GabryRox
|
|
December 21, 2016, 05:51:52 PM |
|
5 x RX480:
XMR: GPU0 788 h/s, GPU1 783 h/s, GPU2 791 h/s, GPU3 786 h/s, GPU4 789 h/s
Can you please share your clock settings ; bios mod details, power draw? Thank you Yes, I would appreciate that as well. In addition, would you mind sharing your "-a" and "-h" settings within Claymore .bat file? Since he made this before the 470/480's came out, they are not mentioned anywhere in the readme file. I think that -a 2 is probably best but anything I do with the -h value seems to reduce the hash-rate of my 470's. I assume that -h value will at least be similar for 480s and 470s.
|
|
|
|
JuanHungLo
|
|
December 21, 2016, 05:55:33 PM |
|
Does anyone have hash rate and power consumption numbers for R9 380 4GB cards for XMR using this miner (ballpark)? I 380 cards a decent choice for mining XMR?
606 with 1070/1600 and modded BIOS, not sure on power consumption though
|
Bull markets are born on pessimism, grow on skepticism, mature on optimism, and die on euphoria. - John Templeton
|
|
|
GabryRox
|
|
December 21, 2016, 06:05:10 PM |
|
Has anyone using MoneroPool.com seen any productivity issues the last few days? I was going along fine at pretty close to their own profit calculator as well as the major external ones, then about 3 days ago it dropped dramatically. For instance, my last 2 payouts of .5 XMR took 30 hours each (.4 XMR/day). My previous 5 payouts were averaging .67 XMR/day, which is very close to the calculators but now it has dropped almost 40%. Yes, I understand that difficulty went up a bit the last few days but now it has actually dropped back down again. Has anyone else had this issue on this pool? I'm highly considering trying dwarfoool since this really seems to be a pool issue.
|
|
|
|
ps_jb
|
|
December 21, 2016, 06:17:35 PM |
|
In addition, would you mind sharing your "-a" and "-h" settings within Claymore .bat file?
In my case (RX 480) these parameters does not play any role. Modded card has 735 H/s with default -a and -h
|
|
|
|
maxmad_x
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 546
Merit: 250
It takes a lot to build but not much to lose
|
|
December 21, 2016, 06:20:36 PM |
|
5 x RX480:
XMR: GPU0 788 h/s, GPU1 783 h/s, GPU2 791 h/s, GPU3 786 h/s, GPU4 789 h/s
Can you please share your clock settings ; bios mod details, power draw? Thank you Yes, I would appreciate that as well. In addition, would you mind sharing your "-a" and "-h" settings within Claymore .bat file? Since he made this before the 470/480's came out, they are not mentioned anywhere in the readme file. I think that -a 2 is probably best but anything I do with the -h value seems to reduce the hash-rate of my 470's. I assume that -h value will at least be similar for 480s and 470s. For my rx480 I am finding that default -h of 1024 and -a 4 works the best ! Surprising that -a 4 is working better than -a 2
|
|
|
|
GabryRox
|
|
December 21, 2016, 06:28:14 PM |
|
ah ok... sounds like default -h of 1024 is the way to go then. and 735 for a modded 480 seems about right compared to the 690 i got from my modded 470... in the ballpark at least. What I can't figure out is how 800 is possible on a 470 as Wolf mentioned in this or another thread. But I dont remember seeing anyone else claiming anywhere close to that high so who knows. Will be interesting to see what kind of bump the 4xx series gets from Claymore's next rev of this miner. Unfortunately, I think it will be delayed a bit as he mentioned on the ZEC thread that he finally caved and will be doing a linux miner for ZEC after all. Not sure why the demand to ZEC miners is still so high given that both XMR and ETH are currently considerably more profitable to mine. I guess a lot of people still hoping ZEC prices will go through the roof.
|
|
|
|
ps_jb
|
|
December 21, 2016, 06:40:21 PM |
|
Not sure why the demand to ZEC miners is still so high given that both XMR and ETH are currently considerably more profitable to mine. I guess a lot of people still hoping ZEC prices will go through the roof.
