smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
May 12, 2014, 05:18:45 AM |
|
what to do when i got this one? 2014-May-12 06:23:00.201575 [P2P1]ERROR c:\temp\bytecoin\git\bitmonero-master\contrib\epee\include\net\abstract_tcp_server2.inl:307 send que size is more than ABSTRACT_SERVER_SEND_QUE_MAX_COUNT(100), shutting down connection 2014-May-12 06:23:00.209575 [P2P1]ERROR c:\temp\bytecoin\git\bitmonero-master\contrib\epee\include\net\levin_protocol_handler_async.h:638 [90.220.5.84:18080 OUT]Failed to do_send()
is this a problem ? It won't break your daemon but it does cause extra connections to be opened. If you see a lot of them it is best to restart your daemon. thanks for your reply yes i have 100's of them inside my log, but after a restart it runs smooth again. i just hope it does not happen while im sleeping otherwise i would just make a small Catch n replay script that restarts the deamon from time to time. A few of them are no big deal. Nothing really bad will happen if the error occurs while you are sleeping. Just restart it if you see a lot of them.
|
|
|
|
georgeandy
|
|
May 12, 2014, 06:28:57 AM |
|
I feel this coin is different from the other coins , I'll buy some and hold
|
|
|
|
David Latapie
|
|
May 12, 2014, 06:32:54 AM Last edit: May 12, 2014, 07:15:11 AM by David Latapie |
|
I feel this coin is different from the other coins , I'll buy some and hold For sure it is:) Remember to vote for monero on swaphole! https://www.swaphole.com/#!voting(copy the whole link, simple machines forum breaks the links with a #)
|
|
|
|
4420866
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
|
May 12, 2014, 06:34:36 AM |
|
When can pool diggers?
|
|
|
|
David Latapie
|
|
May 12, 2014, 06:35:49 AM |
|
When can pool diggers? Soon, the dev are now working on the frond end.
|
|
|
|
David Latapie
|
|
May 12, 2014, 06:36:35 AM |
|
Please someone message me I want to buy more monero, I will pay on the high end
I don't have any feedback so we can do escrow or whatever the formal sell procedure is https://cryptonote.exchange.to/
|
|
|
|
surfer43
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 560
Merit: 250
"Trading Platform of The Future!"
|
|
May 12, 2014, 06:46:33 AM |
|
I have a pool set up. As soon as the payments and front end is worked out, I will open it for the public.
|
|
|
|
surfer43
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 560
Merit: 250
"Trading Platform of The Future!"
|
|
May 12, 2014, 06:47:37 AM |
|
I feel this coin is different from the other coins , I'll buy some and hold For sure it is:) Remember to vote for monero on swaphole! https://www.swaphole.com/#!voting (copy the whole link, simple machines forum breaks the links with a #) FYI to fix the link problem just use url tags around the link like this [url]https://www.swaphole.com/#!voting[/url] https://www.swaphole.com/#!voting
|
|
|
|
herecoming
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
May 12, 2014, 06:51:28 AM |
|
I have a pool set up. As soon as the payments and front end is worked out, I will open it for the public.
It will be CPU only mining pool?
|
|
|
|
David Latapie
|
|
May 12, 2014, 06:53:14 AM |
|
It will be CPU only mining pool? Yes, since CryptoNight is CPU-only (at least currently).
|
|
|
|
|
surfer43
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 560
Merit: 250
"Trading Platform of The Future!"
|
|
May 12, 2014, 06:54:15 AM |
|
I have a pool set up. As soon as the payments and front end is worked out, I will open it for the public.
It will be CPU only mining pool? MRO is currently CPU only as far as we know. If you do have a GPU miner or ASIC, I will accept shares and blocks from them also.
|
|
|
|
buckjams
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
|
|
May 12, 2014, 07:05:56 AM |
|
I like this coin because you can get coins to for free and the wallet works great!
how can i get free coins?
|
|
|
|
eizh
|
|
May 12, 2014, 07:18:51 AM |
|
I like this coin because you can get coins to for free and the wallet works great!
how can i get free coins? The giveaway hasn't started yet, but will soon.
|
|
|
|
jimhuang
|
|
May 12, 2014, 08:50:51 AM |
|
We should voting to some big exchange like Mintpal
|
|
|
|
dreamspark
|
|
May 12, 2014, 09:47:00 AM |
|
I have a pool set up. As soon as the payments and front end is worked out, I will open it for the public.
What fee will you be charging?
|
|
|
|
aminorex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1030
Sine secretum non libertas
|
|
May 12, 2014, 10:02:41 AM |
|
a ring signature coin should employ its mix net to supply ephemeral tunnels so that all transactors disappear into the crowd.
to avoid taint, privacy cannot be optional. ideally it should be impossible to reuse an address.
monero is technically evolvable to deal with these points.
|
Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Give a man a Poisson distribution and he eats at random times independent of one another, at a constant known rate.
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
May 12, 2014, 10:04:31 AM |
|
a ring signature coin should employ its mix net to supply ephemeral tunnels so that all transactors disappear into the crowd.
to avoid taint, privacy cannot be optional. ideally it should be impossible to reuse an address.
monero is technically evolvable to deal with these points.
How would you reuse an address with the current tool chain? I don't think it is possible, certainly not easy.
|
|
|
|
eizh
|
|
May 12, 2014, 10:18:29 AM Last edit: May 12, 2014, 10:44:36 AM by eizh |
|
a ring signature coin should employ its mix net to supply ephemeral tunnels so that all transactors disappear into the crowd.
to avoid taint, privacy cannot be optional. ideally it should be impossible to reuse an address.
monero is technically evolvable to deal with these points.
The one-time address is generated with using a hash that takes a random number as part of its input. That random number can be anything between 1 and a prime number near 2^252. Of course, "random" = pseudorandom, but I don't think it's realistically possible to generate the same key twice. So this feature is already enforced. Another thing to make privacy mandatory is to force a minimum ambiguity factor, but I don't think that's a good idea. Ring signatures increase block size and most of the time an average user doesn't care about privacy beyond what's already provided by stealth addressing. And sometimes users deliberately want traceable payments. I do think built-in (optional) I2P/Tor is desirable.
|
|
|
|
luckygenough56
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1012
|
|
May 12, 2014, 10:49:26 AM |
|
hum...Price seems to be inflated by the fact there is no pools yet. Like Riecoin at launch. Nice coin though.
|
|
|
|
|