likyanny
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 24, 2018, 05:43:08 PM |
|
Will try this out with my 280X and see what I get
|
|
|
|
BSAlex
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 239
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 24, 2018, 06:20:13 PM |
|
HI i try to do mining and i try step by step but something is wrong because the H/s is 0.pls help!!!:)
14:11:27:895 894 Platform: Windows 14:11:28:036 894 No ASM binary found for GPU 0 14:11:28:098 894 GPU #0 algorithm ASM, -h 384, -dmem 0 (Memory used: 787MB)
11.2 version do not support HD6xxx GPU, no ASM binary say just it. Try 9.7, it is still good for obsolete GPU's
|
|
|
|
lncm
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 388
Merit: 13
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 24, 2018, 07:42:12 PM |
|
Help me here. I'm mining Intense.
I have 2 rigs, and in one of them Claymore's GPU miner works great, no problems.
In another one, I have a RX 570 and a RX 560. Performance with Claymore's miner is dismal. RX 560 seems normal ~ 400 H/s, but 570 is only giving 360 or so H/s.
I only edited config.txt file with pool and wallet adress and allpools = 1.
Using XMR-stak hashrate for 570 seems normal, 800+.
But I would like to use Claymore's, as on my main rig it's faster.
|
|
|
|
sger
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 25, 2018, 02:56:15 AM |
|
On fedora I have 3 different versions to make things work openssl-1.1.0f-4.fc26.x86_64 compat-openssl10-1.0.2j-9.fc26.x86_64 openssl-lib-compat-1.0.0i-1.fc25.x86_64
1.1.0 comes as default, 1.0.2 for most stuff, 1.0.0 just for Claymore. [/quote] ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) CentOS 7.4 I make like thise: https://www.ndchost.com/wiki/how-to-install-bitcoin-on-centos-7and ln -S libssl.so.1.0.0 /opt/openssl/lib/libssl.so.1.0.0 ln -S libcrypto.so.1.0.0 /opt/openssl/lib/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 but have: /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 no version information avaible ---"---/libssl.so.1.0.0 ---"--- /lib64/libstdc++.so.6 version GLBCXX_3.4.21 not found cd /opt/openssl/bin ./openssl version OpenSSl 1.0.0s 11 jun 2015 Can you help me?
|
|
|
|
tommyr
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 25, 2018, 09:30:22 PM |
|
Boys i have a issue and i dont know what i have to do.i mine with claymore v9,7 and i mine electroneum 21:37:05:989 1a5c ADL: Cannot find any AMD adapters 21:37:07:679 388 got 253 bytes 21:37:07:698 388 buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"job","params":{"blob":"0101c8ffa8d3058c6f43a5ebcf265ffeb77821c4d760d337eccf7dbc2bd2bd5efb546a75004dcb0 00000004dfc53f26ec55f9c394fdf45d3c9b6cb1fb247f0e9abec9dfc77c8989f2f98bf05","job_id":"198810102627612","target":"21e90100"}}
21:37:07:702 23e0 Round 21:37:07:874 718 Job changed, drop current round 21:37:07:886 23e0 Job changed, drop current round 21:37:07:898 23e0 Round 21:37:09:009 1a5c ADL: Cannot find any AMD adapters its look like this pls HELP
|
|
|
|
lncm
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 388
Merit: 13
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 26, 2018, 01:43:46 PM |
|
Help me here. I'm mining Intense.
I have 2 rigs, and in one of them Claymore's GPU miner works great, no problems.
In another one, I have a RX 570 and a RX 560. Performance with Claymore's miner is dismal. RX 560 seems normal ~ 400 H/s, but 570 is only giving 360 or so H/s.
I only edited config.txt file with pool and wallet adress and allpools = 1.
Using XMR-stak hashrate for 570 seems normal, 800+.
But I would like to use Claymore's, as on my main rig it's faster.