It is all about using old cards by miners who live in countries with cheap electricity. They can mine with profit for a long time
|
|
|
|
thiagobangu
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
|
December 21, 2016, 06:44:43 PM |
|
which is best pool for mining monero?
Dwarfpool. Hello, could you put your dwafpool command line please..
|
|
|
|
maxmad_x
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 546
Merit: 250
It takes a lot to build but not much to lose
|
|
December 21, 2016, 08:28:11 PM |
|
ah ok... sounds like default -h of 1024 is the way to go then. and 735 for a modded 480 seems about right compared to the 690 i got from my modded 470... in the ballpark at least. What I can't figure out is how 800 is possible on a 470 as Wolf mentioned in this or another thread. But I dont remember seeing anyone else claiming anywhere close to that high so who knows. Will be interesting to see what kind of bump the 4xx series gets from Claymore's next rev of this miner. Unfortunately, I think it will be delayed a bit as he mentioned on the ZEC thread that he finally caved and will be doing a linux miner for ZEC after all. Not sure why the demand to ZEC miners is still so high given that both XMR and ETH are currently considerably more profitable to mine. I guess a lot of people still hoping ZEC prices will go through the roof.
@Claymore has never let us down. He has started working on Cryptnote miner improvement especially for newer RX cards. Hopefully he will be able to make some breakthrough. The lad has not yet once let the crypto miner community down. So just hang on.
|
|
|
|
Raja_MBZ
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1505
|
|
December 21, 2016, 08:57:20 PM |
|
ah ok... sounds like default -h of 1024 is the way to go then. and 735 for a modded 480 seems about right compared to the 690 i got from my modded 470... in the ballpark at least. What I can't figure out is how 800 is possible on a 470 as Wolf mentioned in this or another thread. But I dont remember seeing anyone else claiming anywhere close to that high so who knows. Will be interesting to see what kind of bump the 4xx series gets from Claymore's next rev of this miner. Unfortunately, I think it will be delayed a bit as he mentioned on the ZEC thread that he finally caved and will be doing a linux miner for ZEC after all. Not sure why the demand to ZEC miners is still so high given that both XMR and ETH are currently considerably more profitable to mine. I guess a lot of people still hoping ZEC prices will go through the roof.
@Claymore has never let us down. He has started working on Cryptnote miner improvement especially for newer RX cards. Hopefully he will be able to make some breakthrough. The lad has not yet once let the crypto miner community down. So just hang on. I'm hoping for that too. Currently, mining XMR is pretty much useless with the RX series cards. As of now, ZEC and ETH/ETC are the only choices for the miners carrying only RX series cards. I'm as of now getting 750 H/s with my XFX RX 480's through this miner.
|
|
|
|
twente-mining
Member
Offline
Activity: 176
Merit: 10
|
|
December 21, 2016, 10:55:33 PM |
|
Not sure why the demand to ZEC miners is still so high given that both XMR and ETH are currently considerably more profitable to mine. I guess a lot of people still hoping ZEC prices will go through the roof.
It is all about using old cards by miners who live in countries with cheap electricity. They can mine with profit for a long time You have to look at the BTC prices to buddy ...currently mining with a little loss, but the btc prices are still rallying, so dumping all i can :-)
|
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
|
|
|
GabryRox
|
|
December 22, 2016, 12:32:41 AM |
|
ah ok... sounds like default -h of 1024 is the way to go then. and 735 for a modded 480 seems about right compared to the 690 i got from my modded 470... in the ballpark at least. What I can't figure out is how 800 is possible on a 470 as Wolf mentioned in this or another thread. But I dont remember seeing anyone else claiming anywhere close to that high so who knows. Will be interesting to see what kind of bump the 4xx series gets from Claymore's next rev of this miner. Unfortunately, I think it will be delayed a bit as he mentioned on the ZEC thread that he finally caved and will be doing a linux miner for ZEC after all. Not sure why the demand to ZEC miners is still so high given that both XMR and ETH are currently considerably more profitable to mine. I guess a lot of people still hoping ZEC prices will go through the roof.
