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:789) 63W 96A 68c] ASIC:[ 85c (125c) 800hz(BL: 800) 61 (E:190) F:0 L:0] 17: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:648 vlt2:656(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:789) 58W 89A 59c] ASIC:[ 85c (125c) 740hz(BL: 740) 41 (E:193) F:0 L:0] LOOP[6] ON TO:3 (w:173) 18: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:650 vlt2:656(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:789) 63W 96A 73c] ASIC:[ 85c (125c) 790hz(BL: 790) 65 (E:193) F:0 L:0] 19: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:652 vlt2:656(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:789) 58W 88A 78c] ASIC:[ 85c (125c) 750hz(BL: 750) 52 (E:193) F:0 L:0] 20: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:652 vlt2:656(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:789) 55W 83A 73c] ASIC:[ 85c (125c) 710hz(BL: 710) 56 (E:193) F:0 L:0] LOOP[7] ON TO:3 (w:165) 21: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:650 vlt2:656(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:789) 62W 95A 86c] ASIC:[ 85c (125c) 780hz(BL: 780) 58 (E:193) F:0 L:0] 22: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:654 vlt2:656(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:789) 66W 101A 91c] ASIC:[ 85c (125c) 850hz(BL: 850) 58 (E:193) F:0 L:0] 23: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:652 vlt2:656(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:789) 63W 96A 73c] ASIC:[ 85c (125c) 790hz(BL: 790) 49 (E:193) F:0 L:0] LOOP[8] ON TO:3 (w:183) 24: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:654 vlt2:658(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:789) 68W 103A 92c] ASIC:[105c (125c) 850hz(BL: 850) 65 (E:193) F:0 L:0] 25: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:652 vlt2:656(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:789) 67W 103A 102c] ASIC:[100c (125c) 850hz(BL: 850) 67 (E:193) F:0 L:0] 26: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:652 vlt2:656(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:789) 64W 98A 94c] ASIC:[ 85c (125c) 820hz(BL: 820) 51 (E:193) F:0 L:0] LOOP[9] ON TO:5 (w:158) 27: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:648 vlt2:656(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:789) 67W 102A 102c] ASIC:[105c (125c) 820hz(BL: 820) 55 (E:191) F:0 L:0] 28: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:652 vlt2:656(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:789) 70W 107A 103c] ASIC:[115c (125c) 870hz(BL: 870) 60 (E:192) F:0 L:0] 29: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:650 vlt2:656(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:789) 65W 99A 87c] ASIC:[105c (125c) 830hz(BL: 830) 43 (E:193) F:0 L:0]
[H:HW:3385Gh (1000),DC-W:1445,L:0,A:21,MMtmp:0 TMP:(28/28)=>=>=>(68/68 , 78/78)] Pushed 32 jobs , in HW queue 4 jobs (sw:1, hw:1)! min:38 wins:1200[this/last min:16/43] bist-fail:327, hw-err:12 leading-zeroes:42 idle promils[s/m]:0/0, rate:3005gh/s asic-count:546 (wins:2+14) wall watts:2208 Fan:90, conseq:200 AC2DC BAD: 0 0 R/NR: 1537/0 RTF asics: 0 FET: 0:11 1:11 6 restarted 0 reset 0 reset2 1 fake_wins 0 stuck_bist 0 low_power 0 stuck_pll 3 runtime_dsble 0 purge_queue 0 read_timeouts 45 dc2dc_i2c 2 read_tmout2 0 read_crptn 0 purge_queue3 0 bad_idle 3 err_murata Adapter queues: rsp=2, req=20
|
|
|
|
Biffa
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3220
Merit: 1220
|
|
March 05, 2015, 09:03:46 AM |
|
email support@ straight away.
|
|
|
|
justice
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
March 05, 2015, 01:38:43 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
nhminer
|
|
March 05, 2015, 02:00:46 PM |
|
There is an unofficial thread for the SP20s. At this time, I am looking at underclocking my SP30; Currently pulling 3KW and 4.5T
Does anyone of the top of their heads have the best settings for a SP30 for the best hash/watt/fan rate?
|
BCH - 1EshwUEg9LRbY5WMSw7bkBGQUYQeenkcet
|
|
|
nhminer
|
|
March 05, 2015, 02:01:33 PM |
|
Zvi --- I am really enjoying 2.6.14 on my SP20s; One thing is needed to make the scheduling work well for many of us home miners;
Can you please add an option to set the fan speed, rather than just leaving it as auto
You can customize the fan speed if you run your scheduling via text files and use cron jobs. See this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=521520.msg10358008#msg10358008I run all of my miners via these crons (8 of them) and it works great. Thanks!
|
BCH - 1EshwUEg9LRbY5WMSw7bkBGQUYQeenkcet
|
|
|
Biodom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3752
Merit: 3863
|
|
March 05, 2015, 02:12:14 PM |
|
There is an unofficial thread for the SP20s. At this time, I am looking at underclocking my SP30; Currently pulling 3KW and 4.5T
Does anyone of the top of their heads have the best settings for a SP30 for the best hash/watt/fan rate?