Here's the log: 19:27:35:771 2490 19:27:35:787 2490 ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ» 19:27:35:787 2490 º Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.2 º 19:27:35:787 2490 ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ 19:27:35:802 2490 19:27:35:802 2490 b533 19:27:36:021 2490 XMR: 1 pool is specified 19:27:36:021 2490 Main Monero pool is itns.west-pool.org:6666 19:27:36:521 2490 OpenCL platform: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing 19:27:36:537 2490 OpenCL initializing... 19:27:36:537 2490 driver 10.0.2527.8 19:27:36:537 2490 AMD Cards available: 2 19:27:36:552 2490 GPU #0: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 570 Series), 4096 MB available, 32 compute units (pci bus 2:0:0) 19:27:36:552 2490 GPU #0 recognized as Radeon RX 470/570 19:27:36:552 2490 card 0, m1 4096, m2 3840 w 256 19:27:36:568 2490 GPU #1: Baffin (Radeon RX 560 Series), 4096 MB available, 16 compute units (pci bus 3:0:0) 19:27:36:568 2490 GPU #1 recognized as Radeon RX 460/560 19:27:36:568 2490 card 1, m1 4096, m2 3840 w 128 19:27:36:584 2490 POOL version 19:27:36:584 2490 b141 19:27:36:584 2490 Platform: Windows 19:27:36:943 2490 start building OpenCL program for GPU 0... 19:27:36:959 2490 done 19:27:37:177 2490 start building OpenCL program for GPU 1... 19:27:37:177 2490 done 19:27:37:950 2490 GPU #0 algorithm ASM, -h 896, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 3672MB) 19:27:38:466 2490 GPU #1 algorithm ASM, -h 416, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 1704MB) 19:27:38:466 2490 Total cards: 2 19:27:51:535 2490 "-allpools" option is set, default pools can be used for devfee, check "Readme" file for details. 19:27:51:535 2490 Watchdog enabled 19:27:51:551 2490 Remote management (READ-ONLY MODE) is enabled on port 3333 19:27:51:551 2490
19:27:51:676 24cc XMR: Stratum - connecting to 'itns.west-pool.org' <62.48.164.61> port 6666 (unsecure) 19:27:51:707 24cc send: {"method": "login", "params": {"login": "iz4UgogBsxBG1upgHTZUtSeUecGzvgUAb3rru7vbffmUGA5mfTbhvqQCUxzTPSPak9HFgSp9iHWg3Yr dsgDdESY22Ax48unX6", "pass": "x", "agent": "xmr/1.0"}, "id": 1}
19:27:51:707 24cc XMR: Stratum - Connected (itns.west-pool.org:6666) (unsecure) 19:27:51:738 24cc got 303 bytes 19:27:51:738 24cc buf: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"id":"726295761601068","job":{"blob":"0100b0bca3d305b9705f31185bdb8f64cf4e1261a5ea262f0af5965991ef8e248b19857d6ab8680 00000006d96acdde102bd530cf25cf6fa6a542c1c6907be71df97cc129b097bc7f725b501","job_id":"127990916790440","target":"8b4f0100"},"status":"OK"}}
19:27:51:738 24cc parse packet: 302 19:27:51:754 24cc new buf size: 0 19:28:05:683 24cc got 253 bytes 19:28:05:683 24cc buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"job","params":{"blob":"0100c5bca3d305589f5507a58d6f413873e72279b92f984f420b42d9de673baa963a482670fa7d0 000000025f148977470bc5769beee97bc6bbc8e0d3cc7f0f36ddfac3487f8dcf3f4d30701","job_id":"732172125531360","target":"8b4f0100"}}
19:28:05:698 24cc parse packet: 252 19:28:05:698 24cc new buf size: 0 19:28:05:714 24cc XMR: 01/24/18-19:28:05 - New job from itns.west-pool.org:6666 19:28:05:714 24cc target: 0x00014f8b (diff: 50000H) 19:28:05:714 24cc XMR - Total Speed: 688 H/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00 19:28:05:730 24cc XMR: GPU0 214 H/s, GPU1 474 H/s 214H/s on a RX570? Why?
|
|
|
|
trooperx
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 26, 2018, 04:33:13 PM Last edit: January 26, 2018, 05:56:12 PM by trooperx |
|
The new AMD Adrenaline drivers now allow more than 8 GPUs to run on the Asrock H110 pro btc mobo. But when I try running 9 GPUs on CC Miner its a mess - it seems to recognise all 9 GPUs but then at least 2 cards run at 0 H/s and then others hang. The blockchain driver won't work with more than 8 GPUs.
Will the next version be able to support the newer AMD drivers?
*edit* Nevermind! I just split them between 2 instances of the miner and its works perfectly now.
|
|
|
|
zeef
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 301
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 27, 2018, 12:08:08 AM |
|
^^^ If I had to guess (I'm guessing) your cards have crappy Voltage Regulator Modules, I'm guessing you bought the only cards available and they were still in stock because they suck.
