Scientific proof that God exists?

[BADecker]

if there was truly a scientific proof that god exists, that would be all over the news and a known fact among everyone and the key word "faith" in religion would be lost.

There is too much money in deluding people. The media wouldn't show the proof of God if they were ordered to by Government.

See my post directly above to see why our best guess about where life came from is that it was created by God.

Believers in evolution have more of a religion than believers in God. You can see why in my, above, post. But you won't find the media talking about it much.

I am sorry, is your God weak when money is involved? Is that why churches need so much money? A Government can so easily defeat a God that used to kill kids for laughing at bold people, who used to kill tens of thousands just because they were a bit upset at him for killing other tens of thousands? The one who tried to kill Moses for...well, nobody actually knows why, we can presume he liked children's foreskin freshly cut and that's why he tried to kill him... that God suddenly has a conscience and he gets easily fucked by the media and a government? That is what you just implied, that your God, the one being the biggest dick in the world in the Old Testament, is now too old to have any power when facing a Government, something that human beings can easily deal with when needed. That is how much delusional you are,  that's the real retard that is hidden inside you, that is why I told you to get the fuck off this topic and take your shitty Bob Dutko top proofs cd's along with you, you stupid donkey. You are so dumb  you can't even maintain your own story, you mix it up, making your God look like shit when facing a human made system. Your bullshit ideas are stolen from Bob Dutko, step by step, you piece of shit cultist. How dare you insult people who have actually made something, instead of just coming up with the God excuse? How dare you compare your cult with their work and call it a religion, you dumb monkey? Get the fuck out of here, you cheap ripoff.

God is the best. He is above everything. So, you can't understand what God does and why. It's that way with all people, even though some people understand a little more.

God is righteous. He lives forever. You will die. Then He will raise you from the dead to life forever, as well. Your choice to go against Him here will seal your eternal life into eternal torment in the Lake of Fire.

Since it is your choice, turn, now, while you still have life so that you can turn, so that you have eternal life in joy in Heaven.

Against him? What the fuck are you talking about?
How can I go against something that does not exist?

The onus is on him to give me a brain so that I can think and discard all the Bronze Age mambo jumbo.

If he wanted me to follow some specific book he should have wired my brain accordingly.  So he fucked up with his design.

BTW, read about the Osiris myth, you'll see many parallels with the Jesus myth.

Happy Easter! Osiris has risen (twice).

Yes, but. How can you be in favor of something that you KNOW does not exist, like atheism.

Until you understand that you are not an atheist, because you don't believe in atheism, because you know that God might exist somewhere, and speak this thing that you understand, anybody will laugh at anything that you might say.

You call it atheism.  I reject all bullshit Bronze Age stories. So no gods, ghosts, spirits or any supernatural forces.  They don't exist because there is no evidence.

Is it possible that supernatural beings exist?  Maybe.
Until there is an evidence I say they don't exist. I will be the first one to change my position once such evidence is discovered.

Saying that atheism does not exist is like saying color black does exist.

Now you are simply contradicting yourself. First you say that God doesn't exist. Then you say that maybe supernatural beings exist. So, you know that God might exist. You contradict atheism which says that God doesn't exist. You contradict yourself.

Obviously, you have some saneness left. Check yourself in at a medical facility before you lose the little you have left.

Since the Bronze Age happened a long time ago, entropy has had a lot longer to work on us. Those people were smarter than we are. They were right. Go check yourself in, before it is too late for you.

You can thank me later.

[1715517356]

1715517356

[1715517356]

1715517356

[Abrams_PM]

What people wrote the Bible is understandable but it does not mean that every person how to do something on the non-material is the spiritual aspiration of a person to believe the creator.

[Buffer Overflow]

This silly thread still rumbling on and on.....

It was shown there isn't any scientfic proof of God way back on page 1 ish. 

Some people are just at war with the truth I guess. 

[PancherBitCoin]

This silly thread still rumbling on and on.....

It was shown there isn't any scientfic proof of God way back on page 1 ish. 

Some people are just at war with the truth I guess. 

I am very, very not pleased that in general there are such questions that relate to faith and God. I do not like blasphemy

[stats]

I am an agnostic and for me sometimes God does not exist because the bible is so contradicting.

Since you are that mixed up, no wonder the Bible seems contradictory to you.

Different parts of the Bible were written by different  Bronze Age people.  Some were vengeful and wanted to kill babies of their enemies and eat them, others were more concerned with the type of clothing they were wearing. At least one writer had a fight with another man and his wife touched other's guy genitals so he wrote this scenario in the Bible and cut off her hand.