Underclocking SP30 courtesy of Tigggger: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=960937.msg10657999#msg10657999
|
|
|
|
jtoomim
|
|
March 05, 2015, 05:01:55 PM |
|
If any of you have SP30s from the group buy hosted at Titan and don't know where to put them, Toomim Bros has about 60 kW still available. We allow (or even encourage) underclocking to improve efficiency. At 2.0 kW, for example, an SP30 has 80% of the hashrate but 67% of the operating cost.
|
Hosting bitcoin miners for $65 to $80/kW/month on clean, cheap hydro power. http://Toom.im
|
|
|
jtoomim
|
|
March 05, 2015, 05:03:31 PM |
|
I didn't want this to get buried, so I'm quoting it here: Here's some data for you guys. http://toom.im/images/Spondoolies%20Hashrate.pnghttp://toom.im/images/Spondoolies%20Efficiency.pnghttp://toom.im/images/Spondoolies%20Marginal%20Hashrate.pngThe marginal efficiency graph shows the efficiency of a small increment in power. If you step the power consumption on an SP20 up from 1100W to 1200W, you only gain an extra 50 or so GH/s for 100 W in extra power consumption, giving a marginal efficiency of 2.0 J/GH. On the other hand, the overall efficiency at 1200W for an SP20 is about 0.75 J/GH. The marginal efficiency is a very useful metric for choosing what power settings to run a miner at. You should run your miners at a setting such that the marginal efficiency leaves you at the breakeven point. Right now, 1 TH/s earns about $0.111 per hour. If your power or hosting costs you $0.14/kWh, then your breakeven point would be [$0.111/(h•TH/s)] / [$0.14/kW•h] = 0.79 kJ/TH = 0.79 J/GH so you would want to run an SP20 at the setting that gives you a marginal efficiency of about 0.79 J/GH, which turns out to be about 600 W AC. Some notes: All tests were conducted on 240V +/- 5V with intake temperatures between 8°C and 18°C. The SP31s tested used Murata power supplies. The Murata PSUs are more efficient than the Emerson1200 PSUs (about 91.5% vs 88%). The SP30 tested used Emerson1200s. The SP20 used an HP DPS1200FB PSU, which appears to be 90% efficient on 240V. AC power consumption for the SP35, SP31, SP10 and SP20 were measured using a Dell PDU, and should be accurate to within 20W. AC power consumption for the SP30 was read off of the ASIC Stats page. Previous testing has shown the Emerson1200 and Emerson1600 (in the SP35) to give accurate AC consumption measurements compared to our PDUs. The DC power measurements of the SP10s and SP20s appear to be miscalibrated. At high power, they appear to be accurate, with our PDU measuring AC consumption that's about 10% higher than the reported DC power consumption. At low power (e.g. 60%), the SP10 reports DC power consumption 4% *below* the AC consumption, and the SP20 reports DC consumption equal to AC consumption. Power measurements from Murata power supplies show an inverse pattern, and are very inaccurate (and biased for low readings) at full power output, but tend to be accurate at 80% of max power or below. Do not rely on the power readings from SP10s, SP20s, and Murata SP30/31s for anything important. The SP10s tested were all from a moderately slow corner batch. A few of the max power datapoints might be missing from some machine types (e.g. SP10, SP35) to simplify testing. Most testing was done using voltage limiting (600 mV < start voltage = max voltage < 700 mV, or 750 mV for SP20). The SP30 was tested using power limiting, which is part of why its graph is slightly wavy. At very low voltages or power limits (< 620 mV, roughly, for both Rockerbox and Hammer), some ASICs on a machine will fail to start up. This results in rapidly dropping hashrate and power consumption towards the left end of the graphs, as well as potential system instability, with slight improvements in efficiency. Different ASICs will have vastly differing minimum voltages for operation, which means that some machines will be capable of much lower power operation when run at minimum voltage. I've seen a 25% (430W) difference in minimum power between two SP31s from the same batch, for example. However, the difference in efficiency between these machines at their minima was smaller, at 0.50 vs 0.45 J/GH. YMMV (your miners may vary). Data tables available upon request. Email j@toom.im if you want one. Specify which machine type(s) you want them for.
