Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 12:25:23 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 [254] 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 ... 326 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3  (Read 2144938 times)
damniatx
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 109
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 23, 2017, 02:04:09 PM
 #5061

anyone use rx470 with this miner ?, I can only got 620H/s. any tips for me guys ?
1714134323
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714134323

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714134323
Reply with quote  #2

1714134323
Report to moderator
1714134323
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714134323

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714134323
Reply with quote  #2

1714134323
Report to moderator
1714134323
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714134323

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714134323
Reply with quote  #2

1714134323
Report to moderator
The Bitcoin network protocol was designed to be extremely flexible. It can be used to create timed transactions, escrow transactions, multi-signature transactions, etc. The current features of the client only hint at what will be possible in the future.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
invicta
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 194
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 23, 2017, 03:32:29 PM
 #5062

anyone use rx470 with this miner ?, I can only got 620H/s. any tips for me guys ?

BIOS mod it (if you haven’t already) - strap the 1500 timings to the rest and OC the memory to 1800+. It should reach 700-750H/s easy and some have reported over 800H/s on Polaris. I’ve gone for stability and dialled mine back a bit.
BSAlex
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 239
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 23, 2017, 06:49:27 PM
 #5063


It was their Nicehash EU (SSL) servers, switching to the USA servers resolved it.

EU server also works OK now
recondiscord
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 23, 2017, 10:57:39 PM
 #5064

Please add R7250 ;-;
bobymoore
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 61
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 25, 2017, 06:13:45 PM
 #5065

nanopool don't show my statistics.dont show my worker online,i use v10.2 beta,vega 56,blockchain driver.
notbatman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038



View Profile
November 25, 2017, 09:12:11 PM
 #5066

Holy crap Claymore dude, one of my 480s gets 996 h/s!!!  It was doing 830 h/s on the other miner I've been using.
lankyman
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 382
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 25, 2017, 09:19:41 PM
 #5067

I get 633 hashes on all my 3 GPUs  RX470 - using 9.7 and when i use 10.2 i get 300 odd hashes on my 3rd listed GPU.


Call_Me_Bambi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 261


View Profile
November 25, 2017, 09:21:18 PM
 #5068

Holy crap Claymore dude, one of my 480s gets 996 h/s!!!  It was doing 830 h/s on the other miner I've been using.

Care to share with us what the 'other miner' was (and the config used) so we can do a little test for ourselves and see if Claymore is that much better - thanks.
notbatman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038



View Profile
November 25, 2017, 10:42:38 PM
 #5069

Holy crap Claymore dude, one of my 480s gets 996 h/s!!!  It was doing 830 h/s on the other miner I've been using.

Care to share with us what the 'other miner' was (and the config used) so we can do a little test for ourselves and see if Claymore is that much better - thanks.

other miner:

gatelessgate-0.1.3-pre6b

config:

 
Code:
{
  "algorithm": "cryptonight",
  "rawintensity": "1008",
  "worksize": "8",
  "gpu-threads": "1",
  "gpu-fan" :  "75",
  "no-extranonce" : true,
  "more-notices" : true,
 
  "pools": [
    {
      "name": "FARMERPOOL-XMR",
      "user": "panda.miner",
      "pass": "x",
      "url": "stratum+ssl://xmr.pool.cn:8888"
    }
  ]
}

note:

I use a custom mining BIOS.
Call_Me_Bambi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 261


View Profile
November 26, 2017, 09:47:10 AM
 #5070

Holy crap Claymore dude, one of my 480s gets 996 h/s!!!  It was doing 830 h/s on the other miner I've been using.

Care to share with us what the 'other miner' was (and the config used) so we can do a little test for ourselves and see if Claymore is that much better - thanks.

other miner:
gatelessgate-0.1.3-pre6b
config:

Code:
{
  "algorithm": "cryptonight",
  "rawintensity": "1008",
  "worksize": "8",
  "gpu-threads": "1",
  "gpu-fan" :  "75",
  "no-extranonce" : true,
  "more-notices" : true,
  
  "pools": [
    {
      "name": "FARMERPOOL-XMR",
      "user": "panda.miner",
      "pass": "x",
      "url": "stratum+ssl://xmr.pool.cn:8888"
    }
  ]
}
note:
I use a custom mining BIOS.