@Claymore has never let us down. He has started working on Cryptnote miner improvement especially for newer RX cards. Hopefully he will be able to make some breakthrough. The lad has not yet once let the crypto miner community down. So just hang on. I'm hoping for that too. Currently, mining XMR is pretty much useless with the RX series cards. As of now, ZEC and ETH/ETC are the only choices for the miners carrying only RX series cards. I'm as of now getting 750 H/s with my XFX RX 480's through this miner. how exactly do you figure XMR is useless with RX cards lol? In reality, XMR is actually the most profitable (currently 20% better than ETH and nearly 50% better than ZEC) for the last several days. And that is on my 5-470 un-modded rig! After I strap-mod those puppies, the profitability margin of XMR over ZEC will only improve for me (all else being equal of course). Not only is XMR currently the most profitable to mine with XMR, it's probably the only profitable CPU mineable coin at present. I have 3 i7's getting close to 900 h/s on XMR... so basically the equivalent of 1.5 more 470's.
|
|
|
|
maxmad_x
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 546
Merit: 250
It takes a lot to build but not much to lose
|
|
December 22, 2016, 01:09:24 AM |
|
ah ok... sounds like default -h of 1024 is the way to go then. and 735 for a modded 480 seems about right compared to the 690 i got from my modded 470... in the ballpark at least. What I can't figure out is how 800 is possible on a 470 as Wolf mentioned in this or another thread. But I dont remember seeing anyone else claiming anywhere close to that high so who knows. Will be interesting to see what kind of bump the 4xx series gets from Claymore's next rev of this miner. Unfortunately, I think it will be delayed a bit as he mentioned on the ZEC thread that he finally caved and will be doing a linux miner for ZEC after all. Not sure why the demand to ZEC miners is still so high given that both XMR and ETH are currently considerably more profitable to mine. I guess a lot of people still hoping ZEC prices will go through the roof.
@Claymore has never let us down. He has started working on Cryptnote miner improvement especially for newer RX cards. Hopefully he will be able to make some breakthrough. The lad has not yet once let the crypto miner community down. So just hang on. I'm hoping for that too. Currently, mining XMR is pretty much useless with the RX series cards. As of now, ZEC and ETH/ETC are the only choices for the miners carrying only RX series cards. I'm as of now getting 750 H/s with my XFX RX 480's through this miner. how exactly do you figure XMR is useless with RX cards lol? In reality, XMR is actually the most profitable (currently 20% better than ETH and nearly 50% better than ZEC) for the last several days. And that is on my 5-470 un-modded rig! After I strap-mod those puppies, the profitability margin of XMR over ZEC will only improve for me (all else being equal of course). Not only is XMR currently the most profitable to mine with XMR, it's probably the only profitable CPU mineable coin at present. I have 3 i7's getting close to 900 h/s on XMR... so basically the equivalent of 1.5 more 470's. nah not really . XMR was about 60% profitable and now almost similary profitable to ETH/ETC/ZCASH use whattomine.com for comparison with your results. I have exclusively RX480s and above is my comparison Current profitability comparison for exclusively RX480
|
|
|
|
GabryRox
|
|
December 22, 2016, 02:21:23 AM |
|
ah ok... sounds like default -h of 1024 is the way to go then. and 735 for a modded 480 seems about right compared to the 690 i got from my modded 470... in the ballpark at least. What I can't figure out is how 800 is possible on a 470 as Wolf mentioned in this or another thread. But I dont remember seeing anyone else claiming anywhere close to that high so who knows. Will be interesting to see what kind of bump the 4xx series gets from Claymore's next rev of this miner. Unfortunately, I think it will be delayed a bit as he mentioned on the ZEC thread that he finally caved and will be doing a linux miner for ZEC after all. Not sure why the demand to ZEC miners is still so high given that both XMR and ETH are currently considerably more profitable to mine. I guess a lot of people still hoping ZEC prices will go through the roof.
