|
patmast3r
|
 |
June 30, 2014, 08:58:27 AM |
|
When is next Alpha build with bug fix coming? & source for alpha already available?
thank you!
No ETA on next build. Source won't be available for a while. |
|
|
|
jenea4pda
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 382
Merit: 250
Iota and JINN
|
|
June 30, 2014, 09:57:41 AM |
|
When is next Alpha build with bug fix coming? & source for alpha already available?
thank you!
No ETA on next build. Source won't be available for a while. IMO, Source of NEM must be closed for at least half of year after NEM release! We are all so tired from many clones... But... may be clones-this is good way to promote(some kind of marketing) real NEM? |
www.iotatoken.com https://twitter.com/iotatokenIota is a brand new and novel micro-transaction cryptotoken optimized for the Internet-of-Things (IoT). Unlike the complex and heavy blockchains of Bitcoin and the like, which were designed with other uses in mind, Iota is created to be as lightweight as possible, hence the name "Iota" with emphasis on the ‘IoT’ part.
|
|
|
Fernandez
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 30, 2014, 10:05:33 AM |
|
When is next Alpha build with bug fix coming? & source for alpha already available?
thank you!
No ETA on next build. Source won't be available for a while. IMO, Source of NEM must be closed for at least half of year after NEM release! We are all so tired from many clones... But... may be clones-this is good way to promote(some kind of marketing) real NEM? I said earlier, and I still maintain that this is the wrong approach. The source should be open, and we will beat the competition by having a superior ecosystem. |
|
|
|
|
|
mladen00
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2124
Merit: 1013
K-ing®
|
|
June 30, 2014, 11:08:43 AM |
|
When is next Alpha build with bug fix coming? & source for alpha already available?
thank you!
No ETA on next build. Source won't be available for a while. IMO, Source of NEM must be closed for at least half of year after NEM release! We are all so tired from many clones... But... may be clones-this is good way to promote(some kind of marketing) real NEM? I said earlier, and I still maintain that this is the wrong approach. The source should be open, and we will beat the competition by having a superior ecosystem. no, we do not need clones beafore NEM goes out |
IOTA
|
|
|
|
patmast3r
|
|
June 30, 2014, 11:26:12 AM |
|
When is next Alpha build with bug fix coming? & source for alpha already available?
thank you!
No ETA on next build. Source won't be available for a while. IMO, Source of NEM must be closed for at least half of year after NEM release! We are all so tired from many clones... But... may be clones-this is good way to promote(some kind of marketing) real NEM? I said earlier, and I still maintain that this is the wrong approach. The source should be open, and we will beat the competition by having a superior ecosystem. no, we do not need clones beafore NEM goes out Open Source before launch doesn't make much sense. It's also safer for the entire world. Noone should be able to use unfisnished code to make a clone of NEM. Them having network problems might reflect badly on NEM since it' supposedly a clone. Look at NAS. According to Jean-Luc they used unfinished, not production ready code. Now it has followers that were all hoping to be part of a great coin. Let's spare the people an early crappy NEM Clone like NAS  |
|
|
|
|
jxmhqjg
|
|
June 30, 2014, 12:07:39 PM |
|
 My friend is always talking about NEM so I made this picture. I want to be NEM cheerleader. Nice! I like the pic |
NEM is the future
|
|
|
|
DarkhorseofNxt
|
|
June 30, 2014, 12:18:11 PM |
|
Hey guys. How you doing? Just a suggestion. If you guys are still not settled on NEM logo, why dont you do something like what "Viacoin" did. The inputs were awesome and straight forward. Heres the link. The designer pipipipopopo has talents. Why waste time arguing.  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=646754.0 |
|
|
|
|
shaman2000
|
|
June 30, 2014, 12:26:21 PM |
|
Let's go back to normality:
Keep on voting for NEM guys!!!
https://hitbtc.com/voteLet's make our best, by the way-when you are member there you vote will be x10
|
|
|
|
|
ARGpentem
|
|
June 30, 2014, 01:00:17 PM |
|
When is next Alpha build with bug fix coming? & source for alpha already available?
thank you!