What Bible gives you is an insight into Bronze Age minds, how they lived and survived.

To use any of it as a source of guide is just irresponsible.  Unless of course if you think slavery and stoning of people is a good idea.

Killing gays or children who disobey their parents will get you a life sentence whether your God likes or not.

Why to discuss the god, faith in God, its existence, why recall such nasty things. But still need to make discounts on that, there are exceptions and accidents. Besides, God more loves the sinners of the week of the righteous. The righteous do not need to be guided, but the offender needs to.

Nothing happens by accident. Everything happens according to cause and effect. Cause and effect is controlled by God according to the general desires of the people. The desires of the people are connected to the only freedom people have, the freedom to decide if they have faith in God or not.

God exists. The proof is here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

BADecker's evidence in a nutshell......

Link 1
Machine like nature of the universe.
Cause and effect
Nations looking for God?
BADecker believes that all machines are ultimately the result of a god.

Link 2
Cause and effect

Link 3
Cause and effect

Link 4
Cause and effect

Cause and effect rebuttal
If cause and effect is proof of a god, then who made god? Was it god's god? And who made god's god? was it god's god's god? This is a cycle of infinity. This is no proof.
BADecker simply applies an assumption that  this a god. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uC7Ttc9g1u8   

Machines like nature of the universe rebuttal
BADecker believes that machines need a maker and that maker has to be a god. The reality of this is that evolution has caused the changes. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v481/n7381/full/nature10724.html   

BADecker then claims that this is only theory. The reality is that science is disproving/proving all theories  we (humans) have believed for years. That is the nature of science. For it to be tested by others. People like BADecker will continually use their same argument of assumptions to state there is no proof that god does not exist. The reality is that history has shown that early Vikings believed  "lightning flashed whenever Thor threw his hammer". Science has proven this incorrect.

Nations looking for god rebuttal
BADecker claims that people are looking for how the universe was made. This is true. However, BADecker then claims that because the answers are still not found, the answer must be a god. WRONG.... this is not proof. This is an assumption again on BADecker's part. Science is unlocking secrets every day. Religion is being disproven daily and BADecker continues to hold on to his mindless views.

[Zisove28]

This silly thread still rumbling on and on.....

It was shown there isn't any scientfic proof of God way back on page 1 ish. 

Some people are just at war with the truth I guess. 

I am very, very not pleased that in general there are such questions that relate to faith and God. I do not like blasphemy

Nobody likes it, but many users keep up with each other and try to talk a lot of bad thoughts and words towards believing in God.

[BADecker]

I am an agnostic and for me sometimes God does not exist because the bible is so contradicting.

Since you are that mixed up, no wonder the Bible seems contradictory to you.

Different parts of the Bible were written by different  Bronze Age people.  Some were vengeful and wanted to kill babies of their enemies and eat them, others were more concerned with the type of clothing they were wearing. At least one writer had a fight with another man and his wife touched other's guy genitals so he wrote this scenario in the Bible and cut off her hand.

What Bible gives you is an insight into Bronze Age minds, how they lived and survived.

To use any of it as a source of guide is just irresponsible.  Unless of course if you think slavery and stoning of people is a good idea.

Killing gays or children who disobey their parents will get you a life sentence whether your God likes or not.

Why to discuss the god, faith in God, its existence, why recall such nasty things. But still need to make discounts on that, there are exceptions and accidents. Besides, God more loves the sinners of the week of the righteous. The righteous do not need to be guided, but the offender needs to.

Nothing happens by accident. Everything happens according to cause and effect. Cause and effect is controlled by God according to the general desires of the people. The desires of the people are connected to the only freedom people have, the freedom to decide if they have faith in God or not.

God exists. The proof is here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

BADecker's evidence in a nutshell......

Link 1
Machine like nature of the universe.
Cause and effect
Nations looking for God?
BADecker believes that all machines are ultimately the result of a god.