Ah yes, gatelessgate; I gave it a quick go sometime back but found that Claymore's Cryptonote miner was much better. Sgminer is another one I've used but lately I've found Claymore's miner to be a bit better. Sgminer used to be, for me, better than Claymore, something must have changed in my setup, I shall investigate.
Pennywis3
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 327
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 26, 2017, 01:49:35 PM
 #5071

Ah yes, gatelessgate; I gave it a quick go sometime back but found that Claymore's Cryptonote miner was much better. Sgminer is another one I've used but lately I've found Claymore's miner to be a bit better. Sgminer used to be, for me, better than Claymore, something must have changed in my setup, I shall investigate.

Don't know what GPUs you are using, but for mining XMR on RX 4x0,5x0 GPUs , claymore is not even remotely as fast as a properly set up SGminer GM.
The only problem SGminer GM has is not being up to date, so there's problems with changing voltage, clock eth., but that can be done with other tools as well.

So yea, there's probably something changed in your setup Smiley
invicta
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 194
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 26, 2017, 02:39:09 PM
 #5072

Ah yes, gatelessgate; I gave it a quick go sometime back but found that Claymore's Cryptonote miner was much better. Sgminer is another one I've used but lately I've found Claymore's miner to be a bit better. Sgminer used to be, for me, better than Claymore, something must have changed in my setup, I shall investigate.

Don't know what GPUs you are using, but for mining XMR on RX 4x0,5x0 GPUs , claymore is not even remotely as fast as a properly set up SGminer GM.
The only problem SGminer GM has is not being up to date, so there's problems with changing voltage, clock eth., but that can be done with other tools as well.

So yea, there's probably something changed in your setup Smiley

Do you have a suggested guide or thread for SGMiner GM? I know it's not been updated in a while. The thing I always liked about Claymore is it seems to auto-configure itself quite nicely and generally pretty well, that's why a lot of people (me included) use it.
Pennywis3
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 327
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 26, 2017, 03:12:07 PM
 #5073

Do you have a suggested guide or thread for SGMiner GM? I know it's not been updated in a while. The thing I always liked about Claymore is it seems to auto-configure itself quite nicely and generally pretty well, that's why a lot of people (me included) use it.

There a thread about it here on the forums, other than that, not really.
Its everyone for himself when It comes to sgminer I guess.

Otherwise I agree with you, Claymore are damn fine miners, I'm using them myself.
Just not for Monero  Grin
Call_Me_Bambi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 261


View Profile
November 27, 2017, 12:30:54 AM
 #5074

Ah yes, gatelessgate; I gave it a quick go sometime back but found that Claymore's Cryptonote miner was much better. Sgminer is another one I've used but lately I've found Claymore's miner to be a bit better. Sgminer used to be, for me, better than Claymore, something must have changed in my setup, I shall investigate.

Don't know what GPUs you are using, but for mining XMR on RX 4x0,5x0 GPUs , claymore is not even remotely as fast as a properly set up SGminer GM.
The only problem SGminer GM has is not being up to date, so there's problems with changing voltage, clock eth., but that can be done with other tools as well.

So yea, there's probably something changed in your setup Smiley

Do you have a suggested guide or thread for SGMiner GM? I know it's not been updated in a while. The thing I always liked about Claymore is it seems to auto-configure itself quite nicely and generally pretty well, that's why a lot of people (me included) use it.

There is a thread for SGminer-GM here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1612329.0 . It's not a busy thread but there are still some occasional new posts but, as said, your pretty much on your own.
notbatman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038



View Profile
November 27, 2017, 09:51:07 AM
Last edit: November 27, 2017, 11:17:53 AM by notbatman
 #5075

Crap, I was mining on nicehash via SSL when all my miners (linux/cc v10.2) got disconnected, when they reconnected they all complained about a server error then experienced a segmentation fault except for one rig that just froze.