I just got stuck with asus 580s elpida, same issue... i can pack 19 msi cards in one rig if I can find stock...
I got the cards a while ago, and I got them directly from the official distributor in my country where they can only sell at the original retail price. I dont think any sapphire nitro+ limited edition are bad, they are all ASIC 80%+, samsung memory, and probably the best performance for mining. The thing is, I tried to split the rig into 2x 6 cards each, and they work perfectly fine (the same cards I used in a 12 gpu rig),, but putting them into 1 mobo (tried ASUS B250 mining expert, Biostar TB250 btc pro, and Asrock h110 pro btc+), some cards crash, so Im guessing either claymore doesnt do well with 12 gpu rigs, or there is something Im missing. I got plenty of virtual memory. tried higher end processors and more ram lowered core n memory tried stock bios with stock core/memory and voltage sgminer-gm works with 12 cards and all is fine, but it hashes lower than claymore for me (900hs for sgminer, 1050hs for claymore). You need to segment the GPU's into groups of 6 using the command line flag. You then run two instances of the miner on the same rig. Works good that way. Can you give an example on how to segment? ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) What drivers do you recommend? Blockchain or 17.12.1 ? Regards
|
|
|
|
ofpcarnage
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 76
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 27, 2018, 11:00:07 AM |
|
Will you be adding support for Vega 64's ?
|
|
|
|
uDwcHYO
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 27, 2018, 11:14:29 AM |
|
do you have a current hashrate and average for the day are the same? I have a difference of 12-15%
|
zzz
|
|
|
galaxy5user
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 27, 2018, 11:54:23 AM |
|
For RX 550 it shows: "No ASM binary found" and hashrate is zero.
|
|
|
|
Crypto Max
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 27, 2018, 05:02:36 PM |
|
Hey guys with Claymore v10.2.Beta I get 450-470 h/s with my R9 270x (no OC) but with the new version 11.2 I get no more then 400-420 h/s (at max, no OC)
I did get a lot of hardware errors with V10.2.Beta I'd say 20-25%. With the new V11.2 I don't seem to be getting any hardware errors at all. Is this something anyone else experienced with their video cards and older claymore versions?
|
|
|
|
lncm
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 388
Merit: 13
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 27, 2018, 05:53:38 PM |
|
Help me here. I'm mining Intense.
I have 2 rigs, and in one of them Claymore's GPU miner works great, no problems.
In another one, I have a RX 570 and a RX 560. Performance with Claymore's miner is dismal. RX 560 seems normal ~ 400 H/s, but 570 is only giving 360 or so H/s.
I only edited config.txt file with pool and wallet adress and allpools = 1.
Using XMR-stak hashrate for 570 seems normal, 800+.
But I would like to use Claymore's, as on my main rig it's faster.
