notbatman
Legendary

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
|
 |
October 18, 2017, 10:52:55 AM |
|
^^^ try running ldconfig it might sort out your ssl issue.
|
|
|
|
|
garytheasshole
Full Member
 

Activity: 406
Merit: 105
Chosŏn Minjujuŭi Inmin Konghwaguk
|
 |
October 18, 2017, 11:26:39 AM |
|
^^^ try running ldconfig it might sort out your ssl issue.
Use LD_PRELOAD. I used to have to do it with cURL, too - Claymore for some fucked reason doesn't statically link it, so... you had to install the old-ass compatibility library for it (if your distro had one) and then LD_PRELOAD it. Statically linking openssl is rather stupid. It's horrid and needs to be patched monthly at best. You don't want Claymore to build another binary just because openssl fucked up, you get to only update openssl. But along with their shitty versioning it's quite the headache, we should've stopped using it years ago, but we're stuck with it.
|
|
|
|
garytheasshole
Full Member
 

Activity: 406
Merit: 105
Chosŏn Minjujuŭi Inmin Konghwaguk
|
 |
October 18, 2017, 12:30:27 PM |
|
^^^ try running ldconfig it might sort out your ssl issue.
Use LD_PRELOAD. I used to have to do it with cURL, too - Claymore for some fucked reason doesn't statically link it, so... you had to install the old-ass compatibility library for it (if your distro had one) and then LD_PRELOAD it. Statically linking openssl is rather stupid. It's horrid and needs to be patched monthly at best. You don't want Claymore to build another binary just because openssl fucked up, you get to only update openssl. But along with their shitty versioning it's quite the headache, we should've stopped using it years ago, but we're stuck with it. Actually, in the case of a MAJOR version update such as this one, it could make sense. But right now, OpenSSL < 1.0.0 isn't uncommon. cURL 3 is older than Jesus. On fedora I have 3 different versions to make things work openssl-1.1.0f-4.fc26.x86_64 compat-openssl10-1.0.2j-9.fc26.x86_64 openssl-lib-compat-1.0.0i-1.fc25.x86_64
1.1.0 comes as default, 1.0.2 for most stuff, 1.0.0 just for Claymore.
|
|
|
|
halker2010
Sr. Member
  

Activity: 532
Merit: 250
The harder your life is the more meaning it has.
|
 |
October 18, 2017, 01:22:17 PM |
|
I get 2.730 Mhs on my 4*R9 380 2Gb rig. Slightly overclocked. Version 9.7. I tired to struggle with version 10. It doesn't mine at all.
i think that's Kh/s but how can i lower the voltage? mine is Asus and its really unstable when i change the clocks.
|
|
|
|
|
MegaRipZ
Newbie

Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 19, 2017, 07:17:47 AM |
|
Issues with Ubuntu 14.04 -
nsgpucnminer: relocation error: /opt/Claymore10/nsgpucnminer: symbol _ZNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEC1EPKcRKS3_, version GLIBCXX_3.4.21 not defined in file libstdc++.so.6 with link time reference
|
|
|
|
|
MegaRipZ
Newbie

Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 19, 2017, 07:54:51 AM |
|
Issues with Ubuntu 14.04 -
nsgpucnminer: relocation error: /opt/Claymore10/nsgpucnminer: symbol _ZNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEC1EPKcRKS3_, version GLIBCXX_3.4.21 not defined in file libstdc++.so.6 with link time reference
14.04 is older than Jesus. Try running something made this century. I have an issues with AMD drivers ( 13.12) on my rig (R9 270 and R7 370 cards) on Ubuntu > 14.04 
|
|
|
|
|
StErMi
Newbie

Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 19, 2017, 08:13:29 AM |
|
We have 2 Sapphire RX 470 modded without OC. When I start v10.2 I don't know why all the system freeze after a few minutes (it becomes really laggy like all the resources are taken from claymore).
Do you know why? I'm starting it with default options.
Cheers, Ema.
|
|
|
|
|
gusknure
Newbie

Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 19, 2017, 09:06:33 AM |
|
v 10.2 driver 16.9.2 NsGpuCNMiner.exe -xpool pool -xwal wal -xpsw x -di 01 -tstop 65 -dmem 1 -allpools 1 -h 940
Max 760 h\s per card 480x Why I can reach 900 ? What I need to do ?
on eth I have 30+-
|
|
|
|
|
IojkinKot
Newbie

Activity: 61
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 19, 2017, 09:43:15 AM |
|
v 10.2 driver 16.9.2 NsGpuCNMiner.exe -xpool pool -xwal wal -xpsw x -di 01 -tstop 65 -dmem 1 -allpools 1 -h 940
Max 760 h\s per card 480x Why I can reach 900 ? What I need to do ?
on eth I have 30+-
Use blockchain drivers, modified straps, core 1250 and above, and my settings -dmem and - h
|
|
|
|
|
gusknure
Newbie

Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 19, 2017, 10:17:16 AM |
|
v 10.2 driver 16.9.2 NsGpuCNMiner.exe -xpool pool -xwal wal -xpsw x -di 01 -tstop 65 -dmem 1 -allpools 1 -h 940
Max 760 h\s per card 480x Why I can reach 900 ? What I need to do ?
on eth I have 30+-
Use blockchain drivers, modified straps, core 1250 and above, and my settings -dmem and - h Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
MegaRipZ
Newbie

Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 19, 2017, 10:52:48 AM |
|
My words apply again - stop using those insanely old AMD drivers...
Wolf0, I install Ubuntu 16.04.3 with amdgpu-pro-16.60-379184. In Claymore's 9.1 I have ~440H/s with Pitcairn GPU (Radeon R7 370) and in new Claymore's miner (10.2) I have only 206-207H/s. Is it Pitcairn's bug on new version? HD 7950 woking well in new version, but have a slower H/s.
|
|
|
|
|
NewbieMiner17
Newbie

Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 19, 2017, 03:24:54 PM |
|
v 10.2 driver 16.9.2 NsGpuCNMiner.exe -xpool pool -xwal wal -xpsw x -di 01 -tstop 65 -dmem 1 -allpools 1 -h 940
Max 760 h\s per card 480x Why I can reach 900 ? What I need to do ?
on eth I have 30+-
Use blockchain drivers, modified straps, core 1250 and above, and my settings -dmem and - h Is this for 4gb or 8gb cards? I have blockchain drivers, 480 Nitro+ 4GB modded to around 1250c 2000m. Only getting around 750h/s... I tried looking at strapping the memory myself (currently using Anorak Memshift) but I'm not confident enough I fully understand the areas I need to modify. There is 1:1500, 1:1650, 1:750.... but then theres 2:1500, 2:1650 etc. Should I be copying the line 1:1500 to all the other 1's (up to 2000 that is)then doing the same with the 2s?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Call_Me_Bambi
|
 |
October 19, 2017, 04:39:10 PM |
|
v 10.2 driver 16.9.2 NsGpuCNMiner.exe -xpool pool -xwal wal -xpsw x -di 01 -tstop 65 -dmem 1 -allpools 1 -h 940
Max 760 h\s per card 480x Why I can reach 900 ? What I need to do ?
on eth I have 30+-
Use blockchain drivers, modified straps, core 1250 and above, and my settings -dmem and - h Is this for 4gb or 8gb cards? I have blockchain drivers, 480 Nitro+ 4GB modded to around 1250c 2000m. Only getting around 750h/s... I tried looking at strapping the memory myself (currently using Anorak Memshift) but I'm not confident enough I fully understand the areas I need to modify. There is 1:1500, 1:1650, 1:750.... but then theres 2:1500, 2:1650 etc. Should I be copying the line 1:1500 to all the other 1's (up to 2000 that is)then doing the same with the 2s? If you are unsure about how to apply the straps then use the 'One Click Timing' feature of Polaris Bios Editor. This will automatically set the timing straps. I've used it many times on a variety of cards and it work great. Latest version here.. https://github.com/jaschaknack/PolarisBiosEditor
|
|
|
|
|
sergey777
Newbie

Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 20, 2017, 07:36:10 AM |
|
7870 - 412 h\s 
|
|
|
|
|
ingyenfrag
Newbie

Activity: 84
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 20, 2017, 08:16:18 AM |
|
Hey Claymore!
Do you have any idea when will you release the vega optimized version which uses a multi thread support? Days? Weeks? Months?
I'm really excited about it.
|
|
|
|
|
garytheasshole
Full Member
 

Activity: 406
Merit: 105
Chosŏn Minjujuŭi Inmin Konghwaguk
|
 |
October 20, 2017, 11:06:15 AM |
|
7870 - 412 h\s  You're probably better off with the 9.x version on that GPU
|
|
|
|
carlo_0000
Legendary

Activity: 1281
Merit: 1003
|
 |
October 20, 2017, 08:40:12 PM |
|
v 10.2 driver 16.9.2 NsGpuCNMiner.exe -xpool pool -xwal wal -xpsw x -di 01 -tstop 65 -dmem 1 -allpools 1 -h 940
Max 760 h\s per card 480x Why I can reach 900 ? What I need to do ?
on eth I have 30+-
Use blockchain drivers, modified straps, core 1250 and above, and my settings -dmem and - h Is this for 4gb or 8gb cards? I have blockchain drivers, 480 Nitro+ 4GB modded to around 1250c 2000m. Only getting around 750h/s... I tried looking at strapping the memory myself (currently using Anorak Memshift) but I'm not confident enough I fully understand the areas I need to modify. There is 1:1500, 1:1650, 1:750.... but then theres 2:1500, 2:1650 etc. Should I be copying the line 1:1500 to all the other 1's (up to 2000 that is)then doing the same with the 2s? are you sure you can do better than 750h on 4Gb version ? because double thread won't work on 4gb version i have the 1375 timing if i remember with max 1870 memory (they start at 1900 when new but now had to get them down because memory errors) i tested all the traps last year that was the fastest one on monero with claymore 9.7 i think, so i have around 735h/s
|
|
|
|
|
IojkinKot
Newbie

Activity: 61
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 21, 2017, 08:59:52 AM |
|
v 10.2 driver 16.9.2 NsGpuCNMiner.exe -xpool pool -xwal wal -xpsw x -di 01 -tstop 65 -dmem 1 -allpools 1 -h 940
Max 760 h\s per card 480x Why I can reach 900 ? What I need to do ?
on eth I have 30+-
Use blockchain drivers, modified straps, core 1250 and above, and my settings -dmem and - h Is this for 4gb or 8gb cards? I have blockchain drivers, 480 Nitro+ 4GB modded to around 1250c 2000m. Only getting around 750h/s... I tried looking at strapping the memory myself (currently using Anorak Memshift) but I'm not confident enough I fully understand the areas I need to modify. There is 1:1500, 1:1650, 1:750.... but then theres 2:1500, 2:1650 etc. Should I be copying the line 1:1500 to all the other 1's (up to 2000 that is)then doing the same with the 2s? are you sure you can do better than 750h on 4Gb version ? because double thread won't work on 4gb version i have the 1375 timing if i remember with max 1870 memory (they start at 1900 when new but now had to get them down because memory errors) i tested all the traps last year that was the fastest one on monero with claymore 9.7 i think, so i have around 735h/s http://i92.fastpic.ru/big/2017/1021/a3/323cde4a6b5c286c2e6833dded122aa3.png
|
|
|
|
|
Grinner888
Newbie

Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 21, 2017, 11:57:27 AM |
|
how about RX 470 4GB? I can only seem to get 770h/s is it possible to hit 900 h/s?
|
|
|
|
|
IojkinKot
Newbie

Activity: 61
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 21, 2017, 03:38:41 PM |
|
how about RX 470 4GB? I can only seem to get 770h/s is it possible to hit 900 h/s?
Read my previous messages
|
|
|
|
|
|