Bitcoin Forum
December 06, 2016, 12:35:33 PM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 [43] 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [announce] Namecoin - a distributed naming system based on Bitcoin  (Read 319031 times)
vindimy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 239



View Profile
September 11, 2013, 04:32:53 AM
 #841

I would tend to think you're stuck on the synchronization part.
What block number does getinfo reports? You should have at least 133271.

Yep, it seems it's on an old block (or still downloading blocks?).

Code:
$ namecoind getinfo
{
    "version" : 35000,
    "balance" : 0.00000000,
    "blocks" : 109890,
    "connections" : 8,
    "proxy" : "",
    "generate" : false,
    "genproclimit" : -1,
    "difficulty" : 2275750.77475240,
    "hashespersec" : 0,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1373125339,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
    "mininput" : 0.00010000,
    "errors" : ""
}

Edit: actually the block count is moving up, just slowly..

Code:
$ namecoind getinfo
{
    "version" : 35000,
    "balance" : 0.00000000,
    "blocks" : 109997,
    "connections" : 8,
    "proxy" : "",
    "generate" : false,
    "genproclimit" : -1,
    "difficulty" : 2275750.77475240,
    "hashespersec" : 0,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1373125339,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
    "mininput" : 0.00010000,
    "errors" : ""
}

1481027733
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481027733

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481027733
Reply with quote  #2

1481027733
Report to moderator
1481027733
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481027733

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481027733
Reply with quote  #2

1481027733
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
phelix
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680


nmc:id/phelix


View Profile
September 11, 2013, 07:19:14 AM
 #842

I would tend to think you're stuck on the synchronization part.
What block number does getinfo reports? You should have at least 133271.

Yep, it seems it's on an old block (or still downloading blocks?).
[...]

Edit: actually the block count is moving up, just slowly..
[...]
The latest one from here should be faster, especially on non ssd systems: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=236375.0

blockchained.com ■ bitcointalk top posts
Deafboy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 484



View Profile WWW
September 21, 2013, 05:09:38 AM
 #843

Is there a way to open old wallet in namecoin Q.3.70b?
Code:
[deafboy@Planetexpress namecoinq-vQ.3.70b]$ ./namecoin-qt


************************
EXCEPTION: 11DbException      
Db::open: Invalid argument      
namecoin in Runaway exception      

Segmentation fault (core dumped)
[deafboy@Planetexpress namecoinq-vQ.3.70b]$

edit: Nevermind, wallet file was corrupted. Working copy restored from backup is working with Q.3.70b
phelix
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680


nmc:id/phelix


View Profile
September 22, 2013, 08:43:45 AM
 #844

Is there a way to open old wallet in namecoin Q.3.70b?
Code:
[deafboy@Planetexpress namecoinq-vQ.3.70b]$ ./namecoin-qt


************************
EXCEPTION: 11DbException      
Db::open: Invalid argument      
namecoin in Runaway exception      

Segmentation fault (core dumped)
[deafboy@Planetexpress namecoinq-vQ.3.70b]$

edit: Nevermind, wallet file was corrupted. Working copy restored from backup is working with Q.3.70b
Glad to hear it was not a problem with the new version.

blockchained.com ■ bitcointalk top posts
phelix
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680


nmc:id/phelix


View Profile
October 02, 2013, 08:11:07 AM
 #845

Just want to point out snailbrain's Namecoin version with GUI is now "official".



see http://namecoin.info and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=236340.msg3211229#msg3211229

blockchained.com ■ bitcointalk top posts
nelisky
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554


View Profile
October 15, 2013, 12:16:24 PM
 #846

Have you guys noticed this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=310954.0 already?
virtualmaster
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504



View Profile
October 15, 2013, 12:42:11 PM
 #847

Have you guys noticed this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=310954.0 already?
Yes. I saw it from the beginning.
The user 'libcoin'
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=52207
have done his first post on the Namecoin forum and asserted that Namecoin is dead  
'This is the postmortems and obituary over namecoin.'
but Namecoin has been always his favorite alt-coin.
'Namecoin has always been my favorite alt-coin'
Here in bitcointalk.org his first word about Namecoin is only in his post where he is announcing its dead.
Very strange.

They are some technical observations made by him which needs to be checked if it they are true or not. I guess that could take some time.
But he could make a very easy demonstration of his theory by transferring a .bit domain owned by somebody to another address and then back to the original owner.


Calendars for free to print: 2014 Calendar in JPG | 2014 Calendar in PDF Protect the Environment with Namecoin: 2014 Calendar in JPG | 2014 Calendar in PDF
Namecoinia.org  -  take the planet in your hands
BTC: 15KXVQv7UGtUoTe5VNWXT1bMz46MXuePba   |  NMC: NABFA31b3x7CvhKMxcipUqA3TnKsNfCC7S
nelisky
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554


View Profile
October 15, 2013, 12:48:48 PM
 #848

Well, the whole tone of his post sounded fishy, but he does mention at the very end of the OP that he made an example of the issue in practice and explains it. I honestly don't have the brain power today to parse through this but my TL/DR makes me think the issue as described is not a protocol issue but rather a missing check in the implementation. That being the case I can't understand the 'post-mortem' tag (unless, of course, someone wants to buy cheaper).
virtualmaster
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504



View Profile
October 15, 2013, 01:03:13 PM
 #849

Well, the whole tone of his post sounded fishy, but he does mention at the very end of the OP that he made an example of the issue in practice and explains it. I honestly don't have the brain power today to parse through this but my TL/DR makes me think the issue as described is not a protocol issue but rather a missing check in the implementation. That being the case I can't understand the 'post-mortem' tag (unless, of course, someone wants to buy cheaper).
In the meantime he demonstrated the bug on a chosen domain.
It seems that I misinterpreted some informations.
I hope we can fix it quickly.

