[ANN] [XMG] MAGI | CPU mining | mPoW | mPoS | [MagiPay]

[tom1111]

My Digital Ocean VPS works now.

On the other VPS, I'm getting this with the command MAKE

magi@104:~/m7m-cpuminer-v2$ make
make  all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2'
Making all in compat
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2/compat'
Making all in jansson
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2/compat/jansson'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2/compat/jansson'
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2/compat'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2/compat'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2/compat'
Making all in m7
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2/m7'
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..     -g -O2 -MT m7hash.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/m7hash.Tpo -c -o m7hash.o m7hash.cpp
m7hash.cpp: In function ‘uint256 hash_M7M_v2(T1, T1, unsigned int)’:
m7hash.cpp:126:52: error: ‘numeric_limits’ is not a member of ‘std’
m7hash.cpp:126:52: error: expected primary-expression before ‘double’
m7hash.cpp:126:52: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘double’
m7hash.cpp:126:66: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘;’ token
m7hash.cpp:126:66: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘;’ token
m7hash.cpp:126:66: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘;’ token
make[2]: *** [m7hash.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2/m7'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2'
make: *** [all] Error 2
magi@104:~/m7m-cpuminer-v2$

magi@104:~/m7m-cpuminer-v2$ sudo cp minerd /usr/local/bin
[sudo] password for magi:
cp: cannot stat `minerd': No such file or directory
magi@104:~/m7m-cpuminer-v2$

If you use the version using m7hash.cpp
open that file and add to the top
#include <limits>
and it will compile
at least it worked for me

[The Frisian]

My Digital Ocean VPS works now.

On the other VPS, I'm getting this with the command MAKE

magi@104:~/m7m-cpuminer-v2$ make
make  all-recursive
...

A fork of the code here works now in my vps:

https://github.com/magi-project/m7m-cpuminer-v2

Code:

git clone https://github.com/magi-project/m7m-cpuminer-v2
cd m7magi-cpuminer
./autogen.sh
CFLAGS="-O3" ./configure
make
sudo cp minerd /usr/local/bin

Thanks Joe, now it all works again.
How about the third of the original hashrate,
will this be compensated by the reward (which was already very low regarding the reward of the beginning)

[joelao95]

Thanks Joe, now it all works again.
How about the third of the original hashrate,
will this be compensated by the reward (which was already very low regarding the reward of the beginning)

So like everyone gets 1/3 less hashrate, share still the same..

p.s., can somebody post how much reduction in hashrate

[muchoman]

Thanks Joe, now it all works again.
How about the third of the original hashrate,
will this be compensated by the reward (which was already very low regarding the reward of the beginning)

So like everyone gets 1/3 less hashrate, share still the same..

p.s., can somebody post how much reduction in hashrate

Got 60 now 24 on 3570k

[111magic]

So less power consumption? Nice!

[muchoman]

So less power consumption? Nice!

Power consumption is the same as before.

[jawitech]

With my home PC CPU i got around 10-13 kh/s with the old miner, now 3-4 kh/s with the new one

Any solution for the VPS problem, Joe?

[shaolin_rs]

I have updated my miner package for the new algorithm. These are the links:-

64 bit Windows:-

.rar fille https://www.dropbox.com/s/hiadf8o5u7bsit7/XMGpoolminerWin64.rar?dl=0

self-extracting .exe [urlhttps[Suspicious link removed]?dl=0][/url]

32 bit Windows:-

.rar file https://www.dropbox.com/s/dii8cvz7lp8xuey/XMGpoolminerWin32.rar?dl=0

self-extracting .exe ?dl=0

These packages include my Windows batch file "wrappers" for best performance. Please see the read.me file for more info and refer to this earlier post too https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=735170.msg9285948#msg9285948

To estimate the hashrate that you can expect with the new algorithm, go to this web site https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu_list.php and find the Passmark for your CPU. Divide the Passmark figure by 1000, then:-

For 64 bit hashrate in Kh/s, multiply by pi (3.142)

For 32 bit hashrate in Kh/s, multiply by 2

Please post details of any problems you get with this software. I will be around for quite a few hours yet before the urge to sleep overcomes me It is 3am here.

I have only 1.77kh/s on AM1 5350 64bit Spexx miner, by this calculation need to be much more score any suggestion?

[joelao95]

My with home pc CPU i got around 10-13 kh/s with the old miner, now 3-4 kh/s with the new one

Any solution for the VPS problem, Joe?

A fork of the code works:
https://github.com/magi-project/m7m-cpuminer-v2

Also this is another version by nonce-pool, maybe with improved performance:
https://github.com/noncepool/m7magi-cpuminer-v2

I will get those compared and finalized a one with link post then.

Code:

git clone https://github.com/magi-project/m7m-cpuminer-v2
cd m7magi-cpuminer
./autogen.sh
CFLAGS="-O3" ./configure
make
sudo cp minerd /usr/local/bin

[joelao95]

I have only 1.77kh/s on AM1 5350 64bit Spexx miner, by this calculation need to be much more score any suggestion?

