Bitcoin Forum
December 05, 2024, 08:25:43 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 [163] 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 ... 1310 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] [XMG] MAGI | CPU mining | mPoW | mPoS | [MagiPay]  (Read 2375960 times)
tom1111
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 26, 2014, 03:59:20 PM
 #3241

My Digital Ocean VPS works now.

On the other VPS, I'm getting this with the command MAKE

magi@104:~/m7m-cpuminer-v2$ make
make  all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2'
Making all in compat
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2/compat'
Making all in jansson
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2/compat/jansson'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2/compat/jansson'
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2/compat'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2/compat'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2/compat'
Making all in m7
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2/m7'
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..     -g -O2 -MT m7hash.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/m7hash.Tpo -c -o m7hash.o m7hash.cpp
m7hash.cpp: In function ‘uint256 hash_M7M_v2(T1, T1, unsigned int)’:
m7hash.cpp:126:52: error: ‘numeric_limits’ is not a member of ‘std’
m7hash.cpp:126:52: error: expected primary-expression before ‘double’
m7hash.cpp:126:52: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘double’
m7hash.cpp:126:66: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘;’ token
m7hash.cpp:126:66: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘;’ token
m7hash.cpp:126:66: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘;’ token
make[2]: *** [m7hash.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2/m7'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2'
make: *** [all] Error 2
magi@104:~/m7m-cpuminer-v2$

magi@104:~/m7m-cpuminer-v2$ sudo cp minerd /usr/local/bin
[sudo] password for magi:
cp: cannot stat `minerd': No such file or directory
magi@104:~/m7m-cpuminer-v2$



If you use the version using m7hash.cpp
open that file and add to the top
#include <limits>
and it will compile
at least it worked for me
The Frisian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1019
Merit: 1003


Senior Developer and founder of ViMeAv ICT


View Profile WWW
October 26, 2014, 04:06:30 PM
 #3242

My Digital Ocean VPS works now.

On the other VPS, I'm getting this with the command MAKE

magi@104:~/m7m-cpuminer-v2$ make
make  all-recursive
...


A fork of the code here works now in my vps:

https://github.com/magi-project/m7m-cpuminer-v2

Code:
git clone https://github.com/magi-project/m7m-cpuminer-v2
cd m7magi-cpuminer
./autogen.sh
CFLAGS="-O3" ./configure
make
sudo cp minerd /usr/local/bin

Thanks Joe, now it all works again.
How about the third of the original hashrate,
will this be compensated by the reward (which was already very low regarding the reward of the beginning)


joelao95 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1009


Coin of the Magi!


View Profile
October 26, 2014, 04:10:22 PM
 #3243

Thanks Joe, now it all works again.
How about the third of the original hashrate,
will this be compensated by the reward (which was already very low regarding the reward of the beginning)

So like everyone gets 1/3 less hashrate, share still the same..

p.s., can somebody post how much reduction in hashrate


  Coin MAGI  . XMG   
Coin Source : Trust Verified    [ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ]
  ♓.NΣTWORK-DΣPΣNDΣNT  RΣWARDING SYSTΣM  ※ 
  ANN THREAD MAGIPAY FAQ FORUM
.CPU Mining   PoS-II   PoM   Unique Block Reward 
muchoman
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 465
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 26, 2014, 04:16:13 PM
 #3244

Thanks Joe, now it all works again.
How about the third of the original hashrate,
will this be compensated by the reward (which was already very low regarding the reward of the beginning)

So like everyone gets 1/3 less hashrate, share still the same..

p.s., can somebody post how much reduction in hashrate

Got 60 now 24 on 3570k
111magic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1005



View Profile
October 26, 2014, 04:23:53 PM
 #3245

So less power consumption? Nice!

bitcoin: bc1qyadvvyv29z08ln2ta7g3uqwzkscr7wq4p09wuz
muchoman
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 465
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 26, 2014, 04:30:53 PM
 #3246

So less power consumption? Nice!