Here's the log: 19:27:35:771 2490 19:27:35:787 2490 ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ» 19:27:35:787 2490 º Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.2 º 19:27:35:787 2490 ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ 19:27:35:802 2490 19:27:35:802 2490 b533 19:27:36:021 2490 XMR: 1 pool is specified 19:27:36:021 2490 Main Monero pool is itns.west-pool.org:6666 19:27:36:521 2490 OpenCL platform: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing 19:27:36:537 2490 OpenCL initializing... 19:27:36:537 2490 driver 10.0.2527.8 19:27:36:537 2490 AMD Cards available: 2 19:27:36:552 2490 GPU #0: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 570 Series), 4096 MB available, 32 compute units (pci bus 2:0:0) 19:27:36:552 2490 GPU #0 recognized as Radeon RX 470/570 19:27:36:552 2490 card 0, m1 4096, m2 3840 w 256 19:27:36:568 2490 GPU #1: Baffin (Radeon RX 560 Series), 4096 MB available, 16 compute units (pci bus 3:0:0) 19:27:36:568 2490 GPU #1 recognized as Radeon RX 460/560 19:27:36:568 2490 card 1, m1 4096, m2 3840 w 128 19:27:36:584 2490 POOL version 19:27:36:584 2490 b141 19:27:36:584 2490 Platform: Windows 19:27:36:943 2490 start building OpenCL program for GPU 0... 19:27:36:959 2490 done 19:27:37:177 2490 start building OpenCL program for GPU 1... 19:27:37:177 2490 done 19:27:37:950 2490 GPU #0 algorithm ASM, -h 896, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 3672MB) 19:27:38:466 2490 GPU #1 algorithm ASM, -h 416, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 1704MB) 19:27:38:466 2490 Total cards: 2 19:27:51:535 2490 "-allpools" option is set, default pools can be used for devfee, check "Readme" file for details. 19:27:51:535 2490 Watchdog enabled 19:27:51:551 2490 Remote management (READ-ONLY MODE) is enabled on port 3333 19:27:51:551 2490
19:27:51:676 24cc XMR: Stratum - connecting to 'itns.west-pool.org' <62.48.164.61> port 6666 (unsecure) 19:27:51:707 24cc send: {"method": "login", "params": {"login": "iz4UgogBsxBG1upgHTZUtSeUecGzvgUAb3rru7vbffmUGA5mfTbhvqQCUxzTPSPak9HFgSp9iHWg3Yr dsgDdESY22Ax48unX6", "pass": "x", "agent": "xmr/1.0"}, "id": 1}
19:27:51:707 24cc XMR: Stratum - Connected (itns.west-pool.org:6666) (unsecure) 19:27:51:738 24cc got 303 bytes 19:27:51:738 24cc buf: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"id":"726295761601068","job":{"blob":"0100b0bca3d305b9705f31185bdb8f64cf4e1261a5ea262f0af5965991ef8e248b19857d6ab8680 00000006d96acdde102bd530cf25cf6fa6a542c1c6907be71df97cc129b097bc7f725b501","job_id":"127990916790440","target":"8b4f0100"},"status":"OK"}}
19:27:51:738 24cc parse packet: 302 19:27:51:754 24cc new buf size: 0 19:28:05:683 24cc got 253 bytes 19:28:05:683 24cc buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"job","params":{"blob":"0100c5bca3d305589f5507a58d6f413873e72279b92f984f420b42d9de673baa963a482670fa7d0 000000025f148977470bc5769beee97bc6bbc8e0d3cc7f0f36ddfac3487f8dcf3f4d30701","job_id":"732172125531360","target":"8b4f0100"}}
19:28:05:698 24cc parse packet: 252 19:28:05:698 24cc new buf size: 0 19:28:05:714 24cc XMR: 01/24/18-19:28:05 - New job from itns.west-pool.org:6666 19:28:05:714 24cc target: 0x00014f8b (diff: 50000H) 19:28:05:714 24cc XMR - Total Speed: 688 H/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00 19:28:05:730 24cc XMR: GPU0 214 H/s, GPU1 474 H/s 214H/s on a RX570? Why? Nobody? ![Embarrassed](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/embarrassed.gif)
|
|
|
|
Eisenkopf89
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 27, 2018, 10:31:21 PM |
|
Help me here. I'm mining Intense.
I have 2 rigs, and in one of them Claymore's GPU miner works great, no problems.
In another one, I have a RX 570 and a RX 560. Performance with Claymore's miner is dismal. RX 560 seems normal ~ 400 H/s, but 570 is only giving 360 or so H/s.
I only edited config.txt file with pool and wallet adress and allpools = 1.
Using XMR-stak hashrate for 570 seems normal, 800+.
But I would like to use Claymore's, as on my main rig it's faster.