You can try MarcusDe's compilation too since he has different versions for specific CPUs: http://graymines.net/miners/magi

[conteaza]

Thanks Joe, now it all works again.
How about the third of the original hashrate,
will this be compensated by the reward (which was already very low regarding the reward of the beginning)

So like everyone gets 1/3 less hashrate, share still the same..

p.s., can somebody post how much reduction in hashrate

I got now around 10kH/s but was 25k

[joelao95]

Thanks guys, looks like we got 2.5 times reduction due to the algo change.

[shaolin_rs]

I have only 1.77kh/s on AM1 5350 64bit Spexx miner, by this calculation need to be much more score any suggestion?

You can try MarcusDe's compilation too since he has different versions for specific CPUs: http://graymines.net/miners/magi

much better 7.67 kh/s thx

[joelao95]

I have only 1.77kh/s on AM1 5350 64bit Spexx miner, by this calculation need to be much more score any suggestion?

You can try MarcusDe's compilation too since he has different versions for specific CPUs: http://graymines.net/miners/magi

much better 7.67 kh/s thx

Nice, how much reduced?

[jawitech]

How about the third of the original hashrate,
will this be compensated by the reward (which was already very low regarding the reward of the beginning)

Since switching, I made nearly as much coins as before in 24h. Looks good so far. At nonce-pool the block rewards on average are higher than before (now mostly 11 coins instead of 5 per block).

[jawitech]

My Digital Ocean VPS works now.

On the other VPS, I'm getting this with the command MAKE

magi@104:~/m7m-cpuminer-v2$ make
make  all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2'
Making all in compat
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2/compat'
Making all in jansson
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2/compat/jansson'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2/compat/jansson'
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2/compat'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2/compat'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2/compat'
Making all in m7
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2/m7'
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..     -g -O2 -MT m7hash.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/m7hash.Tpo -c -o m7hash.o m7hash.cpp
m7hash.cpp: In function ‘uint256 hash_M7M_v2(T1, T1, unsigned int)’:
m7hash.cpp:126:52: error: ‘numeric_limits’ is not a member of ‘std’
m7hash.cpp:126:52: error: expected primary-expression before ‘double’
m7hash.cpp:126:52: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘double’
m7hash.cpp:126:66: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘;’ token
m7hash.cpp:126:66: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘;’ token
m7hash.cpp:126:66: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘;’ token
make[2]: *** [m7hash.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2/m7'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/magi/m7m-cpuminer-v2'
make: *** [all] Error 2
magi@104:~/m7m-cpuminer-v2$

magi@104:~/m7m-cpuminer-v2$ sudo cp minerd /usr/local/bin
[sudo] password for magi:
cp: cannot stat `minerd': No such file or directory
magi@104:~/m7m-cpuminer-v2$

If you use the version using m7hash.cpp
open that file and add to the top
#include <limits>
and it will compile
at least it worked for me

Thanks for your suggestion, unfortunately I'm not really familiar with linux (just followed the step by step tutorial). But meanwhile I got it running.

[jawitech]

A fork of the code here works now in my vps:

https://github.com/magi-project/m7m-cpuminer-v2

Code:

git clone https://github.com/magi-project/m7m-cpuminer-v2
cd m7m-cpuminer-v2
./autogen.sh
CFLAGS="-O3" ./configure
make
sudo cp minerd /usr/local/bin

Edit, corrected the guide now

Great, got it running now. Thanks!

My total hashrate decreased from 50 kh/s (2 thread AMD Athlon X2 220 + 2 VPS) to 15 kh/s.

[joelao95]

A fork of the code here works now in my vps:

https://github.com/magi-project/m7m-cpuminer-v2

Code:

git clone https://github.com/magi-project/m7m-cpuminer-v2
cd m7m-cpuminer-v2
./autogen.sh
CFLAGS="-O3" ./configure
make
sudo cp minerd /usr/local/bin

Edit, corrected the guide now

Great, got it running now. Thanks!

My total hashrate decreased from 50 kh/s (2 thread AMD Athlon X2 220 + 2 VPS) to 15 kh/s.

May need optimization .. prior reports:

Got 60 now 24 on 3570k

I got now around 10kH/s but was 25k

[The Frisian]

The reward is now much higher than during last weeks.

[jawitech]

May need optimization .. prior reports:

Got 60 now 24 on 3570k

I got now around 10kH/s but was 25k

Was testing the 3 different miners I downloaded. With the generic version that Spexx provided, my desktop CPU got 3-4 kh/s. With the core2 miner from MarcusDE I'm getting 7-8 kh/s. The both VPS have a little less than 50% of what they had before. Now my total is 20 kh/s on average instead of 50 kh/s before. What do you think, is that ok?