BitLucy.com 🎰 no more in bitcointalk

[Strongkored]

The deposit bonus of 200% is interesting but a minimum of 100$ is quite high in my opinion.

$100 minimum deposit requirement is indeed high for a deposit bonus campaign. Minimum $20 deposit requirement is reasonable for a deposit bonus promotion. Although 200% deposit bonus is tempting with 25× wagering requirements only, but OP hasn't mentioned that how the wagering requirements will be applied. Probably the wagering requirement is applied to the total sum of deposit and bonus amount.

Maybe why they apply a high for minimum deposit to this bonus promos to reduce abuse that might happen again in this promotion, as happened in their initial promotion which caused them to do maintenance to make system improvements. Don't forget to follow this if you are interested because this promotion is only valid for 48 hours.

[babygun]

$100 minimum deposit requirement is indeed high for a deposit bonus campaign. Minimum $20 deposit requirement is reasonable for a deposit bonus promotion. Although 200% deposit bonus is tempting with 25× wagering requirements only, but OP hasn't mentioned that how the wagering requirements will be applied. Probably the wagering requirement is applied to the total sum of deposit and bonus amount.

I agree, a minimum of 20 or 25$ would be better for me. The wagering requirement I can understand, that is similar for a lot of sites who offer deposit bonuses. Normally it is around 35x, so a 25x wagering requirement is acceptable but never easy to do.

[tygeade]

It is a pity that they have already stopped the campaign. From my head the campaign has already stopped twice, while it had only just lasted a week. I think they have good intentions with the site, but the project has been grossly underestimated. It wasn't a smart idea to let Royse777 post the flyer either, it feels like he's abusing his DT status in this way. Bitlucy then created an account itself. Anyway, let's hope the problems will soon be a thing of the past.

It can be a pity that they stopped their signature campaign but they will have their reasons for it. Why would Royse abuse his DT status? He has connections to the site so he can promote them all they want.
The deposit bonus of 200% is interesting but a minimum of 100$ is quite high in my opinion.

Between the problems they had, and the money that they spent on recovering from it, I am guessing that they may lack the funds to keep on going. I am not saying that it will be a problem for a long time, but at the same time it is definitely not a problem for them neither.

I get that we may want them to keep on their signature campaign, but if they remove it and see it's fine, then they will keep on not doing that. Or if they think it was great, then they will recover, make some more money, save aside, and then repeat it again in the future to get those people again. All in all, they know their finances better than we do so there is nothing shocking about it.

[Wiwo]

It is a pity that they have already stopped the campaign. From my head the campaign has already stopped twice, while it had only just lasted a week. I think they have good intentions with the site, but the project has been grossly underestimated. It wasn't a smart idea to let Royse777 post the flyer either, it feels like he's abusing his DT status in this way. Bitlucy then created an account itself. Anyway, let's hope the problems will soon be a thing of the past.

It can be a pity that they stopped their signature campaign but they will have their reasons for it. Why would Royse abuse his DT status? He has connections to the site so he can promote them all they want.
The deposit bonus of 200% is interesting but a minimum of 100$ is quite high in my opinion.

Between the problems they had, and the money that they spent on recovering from it, I am guessing that they may lack the funds to keep on going. I am not saying that it will be a problem for a long time, but at the same time it is definitely not a problem for them neither.

I get that we may want them to keep on their signature campaign, but if they remove it and see it's fine, then they will keep on not doing that. Or if they think it was great, then they will recover, make some more money, save aside, and then repeat it again in the future to get those people again. All in all, they know their finances better than we do so there is nothing shocking about it.

Just like they manager and admin on this forum have stated clearly that there is some delays and the site may be delayed going live and since activities on the site was not back then there is no need for a signature campaign. I think its ok the way their handled the whole situation and coming up to this point, and i believe there will be some positive improvement going forward.

[Strongkored]

-snip-
Between the problems they had, and the money that they spent on recovering from it, I am guessing that they may lack the funds to keep on going. I am not saying that it will be a problem for a long time, but at the same time it is definitely not a problem for them neither.

I get that we may want them to keep on their signature campaign, but if they remove it and see it's fine, then they will keep on not doing that. Or if they think it was great, then they will recover, make some more money, save aside, and then repeat it again in the future to get those people again. All in all, they know their finances better than we do so there is nothing shocking about it.