My windows rig was connected with gatelessgate via the regular nicehash port and it's still up and running.

Here's a log snippet from one of the miners right before it crashed:

Code:
...
00:18:05:489 da70f740 GPU 5 temp = 63, old fan speed = 72, new fan speed = 75

00:18:07:574 98ff9700 cert subject: /C=SI/ST=Slovenia/L=Ljubljana/O=NiceHash/CN=*.nicehash.com/emailAddress=info@nicehash.com
00:18:07:575 98ff9700 cert issuer: /C=SI/ST=Slovenia/L=Ljubljana/O=NiceHash/CN=*.nicehash.com/emailAddress=info@nicehash.com
00:18:07:575 98ff9700 SSL/TLS encryption is enabled
00:18:07:575 98ff9700 send: {"method": "login", "params": {"login": "REDACTED_FOR_BCT_FORUM_POST", "pass": "x", "agent": "xmr/1.0"}, "id": 1}

00:18:07:575 98ff9700 XMR: Stratum - Connected (cryptonight.usa.nicehash.com:33355) (SSL/TLS)
00:18:07:656 98ff9700 got 79 bytes
00:18:07:656 98ff9700 buf: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Internal server error"}}

00:18:07:656 98ff9700 parse packet: 76
00:18:07:656 98ff9700 Error in server response
: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Internalservererror"}}
00:18:07:657 98ff9700 buf was cleared

tg88
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2366
Merit: 1402



View Profile
November 27, 2017, 11:25:59 AM
 #5076

Crap, I was mining on nicehash via SSL when all my miners (linux/cc v10.2) got disconnected, when they reconnected they all complained about a server error then experienced a segmentation fault except for one rig that just froze.

My windows rig was connected with gatelessgate via the regular nicehash port and it's still up and running.

Here's a log snippet from one of the miners right before it crashed:

Code:
...
00:18:05:489 da70f740 GPU 5 temp = 63, old fan speed = 72, new fan speed = 75

00:18:07:574 98ff9700 cert subject: /C=SI/ST=Slovenia/L=Ljubljana/O=NiceHash/CN=*.nicehash.com/emailAddress=info@nicehash.com
00:18:07:575 98ff9700 cert issuer: /C=SI/ST=Slovenia/L=Ljubljana/O=NiceHash/CN=*.nicehash.com/emailAddress=info@nicehash.com
00:18:07:575 98ff9700 SSL/TLS encryption is enabled
00:18:07:575 98ff9700 send: {"method": "login", "params": {"login": "REDACTED_FOR_BCT_FORUM_POST", "pass": "x", "agent": "xmr/1.0"}, "id": 1}

00:18:07:575 98ff9700 XMR: Stratum - Connected (cryptonight.usa.nicehash.com:33355) (SSL/TLS)
00:18:07:656 98ff9700 got 79 bytes
00:18:07:656 98ff9700 buf: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Internal server error"}}

00:18:07:656 98ff9700 parse packet: 76
00:18:07:656 98ff9700 Error in server response
: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Internalservererror"}}
00:18:07:657 98ff9700 buf was cleared


That also happened to my rigs today.

is a problem that occurs with some frequency mining in the nicehash.

.
▄██████████████
███████████████
███████████████
█████████████▀░
███████████▀▄░█
██████████░███░
███████▀▀░▀▀█▀▀
█████▀░░░░░░░▀▄
█████░░░░░░░░░█
█████▄░░░░░░░▄▀
███████▄▄▄▄▄███
███████████████
▀██████████████
▄██████████████
███████████████
████████████▀██
█████████▀▀░░░▀
████████░░░░░░░
██████░░░░░░░░░
█████░░░░░░░░░░
█████░░░░░░░░░░
██████▄░░░░▄▄▄░
█████████▀▀░░░▀
████████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
███████████████
▀██████████████
▄██████████████
███████████████
██████████▀▀▀▀▀
███████▀░▀█▄░░░
██████░░░░░█▄░▄
█████░░▄▄▄▄▄██▀
█████▀▀▀░░░░▄█▄
█████░░░▄▄█▀▀░█
██████▄█▀▀░░░░▀
███████▄▄░░░░░░
██████████▄▄▄▄▄
███████████████
▀██████████████
▄████████████████████████▄
██████████████████████████
█████████████░████████████
████████████▀▄████████████
█████▀▀░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▀█████
████▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀████
████░░░██░██░░░░█░░░░░████
████░░░▄▄▀▄▄░░▀▀▄▀▀░░░████
████▄░░▀▀░▀▀░░░░▀░░░░▄████
█████▄▄░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄█████
██████████████████████████
██████████████████████████
▀████████████████████████▀
.
invicta
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 194
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 27, 2017, 12:14:41 PM
 #5077