Power consumption is the same as before.
jawitech
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 26, 2014, 05:02:19 PM
Last edit: October 26, 2014, 05:53:47 PM by jawitech
 #3247

With my home PC CPU i got around 10-13 kh/s with the old miner, now 3-4 kh/s with the new one

Any solution for the VPS problem, Joe?
shaolin_rs
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 20
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 26, 2014, 05:03:50 PM
 #3248

I have updated my miner package for the new algorithm. These are the links:-

64 bit Windows:-

.rar fille https://www.dropbox.com/s/hiadf8o5u7bsit7/XMGpoolminerWin64.rar?dl=0

self-extracting .exe [urlhttps[Suspicious link removed]?dl=0][/url]

32 bit Windows:-

.rar file https://www.dropbox.com/s/dii8cvz7lp8xuey/XMGpoolminerWin32.rar?dl=0

self-extracting .exe ?dl=0

These packages include my Windows batch file "wrappers" for best performance. Please see the read.me file for more info and refer to this earlier post too https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=735170.msg9285948#msg9285948

To estimate the hashrate that you can expect with the new algorithm, go to this web site https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu_list.php and find the Passmark for your CPU. Divide the Passmark figure by 1000, then:-

For 64 bit hashrate in Kh/s, multiply by pi (3.142)

For 32 bit hashrate in Kh/s, multiply by 2

Please post details of any problems you get with this software. I will be around for quite a few hours yet before the urge to sleep overcomes me Smiley It is 3am here.

I have only 1.77kh/s on AM1 5350 64bit Spexx miner, by this calculation need to be much more score any suggestion?
joelao95 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1009


Coin of the Magi!


View Profile
October 26, 2014, 05:25:15 PM
 #3249

My with home pc CPU i got around 10-13 kh/s with the old miner, now 3-4 kh/s with the new one

Any solution for the VPS problem, Joe?

A fork of the code works:
https://github.com/magi-project/m7m-cpuminer-v2

Also this is another version by nonce-pool, maybe with improved performance:
https://github.com/noncepool/m7magi-cpuminer-v2

I will get those compared and finalized a one with link post then.

Code:
git clone https://github.com/magi-project/m7m-cpuminer-v2
cd m7magi-cpuminer
./autogen.sh
CFLAGS="-O3" ./configure
make
sudo cp minerd /usr/local/bin


  Coin MAGI  . XMG   
Coin Source : Trust Verified    [ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ]
  ♓.NΣTWORK-DΣPΣNDΣNT  RΣWARDING SYSTΣM  ※ 
  ANN THREAD MAGIPAY FAQ FORUM
.CPU Mining   PoS-II   PoM   Unique Block Reward 
joelao95 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1009


Coin of the Magi!


View Profile
October 26, 2014, 05:27:34 PM
 #3250

I have only 1.77kh/s on AM1 5350 64bit Spexx miner, by this calculation need to be much more score any suggestion?
You can try MarcusDe's compilation too since he has different versions for specific CPUs: http://graymines.net/miners/magi


  Coin MAGI  . XMG   
Coin Source : Trust Verified    [ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ]
  ♓.NΣTWORK-DΣPΣNDΣNT  RΣWARDING SYSTΣM  ※ 
  ANN THREAD MAGIPAY FAQ FORUM
.CPU Mining   PoS-II   PoM   Unique Block Reward 
conteaza
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250



View Profile
October 26, 2014, 05:29:58 PM
 #3251

Thanks Joe, now it all works again.
How about the third of the original hashrate,
will this be compensated by the reward (which was already very low regarding the reward of the beginning)

So like everyone gets 1/3 less hashrate, share still the same..

p.s., can somebody post how much reduction in hashrate
I got now around 10kH/s but was 25k
joelao95 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1009


Coin of the Magi!


View Profile
October 26, 2014, 05:31:32 PM
 #3252

Thanks guys, looks like we got 2.5 times reduction due to the algo change.


  Coin MAGI  . XMG   
Coin Source : Trust Verified    [ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ]
  ♓.NΣTWORK-DΣPΣNDΣNT  RΣWARDING SYSTΣM  ※ 
  ANN THREAD MAGIPAY FAQ FORUM
.CPU Mining   PoS-II   PoM   Unique Block Reward 
shaolin_rs
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 20
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 26, 2014, 05:52:51 PM
 #3253

I have only 1.77kh/s on AM1 5350 64bit Spexx miner, by this calculation need to be much more score any suggestion?
You can try MarcusDe's compilation too since he has different versions for specific CPUs: http://graymines.net/miners/magi

much better 7.67 kh/s thx
joelao95 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1009


Coin of the Magi!


View Profile
October 26, 2014, 06:02:35 PM
 #3254

I have only 1.77kh/s on AM1 5350 64bit Spexx miner, by this calculation need to be much more score any suggestion?
You can try MarcusDe's compilation too since he has different versions for specific CPUs: http://graymines.net/miners/magi

much better 7.67 kh/s thx

Nice, how much reduced?