In my opinion, continuing to promote through a signature campaign while the website has not recovered to the initial stage of their launch is not a profitable thing for them, it is very possible that it will be a waste of money. We may know that one of the goals of the signature campaign is to increase awareness of the members of this forum about Casino that held signature campaign and also attract new players. Maybe they will hold a signature campaign again, especially if sportbetting is active again on Bitlucy because sportbetting is also one that attracts many players.

[serjent05]

-snip-
Between the problems they had, and the money that they spent on recovering from it, I am guessing that they may lack the funds to keep on going. I am not saying that it will be a problem for a long time, but at the same time it is definitely not a problem for them neither.

I get that we may want them to keep on their signature campaign, but if they remove it and see it's fine, then they will keep on not doing that. Or if they think it was great, then they will recover, make some more money, save aside, and then repeat it again in the future to get those people again. All in all, they know their finances better than we do so there is nothing shocking about it.

In my opinion, continuing to promote through a signature campaign while the website has not recovered to the initial stage of their launch is not a profitable thing for them, it is very possible that it will be a waste of money. We may know that one of the goals of the signature campaign is to increase awareness of the members of this forum about Casino that held signature campaign and also attract new players. Maybe they will hold a signature campaign again, especially if sportbetting is active again on Bitlucy because sportbetting is also one that attracts many players.

As far as I know Royse777 stated that the signature campaign is on hold because they are undergoing experimentation, probably to get the best out of the budget allocated to it.  If it doesn't meet the target, it needs to be stopped or paused, then think of another approach to hit the goal.  I don't think it is a matter of budget but rather the marketing team is still figuring out the best approach to promote the casino. 

We are still experimenting our marketing.

It wasn't a smart idea to let Royse777 post the flyer either, it feels like he's abusing his DT status in this way.

What?  I don't see Royse777 abusing his DT status.  I see it as being responsible since I think he is part of the marketing people of Bitlucy

[BobK71]

-snip-
Between the problems they had, and the money that they spent on recovering from it, I am guessing that they may lack the funds to keep on going. I am not saying that it will be a problem for a long time, but at the same time it is definitely not a problem for them neither.

I get that we may want them to keep on their signature campaign, but if they remove it and see it's fine, then they will keep on not doing that. Or if they think it was great, then they will recover, make some more money, save aside, and then repeat it again in the future to get those people again. All in all, they know their finances better than we do so there is nothing shocking about it.

In my opinion, continuing to promote through a signature campaign while the website has not recovered to the initial stage of their launch is not a profitable thing for them, it is very possible that it will be a waste of money. We may know that one of the goals of the signature campaign is to increase awareness of the members of this forum about Casino that held signature campaign and also attract new players. Maybe they will hold a signature campaign again, especially if sportbetting is active again on Bitlucy because sportbetting is also one that attracts many players.

If the deposit balance is reduced then many users may be encouraged to deposit. I think 200% only for attracting users to their platform and they will try to continuing their signature campaign after completion of initial requirements.  

[FanEagle]

If I have understood it correctly, in addition I have to wager x25 these 100 bucks to be able to obtain a deposit bonus. Not an expert in wagering, but that seems a lot to get these free hundred. I would even say it is rather risky. I would have used dice and set a 95% win chance to get this x25 wager, but there is no dice at bitlucy. Slots - must be very lucky to catch a multiplier, table games - this is always a 50/50 win chance to me.

Well, when you are giving away free money away, there needs to be some requirements otherwise what is the point. So, let's assume that they do 200% deposit bonus, and then they put the wagering requirement to a low place, like let's say 2x wagered, then how are they going to make any profit at all?

You could wager a good amount with a high return, like 90% chance to win, and 90% of the people will hit it and take the money out withdraw it and never come back. That would be a bad idea, so the better one is having rollover, and 25x is not a bad one neither, there are some places that require 40x as well so it could be quite bad for you if it was like that.

[maydna]

As far as I know Royse777 stated that the signature campaign is on hold because they are undergoing experimentation, probably to get the best out of the budget allocated to it.  If it doesn't meet the target, it needs to be stopped or paused, then think of another approach to hit the goal.  I don't think it is a matter of budget but rather the marketing team is still figuring out the best approach to promote the casino. 