Link 2
Cause and effect

Link 3
Cause and effect

Link 4
Cause and effect

Cause and effect rebuttal
If cause and effect is proof of a god, then who made god? Was it god's god? And who made god's god? was it god's god's god? This is a cycle of infinity. This is no proof.
BADecker simply applies an assumption that  this a god. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uC7Ttc9g1u8   

Machines like nature of the universe rebuttal
BADecker believes that machines need a maker and that maker has to be a god. The reality of this is that evolution has caused the changes. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v481/n7381/full/nature10724.html   

BADecker then claims that this is only theory. The reality is that science is disproving/proving all theories  we (humans) have believed for years. That is the nature of science. For it to be tested by others. People like BADecker will continually use their same argument of assumptions to state there is no proof that god does not exist. The reality is that history has shown that early Vikings believed  "lightning flashed whenever Thor threw his hammer". Science has proven this incorrect.

Nations looking for god rebuttal
BADecker claims that people are looking for how the universe was made. This is true. However, BADecker then claims that because the answers are still not found, the answer must be a god. WRONG.... this is not proof. This is an assumption again on BADecker's part. Science is unlocking secrets every day. Religion is being disproven daily and BADecker continues to hold on to his mindless views.

Thanks, again, for helping to solidify the scientific proof that God exists,
by showing a bunch of religion in your post,
and by not showing any rebuttal to the scientific proof that God exists.

[stats]

I am an agnostic and for me sometimes God does not exist because the bible is so contradicting.

Since you are that mixed up, no wonder the Bible seems contradictory to you.

Different parts of the Bible were written by different  Bronze Age people.  Some were vengeful and wanted to kill babies of their enemies and eat them, others were more concerned with the type of clothing they were wearing. At least one writer had a fight with another man and his wife touched other's guy genitals so he wrote this scenario in the Bible and cut off her hand.

What Bible gives you is an insight into Bronze Age minds, how they lived and survived.

To use any of it as a source of guide is just irresponsible.  Unless of course if you think slavery and stoning of people is a good idea.

Killing gays or children who disobey their parents will get you a life sentence whether your God likes or not.

Why to discuss the god, faith in God, its existence, why recall such nasty things. But still need to make discounts on that, there are exceptions and accidents. Besides, God more loves the sinners of the week of the righteous. The righteous do not need to be guided, but the offender needs to.

Nothing happens by accident. Everything happens according to cause and effect. Cause and effect is controlled by God according to the general desires of the people. The desires of the people are connected to the only freedom people have, the freedom to decide if they have faith in God or not.

God exists. The proof is here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

BADecker's evidence in a nutshell......

Link 1
Machine like nature of the universe.
Cause and effect
Nations looking for God?
BADecker believes that all machines are ultimately the result of a god.

Link 2
Cause and effect

Link 3
Cause and effect

Link 4
Cause and effect

Cause and effect rebuttal
If cause and effect is proof of a god, then who made god? Was it god's god? And who made god's god? was it god's god's god? This is a cycle of infinity. This is no proof.
BADecker simply applies an assumption that  this a god. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uC7Ttc9g1u8   

Machines like nature of the universe rebuttal
BADecker believes that machines need a maker and that maker has to be a god. The reality of this is that evolution has caused the changes. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v481/n7381/full/nature10724.html   

BADecker then claims that this is only theory. The reality is that science is disproving/proving all theories  we (humans) have believed for years. That is the nature of science. For it to be tested by others. People like BADecker will continually use their same argument of assumptions to state there is no proof that god does not exist. The reality is that history has shown that early Vikings believed  "lightning flashed whenever Thor threw his hammer". Science has proven this incorrect.

Nations looking for god rebuttal
BADecker claims that people are looking for how the universe was made. This is true. However, BADecker then claims that because the answers are still not found, the answer must be a god. WRONG.... this is not proof. This is an assumption again on BADecker's part. Science is unlocking secrets every day. Religion is being disproven daily and BADecker continues to hold on to his mindless views.

Thanks, again, for helping to solidify the scientific proof that God exists,
by showing a bunch of religion in your post,
and by not showing any rebuttal to the scientific proof that God exists.

Oh Puddleduck...... you silly sausage.

Don't you see that you have not provided any evidence showing your God?

If you did, others would be using your evidence.

I guess they see you as the fool you are.

[Horacewoodwood]

if there was truly a scientific proof that god exists, that would be all over the news and a known fact among everyone and the key word "faith" in religion would be lost.

There is too much money in deluding people. The media wouldn't show the proof of God if they were ordered to by Government.

See my post directly above to see why our best guess about where life came from is that it was created by God.

Believers in evolution have more of a religion than believers in God. You can see why in my, above, post. But you won't find the media talking about it much.

