|
JakeThePanda
|
 |
June 10, 2014, 03:43:27 PM |
|
No, the sender address is not correct. Well follow link. XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da You sent 0.1 to yourself, isn't ? do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC No, none of them (XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da) are the sender address. I can provide the transaction ID to prove if necessary. Please provide Here are two transaction IDs from my wallet: ID #1Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.056831 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.056841 XC
Transaction ID: ccd856d41fcfecd497d09c35d8187573db5b91ab43d8c512fbb96b2bbc3ee387 Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.043169 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.043179 XC
Transaction ID: 60bb17bbf3d5fd411795870e11601ed0543a625802d3f88ef73eb01f9e882a07
I link it http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28131.htmCheck. you don't know how to read block explorer. Have you heard change address ? Details for Block #28131
Hash 375823c27127d20d0e5db2b9dbe815cd50aa593bd24b48f1a9ab4c87a247a75f
Date/Time 2014-06-10 12:36:04 extracted by Proof of Stake
Transactions 4
Value Out 1,020.352284 XC
Difficulty 0.00113073
Outstanding 5,512,395.57576338 XC
Transactions
Raw Block
Hash Value Out From (amount) To (amount)
600409af81... 0.0 XC
Generation + Fees
Included in following transaction(s) 0.823265 XC
3ecaeebbbf... 1,000.809285 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 999.986 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.4 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.409285 XC
ccd856d41f... 9.79992 XC
XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC 9.79993 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.056831 XC
60bb17bbf3... 9.743079 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XF9GYs4Xhir9eQ9DLyApeLxhv8H4i9dnge 9.69991 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.043169 XC
Proved. Thanks for the analysis. Could you identify the specific sender address? I only have one address have balance. Well, do listaddressgroupings at debug console. You didn't send from specific address, but send from account. An account has a lot of address(change address). Do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC at debug console. Well, XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC have 0 balance in my account. So he did identify an address from your wallet? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whoever mines the block which ends up containing your transaction will get its fee.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
520Bit
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:44:23 PM |
|
No, the sender address is not correct. Well follow link. XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da You sent 0.1 to yourself, isn't ? do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC No, none of them (XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da) are the sender address. I can provide the transaction ID to prove if necessary. Please provide Here are two transaction IDs from my wallet: ID #1Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.056831 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.056841 XC
Transaction ID: ccd856d41fcfecd497d09c35d8187573db5b91ab43d8c512fbb96b2bbc3ee387 Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.043169 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.043179 XC
Transaction ID: 60bb17bbf3d5fd411795870e11601ed0543a625802d3f88ef73eb01f9e882a07
I link it http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28131.htmCheck. you don't know how to read block explorer. Have you heard change address ? Details for Block #28131
Hash 375823c27127d20d0e5db2b9dbe815cd50aa593bd24b48f1a9ab4c87a247a75f
Date/Time 2014-06-10 12:36:04 extracted by Proof of Stake
Transactions 4
Value Out 1,020.352284 XC
Difficulty 0.00113073
Outstanding 5,512,395.57576338 XC
Transactions
Raw Block
Hash Value Out From (amount) To (amount)
600409af81... 0.0 XC
Generation + Fees
Included in following transaction(s) 0.823265 XC
3ecaeebbbf... 1,000.809285 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 999.986 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.4 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.409285 XC
ccd856d41f... 9.79992 XC
XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC 9.79993 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.056831 XC
60bb17bbf3... 9.743079 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XF9GYs4Xhir9eQ9DLyApeLxhv8H4i9dnge 9.69991 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.043169 XC
Proved. Thanks for the analysis. Could you identify the specific sender address? I only have one address have balance. Well, do listaddressgroupings at debug console. You didn't send from specific address, but send from account. An account has a lot of address(change address). Do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC at debug console. Well, XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC have 0 balance in my account. So he did identify an address from your wallet? Yes, but it is not the sender address. |
|
|
|
|
|
JakeThePanda
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:46:57 PM |
|
