Tomatocage
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1222
brb keeping up with the Kardashians
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 19, 2013, 07:39:43 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
phelix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1020
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 19, 2013, 08:04:25 PM |
|
Today, yes. But this is a thread of historical value. Above people event planted the rumor vinced could be an alter ego of the great Satoshi himself. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Also it's so messy in the Altcoins section these days. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
lunarboy
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 19, 2013, 08:11:05 PM |
|
Today, yes. But this is a thread of historical value. Above people event planted the rumor vinced could be an alter ego of the great Satoshi himself. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Also it's so messy in the Altcoins section these days. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Far too many Alt errr Egos ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 19, 2013, 09:46:11 PM |
|
No. Namecoin is special since it was designed as a complement for bitcoin (data storage, naming spaces, etc) not a competitor (merged-mining). And besides it has been in this section since April 2011 and now you want to move it? snailbrain: Namecoin-qt - based on Namecoin 3.50 + Latest Bitcoin-qt
Awesome. I think this alone will be sufficient to revive interest in namecoins and its vision. Make sure it is well-tested, I can help with that ...
|
|
|
|
snailbrain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1807
Merit: 1020
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 19, 2013, 09:55:50 PM |
|
nmc deserves it's own section <3
|
|
|
|
phelix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1020
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 20, 2013, 10:40:47 AM |
|
[...] How's this for a plan? I need the following RPC calls added: - importprivkey - dumpprivkey - importaddress (from codeshark's PR, I can dig the number if needed) - listunspent - createrawtransaction - decoderawtransaction - getrawtransaction - sendrawtransaction - signrawtransaction - signmessage - verifymessage - listaddressgroupings (I can live without this one, but it is useful)
I also need all the tx to be available for querying, not just those for wallet addresses (I think that's already the way it is).
I have a new idea. These would be most important imho: - importprivkey - dumpprivkey - signmessage - verifymessage [...] i'm sure some more people are holding huge stacks of nmc, they should step-up, join together, make a foundation or something to manage the bounties and pay someone [...]
There is a little known Namecoin Marketing and Development Fund: http://dot-bit.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=473&p=2694I was not even aware there is a Namecoin subreddit now: http://www.reddit.com/r/namecoin
|
|
|
|
nelisky
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1002
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 20, 2013, 10:43:01 AM |
|
[...] How's this for a plan? I need the following RPC calls added: - importprivkey - dumpprivkey - importaddress (from codeshark's PR, I can dig the number if needed) - listunspent - createrawtransaction - decoderawtransaction - getrawtransaction - sendrawtransaction - signrawtransaction - signmessage - verifymessage - listaddressgroupings (I can live without this one, but it is useful)
I also need all the tx to be available for querying, not just those for wallet addresses (I think that's already the way it is).
I have a new idea. These would be most important imho: - importprivkey - dumpprivkey - signmessage - verifymessage What? Where did you take that those would be the most important *for my needs*? ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) So, in a nutshell no, that will not be enough, not even close to it, for my needs. I will, however, be glad to tip anyone that pushes those 4 rpc calls into namecoin.
|
|
|
|
phelix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1020
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 20, 2013, 11:42:21 AM Last edit: May 20, 2013, 12:30:49 PM by phelix |
|
[...] How's this for a plan? I need the following RPC calls added: - importprivkey - dumpprivkey - importaddress (from codeshark's PR, I can dig the number if needed) - listunspent - createrawtransaction - decoderawtransaction - getrawtransaction - sendrawtransaction - signrawtransaction - signmessage - verifymessage - listaddressgroupings (I can live without this one, but it is useful)
I also need all the tx to be available for querying, not just those for wallet addresses (I think that's already the way it is).
I have a new idea. These would be most important imho: - importprivkey - dumpprivkey - signmessage - verifymessage What? Where did you take that those would be the most important *for my needs*? ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) So, in a nutshell no, that will not be enough, not even close to it, for my needs. I will, however, be glad to tip anyone that pushes those 4 rpc calls into namecoin. hehe. I am wondering what is the best way to go forward. Try and rebase on v0.8 or improving the current codebase? Rebasing would probably be a hell of a lot of work. Is there any good library we can build on by now? edit: here goes the idea: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=210876 [NMC] Brainstorm: File Signing
|
|
|
|
twobits
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 20, 2013, 12:56:30 PM |
|
I have a new idea. These would be most important imho: - importprivkey - dumpprivkey - signmessage - verifymessage
Oh, these will be first at least in what I am working on. Really for no other reason then they came first, so they will be easy to work into the code as I work up the timeline. At the moment though I just got done putting in some fixes for the coinbase. Now I have no real way to test these. So, is anyone running testnet these days for namecoin? Anyone up to helping to test? Or anyone have a networked connected box/vps I can use to run it on the testnet?