  Coin MAGI  . XMG   
Coin Source : Trust Verified    [ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ]
  ♓.NΣTWORK-DΣPΣNDΣNT  RΣWARDING SYSTΣM  ※ 
  ANN THREAD MAGIPAY FAQ FORUM
.CPU Mining   PoS-II   PoM   Unique Block Reward 
jawitech
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 26, 2014, 06:42:00 PM
 #3255

How about the third of the original hashrate,
will this be compensated by the reward (which was already very low regarding the reward of the beginning)

Since switching, I made nearly as much coins as before in 24h. Looks good so far. At nonce-pool the block rewards on average are higher than before (now mostly 11 coins instead of 5 per block).
jawitech
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 26, 2014, 06:46:32 PM
 #3256

My Digital Ocean VPS works now.

On the other VPS, I'm getting this with the command MAKE

magi@104:~/m7m-cpuminer-v2$ make
make  all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2'
Making all in compat
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2/compat'
Making all in jansson
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2/compat/jansson'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2/compat/jansson'
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2/compat'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2/compat'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2/compat'
Making all in m7
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2/m7'
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..     -g -O2 -MT m7hash.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/m7hash.Tpo -c -o m7hash.o m7hash.cpp
m7hash.cpp: In function ‘uint256 hash_M7M_v2(T1, T1, unsigned int)’:
m7hash.cpp:126:52: error: ‘numeric_limits’ is not a member of ‘std’
m7hash.cpp:126:52: error: expected primary-expression before ‘double’
m7hash.cpp:126:52: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘double’
m7hash.cpp:126:66: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘;’ token
m7hash.cpp:126:66: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘;’ token
m7hash.cpp:126:66: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘;’ token
make[2]: *** [m7hash.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2/m7'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2'
make: *** [all] Error 2
magi@104:~/m7m-cpuminer-v2$

magi@104:~/m7m-cpuminer-v2$ sudo cp minerd /usr/local/bin
[sudo] password for magi:
cp: cannot stat `minerd': No such file or directory
magi@104:~/m7m-cpuminer-v2$



If you use the version using m7hash.cpp
open that file and add to the top
#include <limits>
and it will compile
at least it worked for me

Thanks for your suggestion, unfortunately I'm not really familiar with linux (just followed the step by step tutorial). But meanwhile I got it running.
jawitech
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 26, 2014, 06:48:22 PM
 #3257


A fork of the code here works now in my vps:

https://github.com/magi-project/m7m-cpuminer-v2

Code:
git clone https://github.com/magi-project/m7m-cpuminer-v2
cd m7m-cpuminer-v2
./autogen.sh
CFLAGS="-O3" ./configure
make
sudo cp minerd /usr/local/bin

Edit, corrected the guide now

Great, got it running now. Thanks!

My total hashrate decreased from 50 kh/s (2 thread AMD Athlon X2 220 + 2 VPS) to 15 kh/s.
joelao95 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1009


Coin of the Magi!


View Profile
October 26, 2014, 07:19:46 PM
 #3258


A fork of the code here works now in my vps:

https://github.com/magi-project/m7m-cpuminer-v2

Code:
git clone https://github.com/magi-project/m7m-cpuminer-v2
cd m7m-cpuminer-v2
./autogen.sh
CFLAGS="-O3" ./configure
make
sudo cp minerd /usr/local/bin

Edit, corrected the guide now

Great, got it running now. Thanks!

My total hashrate decreased from 50 kh/s (2 thread AMD Athlon X2 220 + 2 VPS) to 15 kh/s.

May need optimization .. prior reports:

Got 60 now 24 on 3570k
I got now around 10kH/s but was 25k


  Coin MAGI  . XMG   
Coin Source : Trust Verified    [ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ]
  ♓.NΣTWORK-DΣPΣNDΣNT  RΣWARDING SYSTΣM  ※ 
  ANN THREAD MAGIPAY FAQ FORUM
.CPU Mining   PoS-II   PoM   Unique Block Reward 
The Frisian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1019
Merit: 1003


Senior Developer and founder of ViMeAv ICT


View Profile WWW
October 26, 2014, 07:25:17 PM
 #3259

The reward is now much higher than during last weeks.
jawitech
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 26, 2014, 07:45:50 PM
 #3260


May need optimization .. prior reports:

Got 60 now 24 on 3570k
I got now around 10kH/s but was 25k

Was testing the 3 different miners I downloaded. With the generic version that Spexx provided, my desktop CPU got 3-4 kh/s. With the core2 miner from MarcusDE I'm getting 7-8 kh/s. The both VPS have a little less than 50% of what they had before. Now my total is 20 kh/s on average instead of 50 kh/s before. What do you think, is that ok?
Pages: « 1 ... 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 [163] 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 ... 1310 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!