No, the sender address is not correct. Well follow link. XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da You sent 0.1 to yourself, isn't ? do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC No, none of them (XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da) are the sender address. I can provide the transaction ID to prove if necessary. Please provide Here are two transaction IDs from my wallet: ID #1Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.056831 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.056841 XC
Transaction ID: ccd856d41fcfecd497d09c35d8187573db5b91ab43d8c512fbb96b2bbc3ee387 Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.043169 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.043179 XC
Transaction ID: 60bb17bbf3d5fd411795870e11601ed0543a625802d3f88ef73eb01f9e882a07
I link it http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28131.htmCheck. you don't know how to read block explorer. Have you heard change address ? Details for Block #28131
Hash 375823c27127d20d0e5db2b9dbe815cd50aa593bd24b48f1a9ab4c87a247a75f
Date/Time 2014-06-10 12:36:04 extracted by Proof of Stake
Transactions 4
Value Out 1,020.352284 XC
Difficulty 0.00113073
Outstanding 5,512,395.57576338 XC
Transactions
Raw Block
Hash Value Out From (amount) To (amount)
600409af81... 0.0 XC
Generation + Fees
Included in following transaction(s) 0.823265 XC
3ecaeebbbf... 1,000.809285 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 999.986 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.4 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.409285 XC
ccd856d41f... 9.79992 XC
XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC 9.79993 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.056831 XC
60bb17bbf3... 9.743079 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XF9GYs4Xhir9eQ9DLyApeLxhv8H4i9dnge 9.69991 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.043169 XC
Proved. Thanks for the analysis. Could you identify the specific sender address? I only have one address have balance. Well, do listaddressgroupings at debug console. You didn't send from specific address, but send from account. An account has a lot of address(change address). Do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC at debug console. Well, XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC have 0 balance in my account. So he did identify an address from your wallet? Yes, but it is not the sender address. Meh, he still identified the sender. Same thing in my mind. |
|
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:48:36 PM |
|
No, the sender address is not correct. Well follow link. XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da You sent 0.1 to yourself, isn't ? do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC No, none of them (XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da) are the sender address. I can provide the transaction ID to prove if necessary. Please provide Here are two transaction IDs from my wallet: ID #1Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.056831 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.056841 XC
Transaction ID: ccd856d41fcfecd497d09c35d8187573db5b91ab43d8c512fbb96b2bbc3ee387 Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.043169 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.043179 XC
Transaction ID: 60bb17bbf3d5fd411795870e11601ed0543a625802d3f88ef73eb01f9e882a07
I link it http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28131.htmCheck. you don't know how to read block explorer. Have you heard change address ? Details for Block #28131
Hash 375823c27127d20d0e5db2b9dbe815cd50aa593bd24b48f1a9ab4c87a247a75f
Date/Time 2014-06-10 12:36:04 extracted by Proof of Stake
Transactions 4
Value Out 1,020.352284 XC
Difficulty 0.00113073
Outstanding 5,512,395.57576338 XC
Transactions
Raw Block
Hash Value Out From (amount) To (amount)
600409af81... 0.0 XC
Generation + Fees
Included in following transaction(s) 0.823265 XC
3ecaeebbbf... 1,000.809285 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 999.986 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.4 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.409285 XC
ccd856d41f... 9.79992 XC
XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC 9.79993 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.056831 XC
60bb17bbf3... 9.743079 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XF9GYs4Xhir9eQ9DLyApeLxhv8H4i9dnge 9.69991 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.043169 XC
Proved. Thanks for the analysis. Could you identify the specific sender address? I only have one address have balance. Well, do listaddressgroupings at debug console. You didn't send from specific address, but send from account. An account has a lot of address(change address). Do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC at debug console. Well, XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC have 0 balance in my account. When you sent 0.1 , XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC 9.79993 was used for input. sent 0.056831 to XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is, change 9.743089 was returned to XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs. XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs is change address. Index Previous output Address Amount
0 856b2a8fc272...:0 XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC 9.79993 XC
Outputs
Index Redeemed in Address Amount
0 60bb17bbf3d5... XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
1 07faf677cc18... XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.056831 XC
XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC has 0.001. |
|
|
|
|
policymaker
Full Member
 Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Crypto Currency Supporter
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:50:42 PM |
|
Secure replied that the transaction was not mixed, just passed through. And chaeplin did say that the dev can fix that, so in the end he helped
|
|
|
|
|
520Bit
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:54:47 PM |
|
No, the sender address is not correct. Well follow link. XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da You sent 0.1 to yourself, isn't ? do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC No, none of them (XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da) are the sender address. I can provide the transaction ID to prove if necessary. Please provide Here are two transaction IDs from my wallet: ID #1Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.056831 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.056841 XC
Transaction ID: ccd856d41fcfecd497d09c35d8187573db5b91ab43d8c512fbb96b2bbc3ee387 Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.043169 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.043179 XC
Transaction ID: 60bb17bbf3d5fd411795870e11601ed0543a625802d3f88ef73eb01f9e882a07
I link it http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28131.htmCheck. you don't know how to read block explorer. Have you heard change address ? Details for Block #28131
Hash 375823c27127d20d0e5db2b9dbe815cd50aa593bd24b48f1a9ab4c87a247a75f
Date/Time 2014-06-10 12:36:04 extracted by Proof of Stake
Transactions 4
Value Out 1,020.352284 XC
Difficulty 0.00113073
Outstanding 5,512,395.57576338 XC
Transactions
Raw Block
Hash Value Out From (amount) To (amount)
600409af81... 0.0 XC
Generation + Fees
Included in following transaction(s) 0.823265 XC
3ecaeebbbf... 1,000.809285 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 999.986 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.4 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.409285 XC
ccd856d41f... 9.79992 XC
XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC 9.79993 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.056831 XC
60bb17bbf3... 9.743079 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XF9GYs4Xhir9eQ9DLyApeLxhv8H4i9dnge 9.69991 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.043169 XC
Proved. Thanks for the analysis. Could you identify the specific sender address? I only have one address have balance. Well, do listaddressgroupings at debug console. You didn't send from specific address, but send from account. An account has a lot of address(change address). Do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC at debug console. Well, XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC have 0 balance in my account. When you sent 0.1 , XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC 9.79993 was used for input. sent 0.056831 to XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is, change 9.743089 was returned to XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs. XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs is change address. Index Previous output Address Amount
0 856b2a8fc272...:0 XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC 9.79993 XC
Outputs
Index Redeemed in Address Amount
0 60bb17bbf3d5... XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
1 07faf677cc18... XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.056831 XC
XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC has 0.001. I just received 0.001 XC a few minutes ago, may be you sent it. |
|
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:58:08 PM |
|
I just received 0.001 XC a few minutes ago, may be you sent it.
Yes. input, output, change. |
|
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
June 10, 2014, 04:26:02 PM |
|
ref: user@sv2:~/x11coin> ./run.py 28100 28800
* ====> Working block height 28131 has 4 tx
* ====> Searchng XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
tx: 2 percent 100 value 0.1
* ====> Working block height 28169 has 8 tx
* ====> Searchng XQS9sQ7aojzyUMmjwS6WUzJPR16N1q2jGx
tx: 2 percent 100 value 2.602155
|
|
|
|
|
|
Propulsion
|
|
June 10, 2014, 09:02:47 PM |
|
Can someone explain to me why the XC mixing method does not mix coins? Wouldn't that make XC fundamentally broken?
|
|
|
|
|
|
JakeThePanda
|
|
June 11, 2014, 12:08:19 AM
Last edit: June 11, 2014, 12:52:21 AM by JakeThePanda |
|
What's up DRK fuddsters? We should just call this thread "Scared Darkcoin Holders".
|
|
|
|
|
adhitthana
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 11, 2014, 12:43:02 AM |
|
Can someone explain to me why the XC mixing method does not mix coins? The mixer does mix coins. It's been tested many times. However coins that don't go through the mixer don't get mixed. Pretty simple. |
|
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
June 11, 2014, 10:57:57 AM
Last edit: June 11, 2014, 05:23:56 PM by chaeplin |
|
ref: ver. XCv0.9.1.41x11-coin-1.0
sendfrommixer "1" XH2xAiXB2H6tXSraubgfxWHKRUJR8rWdHm 0.1
Its my mintpal deposit adress and that is working i have now 0.09999 at my mintpal deposit.
I have searched a direct link to this transaction but i cant find one with my user perspective.
Xnode has been paid for but its not mine i'm curious to know what is the xnode that has been paid for this transaction.
Nice work ATCsecure !