Here's the log: 19:27:35:771 2490 19:27:35:787 2490 ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ» 19:27:35:787 2490 º Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.2 º 19:27:35:787 2490 ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ 19:27:35:802 2490 19:27:35:802 2490 b533 19:27:36:021 2490 XMR: 1 pool is specified 19:27:36:021 2490 Main Monero pool is itns.west-pool.org:6666 19:27:36:521 2490 OpenCL platform: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing 19:27:36:537 2490 OpenCL initializing... 19:27:36:537 2490 driver 10.0.2527.8 19:27:36:537 2490 AMD Cards available: 2 19:27:36:552 2490 GPU #0: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 570 Series), 4096 MB available, 32 compute units (pci bus 2:0:0) 19:27:36:552 2490 GPU #0 recognized as Radeon RX 470/570 19:27:36:552 2490 card 0, m1 4096, m2 3840 w 256 19:27:36:568 2490 GPU #1: Baffin (Radeon RX 560 Series), 4096 MB available, 16 compute units (pci bus 3:0:0) 19:27:36:568 2490 GPU #1 recognized as Radeon RX 460/560 19:27:36:568 2490 card 1, m1 4096, m2 3840 w 128 19:27:36:584 2490 POOL version 19:27:36:584 2490 b141 19:27:36:584 2490 Platform: Windows 19:27:36:943 2490 start building OpenCL program for GPU 0... 19:27:36:959 2490 done 19:27:37:177 2490 start building OpenCL program for GPU 1... 19:27:37:177 2490 done 19:27:37:950 2490 GPU #0 algorithm ASM, -h 896, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 3672MB) 19:27:38:466 2490 GPU #1 algorithm ASM, -h 416, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 1704MB) 19:27:38:466 2490 Total cards: 2 19:27:51:535 2490 "-allpools" option is set, default pools can be used for devfee, check "Readme" file for details. 19:27:51:535 2490 Watchdog enabled 19:27:51:551 2490 Remote management (READ-ONLY MODE) is enabled on port 3333 19:27:51:551 2490
19:27:51:676 24cc XMR: Stratum - connecting to 'itns.west-pool.org' <62.48.164.61> port 6666 (unsecure) 19:27:51:707 24cc send: {"method": "login", "params": {"login": "iz4UgogBsxBG1upgHTZUtSeUecGzvgUAb3rru7vbffmUGA5mfTbhvqQCUxzTPSPak9HFgSp9iHWg3Yr dsgDdESY22Ax48unX6", "pass": "x", "agent": "xmr/1.0"}, "id": 1}
19:27:51:707 24cc XMR: Stratum - Connected (itns.west-pool.org:6666) (unsecure) 19:27:51:738 24cc got 303 bytes 19:27:51:738 24cc buf: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"id":"726295761601068","job":{"blob":"0100b0bca3d305b9705f31185bdb8f64cf4e1261a5ea262f0af5965991ef8e248b19857d6ab8680 00000006d96acdde102bd530cf25cf6fa6a542c1c6907be71df97cc129b097bc7f725b501","job_id":"127990916790440","target":"8b4f0100"},"status":"OK"}}
19:27:51:738 24cc parse packet: 302 19:27:51:754 24cc new buf size: 0 19:28:05:683 24cc got 253 bytes 19:28:05:683 24cc buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"job","params":{"blob":"0100c5bca3d305589f5507a58d6f413873e72279b92f984f420b42d9de673baa963a482670fa7d0 000000025f148977470bc5769beee97bc6bbc8e0d3cc7f0f36ddfac3487f8dcf3f4d30701","job_id":"732172125531360","target":"8b4f0100"}}
19:28:05:698 24cc parse packet: 252 19:28:05:698 24cc new buf size: 0 19:28:05:714 24cc XMR: 01/24/18-19:28:05 - New job from itns.west-pool.org:6666 19:28:05:714 24cc target: 0x00014f8b (diff: 50000H) 19:28:05:714 24cc XMR - Total Speed: 688 H/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00 19:28:05:730 24cc XMR: GPU0 214 H/s, GPU1 474 H/s 214H/s on a RX570? Why? Nobody? ![Embarrassed](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/embarrassed.gif) Try to use dmem 0 and push the hashcnt to 1024 or more. I use atm v9.7 with basic clocking and -h 1025 and run with ~600 H/s
|
|
|
|
Minero57
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2018, 12:44:44 AM |
|
I have the same problem as most here. I'm running with an RX480 8GB and an RX580 8GB. Clearly for us, v10.2 is giving us a higher hashrate than v11.x! I've tried playing with -dmem and -h with no luck. Please investigate Mr. Claymore. ![Embarrassed](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/embarrassed.gif)
|
|
|
|
ikicha
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2018, 03:00:21 AM |
|
I using Claymore v.11.2, i have 5xRX570 card At claymore, i got 4000 H/s total speed, but on MiningRigRentals, i got average only 3500 H/s. Is normal?
|
|
|
|
lncm
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 388
Merit: 13
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2018, 08:55:45 AM |
|
Try to use dmem 0 and push the hashcnt to 1024 or more. I use atm v9.7 with basic clocking and -h 1025 and run with ~600 H/s
Thanks -dmem 0 and -h1024 gives the card much more acceptable performance, 790 H/s. However nowhere near what would be expected, it does 830 with XMR-stak, wich in my experience is always slower than Claymore's. I have 3 Ellesmere cards on another rig, and every card is ~9-10% faster with claymore's with default settings than XMR-stak. I really can't understand what's going on here.
|
|
|
|
vesemir7
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2018, 10:40:53 AM |
|
hi first post here as I'm hitting a wall for the last couple of months and I don't seem to be going anywhere with my first rig build.