@Claymore has never let us down. He has started working on Cryptnote miner improvement especially for newer RX cards. Hopefully he will be able to make some breakthrough. The lad has not yet once let the crypto miner community down. So just hang on. I'm hoping for that too. Currently, mining XMR is pretty much useless with the RX series cards. As of now, ZEC and ETH/ETC are the only choices for the miners carrying only RX series cards. I'm as of now getting 750 H/s with my XFX RX 480's through this miner. how exactly do you figure XMR is useless with RX cards lol? In reality, XMR is actually the most profitable (currently 20% better than ETH and nearly 50% better than ZEC) for the last several days. And that is on my 5-470 un-modded rig! After I strap-mod those puppies, the profitability margin of XMR over ZEC will only improve for me (all else being equal of course). Not only is XMR currently the most profitable to mine with XMR, it's probably the only profitable CPU mineable coin at present. I have 3 i7's getting close to 900 h/s on XMR... so basically the equivalent of 1.5 more 470's. nah not really . XMR was about 60% profitable and now almost similary profitable to ETH/ETC/ZCASH use whattomine.com for comparison with your results. I have exclusively RX480s and above is my comparison Current profitability comparison for exclusively RX480 hmmm strange... is that screen-shot for 1 RX-480? not sure what your electricity rates are or your exact build or consumption but I can't get anywhere close to those results on that site with either default values for 5x470 or 5x480, or even my own actual numbers from a 5x470 modded bios rig. 5x480 default @ .11 cents: XMR = 4.06 profit / ETH = 3.45 profit / ZEC = 3.13 profit 5x470 default @ .11 cents: XMR = 3.46 profit / ETH = 3.10 profit / ZEC = 2.50 profit MY 5x470 mod @ 11 cents: XMR = 3.46 profit / ETH = 3.04 profit / ZEC = 2.41 profit (actually very close to defaults on this site) I know this is very volotile and rates and difficulties change by the minute but over the past 4-5 days I have not once seen ZEC = or above the other 2 and I have been checking this site as well as CoinWarez. I did have a bit of an issue with XMR not coming in like the calculators said, but I think that was more of a pool problem. Since changing over to dwarfpool, actual earnings appear to be in line with these estimates. Don't get me wrong, I hope people keep mining ZEC like crazy so as to hopefully keep the diff lower on XMR and ETH, but I had just assumed that most of those people were the ones with older GPUs that do better on ZEC. I thought most people with 470/480 had already moved back to XMR or ETH.
|
|
|
|
maxmad_x
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 546
Merit: 250
It takes a lot to build but not much to lose
|
|
December 22, 2016, 02:41:49 AM |
|
ah ok... sounds like default -h of 1024 is the way to go then. and 735 for a modded 480 seems about right compared to the 690 i got from my modded 470... in the ballpark at least. What I can't figure out is how 800 is possible on a 470 as Wolf mentioned in this or another thread. But I dont remember seeing anyone else claiming anywhere close to that high so who knows. Will be interesting to see what kind of bump the 4xx series gets from Claymore's next rev of this miner. Unfortunately, I think it will be delayed a bit as he mentioned on the ZEC thread that he finally caved and will be doing a linux miner for ZEC after all. Not sure why the demand to ZEC miners is still so high given that both XMR and ETH are currently considerably more profitable to mine. I guess a lot of people still hoping ZEC prices will go through the roof.