I am sorry, is your God weak when money is involved? Is that why churches need so much money? A Government can so easily defeat a God that used to kill kids for laughing at bold people, who used to kill tens of thousands just because they were a bit upset at him for killing other tens of thousands? The one who tried to kill Moses for...well, nobody actually knows why, we can presume he liked children's foreskin freshly cut and that's why he tried to kill him... that God suddenly has a conscience and he gets easily fucked by the media and a government? That is what you just implied, that your God, the one being the biggest dick in the world in the Old Testament, is now too old to have any power when facing a Government, something that human beings can easily deal with when needed. That is how much delusional you are,  that's the real retard that is hidden inside you, that is why I told you to get the fuck off this topic and take your shitty Bob Dutko top proofs cd's along with you, you stupid donkey. You are so dumb  you can't even maintain your own story, you mix it up, making your God look like shit when facing a human made system. Your bullshit ideas are stolen from Bob Dutko, step by step, you piece of shit cultist. How dare you insult people who have actually made something, instead of just coming up with the God excuse? How dare you compare your cult with their work and call it a religion, you dumb monkey? Get the fuck out of here, you cheap ripoff.

God is the best. He is above everything. So, you can't understand what God does and why. It's that way with all people, even though some people understand a little more.

God is righteous. He lives forever. You will die. Then He will raise you from the dead to life forever, as well. Your choice to go against Him here will seal your eternal life into eternal torment in the Lake of Fire.

Since it is your choice, turn, now, while you still have life so that you can turn, so that you have eternal life in joy in Heaven.

Are you done with eating shit? Are you happy now, after going around my argument and just coming up with some cultist bullshit? God does not exist. Until there will be a clear, solid proof of a deity, you get the fuck out of here and go eat shit at your local church, that's where you are welcome. If you don't get it the first time, no worry, I'll be here daily to remind people what a hypocrite piece of shit you are and to remind you to fuck off. Much love from a guy who doesn't take kindly to cultists. Now fuck off.

[BADecker]

if there was truly a scientific proof that god exists, that would be all over the news and a known fact among everyone and the key word "faith" in religion would be lost.

There is too much money in deluding people. The media wouldn't show the proof of God if they were ordered to by Government.

See my post directly above to see why our best guess about where life came from is that it was created by God.

Believers in evolution have more of a religion than believers in God. You can see why in my, above, post. But you won't find the media talking about it much.

I am sorry, is your God weak when money is involved? Is that why churches need so much money? A Government can so easily defeat a God that used to kill kids for laughing at bold people, who used to kill tens of thousands just because they were a bit upset at him for killing other tens of thousands? The one who tried to kill Moses for...well, nobody actually knows why, we can presume he liked children's foreskin freshly cut and that's why he tried to kill him... that God suddenly has a conscience and he gets easily fucked by the media and a government? That is what you just implied, that your God, the one being the biggest dick in the world in the Old Testament, is now too old to have any power when facing a Government, something that human beings can easily deal with when needed. That is how much delusional you are,  that's the real retard that is hidden inside you, that is why I told you to get the fuck off this topic and take your shitty Bob Dutko top proofs cd's along with you, you stupid donkey. You are so dumb  you can't even maintain your own story, you mix it up, making your God look like shit when facing a human made system. Your bullshit ideas are stolen from Bob Dutko, step by step, you piece of shit cultist. How dare you insult people who have actually made something, instead of just coming up with the God excuse? How dare you compare your cult with their work and call it a religion, you dumb monkey? Get the fuck out of here, you cheap ripoff.

God is the best. He is above everything. So, you can't understand what God does and why. It's that way with all people, even though some people understand a little more.

God is righteous. He lives forever. You will die. Then He will raise you from the dead to life forever, as well. Your choice to go against Him here will seal your eternal life into eternal torment in the Lake of Fire.

Since it is your choice, turn, now, while you still have life so that you can turn, so that you have eternal life in joy in Heaven.

Are you done with eating shit? Are you happy now, after going around my argument and just coming up with some cultist bullshit? God does not exist. Until there will be a clear, solid proof of a deity, you get the fuck out of here and go eat shit at your local church, that's where you are welcome. If you don't get it the first time, no worry, I'll be here daily to remind people what a hypocrite piece of shit you are and to remind you to fuck off. Much love from a guy who doesn't take kindly to cultists. Now fuck off.

You are so funny. Have you been to the bottom of the oceans lately to check there for God? Many ancient peoples thought that the constellation, Orion, was the place that life came from. Have you been out there to check for God? What? You have it on authority that God doesn't exist in either of those places? What authority? Your own? LOL!

