torbank
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2013, 07:30:25 AM |
|
Browser plugins available now for chrome and firefox.
I think this is a real milestone.
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2013, 07:34:00 AM |
|
Time to petition opendns too. Who does the plugin query?
|
|
|
|
Matthew N. Wright
Untrustworthy
Hero Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Hero VIP ultra official trusted super staff puppet
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2013, 07:52:08 AM |
|
Looking for someone to come represent NameCoin at the Bitcoin EU conference ( http://theconference.eu) on a panel of alternative currencies. Anyone available to come to Amsterdam September 27-29 and sit on the panel with Charles Lee (coblee) and others?
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2013, 08:28:50 AM |
|
Browser plugins available now for chrome and firefox.
I think this is a real milestone.
Hey, good news, got a link for those? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
nelisky
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1002
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2013, 08:43:10 AM |
|
Bounty #2:
Based on snailbrain's latest namecoin-qt I have the following problem: - manually create and submit a tx to send full balance of addr1 -> part to addr2 -> part back to addr1 (think change back to sending address) - The transaction is sent correctly but the wallet is updated only for the debit of addr1 and credit of addr2. For some reason the credit of addr1 is ignored, even when the the tx is included in a block - restarting namecoind with -rescan gets that balance back
I need the above to work as in bitcoin, i.e. when sending to the address the output belongs to, both debit and credit to that address get processed by the wallet.
I have 1 BTC up for grabs for that fix, and I'll also try to fix it myself time permitting.
Yesterday I asked for pointers on #bitcoin-dev and instead of tech advice I got a "you shouldn't do that"... oh well.
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2013, 08:47:33 AM |
|
Why wouldn't they recommend that?
|
|
|
|
nelisky
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1002
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2013, 08:54:06 AM |
|
Why wouldn't they recommend that?
Because reusing addresses hurts everyone's privacy... it's true to some extent, but it is always a problem when human behavior is the thing being hacked on instead of code.
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2013, 09:01:24 AM |
|
Isn't there a way to fix that without reusing an address?
|
|
|
|
nelisky
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1002
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2013, 09:07:24 AM |
|
Isn't there a way to fix that without reusing an address?
Huh? The problem only exists when reusing the address. My workflow depends on that, and changing the workflow is a lot of work. At any rate, this issue is a bug and should be fixed.
|
|
|
|
domob
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1135
Merit: 1170
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2013, 09:24:22 AM |
|
Bounty #2:
Based on snailbrain's latest namecoin-qt I have the following problem: - manually create and submit a tx to send full balance of addr1 -> part to addr2 -> part back to addr1 (think change back to sending address) - The transaction is sent correctly but the wallet is updated only for the debit of addr1 and credit of addr2. For some reason the credit of addr1 is ignored, even when the the tx is included in a block - restarting namecoind with -rescan gets that balance back
I need the above to work as in bitcoin, i.e. when sending to the address the output belongs to, both debit and credit to that address get processed by the wallet.
I have 1 BTC up for grabs for that fix, and I'll also try to fix it myself time permitting.
Yesterday I asked for pointers on #bitcoin-dev and instead of tech advice I got a "you shouldn't do that"... oh well.
I presume snailbrain is the best fit for fixing the bug. However, if you give me a reasonable time-frame (say 48h) without risk of anyone snatching the bounty away while I work on it, I can give it a try. But as said, it is probably easiest if snailbrain claims the bounty. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
Use your Namecoin identity as OpenID: https://nameid.org/Donations: 1 domobKsPZ5cWk2kXssD8p8ES1qffGUCm | NMC: NC domobcmcmVdxC5yxMitojQ4tvAtv99pY BM-GtQnWM3vcdorfqpKXsmfHQ4rVYPG5pKS | GPG 0xA7330737
|
|
|
|
khal
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2013, 05:35:16 PM Last edit: June 11, 2013, 07:16:23 PM by khal |
|
Good work, but who is the creator ? Is it opensource ? For what I've seen, it uses a proxy server (my proxy currently, listed here : https://dot-bit.org/How_To_Browse_Bit_Domains#List_of_App_proxies). You can do the same with foxyproxy for example : https://dot-bit.org/How_To_Configure_FoxyproxyI would like to see it evolve to allow the user to chose a local proxy (to trust nobody, but the blockchain :p), so, itf it could be open sourced it would be cool :p
|
|
|
|
virtualmaster
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2013, 06:35:50 PM |
|
The foxyproxy is a 2 click solution at it works without problems. ( an old but still very good description Khal) This add-on is a 1 click solution but it doesn't work. (at least by me mozilla/google chrome - none of them after installed and restarted) I will look why doesn't work.
|
|
|
|
lunarboy
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2013, 06:39:32 PM |
|
+1 Great work. Had a look at it today, seems like its well done but couldn't get it working as intended, and struggled to find any documentation. For my tuppence worth,... It should be open sourced. If these guys can bring one click .bit registration to the masses, keeping the proprietary software is not necessary, open source it and build from a trusted first mover advantage. Keep up the good work guys your on the right path.
|
|
|
|
khal
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2013, 08:04:57 PM |
|
We currently need some people to moderate the namecoin forum, because there is too much spam and I've not the time to clean the forum regularly. People interested can postulate here.
|
|
|
|
|
snailbrain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1807
Merit: 1020
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2013, 09:16:18 PM |
|
Bounty #2:
Based on snailbrain's latest namecoin-qt I have the following problem: - manually create and submit a tx to send full balance of addr1 -> part to addr2 -> part back to addr1 (think change back to sending address) - The transaction is sent correctly but the wallet is updated only for the debit of addr1 and credit of addr2. For some reason the credit of addr1 is ignored, even when the the tx is included in a block - restarting namecoind with -rescan gets that balance back
I need the above to work as in bitcoin, i.e. when sending to the address the output belongs to, both debit and credit to that address get processed by the wallet.
I have 1 BTC up for grabs for that fix, and I'll also try to fix it myself time permitting.
Yesterday I asked for pointers on #bitcoin-dev and instead of tech advice I got a "you shouldn't do that"... oh well.
maybe try the update.. testing "seemed" to show the correct amounts? +1
|
|
|
|
virtualmaster
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 12, 2013, 05:55:13 AM |
|
Tried namecoin-qt 3.56. The basic features seems to work. I will try the 3.57 also. So far is a good work and a great step forward in the Namecoin history. Thank you snailbrain. Is it intended to include the Domain registration features also or there will be two branches ?
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 12, 2013, 06:46:47 AM |
|
Tried namecoin-qt 3.56. The basic features seems to work. I will try the 3.57 also. So far is a good work and a great step forward in the Namecoin history. Thank you snailbrain. Is it intended to include the Domain registration features also or there will be two branches ? I think it will include eventually from the sneak preview. Recall you can go to the debug window (Help --> Debug window) and console tab opens up when you can see all the rpc calls ... type help .. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
|