@Claymore has never let us down. He has started working on Cryptnote miner improvement especially for newer RX cards. Hopefully he will be able to make some breakthrough. The lad has not yet once let the crypto miner community down. So just hang on. I'm hoping for that too. Currently, mining XMR is pretty much useless with the RX series cards. As of now, ZEC and ETH/ETC are the only choices for the miners carrying only RX series cards. I'm as of now getting 750 H/s with my XFX RX 480's through this miner. how exactly do you figure XMR is useless with RX cards lol? In reality, XMR is actually the most profitable (currently 20% better than ETH and nearly 50% better than ZEC) for the last several days. And that is on my 5-470 un-modded rig! After I strap-mod those puppies, the profitability margin of XMR over ZEC will only improve for me (all else being equal of course). Not only is XMR currently the most profitable to mine with XMR, it's probably the only profitable CPU mineable coin at present. I have 3 i7's getting close to 900 h/s on XMR... so basically the equivalent of 1.5 more 470's. nah not really . XMR was about 60% profitable and now almost similary profitable to ETH/ETC/ZCASH use whattomine.com for comparison with your results. I have exclusively RX480s and above is my comparison Current profitability comparison for exclusively RX480 hmmm strange... is that screen-shot for 1 RX-480? not sure what your electricity rates are or your exact build or consumption but I can't get anywhere close to those results on that site with either default values for 5x470 or 5x480, or even my own actual numbers from a 5x470 modded bios rig. 5x480 default @ .11 cents: XMR = 4.06 profit / ETH = 3.45 profit / ZEC = 3.13 profit 5x470 default @ .11 cents: XMR = 3.46 profit / ETH = 3.10 profit / ZEC = 2.50 profit MY 5x470 mod @ 11 cents: XMR = 3.46 profit / ETH = 3.04 profit / ZEC = 2.41 profit (actually very close to defaults on this site) I know this is very volotile and rates and difficulties change by the minute but over the past 4-5 days I have not once seen ZEC = or above the other 2 and I have been checking this site as well as CoinWarez. I did have a bit of an issue with XMR not coming in like the calculators said, but I think that was more of a pool problem. Since changing over to dwarfpool, actual earnings appear to be in line with these estimates. Don't get me wrong, I hope people keep mining ZEC like crazy so as to hopefully keep the diff lower on XMR and ETH, but I had just assumed that most of those people were the ones with older GPUs that do better on ZEC. I thought most people with 470/480 had already moved back to XMR or ETH. Here are my stats per RX480
|
|
|
|
Gogreen
|
|
December 22, 2016, 02:49:02 AM |
|
did you mod your rx 480? i got 22 only at stock speed with these http://tinyurl.com/gmclx9n
|
Bitcoin mining Antminer s7 4.7 TH Used in Good Condition Best Offer Prices @ ebay seller order directly here https://goo.gl/uaoh1r. Bitcoin payment optional.
|
|
|
maxmad_x
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 546
Merit: 250
It takes a lot to build but not much to lose
|
|
December 22, 2016, 02:56:17 AM |
|
yep Boysie mod edited a bit more.
|
|
|
|
Gogreen
|
|
December 22, 2016, 03:05:56 AM |
|
yep Boysie mod edited a bit more. nitro rx 480 here by the way. thats a good number. i did try to overC without biso mod i got 24 to 25 and strange indeed i got one rx 470 with stock speed of 24.600+ mh alone. A rare card i got.
|
Bitcoin mining Antminer s7 4.7 TH Used in Good Condition Best Offer Prices @ ebay seller order directly here https://goo.gl/uaoh1r. Bitcoin payment optional.
|
|
|
yuslav
|
|
December 22, 2016, 08:03:54 AM |
|
I have two farms on RX480 crash on XMR. Too bad that is not overloaded, but just no image or shut down.
|
I'm an idiot. I believe in Bitcoin!
|
|
|
Golku
|
|
December 22, 2016, 08:17:48 AM |
|
I have two farms on RX480 crash on XMR. Too bad that is not overloaded, but just no image or shut down.
maybe you have a to high oc ? did you try it with stock ?
|
|
|
|
|