Perhaps you should take a night course in understanding how to interpret science law, so that you can see that God exists from the proof:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

It might even help you learn how to stay on topic.

[qwik2learn]

Skeptics are comfortable with Evolution but uncomfortable with the Survival hypothesis.
Understanding the evidence supporting survival takes time but it is worth it.
Rebirth is typically a key element of authentic spiritual teachings, this suggests that there should be empirical evidence of Survival. I have posted many examples of this kind of evidence, but never have I seen someone quote it and state that "this evidence could be better explained without Survival because..."

[Horacewoodwood]

if there was truly a scientific proof that god exists, that would be all over the news and a known fact among everyone and the key word "faith" in religion would be lost.

There is too much money in deluding people. The media wouldn't show the proof of God if they were ordered to by Government.

See my post directly above to see why our best guess about where life came from is that it was created by God.

Believers in evolution have more of a religion than believers in God. You can see why in my, above, post. But you won't find the media talking about it much.

I am sorry, is your God weak when money is involved? Is that why churches need so much money? A Government can so easily defeat a God that used to kill kids for laughing at bold people, who used to kill tens of thousands just because they were a bit upset at him for killing other tens of thousands? The one who tried to kill Moses for...well, nobody actually knows why, we can presume he liked children's foreskin freshly cut and that's why he tried to kill him... that God suddenly has a conscience and he gets easily fucked by the media and a government? That is what you just implied, that your God, the one being the biggest dick in the world in the Old Testament, is now too old to have any power when facing a Government, something that human beings can easily deal with when needed. That is how much delusional you are,  that's the real retard that is hidden inside you, that is why I told you to get the fuck off this topic and take your shitty Bob Dutko top proofs cd's along with you, you stupid donkey. You are so dumb  you can't even maintain your own story, you mix it up, making your God look like shit when facing a human made system. Your bullshit ideas are stolen from Bob Dutko, step by step, you piece of shit cultist. How dare you insult people who have actually made something, instead of just coming up with the God excuse? How dare you compare your cult with their work and call it a religion, you dumb monkey? Get the fuck out of here, you cheap ripoff.

God is the best. He is above everything. So, you can't understand what God does and why. It's that way with all people, even though some people understand a little more.

God is righteous. He lives forever. You will die. Then He will raise you from the dead to life forever, as well. Your choice to go against Him here will seal your eternal life into eternal torment in the Lake of Fire.

Since it is your choice, turn, now, while you still have life so that you can turn, so that you have eternal life in joy in Heaven.

Are you done with eating shit? Are you happy now, after going around my argument and just coming up with some cultist bullshit? God does not exist. Until there will be a clear, solid proof of a deity, you get the fuck out of here and go eat shit at your local church, that's where you are welcome. If you don't get it the first time, no worry, I'll be here daily to remind people what a hypocrite piece of shit you are and to remind you to fuck off. Much love from a guy who doesn't take kindly to cultists. Now fuck off.

You are so funny. Have you been to the bottom of the oceans lately to check there for God? Many ancient peoples thought that the constellation, Orion, was the place that life came from. Have you been out there to check for God? What? You have it on authority that God doesn't exist in either of those places? What authority? Your own? LOL!

Perhaps you should take a night course in understanding how to interpret science law, so that you can see that God exists from the proof:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

It might even help you learn how to stay on topic.

Interpretations are not proof, exact facts are. When everyone tells you that shit you keel posting is a fail, you should get a clue. But apologists don't get too many clues, don't they? As for the proof, you may not pass the burden of proof onto me or anybody else who said they do not believe a God exists. It is your burden, not ours. You claim a God exists, you come with the exact proof. But none of you will since you have no proof. Now do as I said and fuck off outta here, you Bob Dutko ass licker.

[Horacewoodwood]

Skeptics are comfortable with Evolution but uncomfortable with the Survival hypothesis.
Understanding the evidence supporting survival takes time but it is worth it.
Rebirth is typically a key element of authentic spiritual teachings, this suggests that there should be empirical evidence of Survival. I have posted many examples of this kind of evidence, but never have I seen someone quote it and state that "this evidence could be better explained without Survival because..."

Know this: if your 'evidence' would be at least the fraction of an interesting idea, at least someone would argue with you over it. Nobody gives a plain fuck about your hypothesis because it is as delusional and dumb as you are. Go home, you're completely drunk and irrecuperable.

