Bitcoin Forum
January 23, 2019, 11:21:48 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 [336] 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 ... 497 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Scientific proof that God exists?  (Read 805011 times)
tikboyhere
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 108
Merit: 100

★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!


View Profile
May 25, 2017, 04:51:53 AM
 #6701

There are lot pf proof that God truly exist and most of them was already been written by the scholars in the old and new testament. There are still alot of physical evidence that are sill being preserve including the cloth that was being apply to his face and to His body after His crucifixion. Either way we just need to believe wether theres a proof or none because at the end He was still our savior and no one can change that. AMEN!!

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
PLINKO    |7| SLOTS     (+) ROULETTE    ▼ BIT SPINBITVESTPLAY or INVEST ║ ✔ Rainbot  ✔ Happy Hours  ✔ Faucet
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
1548285708
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1548285708

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1548285708
Reply with quote  #2

1548285708
Report to moderator
1548285708
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1548285708

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1548285708
Reply with quote  #2

1548285708
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Astargath
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 604


View Profile
May 25, 2017, 09:05:37 AM
 #6702



'The proof that Badecker is far less intelligent than a rock is' or 'When idiots try to act like scientists':
First of all, this is not a reply to you, Badecker, so I do not expect a reply from you. This is me proving how stupid you are and discrediting your idiotic persona as much as possible. Even if you do reply, I do not give a tiny fuck about what you say anymore.
First, Badecker said : 'We simply don't understand the programming because it is so extremely complex.' to which Astargath replied with 'Im sorry but you keep saying we simply don't understand it, then how is it that YOU understand it? If you say something is not understood how can you claim it's true? You realize the logic fallacy, right?'. What comes next is a bit shocking because we rarely see people that get so stupid while trying to scientifically prove something: Badecker replied to Artargath with this ' - Are you trying to be funny? First, who is the we? Second, if anyone says it is not so, they have suggested that they don't understand it. It isn't me stating that you don't understand it. At least not until after you suggested it. Third, who says that it is not understood? I understand it. There are lots of things that some people understand while others don't. This doesn't make them to be not true. However, if this is the extent of your ability to think, it is easy to see why you don't understand.. Let us analyze for a second: first, Badecker said we don't understand the programming. The same Badecker then asked who is the we, which proves that he barely knows what is coming out of his primitive brain. He actually stated something and then asked what was that about. After that, Badecker claims that if someone says something is not in a certain way, he suggests that he does not understand it. Logic failure example: if someone states that the flying spaghetti monster does not exist that actually means that the person is just suggesting he does not understand it. After that Badecker denied the fact that he stated that Astargath does not understand it...although he just did say that about all of us. Right after that he asks who said it is not understood proving to us again how stupid he is and not realizing that he just said it is not understood. Next thing, he claims he understands it, basically doing exactly what Astargath said he was doing, the logic fallacy. Later on, Badecker went full retard by stating evolution doesn't work not knowing parts of the evolution are now used even in computer technology, the very thing that he is typing from, which means it actually works. Not to talk about medicine and other science that uses the principles of evolution successfully. But hey, you can't expect to see butterflies coming out of a piece of shit, can you? Another thing to notice is this: Badecker is part of the apologist idiots who say that they can not trust in evolution because 'evolution theory is still a theory because blah blah blah'...but they believe in God, which is not even at the level of theory, it's a myth, it's primitive science fiction. Logic fallacy again. This is how Badecker ended: 'God set everything in place according to cause and effect... even the cause and effect that made the pollution. But don't blame God for pollution. He only acted according to the request of people, many of whom didn't even know that they were requesting.'. God is the cause and everything we know is the effect, he says, even the pollution. But he is not responsible for the pollution, people are...although he is the cause. However, he only acted at the request of people, even though when he created everything there were no people, but somehow he predicted their request which was not really a request because people did not know they were requesting. In conclusion, God is the cause of pollution but he is not responsible because some people who were also an effect of God were requesting while not knowing they were requesting it. If there would have been a prize for the most insanely stupid person alive at the moment, I would hands down hand it to Badecker. This brainless creature tries to bring 'scientific proof' for God and he actually demands that we take it seriously. That is the effect of religion on some people, mostly dumb ones. I bet that if you give him a gun and the 'legal' right to shoot those who do not believe in his God, he would immediately slaughter at least as much as any islamic terrorist does. Thank you for your time and remember: Badecker is as stupid as a pineapple covered slice of pizza, there is no way he  could ever scientifically prove anything. Stay tuned for more soon.