The best of this delay is to reallocate the budget used for media promotions because usually, promotions can exceed the budget that has been made. Therefore, the casino needs to reschedule the plan and if necessary, they will make a budget allocation list that has been adjusted to the casino plan. It may take some time for them to reorganize their plans and if they feel the need, they will continue the signature campaign because it can help them gain popularity.

[TopTort777]

If I have understood it correctly, in addition I have to wager x25 these 100 bucks to be able to obtain a deposit bonus. Not an expert in wagering, but that seems a lot to get these free hundred. I would even say it is rather risky. I would have used dice and set a 95% win chance to get this x25 wager, but there is no dice at bitlucy. Slots - must be very lucky to catch a multiplier, table games - this is always a 50/50 win chance to me.

Well, when you are giving away free money away, there needs to be some requirements otherwise what is the point. So, let's assume that they do 200% deposit bonus, and then they put the wagering requirement to a low place, like let's say 2x wagered, then how are they going to make any profit at all?

You could wager a good amount with a high return, like 90% chance to win, and 90% of the people will hit it and take the money out withdraw it and never come back. That would be a bad idea, so the better one is having rollover, and 25x is not a bad one neither, there are some places that require 40x as well so it could be quite bad for you if it was like that.

I completely understand that no one wants to give money for free. Perhaps I am more used to other kind of bonuses. For example on bitcasino when you won in competition, you have to wager that amount 1x. But here if I deposit a hundred, to be able to get another two for free I had to wager 2500 with 100. Perhaps I am not a very experienced player, but that seems rather impossible to me. I had to make a win streak of 25 all-ins in table games, or spend a lot of time at slots. This looks more like a competition, then a welcome bonus.

[leytonlufc]

I'm not sure if this place is a scam guys. I made a withdrawal 24 hours ago but still have not received it.

I talked to live support and they are saying they are updating their payment system. But it seems like they have been saying this for weeks without paying players.

[efialtis]

Why would anyone in his/her right mind even consider "using" such a site? After everything that happened during that short period of time. It could not be more obvious that this place is... at the very least... poorly run (if not a complete farce).

My friend Royse seems to be doing his very best but it does not change the fact that anyone depositing money on there is in high risk of not getting s*** back, that is if he/she gets lucky and wins some.

Might be about time to open a GOSU casino, considering the fact that everyone seems to be opening crypto casinos "just like that", lol. Anyway, this whole BitLucy thing has been fun to read and a prime example of why we will need regulation at some point...

[RILWAN]

Just following up to see if this casino is back and running, I saw the last update about the postponement of operations of the site, just drop by to wish them well and fast bounce back.

[FatFork]

If I have understood it correctly, in addition I have to wager x25 these 100 bucks to be able to obtain a deposit bonus. Not an expert in wagering, but that seems a lot to get these free hundred. I would even say it is rather risky. I would have used dice and set a 95% win chance to get this x25 wager, but there is no dice at bitlucy. Slots - must be very lucky to catch a multiplier, table games - this is always a 50/50 win chance to me.

Well, when you are giving away free money away, there needs to be some requirements otherwise what is the point. So, let's assume that they do 200% deposit bonus, and then they put the wagering requirement to a low place, like let's say 2x wagered, then how are they going to make any profit at all?

You could wager a good amount with a high return, like 90% chance to win, and 90% of the people will hit it and take the money out withdraw it and never come back. That would be a bad idea, so the better one is having rollover, and 25x is not a bad one neither, there are some places that require 40x as well so it could be quite bad for you if it was like that.

I completely understand that no one wants to give money for free. Perhaps I am more used to other kind of bonuses. For example on bitcasino when you won in competition, you have to wager that amount 1x. But here if I deposit a hundred, to be able to get another two for free I had to wager 2500 with 100. Perhaps I am not a very experienced player, but that seems rather impossible to me. I had to make a win streak of 25 all-ins in table games, or spend a lot of time at slots. This looks more like a competition, then a welcome bonus.

That example from bitcasino is very different. It's a competition. Of course, there are no large rollover requirements. Here, we have deposit bonuses that are probably easy to abuse. Therefore, the casino needs to impose additional restrictions to combat this. Consider a casino without any limitations on deposit bonuses. A bad customer might abuse this by creating new accounts to rake the free cash out from them indefinitely.
Although I agree that 25x rollover seems a bit excessive. In my experience, such a high rollover is more common with no-deposit bonuses.