[Jonny_DD]

Skeptics are comfortable with Evolution but uncomfortable with the Survival hypothesis.
Understanding the evidence supporting survival takes time but it is worth it.
Rebirth is typically a key element of authentic spiritual teachings, this suggests that there should be empirical evidence of Survival. I have posted many examples of this kind of evidence, but never have I seen someone quote it and state that "this evidence could be better explained without Survival because..."

Know this: if your 'evidence' would be at least the fraction of an interesting idea, at least someone would argue with you over it. Nobody gives a plain fuck about your hypothesis because it is as delusional and dumb as you are. Go home, you're completely drunk and irrecuperable.

Why so rude?
Everyone has the right to express their opinion.
But I'm not sure that scientists will publish such evidence even if they exist. It will change the world too much. And cause a resonance in society

[Horacewoodwood]

Skeptics are comfortable with Evolution but uncomfortable with the Survival hypothesis.
Understanding the evidence supporting survival takes time but it is worth it.
Rebirth is typically a key element of authentic spiritual teachings, this suggests that there should be empirical evidence of Survival. I have posted many examples of this kind of evidence, but never have I seen someone quote it and state that "this evidence could be better explained without Survival because..."

Know this: if your 'evidence' would be at least the fraction of an interesting idea, at least someone would argue with you over it. Nobody gives a plain fuck about your hypothesis because it is as delusional and dumb as you are. Go home, you're completely drunk and irrecuperable.

Why so rude?
Everyone has the right to express their opinion.
But I'm not sure that scientists will publish such evidence even if they exist. It will change the world too much. And cause a resonance in society

That was my opinion about your hypothesis that you repeatedly posted and nobody even took the time to say how dumb it is. I did not say you don't have the right to express your opinion, I just said it's as dumb as a rock. Notice one thing: the fear that the whole world will go nuts if there is concrete proof of a deity. In the meantime, apologists claim there is a God. They also claim that nobody would ever publish evidence of a God because that would blow up the society so what they interpret as proof is good but nobody would ever recognise it because they fear the change. But that proof would only make us sure that there is a God. At the moment, most of the human beings are already sure that there is a God, without having any proof or evidence of such a thing. So why would the proof be something bad? I'll tell you why: because there is no proof. All the apologists know there is no proof, all these cultist fuckers are aware their proof is complete bullshit so all they have to do is make it look like the scientists, the governments, the media, would never allow such proof to be seen because it would cause instability. That's the only thing apologists can do, blame some people for not publishing their bullshit, creating conspiracies. Deep down they all know it's all bullshit. The hypocrisy of apologists like you or Badecker is that you guys know it's bullshit but you let it be so, because people need to believe in something. You don't respect human beings, you consider yourselves above and you think people need your lies to be better. I've seen many like you, I've even seen apologists who don't believe a single word in the bible but claim that people must follow the teachings of Jesus. Not them, but other people. That is why I am so rude, because all of my curse words can never make up for the shameless insults you bring against all humanity with your hypocrisy and lack of morality. Are you pleased now, apologist?

[BADecker]

You are so funny. Have you been to the bottom of the oceans lately to check there for God? Many ancient peoples thought that the constellation, Orion, was the place that life came from. Have you been out there to check for God? What? You have it on authority that God doesn't exist in either of those places? What authority? Your own? LOL!

Perhaps you should take a night course in understanding how to interpret science law, so that you can see that God exists from the proof:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

It might even help you learn how to stay on topic.

Interpretations are not proof, exact facts are. When everyone tells you that shit you keel posting is a fail, you should get a clue. But apologists don't get too many clues, don't they? As for the proof, you may not pass the burden of proof onto me or anybody else who said they do not believe a God exists. It is your burden, not ours. You claim a God exists, you come with the exact proof. But none of you will since you have no proof. Now do as I said and fuck off outta here, you Bob Dutko ass licker.

Science laws are not interpretations. If you don't like science laws, forget this topic. This topic is about science proof that God exists. However...

If you decide to examine the science laws and how they are applied, remember that God isn't explained at all. The only reason I use the masculine pronoun with Him, is, that that's the way most people understand Him. The scientific proof for Him doesn't explain if He has a gender or not. It doesn't explain any religious aspects of Him. It simply shows that He exists... whatever He may be.

[Horacewoodwood]

You are so funny. Have you been to the bottom of the oceans lately to check there for God? Many ancient peoples thought that the constellation, Orion, was the place that life came from. Have you been out there to check for God? What? You have it on authority that God doesn't exist in either of those places? What authority? Your own? LOL!