Crap, I was mining on nicehash via SSL when all my miners (linux/cc v10.2) got disconnected, when they reconnected they all complained about a server error then experienced a segmentation fault except for one rig that just froze.

My windows rig was connected with gatelessgate via the regular nicehash port and it's still up and running.

Here's a log snippet from one of the miners right before it crashed:

Code:
...
00:18:05:489 da70f740 GPU 5 temp = 63, old fan speed = 72, new fan speed = 75

00:18:07:574 98ff9700 cert subject: /C=SI/ST=Slovenia/L=Ljubljana/O=NiceHash/CN=*.nicehash.com/emailAddress=info@nicehash.com
00:18:07:575 98ff9700 cert issuer: /C=SI/ST=Slovenia/L=Ljubljana/O=NiceHash/CN=*.nicehash.com/emailAddress=info@nicehash.com
00:18:07:575 98ff9700 SSL/TLS encryption is enabled
00:18:07:575 98ff9700 send: {"method": "login", "params": {"login": "REDACTED_FOR_BCT_FORUM_POST", "pass": "x", "agent": "xmr/1.0"}, "id": 1}

00:18:07:575 98ff9700 XMR: Stratum - Connected (cryptonight.usa.nicehash.com:33355) (SSL/TLS)
00:18:07:656 98ff9700 got 79 bytes
00:18:07:656 98ff9700 buf: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Internal server error"}}

00:18:07:656 98ff9700 parse packet: 76
00:18:07:656 98ff9700 Error in server response
: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Internalservererror"}}
00:18:07:657 98ff9700 buf was cleared


I just wanted to add that it happened to me as well. If it keeps occurring I'll likely end up mining Equihash instead but their Cryptonote servers have been really flaky recently, first it was 'shareabovetarget' errors on EU, now this. Most of my rigs crashed the software but one hard-locks when the graphics cards come out of 3D mode and drop their clocks back (I assume it's voltage offset is too low). Has anyone had a response from Nicehash?
garytheasshole
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 105


Chosŏn Minjujuŭi Inmin Konghwaguk


View Profile WWW
November 27, 2017, 12:32:31 PM
 #5078

Nicehash is the work of Satan! Don't give them your hashrate they have way too much as it is, too much power in the hands of a single entity is never a good idea, power corrupts.

notbatman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038



View Profile
November 28, 2017, 02:26:33 AM
 #5079

I've added the -allpools 1 option, we'll see if that changes anything...

As for mining on NH it's a double edged sword, It really does pay nicely even if new coins get totally fucked up. The skilled dev will tweak the difficulty re-targeting algorithm accordingly and the shitty dev will swap to ETH tokens. It's a hardening process, perhaps a hammer not a sword is a better analogy.

 
invicta
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 194
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 28, 2017, 12:41:58 PM
 #5080

I've added the -allpools 1 option, we'll see if that changes anything...

As for mining on NH it's a double edged sword, It really does pay nicely even if new coins get totally fucked up. The skilled dev will tweak the difficulty re-targeting algorithm accordingly and the shitty dev will swap to ETH tokens. It's a hardening process, perhaps a hammer not a sword is a better analogy.

 

What do you expect 'allpools 1' will do?

Nicehash is also good for getting paid in BTC without owning ASICs.

Finally, Thor's hammer was smashed by Hela recently - how does that fit into the analogy Grin
Pages: « 1 ... 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 [254] 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 ... 326 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!