skybot13x
|
|
May 06, 2014, 03:42:10 AM |
|
When will this coin be on the exchange?
Hehe it doesnt to be on an exchange =P
|
|
|
|
eizh
|
|
May 06, 2014, 03:45:08 AM |
|
I started the translation to dutch. Will try to finish it in the next 24 hours Working on a Spanish translation for the ANN thread. Thanks, both of you!
|
|
|
|
Buratino
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1003
|
|
May 06, 2014, 04:28:57 AM |
|
Have a total of 350~ hash rate among miners, been a few horus but hope i get something.
Ill be switching everything to monero today. ^_^
It's a huge hashrate! You definitely will get something!
|
|
|
|
trogdorjw73
|
|
May 06, 2014, 06:20:05 AM |
|
Have a total of 350~ hash rate among miners, been a few horus but hope i get something.
Ill be switching everything to monero today. ^_^
It's a huge hashrate! You definitely will get something! Again, is there a calculator somewhere, or a place to see the network hash rate for MRO? It would be helpful to at least be able to provide people with some sort of estimate.
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
May 06, 2014, 06:26:53 AM |
|
Have a total of 350~ hash rate among miners, been a few horus but hope i get something.
Ill be switching everything to monero today. ^_^
It's a huge hashrate! You definitely will get something! Again, is there a calculator somewhere, or a place to see the network hash rate for MRO? It would be helpful to at least be able to provide people with some sort of estimate. You can get the network hash rate with curl $ curl localhost:18081/getinfo { "alt_blocks_count": 221, "difficulty": 2831759, "grey_peerlist_size": 436, "height": 26970, "incoming_connections_count": 5, "outgoing_connections_count": 12, "status": "OK", "tx_count": 964, "tx_pool_size": 0, "white_peerlist_size": 224 }
Divide the difficulty by 60 to get total hash rate. So for this number we get 47196. Divide your hash rate by that to get your share of the network hash rate. For example 350 is 0.74% of the network. There are 1440 blocks per day so someone with this hash rate should get 10.656 blocks per day on average.
|
|
|
|
trogdorjw73
|
|
May 06, 2014, 07:06:41 AM |
|
Have a total of 350~ hash rate among miners, been a few horus but hope i get something.
Ill be switching everything to monero today. ^_^
It's a huge hashrate! You definitely will get something! Again, is there a calculator somewhere, or a place to see the network hash rate for MRO? It would be helpful to at least be able to provide people with some sort of estimate. You can get the network hash rate with curl $ curl localhost:18081/getinfo { "alt_blocks_count": 221, "difficulty": 2831759, "grey_peerlist_size": 436, "height": 26970, "incoming_connections_count": 5, "outgoing_connections_count": 12, "status": "OK", "tx_count": 964, "tx_pool_size": 0, "white_peerlist_size": 224 }
Divide the difficulty by 60 to get total hash rate. So for this number we get 47196. Divide your hash rate by that to get your share of the network hash rate. For example 350 is 0.74% of the network. There are 1440 blocks per day so someone with this hash rate should get 10.656 blocks per day on average. Can you do that "getinfo" with curl on Windows, or is that Linux only? (I'm guessing Linux only. *Sigh*) Also, I assume these are orphan blocks? ------------------------- 2014-May-05 22:26:34.698916 [P2P0]----- BLOCK ADDED AS ALTERNATIVE ON HEIGHT 26907 id: <c4e6b9f9fc08c1134f07d6622d25b2d4f1f9cd0071e893fef1d1e191bb0f06db> PoW: <5a8efa15ae51b87d079ce13112ae68683345d7dbd3f37c29b7a7a716d8050000> difficulty: 2842603 -------------------------
If so, that sort of sucks that I've seen six of those on my rigs so far. Seriously, six orphans and not a single successfully mined block? My luck is bad so far.
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
May 06, 2014, 07:10:28 AM |
|
Can you do that "getinfo" with curl on Windows, or is that Linux only? (I'm guessing Linux only. *Sigh*)
I'm sure there is a Windows version, but you can just use your browser. localhost:18081/getinfo or http://127.0.0.1:18081/getinfo if the first doesn't work Also, I assume these are orphan blocks? ------------------------- 2014-May-05 22:26:34.698916 [P2P0]----- BLOCK ADDED AS ALTERNATIVE ON HEIGHT 26907 id: <c4e6b9f9fc08c1134f07d6622d25b2d4f1f9cd0071e893fef1d1e191bb0f06db> PoW: <5a8efa15ae51b87d079ce13112ae68683345d7dbd3f37c29b7a7a716d8050000> difficulty: 2842603 -------------------------
If so, that sort of sucks that I've seen six of those on my rigs so far. Seriously, six orphans and not a single successfully mined block? My luck is bad so far. They're not your orphans necessarily. Unless it says "found block" you didn't find a block, orphan or otherwise.
|
|
|
|
AnonyMint
|
|
May 06, 2014, 09:29:43 AM |
|
Which file in the source code contains the proof-of-work algorithm?