Perhaps you should take a night course in understanding how to interpret science law, so that you can see that God exists from the proof:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

It might even help you learn how to stay on topic.

Interpretations are not proof, exact facts are. When everyone tells you that shit you keel posting is a fail, you should get a clue. But apologists don't get too many clues, don't they? As for the proof, you may not pass the burden of proof onto me or anybody else who said they do not believe a God exists. It is your burden, not ours. You claim a God exists, you come with the exact proof. But none of you will since you have no proof. Now do as I said and fuck off outta here, you Bob Dutko ass licker.

Science laws are not interpretations. If you don't like science laws, forget this topic. This topic is about science proof that God exists. However...

If you decide to examine the science laws and how they are applied, remember that God isn't explained at all. The only reason I use the masculine pronoun with Him, is, that that's the way most people understand Him. The scientific proof for Him doesn't explain if He has a gender or not. It doesn't explain any religious aspects of Him. It simply shows that He exists... whatever He may be.

No, dumb fuck, scientific laws are not interpretation. Your bullshit is an interpretation of scientific laws and it is complete fantasy. Stop coming up with hypocrite ways of persuading this discussion in your favour, it will not work. Please fuck off and try to find your own ideas instead of pasting the same links that you've learnt on Bob Dutko's bullshit cd's. Apologist.

[BADecker]

You are so funny. Have you been to the bottom of the oceans lately to check there for God? Many ancient peoples thought that the constellation, Orion, was the place that life came from. Have you been out there to check for God? What? You have it on authority that God doesn't exist in either of those places? What authority? Your own? LOL!

Perhaps you should take a night course in understanding how to interpret science law, so that you can see that God exists from the proof:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

It might even help you learn how to stay on topic.

Interpretations are not proof, exact facts are. When everyone tells you that shit you keel posting is a fail, you should get a clue. But apologists don't get too many clues, don't they? As for the proof, you may not pass the burden of proof onto me or anybody else who said they do not believe a God exists. It is your burden, not ours. You claim a God exists, you come with the exact proof. But none of you will since you have no proof. Now do as I said and fuck off outta here, you Bob Dutko ass licker.

Science laws are not interpretations. If you don't like science laws, forget this topic. This topic is about science proof that God exists. However...

If you decide to examine the science laws and how they are applied, remember that God isn't explained at all. The only reason I use the masculine pronoun with Him, is, that that's the way most people understand Him. The scientific proof for Him doesn't explain if He has a gender or not. It doesn't explain any religious aspects of Him. It simply shows that He exists... whatever He may be.

No, dumb fuck, scientific laws are not interpretation. Your bullshit is an interpretation of scientific laws and it is complete fantasy. Stop coming up with hypocrite ways of persuading this discussion in your favour, it will not work. Please fuck off and try to find your own ideas instead of pasting the same links that you've learnt on Bob Dutko's bullshit cd's. Apologist.

You're a kinda sad specimen of humanity. At least stats and af_newbie attempt to break the proof for God down a little. More than likely you can't even read it. What? Does your mama browse the Internet for you? No step-by-step rebuttal of the proof at all!

I certainly support your yakety yak against me and the proof. Since you don't have anything except yakety yak, you are shown for what you are >>> a rambling stooge for some idiot group of idiot atheists. As Han Solo said, "Laugh it up, Fuzzball." All the way to idiot stardom.

We like it. We like it.

Again, the proof for the existence of God links:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

[BADecker]

You are so funny. Have you been to the bottom of the oceans lately to check there for God? Many ancient peoples thought that the constellation, Orion, was the place that life came from. Have you been out there to check for God? What? You have it on authority that God doesn't exist in either of those places? What authority? Your own? LOL!

Perhaps you should take a night course in understanding how to interpret science law, so that you can see that God exists from the proof:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

It might even help you learn how to stay on topic.

Interpretations are not proof, exact facts are. When everyone tells you that shit you keel posting is a fail, you should get a clue. But apologists don't get too many clues, don't they? As for the proof, you may not pass the burden of proof onto me or anybody else who said they do not believe a God exists. It is your burden, not ours. You claim a God exists, you come with the exact proof. But none of you will since you have no proof. Now do as I said and fuck off outta here, you Bob Dutko ass licker.

Science laws are not interpretations. If you don't like science laws, forget this topic. This topic is about science proof that God exists. However...