Oh man sorry for shit posting like this but this was funny as hell to read.
Superlumen
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
May 25, 2017, 09:51:14 AM
 #6703

Science and God doesn't match. Science is about to prood things and Religion is about faith.

JaRViZZ
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 100



View Profile
May 25, 2017, 10:10:53 AM
 #6704

Science and God doesn't match. Science is about to prood things and Religion is about faith.



Therefore, science can never prove the existence of God. Science is not used to accept those things that an ordinary person can not see.

endenada
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 25, 2017, 10:59:08 AM
 #6705

yes .. science is empiric (proof - experiential) and religion is axiomatic (assumptive - transcendental)
many people limit the term God to religions .... established and traditional ...
but god is over religion and science but still under the evolution ...
so, evolution as action and god as reaction, it matches ....
Astargath
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 604


View Profile
May 25, 2017, 01:32:15 PM
 #6706

Science and God doesn't match. Science is about to prood things and Religion is about faith.



Therefore, science can never prove the existence of God. Science is not used to accept those things that an ordinary person can not see.

Bullshit, what other methods are there to prove something? Faith? So which faith should we consider to be accurate, the christian faith, the Muslim faith? Jewish, Buddhism ? Faith is stupid and does not prove anything anywhere. The scientific method works, all the scientific theories work, we have medicine thanks to them, technology, the computer you are using right now exists because science works. Religion is useless, hasn't helped in anything. If you read the bible you realize it's not moral at all, slavery, homophobia... God preached those things, is that the all powerful God that everyone talks about? A God that failed numerous times and had to wipe the whole humanity, how does God actually fail?
BADecker
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1890
Merit: 1090


View Profile
May 25, 2017, 03:55:00 PM
 #6707

so once again our delusional willfully ignorant godswilling badecker has his ass handed to him by horace
and all he can come up with is his silly merry go round lincs back to himself and some ridiculous shit about gods wrath and punishment. zzzzzzzz
does not address any of horace's points because he cant.
dude... let go of your mythical sky fairy beliefs and get out of your little bitcointalk thread echo chamber.
embrace science. cut the crap with your pseudo intellectual bullshit.

Better me than God. Are you going to be the first who can offer some serious rebuttal to the proof that God exists?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380

Cool
qwik2learn
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 636
Merit: 505


View Profile
May 25, 2017, 06:17:52 PM
 #6708

Badecker is a religious fanatic, of course he would deny evolution. He believes himself to be some kind of renowned scientist, he reinterprets and redefines scientific laws, he believes in God but he is not religious, he is a God himself as he knows God's will, he understands how God is and he is also kind to forgive us for our blasphemy. He might also talk to God and save us from his wrath if we maybe say that he is right and the rest of the world as we know it is not. He does with science the same that he does with his religion. He claims in its name but denies it. Some might say he is full of himself but I have to disagree. He is not full of himself. He is full of shit.
 Cool


It is a law of science that a simple theory is more plausible than a complicated one. Another law is that a plausible theory must adequately address the entire body of evidence. What is the plausible and simple theory/explanation for the 40 cases from AECES? Answer: Survival of the personality.
I perceive that non-survival explanations given by you are neither adequate, nor simple.

I'm sorry, but how did you link your answer with my post which was about Badecker? I need some time to read all those cases, research and give you my opinion on them, so you have no answer from me, yet you replied to my post about Badecker as if it were my opinion on that matter.
Thanks for reading the cases, they really are, in my opinion, some of the strongest proof available.
I am still waiting for a rebuttal for these cases, it must include an explanation that is simple and adequate, but to me it seems that survival is the most simple and adequate.
cryptomartin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100



View Profile
May 25, 2017, 08:17:39 PM
 #6709

Didn't know that this topic can get so many posts Cheesy
Astargath
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 604


View Profile
May 26, 2017, 08:49:33 AM
 #6710

so once again our delusional willfully ignorant godswilling badecker has his ass handed to him by horace
and all he can come up with is his silly merry go round lincs back to himself and some ridiculous shit about gods wrath and punishment. zzzzzzzz
does not address any of horace's points because he cant.
dude... let go of your mythical sky fairy beliefs and get out of your little bitcointalk thread echo chamber.
embrace science. cut the crap with your pseudo intellectual bullshit.