I've tried to locate it and can't seem to find it quickly.
I want to analyze the cpu-only claim.
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
May 06, 2014, 09:30:43 AM |
|
Which file in the source code contains the proof-of-work algorithm?
I've tried to locate it and can't seem to find it quickly.
src/crypto/slow-hash.c
|
|
|
|
equipoise
|
|
May 06, 2014, 09:33:00 AM |
|
The bit about needing the block chain on each mining rig is rather stupid as well -- no other coin I can think of requires the block chain to mine it; you only need the miner software.
When you are mining for a pool it gives you the work so you don't need the block chain. If you are solo mining it's logical to have the block chain you are mining on. Just a thought - I never researched it.
|
|
|
|
AnonyMint
|
|
May 06, 2014, 09:36:33 AM |
|
Which file in the source code contains the proof-of-work algorithm?
I've tried to locate it and can't seem to find it quickly.
I want to analyze the cpu-only claim.
src/crypto/slow-hash.c On quick glance, I see AES code. Is this the MemoryCoin algorithm and not the one described in the CryptoNote whitepaper which is memory latency bound?
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
May 06, 2014, 09:38:34 AM |
|
Which file in the source code contains the proof-of-work algorithm?
I've tried to locate it and can't seem to find it quickly.
I want to analyze the cpu-only claim.
src/crypto/slow-hash.c On quick glance, I see AES code. Is this the MemoryCoin algorithm and not the one described in the CryptoNote whitepaper which is memory latency bound? I do not think it is the memorycoin algorithm.
|
|
|
|
dreamspark
|
|
May 06, 2014, 10:01:18 AM |
|
What is the current total coin count?
|
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
May 06, 2014, 10:12:06 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
May 06, 2014, 10:12:25 AM |
|
What is the current total coin count?
Somewhere around 460k
|
|
|
|
AnonyMint
|
|
May 06, 2014, 11:11:45 AM |
|
Which file in the source code contains the proof-of-work algorithm?
I've tried to locate it and can't seem to find it quickly.
I want to analyze the cpu-only claim.
src/crypto/slow-hash.c On quick glance, I see AES code. Is this the MemoryCoin algorithm and not the one described in the CryptoNote whitepaper which is memory latency bound? I do not think it is the memorycoin algorithm. Analyzed it. It is employing AES as another means of defeating GPUs (in addition to the memory latency bound), similar to MemoryCoin. https://cryptonote.org/inside.php#equal-proof-of-work3. GPUs may run hundreds of concurrent instances, but they are limited in other ways See prior analysis of that strategy, which concluded that GPUs would be 2.5 to 3X faster but would perform no better in hashes per Watt: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=355532.msg3976656#msg3976656I pointed out that ASICs would implement AES much more efficiently: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=355532.msg3977088#msg3977088Here follows my conclusions. - slow and thus DDoS prevention will be hampered, which will also likely eliminate any chance of supporting 0 transaction fees
- roughly both memory latency and computation bound (instead of the ideal of being only latency bound), thus if Tilera CPUs or GPUs add dedicated AES support or if ASICs are mated to large fast SDRAM caches, the cpu-only claim will fail.
- it is not leveraging hyperthreads
In short, it is too computation heavy, not maximizing the CPU's hyperthreads, and thus not only will it not be the best cpu-only PoW algorithm possible, it will also fail to be remain cpu-only if it becomes widely adopted. Also being computation heavy, it is consuming more electricity than the ideal cpu-only PoW algorithm.
|
|
|
|
dnaleor
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1000
Want privacy? Use Monero!
|
|
May 06, 2014, 11:30:52 AM |
|
When will this coin be on the exchange?
Is this enough "exchange-like" ?
|
|
|
|
dreamspark
|
|
May 06, 2014, 11:31:53 AM |
|
When will this coin be on the exchange?
Is this enough "exchange-like" ? Its not really the same though is it, Ive been trying to buy since 0.000360.
|
|
|
|
skybot13x
|
|
May 06, 2014, 11:46:24 AM |
|
When will this coin be on the exchange?
Is this enough "exchange-like" ? Its not really the same though is it, Ive been trying to buy since 0.000360. Gotta keep up =P
|
|
|
|
|