[Hamphser]

Just following up to see if this casino is back and running, I saw the last update about the postponement of operations of the site, just drop by to wish them well and fast bounce back.

Not all the time site operation do really end up on a smooth buttery experience on which these kind of complaints and errors or issues could really happen and this time it did really take some time before fixing everything.

You know that people would be always be having something to say whenever they are really in delay or something those activities that had been delayed  or removed or stopped due to this situation.

Give them some time and they would really be having some good comeback pretty sure with that.If this one would be handled and market well then i do feel that this one would be huge.

[MrcMrc]

Just following up to see if this casino is back and running, I saw the last update about the postponement of operations of the site, just drop by to wish them well and fast bounce back.

Not all the time site operation do really end up on a smooth buttery experience on which these kind of complaints and errors or issues could really happen and this time it did really take some time before fixing everything.

You know that people would be always be having something to say whenever they are really in delay or something those activities that had been delayed  or removed or stopped due to this situation.

Give them some time and they would really be having some good comeback pretty sure with that.If this one would be handled and market well then i do feel that this one would be huge.

The most important is that no players balance is held on the site so the team have all the time needed to put things in place before making a welcome back, i know the situation is taking long but then the delay is for good of the casino.

[FanEagle]

I completely understand that no one wants to give money for free. Perhaps I am more used to other kind of bonuses. For example on bitcasino when you won in competition, you have to wager that amount 1x. But here if I deposit a hundred, to be able to get another two for free I had to wager 2500 with 100. Perhaps I am not a very experienced player, but that seems rather impossible to me. I had to make a win streak of 25 all-ins in table games, or spend a lot of time at slots. This looks more like a competition, then a welcome bonus.

I understand, sometimes you may face things that you are not familiar with, competitions to wager and be at the top etc etc could be a bit different. However, in almost all cases of rollover and deposit bonus, there is either 40x or something similar, meaning if you deposit 100 bucks, then you need to wager 4k in order to get the bonus in your account.

It is not really that impossible, we are talking about wagering amount here, meaning you just need to wager and win. Even if you do like 90% chance to win, just for 25 times, there is a good chance you could end up winning it all, not saying you will, but that is the easy part of getting the bonus.

[BitcoinAccepted]

Bonuses that you have to bet high for, players are definitely not waiting for that. I think you should get those kinds of bonuses out of the system. If you also add that a bonus is only valid for 48 hours, it comes across as very intrusive. It would be better to work without bonuses for a while, and ensure that the payouts are processed quickly without a lot of problems. As someone mentioned before, it is also worth considering working with an Igaming provider. Much more professionalism and those companies know what they are doing.

[Tellek Garing]

Bonuses that you have to bet high for, players are definitely not waiting for that. I think you should get those kinds of bonuses out of the system. If you also add that a bonus is only valid for 48 hours, it comes across as very intrusive. It would be better to work without bonuses for a while, and ensure that the payouts are processed quickly without a lot of problems. As someone mentioned before, it is also worth considering working with an Igaming provider. Much more professionalism and those companies know what they are doing.

I think the team have all it takes to run a good casino even though the sote.have suffered from massive abuse of it bonuses system previously which is the reason their facing the challenges their facing today.

But according to what their campaign manager posted earlier the support are working on restoring the site as soon as they did with work the son ite. So I don't think their problem right now is a lack of professionalism but time to put everything together.

[Hamphser]

Just following up to see if this casino is back and running, I saw the last update about the postponement of operations of the site, just drop by to wish them well and fast bounce back.

Not all the time site operation do really end up on a smooth buttery experience on which these kind of complaints and errors or issues could really happen and this time it did really take some time before fixing everything.

You know that people would be always be having something to say whenever they are really in delay or something those activities that had been delayed  or removed or stopped due to this situation.

Give them some time and they would really be having some good comeback pretty sure with that.If this one would be handled and market well then i do feel that this one would be huge.

The most important is that no players balance is held on the site so the team have all the time needed to put things in place before making a welcome back, i know the situation is taking long but then the delay is for good of the casino.

So far there were no held funds or stuck funds from their players on the platform which is a good indication that they arent going anywhere or becoming a scam or something like that.

The have failed on 1st and 2nd time of their launching but making some assurance on 3rd time will really be that good or would be having no problems just like on the other two.
No system is perfect thats why its really understandable that it would really be needing some ample time for them to fix everything and this is not an easy job to be done.