If you decide to examine the science laws and how they are applied, remember that God isn't explained at all. The only reason I use the masculine pronoun with Him, is, that that's the way most people understand Him. The scientific proof for Him doesn't explain if He has a gender or not. It doesn't explain any religious aspects of Him. It simply shows that He exists... whatever He may be.

No, dumb fuck, scientific laws are not interpretation. Your bullshit is an interpretation of scientific laws and it is complete fantasy. Stop coming up with hypocrite ways of persuading this discussion in your favour, it will not work. Please fuck off and try to find your own ideas instead of pasting the same links that you've learnt on Bob Dutko's bullshit cd's. Apologist.

You're a kinda sad specimen of humanity. At least stats and af_newbie attempt to break the proof for God down a little. More than likely you can't even read it. What? Does your mama browse the Internet for you? No step-by-step rebuttal of the proof at all!

I certainly support your yakety yak against me and the proof. Since you don't have anything except yakety yak, you are shown for what you are >>> a rambling stooge for some idiot group of idiot atheists. As Han Solo said, "Laugh it up, Fuzzball." All the way to idiot stardom.

We like it. We like it.

Again, the proof for the existence of God links:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

Unfortunately, he is right.  You are cherry picking your science like you pick your Bible.

You are as stupid as flat Earthers believing in 6000-7000 years old Earth.

There are cultures with more history than your Bible suggest.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_China

So stop your Entropy nonsense.  You are not impressing anyone.  

You are as stupid as those who wrote the Bible.

You are getting to be more like Horace all the time... lots of talk, but nothing to back up anything you say.

[Horacewoodwood]

You are so funny. Have you been to the bottom of the oceans lately to check there for God? Many ancient peoples thought that the constellation, Orion, was the place that life came from. Have you been out there to check for God? What? You have it on authority that God doesn't exist in either of those places? What authority? Your own? LOL!

Perhaps you should take a night course in understanding how to interpret science law, so that you can see that God exists from the proof:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

It might even help you learn how to stay on topic.

Interpretations are not proof, exact facts are. When everyone tells you that shit you keel posting is a fail, you should get a clue. But apologists don't get too many clues, don't they? As for the proof, you may not pass the burden of proof onto me or anybody else who said they do not believe a God exists. It is your burden, not ours. You claim a God exists, you come with the exact proof. But none of you will since you have no proof. Now do as I said and fuck off outta here, you Bob Dutko ass licker.

Science laws are not interpretations. If you don't like science laws, forget this topic. This topic is about science proof that God exists. However...

If you decide to examine the science laws and how they are applied, remember that God isn't explained at all. The only reason I use the masculine pronoun with Him, is, that that's the way most people understand Him. The scientific proof for Him doesn't explain if He has a gender or not. It doesn't explain any religious aspects of Him. It simply shows that He exists... whatever He may be.

No, dumb fuck, scientific laws are not interpretation. Your bullshit is an interpretation of scientific laws and it is complete fantasy. Stop coming up with hypocrite ways of persuading this discussion in your favour, it will not work. Please fuck off and try to find your own ideas instead of pasting the same links that you've learnt on Bob Dutko's bullshit cd's. Apologist.

You're a kinda sad specimen of humanity. At least stats and af_newbie attempt to break the proof for God down a little. More than likely you can't even read it. What? Does your mama browse the Internet for you? No step-by-step rebuttal of the proof at all!

I certainly support your yakety yak against me and the proof. Since you don't have anything except yakety yak, you are shown for what you are >>> a rambling stooge for some idiot group of idiot atheists. As Han Solo said, "Laugh it up, Fuzzball." All the way to idiot stardom.

We like it. We like it.

Again, the proof for the existence of God links:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

I would gladly attempt to break the proof of God if there was any. Assumptions and interpretations do not belong to the 'proof' section, they belong to the belief section. As a result, the shit that you keep on posting is not proof, it's something that you heard from Bob Dutko's cds and it needs no 'step-by-step rebuttal' (funny how you overuse exactly these words that Bob Dutko overuses when he's pissed off at people laughing at his moronic ideas). Also, you trying to become a bit aggressive is pathetic and only demonstrates how desperate you are in proving you own the truth. Exactly like any other apologist. My conclusion is and will be the same untill you come up with some decent stuff and stop acting like a bitchy, dumb apologist: fuck off and come back when you really thought about something. We can do this for a long time by the way. It's up to you when you drop the bullshit and start being serious.