No ETA on next build. Source won't be available for a while. IMO, Source of NEM must be closed for at least half of year after NEM release! We are all so tired from many clones... But... may be clones-this is good way to promote(some kind of marketing) real NEM? I said earlier, and I still maintain that this is the wrong approach. The source should be open, and we will beat the competition by having a superior ecosystem. no, we do not need clones beafore NEM goes out Open Source before launch doesn't make much sense. It's also safer for the entire world. Noone should be able to use unfisnished code to make a clone of NEM. Them having network problems might reflect badly on NEM since it' supposedly a clone. Look at NAS. According to Jean-Luc they used unfinished, not production ready code. Now it has followers that were all hoping to be part of a great coin. Let's spare the people an early crappy NEM Clone like NAS +1. Look they plan a clone months before there is a single line of code https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=620518.0. Many take Linux open source development as a model but I don't think Linux development has an equivalent in crypto even in Bitcoin. Mike Hearn just said Bitcoin core development has come to a halt with only Gavin develops something. The difference is that a helper in Linux knowing they are doing for the good of the humanity; the same thing cannot be said for any single coin. People can feel good about helping crypto movement in general but why should they pick a particular coin whether it is bitcoin, litecoin, doge or nem ? So rationally if a developer has an interest in nem technical development but has no allegiance to nem, he will just clone the source and make his own developments and IPO. On the other hand, clones are not that bad and historically clones can work to advertise the main currency. It is more worrying that a good competitor copy the ideas and implement them in their own system. This 2 gen. crypto market is packed with coins with some legitimate developments: qora, nxt, nxt lite, nfd, exo, noir, cripti, nhz etc. it is now difficult to see a differentiator between all of them. I still like open sources but that's the reality of the market imho. |
A freedom fighter. Stop all your bull shit !
|
|
|
|
patmast3r
|
|
June 30, 2014, 01:02:45 PM |
|
When is next Alpha build with bug fix coming? & source for alpha already available?
thank you!
No ETA on next build. Source won't be available for a while. IMO, Source of NEM must be closed for at least half of year after NEM release! We are all so tired from many clones... But... may be clones-this is good way to promote(some kind of marketing) real NEM? I said earlier, and I still maintain that this is the wrong approach. The source should be open, and we will beat the competition by having a superior ecosystem. no, we do not need clones beafore NEM goes out Open Source before launch doesn't make much sense. It's also safer for the entire world. Noone should be able to use unfisnished code to make a clone of NEM. Them having network problems might reflect badly on NEM since it' supposedly a clone. Look at NAS. According to Jean-Luc they used unfinished, not production ready code. Now it has followers that were all hoping to be part of a great coin. Let's spare the people an early crappy NEM Clone like NAS +1. Look they plan a clone months before there is a single line of code https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=620518.0. Many take Linux open source development as a model but I don't think Linux development has an equivalent in crypto even in Bitcoin. Mike Hearn just said Bitcoin core development has come to a halt with only Gavin develops something. The difference is that a helper in Linux knowing they are doing for the good of the humanity; the same thing cannot be said for any single coin. People can feel good about helping crypto movement in general but why should they pick a particular coin whether it is bitcoin, litecoin, doge or nem ? So rationally if a developer has an interest in nem technical development but has no allegiance to nem, he will just clone the source and make his own developments and IPO. On the other hand, clones are not that bad and historically clones can work to advertise the main currency. It is more worrying that a good competitor copy the ideas and implement them in their own system. This 2 gen. crypto market is packed with coins with some legitimate developments: qora, nxt, nxt lite, nfd, exo, noir, cripti, nhz etc. if it is now difficult to see a differentiator between all of them. Haven't looked closely at all of them but nxtl aka Node has nothing to do with NXT anymore and qory supposedly uses a different POS algo. |
|
|
|
|
ARGpentem
|
|
June 30, 2014, 01:04:49 PM |
|
When is next Alpha build with bug fix coming? & source for alpha already available?
thank you!