Calendars for free to print: 2014 Calendar in JPG | 2014 Calendar in PDF Protect the Environment with Namecoin: 2014 Calendar in JPG | 2014 Calendar in PDF
Namecoinia.org  -  take the planet in your hands
BTC: 15KXVQv7UGtUoTe5VNWXT1bMz46MXuePba   |  NMC: NABFA31b3x7CvhKMxcipUqA3TnKsNfCC7S
domob
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 936


View Profile WWW
October 16, 2013, 05:38:06 AM
 #850

There's already a proposed fix and plan for a hard-fork now.  The fix seemingly has some bugs on GNU/Linux, but the planned strategy is sound and accepted by the community at large (it seems).  I think this problem can be considered well on its way to be solved without causing actual losses to anyone except those who tried to "steal" names abusing the bug.

Use your Namecoin identity as OpenID: https://nameid.org/
Donations: 1domobKsPZ5cWk2kXssD8p8ES1qffGUCm | NMC: NCdomobcmcmVdxC5yxMitojQ4tvAtv99pY
BM-GtQnWM3vcdorfqpKXsmfHQ4rVYPG5pKS | GPG 0xA7330737
namecoin.info
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 17



View Profile WWW
October 29, 2013, 07:28:18 PM
 #851

Out now: Namecoin-Qt & daemon with the name enforcing bug fixed.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=236340.msg3436752#msg3436752
malevolent
can into space
Staff
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1624



View Profile
November 28, 2013, 11:29:56 PM
 #852

How much will I have to download after launching Namecoin these days?
phelix
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680


nmc:id/phelix


View Profile
November 29, 2013, 09:10:56 AM
 #853

How much will I have to download after launching Namecoin these days?
About 1.5GB     Depending on your harddrive (ssd) and connection it can be as 'fast' as two hours.

blockchained.com ■ bitcointalk top posts
rmines
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140


View Profile
November 29, 2013, 04:45:28 PM
 #854

Is the binary offered on the Namecoin website the best way to put NMC in a wallet?

♔ PrimeDice : The Premier Bitcoin Gambling Experience @PrimeDice
Spare some change? 1LkqfvQTLAEiiCwTqkPRcvUdEmkCR11QDE
inaltoasinistra
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 127


View Profile
December 13, 2013, 12:26:24 PM
 #855

Expired name will be deleted from the chain?

bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


https://keybase.io/bitpop


View Profile WWW
December 13, 2013, 12:34:02 PM
 #856

Is the binary offered on the Namecoin website the best way to put NMC in a wallet?

Try multi bit

Reputation  |  PGP  |  DigitalOcean  |  OpenVPN 2GB Free  |  TorGuard  |  Ethereum Classic
Bitcoin: 3DSh6AnmvBpDJFUz2mnLirMLmTMcFs9nDm
Bitmessage: BM-2cXN9j8NFT2n1FxDVQ6HQq4D4MZuuaBFyb
domob
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 936


View Profile WWW
December 13, 2013, 12:35:06 PM
 #857

Expired name will be deleted from the chain?

A name's history is kept forever in the blockchain, just as is done with the history of a chain of Bitcoin transactions.  This is necessary for validation.  However, when a name is expired, implementations are free to remove it from their name-index, so that, e. g., an expired .bit domain may no longer resolve.  Furthermore, when a name is expired, anyone is able to claim it by re-registering the name.  The original private key is not necessary for that; so if you don't want/need a name any longer, feel free to let it expire - but then anyone who is interested in the name may "steal it" after expirey.

Use your Namecoin identity as OpenID: https://nameid.org/
Donations: 1domobKsPZ5cWk2kXssD8p8ES1qffGUCm | NMC: NCdomobcmcmVdxC5yxMitojQ4tvAtv99pY
BM-GtQnWM3vcdorfqpKXsmfHQ4rVYPG5pKS | GPG 0xA7330737
phelix
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680


nmc:id/phelix


View Profile
December 13, 2013, 05:47:19 PM
 #858

Is the binary offered on the Namecoin website the best way to put NMC in a wallet?

Try multi bit
Did I miss something?

blockchained.com ■ bitcointalk top posts
bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


https://keybase.io/bitpop


View Profile WWW
December 14, 2013, 07:18:50 AM
 #859

Is the binary offered on the Namecoin website the best way to put NMC in a wallet?

Try multi bit
Did I miss something?


No its just faster for new users

Reputation  |  PGP  |  DigitalOcean  |  OpenVPN 2GB Free  |  TorGuard  |  Ethereum Classic
Bitcoin: 3DSh6AnmvBpDJFUz2mnLirMLmTMcFs9nDm
Bitmessage: BM-2cXN9j8NFT2n1FxDVQ6HQq4D4MZuuaBFyb
phelix
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680


nmc:id/phelix


View Profile
December 14, 2013, 10:10:11 AM
 #860

Is the binary offered on the Namecoin website the best way to put NMC in a wallet?

Try multi bit
Did I miss something?


No its just faster for new users
it's not available for Namecoin....

blockchained.com ■ bitcointalk top posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 [43] 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!