3 Corsair RX 650 PSUs
Asrock H110 Pro BTC+, flashed bios 1.20
Intel Cpu, 8 Gb RAM
multiple Rx 580 Hynyx, stock over powered risers
60 Gb SSD
Win 10 1709 with several optimizations here and there
Blockchain august drivers.
Even using a single card I can't seem to go above 630 H/s; when I try to scale out adding cards using the -di parameters I hit system crashes and I constantly need to lower the -h parameters until it's stable but meaningless.
For instance I can mine 3 KH/s with 5 cards at 600 each or 6 cards at 500 each. I managed to mine using 8 cards but with a ridiculous hashrate of 300 per card or the system gets unstable.
What am I missing here? pagefile is 20 Gb, I'm using the environment variables as descripted
|
|
|
|
leonix007
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 297
Grow with community
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2018, 02:46:40 PM |
|
hi first post here as I'm hitting a wall for the last couple of months and I don't seem to be going anywhere with my first rig build.
3 Corsair RX 650 PSUs
Asrock H110 Pro BTC+, flashed bios 1.20
Intel Cpu, 8 Gb RAM
multiple Rx 580 Hynyx, stock over powered risers
60 Gb SSD
Win 10 1709 with several optimizations here and there
Blockchain august drivers.
Even using a single card I can't seem to go above 630 H/s; when I try to scale out adding cards using the -di parameters I hit system crashes and I constantly need to lower the -h parameters until it's stable but meaningless.
For instance I can mine 3 KH/s with 5 cards at 600 each or 6 cards at 500 each. I managed to mine using 8 cards but with a ridiculous hashrate of 300 per card or the system gets unstable.
What am I missing here? pagefile is 20 Gb, I'm using the environment variables as descripted
For Isolation purpose, I would suggest to install or use a single card only without risers, exclude other peripherals for the meantime. then fireup miner. check your clocks, try CoreClock 1200, Mem clock 2000 if the problem is still the same, I would suggest to flash them to unleashed its full hashing power. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1954245.0
|
|
|
|
BSAlex
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 239
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 28, 2018, 03:21:17 PM |
|
hi first post here as I'm hitting a wall for the last couple of months and I don't seem to be going anywhere with my first rig build.
3 Corsair RX 650 PSUs
Asrock H110 Pro BTC+, flashed bios 1.20
Intel Cpu, 8 Gb RAM
multiple Rx 580 Hynyx, stock over powered risers
60 Gb SSD
Win 10 1709 with several optimizations here and there
Blockchain august drivers.
Even using a single card I can't seem to go above 630 H/s; when I try to scale out adding cards using the -di parameters I hit system crashes and I constantly need to lower the -h parameters until it's stable but meaningless.
For instance I can mine 3 KH/s with 5 cards at 600 each or 6 cards at 500 each. I managed to mine using 8 cards but with a ridiculous hashrate of 300 per card or the system gets unstable.
What am I missing here? pagefile is 20 Gb, I'm using the environment variables as descripted
It is rather hard to setup 3 PSU properly. I have general feeling that you screw up in this somehow. 1. Try single PSU, start with single GPU, check power consumption AT THE WALL for each GPU. 2. Check all you GPU maybe you have faulty one. 3. Next step - proper biosmod with downvolting, you will be able to limit you power usage to 100W per GPU with hashrate about 900 H/s 4. Add one GPU at time, check power consumption AT THE WALL. Go up to 600W at the wall, no more. Expect to get up to 4 GPU running. No significant hashrate drop should be expected. 5. Use second PSU to power up riser and powerconnectors of next GPUs, again one by one. Check power consumption AT THE WALL at each step. Do not change wiring of the first PSU, switch on the second PSU first step and only then start the first else you can have issues with GPUs connected to second PSU. 6. if you will fully utilise (up to 600W at the wall) two PSUs follow the same procedure with the third. 7. Biosmod is recommended but not mandatory, but expect much lower hashrate with much bigger power consumption. 8. 20 Gb pagefile may be a bit small if you have 8Gb GPUs
|
|
|
|
|