No ETA on next build. Source won't be available for a while. IMO, Source of NEM must be closed for at least half of year after NEM release! We are all so tired from many clones... But... may be clones-this is good way to promote(some kind of marketing) real NEM? I said earlier, and I still maintain that this is the wrong approach. The source should be open, and we will beat the competition by having a superior ecosystem. no, we do not need clones beafore NEM goes out Open Source before launch doesn't make much sense. It's also safer for the entire world. Noone should be able to use unfisnished code to make a clone of NEM. Them having network problems might reflect badly on NEM since it' supposedly a clone. Look at NAS. According to Jean-Luc they used unfinished, not production ready code. Now it has followers that were all hoping to be part of a great coin. Let's spare the people an early crappy NEM Clone like NAS +1. Look they plan a clone months before there is a single line of code https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=620518.0. Many take Linux open source development as a model but I don't think Linux development has an equivalent in crypto even in Bitcoin. Mike Hearn just said Bitcoin core development has come to a halt with only Gavin develops something. The difference is that a helper in Linux knowing they are doing for the good of the humanity; the same thing cannot be said for any single coin. People can feel good about helping crypto movement in general but why should they pick a particular coin whether it is bitcoin, litecoin, doge or nem ? So rationally if a developer has an interest in nem technical development but has no allegiance to nem, he will just clone the source and make his own developments and IPO. On the other hand, clones are not that bad and historically clones can work to advertise the main currency. It is more worrying that a good competitor copy the ideas and implement them in their own system. This 2 gen. crypto market is packed with coins with some legitimate developments: qora, nxt, nxt lite, nfd, exo, noir, cripti, nhz etc. if it is now difficult to see a differentiator between all of them. Haven't looked closely at all of them but nxtl aka Node has nothing to do with NXT anymore and qory supposedly uses a different POS algo. That's why I think they are legitimate developments = having competent developers at various level and doing different things. |
A freedom fighter. Stop all your bull shit !
|
|
|
|
asdlolciterquit
|
|
June 30, 2014, 01:47:46 PM |
|
Let's go back to normality:
Keep on voting for NEM guys!!!
https://hitbtc.com/voteLet's make our best, by the way-when you are member there you vote will be x10 the road is long, but we can do it! |
|
|
|
|
|
ARGpentem
|
|
June 30, 2014, 01:50:35 PM |
|
Let's go back to normality:
Keep on voting for NEM guys!!!
https://hitbtc.com/voteLet's make our best, by the way-when you are member there you vote will be x10 the road is long, but we can do it! Let's vote The new economy starts with you. I believe in NEM. |
A freedom fighter. Stop all your bull shit !
|
|
|
|
asdlolciterquit
|
|
June 30, 2014, 04:35:26 PM |
|
where can i find some info about the alpha? like opinion, comments etc...
is there some site that collect them?
|
|
|
|
|
|
crackerhead
|
|
June 30, 2014, 05:51:35 PM |
|
where can i find some info about the alpha? like opinion, comments etc...
is there some site that collect them?
I'll work on getting something more consolidated today, and post the link here. |
|
|
|
|
crackerhead
|
|
June 30, 2014, 05:52:25 PM |
|
Not to be overlooked, this could be extremely helpful for initial NEM adoption. |
|
|
|
cmason22
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
June 30, 2014, 06:26:45 PM |
|
ELI5 - How is NEM different than other coins? I'm ready to buy my stake!
|
|
|
|
|
|
hypersire
|
|
June 30, 2014, 07:40:36 PM |
|
ELI5 - How is NEM different than other coins? I'm ready to buy my stake!
One big difference is POI (Proof of Importance) as no other coin offers this. POI will try to alleviate some of the problems with POS where only the large account holders are able to generate any interest. With NXT for example, even if you had a million of them in your wallet you will barely forge anything. POI is totally new, a system where nodes are rewarded based on their "importance" to the network. |
|
|
|
|
martismartis
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1005
|
|
June 30, 2014, 07:54:36 PM |
|
ELI5 - How is NEM different than other coins? I'm ready to buy my stake!
One big difference is POI (Proof of Importance) as no other coin offers this. POI will try to alleviate some of the problems with POS where only the large account holders are able to generate any interest. With NXT for example, even if you had a million of them in your wallet you will barely forge anything. POI is totally new, a system where nodes are rewarded based on their "importance" to the network. What is included in "importance"? running a node for xxx hours, days or making x transfers per day, etc? |
|
|
|
|
|