|
Hosting bitcoin miners for $65 to $80/kW/month on clean, cheap hydro power. http://Toom.im
|
|
|
wh00per
|
|
March 05, 2015, 11:49:16 PM |
|
What would be the invoice value of each SP30 for tax purposes if shipped outside US?
|
CSA/cUL Certified Power Distribution Panels - Basic, Switched, Metered. 1-3 phases. Up to 600V. NMC:N4F9qvHz11BHcc4nh1LCJFsrZhA1EWgVwj
|
|
|
raskul
|
|
March 06, 2015, 04:26:16 AM Last edit: March 06, 2015, 11:54:32 AM by raskul |
|
|
tips 1APp826DqjJBdsAeqpEstx6Q8hD4urac8a
|
|
|
RealMalatesta
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1124
|
|
March 06, 2015, 11:52:56 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Bicknellski
|
|
March 06, 2015, 11:58:16 AM |
|
Of course it is really an Avalon. Should report this to Aliexpress. They will take it down. Brand Name: SINISIGMA Package: Yes Model Number: Avalon 1.5TName:: Avalon 1.5TSpeed:: 1500GH/s BTC Bitcoin Miner Networking Tool Power:: 1060W Voice:: 51db Quantity of modules: Six Quantity of chip:: 60 Temperature:: 42 degree centigrade Size:: 17.6cm*38cm*48cm Weight:: 22KG Quality:: Best Dogie did the review I guess.
|
|
|
|
dmwardjr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1318
Technical Analyst/Trader
|
|
March 06, 2015, 12:02:33 PM |
|
They want to make someone create an account to even file a complaint. I'm not giving them my damn contact information. I would suggest others be careful doing so as well.
|
|
|
|
RealMalatesta
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1124
|
|
March 06, 2015, 12:05:18 PM |
|
They want to make someone create an account to even file a complaint. I'm not giving them my damn contact information. I would suggest others be careful doing so as well.
I think SP should do this. But hey, at least it shows that Spondoolies as a brand is an asset i China!
|
|
|
|
Bicknellski
|
|
March 06, 2015, 12:05:42 PM |
|
They want to make someone create an account to even file a complaint. I'm not giving them my damn contact information. I would suggest others be careful doing so as well.
Already have an account. Spend 100$ a month there I can report it but will let SPtech handle this. Choose Report Type
Please report the situation clearly and objectively to AliExpress. All reports will be anonymous and handled as soon as possible. Please do not re-submit your report(s).
Publishing False Information Publishing false information including text and images.
|
|
|
|
dmwardjr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1318
Technical Analyst/Trader
|
|
March 06, 2015, 12:07:55 PM |
|
They want to make someone create an account to even file a complaint. I'm not giving them my damn contact information. I would suggest others be careful doing so as well.
I think SP should do this. But hey, at least it shows that Spondoolies as a brand is an asset i China! Some in China are known for hacking to obtain technical designs on products from corporations, etc... I would be careful if I were SP.
|
|
|
|
dmwardjr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1318
Technical Analyst/Trader
|
|
March 06, 2015, 12:08:24 PM |
|
They want to make someone create an account to even file a complaint. I'm not giving them my damn contact information. I would suggest others be careful doing so as well.
Already have an account. Spend 100$ a month there I can report it but will let SPtech handle this. Sounds like it may be a reputable site then.
|
|
|
|
Bicknellski
|
|
March 06, 2015, 12:18:34 PM |
|
They want to make someone create an account to even file a complaint. I'm not giving them my damn contact information. I would suggest others be careful doing so as well.
I think SP should do this. But hey, at least it shows that Spondoolies as a brand is an asset i China! Some in China are known for hacking to obtain technical designs on products from corporations, etc... I would be careful if I were SP. Aliexpress / Alibaba Of course it is reputable. Some of the companies that sell are not. But they do try very hard to maintain a watch on that in Aliexpress and Alibaba. Rating system is pretty good. In 3 years of using Aliexpress I have hand one complaint about non-shipment and my money was returned by the company after Aliexpress intervened.
|
|
|
|
|