!! http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?95279.htm
Hash a57d4def3d08fe7753a77f8ac05b7a757105d72dcf0f33dd6aafd910a51a0ed0
Blockheight 28315 (142 confirmations)
Date/Time 2014-06-11 03:16:37
Total Output 16.372583 XC
Fee 0.0 XC
Inputs / Outputs
Raw Transaction
Inputs
Index Previous output Address Amount
0 40f01abd6d11...:0 XHaUgNe5rZ6Avf7bwXGBCWdxD5nCxqAxVo 16.382583 XC
Outputs
Index Redeemed in Address Amount
0 Not yet redeemed XWtcrjseXhMBDBvGPfwXq3SVKhdv7qiLcG 16.310359 XC
1 Not yet redeemed XSroWK3bng8awEdZs5eZXUqXgyn4RPr7cG 0.062224 XC
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93622.htmHash 40f01abd6d11e15a0d722c1419a31358d7b399d5e9a4f3d742959122462a03d6
Blockheight 27754 (703 confirmations)
Date/Time 2014-06-09 19:43:38
Total Output 16.45 XC
Fee 0.0 XC
Inputs / Outputs
Raw Transaction
Inputs
Index Previous output Address Amount
0 afe2802947d5...:1 XEuKHQieqYF2xJQ73m92GsY6nkiRjToE9R 16.46 XC
Outputs
Index Redeemed in Address Amount
0 a57d4def3d08... XHaUgNe5rZ6Avf7bwXGBCWdxD5nCxqAxVo 16.382583 XC
1 Not yet redeemed XHx9XtGvaN5kbzfjpEqgSy4pjw6aU6vjae 0.067417 XC
--> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93120.htmHash afe2802947d5737695fd90c6fab5061fdb2a75fd8fe2bbf2be34b74f0925d093
Blockheight 27557 (900 confirmations)
Date/Time 2014-06-09 10:10:06
Total Output 32.928647 XC
Proof of Stake + Fees 0.028647 XC
Inputs / Outputs
Raw Transaction
Inputs
Index Previous output Address Amount
0 9ff63a3e7c94...:1 XEuKHQieqYF2xJQ73m92GsY6nkiRjToE9R 32.9 XC
Outputs
Index Redeemed in Address Amount
0 40f01abd6d11... XEuKHQieqYF2xJQ73m92GsY6nkiRjToE9R 16.46 XC
1 44f76163aca2... XEuKHQieqYF2xJQ73m92GsY6nkiRjToE9R 16.468647 XC
|
|
|
|
|
|
JakeThePanda
|
|
June 11, 2014, 02:08:34 PM |
|
Paging, paging Dr Chaeplin. Please report to the nearest XC thread at once. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JakeThePanda
|
|
June 11, 2014, 04:02:15 PM |
|
same tx
sender -------- > mixer ----> payee change<--------|  First tell dev to post md5 of whateverattached_senderaddress. If he knows the address he should post it... ATC is right not to post the MD5, someone could write a scrypt scanning the blockchain for all used addresses & checking there MD5. With both start & begin addresses finding the route between is easy. If md5 posted it should be in a encrypted file we can all download first. After the answer has been given, release the password. there is no need, when/if somebody posts the address, I will provide the details to the other side of the transaction which will either prove they are correct or prove they are wrong |
|
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
June 11, 2014, 04:09:50 PM |
|
do whatever md5, sha, anything.
like this 'tuuiuauiyduayidsyauiydsaiuydsiuayd_[real_address]_lkjlkajslkdjalksjdalskdjalkjdsalkdjalks'
and post result.
Then when I submit address, Dev should tell input of whatever hash.
|
|
|
|
|
|
JakeThePanda
|
|
June 11, 2014, 04:23:28 PM |
|
ATCSecure? do whatever md5, sha, anything.
like this 'tuuiuauiyduayidsyauiydsaiuydsiuayd_[real_address]_lkjlkajslkdjalksjdalskdjalkjdsalkdjalks'
and post result.
Then when I submit address, Dev should tell input of whatever hash.
Again, I'm not doing that, if he knows the address then he should post it |
|
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
June 11, 2014, 04:28:07 PM |
|
ATCSecure? do whatever md5, sha, anything.
like this 'tuuiuauiyduayidsyauiydsaiuydsiuayd_[real_address]_lkjlkajslkdjalksjdalskdjalkjdsalkdjalks'
and post result.
Then when I submit address, Dev should tell input of whatever hash.
Again, I'm not doing that, if he knows the address then he should post it Why should I ? I havn't submitted wrong address. Only Dev said 'is not the sender address'. So not interested. |
|
|
|
|
policymaker
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Crypto Currency Supporter
|
|
June 11, 2014, 04:30:39 PM |
|
ATCSecure? do whatever md5, sha, anything.
like this 'tuuiuauiyduayidsyauiydsaiuydsiuayd_[real_address]_lkjlkajslkdjalksjdalskdjalkjdsalkdjalks'
and post result.
Then when I submit address, Dev should tell input of whatever hash.
Again, I'm not doing that, if he knows the address then he should post it Why should I ? I havn't submitted wrong address. Only Dev said 'is not the sender address'. So not interested. why don't you just post the address if you really know it and help with the bug fixing? Denying to help will only make you a troll and a FUDer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