|
█████ █████ ███████ █████ ███ █████████████ █████ ██ █████████████████ █████ █ ██████ ██████ █████ ████ ████ █████████████ █████ ████ █████████████ █████ ████ █████████████ █████ ████ █████ █████ █████ █ ██████ ███████ █████ ██ ███████████ █████ █████ ███ █████████ ████ █████ █████ ███████ ██ | | | ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ | | | | | | ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ | | ►WhitePaper ►One-Pager | ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ | | | | ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ | | ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ ███ | █████ █████ ███████ █████ ███ █████████████ █████ ██ █████████████████ █████ █ ██████ ██████ █████ ████ ████ █████████████ █████ ████ █████████████ █████ ████ █████████████ █████ ████ █████ █████ █████ █ ██████ ███████ █████ ██ ███████████ █████ █████ ███ █████████ ████ █████ █████ ███████ ██ |
|
|
|
|
phelix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1020
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 20, 2013, 06:32:01 PM |
|
I have a new idea. These would be most important imho: - importprivkey - dumpprivkey - signmessage - verifymessage
Oh, these will be first at least in what I am working on. Really for no other reason then they came first, so they will be easy to work into the code as I work up the timeline. At the moment though I just got done putting in some fixes for the coinbase. Now I have no real way to test these. So, is anyone running testnet these days for namecoin? Anyone up to helping to test? Or anyone have a networked connected box/vps I can use to run it on the testnet? Seems to be running, I got two connections. http://testnet.explorer.bit ( http://testnet.explorer.dot-bit.org) also shows a block from yesterday.
|
|
|
|
snailbrain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1807
Merit: 1020
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 20, 2013, 07:42:25 PM Last edit: May 20, 2013, 09:43:45 PM by snailbrain |
|
please help test: DO NOT USE AS MAIN WALLET Namecoin-QT Alpha 0.1 - based on Namecoin 3.50 + Latest Bitcoin-qt Warning - you may lose NMCSource + Win bin Make sure you Backup your wallet Make sure you Backup the Block Chain (re-downloading = nightmare) Send Coins at your OWN Risk.. please test with small amounts Known Bugs: sendtoname (via console) crashes client on my win7-64.. the original namecoind 3.50 does the same for me (but seems to be working for others?) Sending Coins - 2 days ago I sent coins which show as unconfirmed in transaction history, possibly due to corrupt blockchain (in-proper shutdown possibly was the cause), as has been working ever since.. but, please test thoroughly and carefully with "small amounts" Encrypt Wallet is not working, do not use. I cannot accept any responsibility for loss of coins - please test at your own risk. but Please help assist/debug.. NMC > Any Alt coins, and BTC imo http://www.mediafire.com/folder/p0rm1buz48a2vu8,8j2ydrcnyrbuiwm/sharednote: readme/licence stuff missing atm, will sort asap THIS IS ONLY FOR TESTING
|
|
|
|
snailbrain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1807
Merit: 1020
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 20, 2013, 08:05:25 PM |
|
You should provide a git repository.
we will eventually..
|
|
|
|
snailbrain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1807
Merit: 1020
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 20, 2013, 08:32:09 PM |
|
Why not now? It allows people to easily review the changes.
Dumping tarballs and binaries is not how you do development, especially open source.
working on it.. sorry, be patient <3
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 20, 2013, 10:30:39 PM |
|
Why not now? It allows people to easily review the changes.
Dumping tarballs and binaries is not how you do development, especially open source.
heheh, Satoshi might argue with you ... in an ideal world everyone would know perfect git and write essays about philosophy behind minor modes... but let's not be too anal shall we? ... and at this point namecoin will take whatever dev work it can get.
|
|
|
|
|
snailbrain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1807
Merit: 1020
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 21, 2013, 01:51:51 AM Last edit: May 25, 2013, 03:16:46 PM by snailbrain |
|
I pledged 100nmc a few pages back for a OSX GUI and am more than happy to send that to a Bounty Address. There used to be one over on dot-bit but we've been under pretty heavy spam recently so not sure where to put it? http://dot-bit.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=948should just need compiling for osx (someone can do it) github thanks for the help moa + arsenische Github removed, re-doin some issues compiling, hopefully will sort tomorrow... and community is helping with tidying it up.. it's time for NMC
|
|
|
|
virtualmaster
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 21, 2013, 07:54:20 AM |
|
it's time for NMC
Yes. The Golden Age of Namecoin is coming.
|
|
|
|
|
snailbrain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1807
Merit: 1020
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 23, 2013, 04:06:49 AM |
|
sorry github will have to wait (I'm not the coder, it will be put on github when complete, he is a busy man) Latest Namecoin-qt + Win Binaries (should compile in linux/osx) should be working bar Encrypt Wallet (fix soon) Still Use with Caution Namecoin-qt http://www.mediafire.com/folder/b8qo76o7d8w6vda,l1lohaglao45023/shared
|
|
|
|
|