Better me than God. Are you going to be the first who can offer some serious rebuttal to the proof that God exists?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380

Cool

No proof whatsoever, what you say in those links is pure speculation, none of it can be tested, give me an example of can we test what you say there? How do you know which God is the real God anyways? Is it the christian God or the muslim God? Is it Zeus?
BADecker
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1890
Merit: 1090


View Profile
May 27, 2017, 01:45:16 AM
 #6711

so once again our delusional willfully ignorant godswilling badecker has his ass handed to him by horace
and all he can come up with is his silly merry go round lincs back to himself and some ridiculous shit about gods wrath and punishment. zzzzzzzz
does not address any of horace's points because he cant.
dude... let go of your mythical sky fairy beliefs and get out of your little bitcointalk thread echo chamber.
embrace science. cut the crap with your pseudo intellectual bullshit.

Better me than God. Are you going to be the first who can offer some serious rebuttal to the proof that God exists?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380

Cool

No proof whatsoever, what you say in those links is pure speculation, none of it can be tested, give me an example of can we test what you say there? How do you know which God is the real God anyways? Is it the christian God or the muslim God? Is it Zeus?

God is not described perfectly by religion. Science is too weak to describe Him even as well as non-scientific religion.

The links contain scientific laws^^^. They are used as they are stated as laws. Anything outside of scientific law is speculation. That is what Scientific theories are... speculation.

A New And Unusual Force in The Universe Just Got Even Stranger






New research has expanded on the discovery of a strange phenomenon called blackbody force, showing that the effect of radiation on particles surrounding massive objects can be magnified by the space that warps around them.

The find could affect how we model the formation of stars and planets, and even help us finally detect a theoretical form of radiation that allows black holes to evaporate.

In 2013, physicists announced radiation emitted from objects called 'blackbodies' could not only nudge small particles away, but tug them closer. What's more, for hot-enough objects with only a small amount of mass, the pushing force could be stronger than their gravitational pull.

If you've never come across the term, a blackbody is any opaque object that absorbs visible light, but doesn't reflect or transmit it.

Technically, blackbodies describe theoretically perfect objects that cannot reflect any light at all. Physical examples such as the carbon nanotube materials used to make the crazy-looking Vantablack coatings come pretty close.


Read more and click the links at http://www.sciencealert.com/researchers-discover-curved-space-magnifies-light-s-pulling-power.


Cool
Astargath
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 604


View Profile
May 27, 2017, 10:47:47 AM
 #6712

so once again our delusional willfully ignorant godswilling badecker has his ass handed to him by horace
and all he can come up with is his silly merry go round lincs back to himself and some ridiculous shit about gods wrath and punishment. zzzzzzzz
does not address any of horace's points because he cant.
dude... let go of your mythical sky fairy beliefs and get out of your little bitcointalk thread echo chamber.
embrace science. cut the crap with your pseudo intellectual bullshit.

Better me than God. Are you going to be the first who can offer some serious rebuttal to the proof that God exists?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380

Cool

No proof whatsoever, what you say in those links is pure speculation, none of it can be tested, give me an example of can we test what you say there? How do you know which God is the real God anyways? Is it the christian God or the muslim God? Is it Zeus?

God is not described perfectly by religion. Science is too weak to describe Him even as well as non-scientific religion.

The links contain scientific laws^^^. They are used as they are stated as laws. Anything outside of scientific law is speculation. That is what Scientific theories are... speculation.

A New And Unusual Force in The Universe Just Got Even Stranger






New research has expanded on the discovery of a strange phenomenon called blackbody force, showing that the effect of radiation on particles surrounding massive objects can be magnified by the space that warps around them.

The find could affect how we model the formation of stars and planets, and even help us finally detect a theoretical form of radiation that allows black holes to evaporate.

In 2013, physicists announced radiation emitted from objects called 'blackbodies' could not only nudge small particles away, but tug them closer. What's more, for hot-enough objects with only a small amount of mass, the pushing force could be stronger than their gravitational pull.

If you've never come across the term, a blackbody is any opaque object that absorbs visible light, but doesn't reflect or transmit it.

Technically, blackbodies describe theoretically perfect objects that cannot reflect any light at all. Physical examples such as the carbon nanotube materials used to make the crazy-looking Vantablack coatings come pretty close.


Read more and click the links at http://www.sciencealert.com/researchers-discover-curved-space-magnifies-light-s-pulling-power.


Cool

You didn't answer, how do you know which God is the real God because you believe in the bible, why? How do you know it was a God? Stating laws is not proof, you are making conclusions for no reason, cause and effect doesn't  point to God in any way. Everything has a cause, ok, how do you know it was God the first cause?

BADecker
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1890
Merit: 1090


View Profile
May 27, 2017, 11:15:53 AM
 #6713

so once again our delusional willfully ignorant godswilling badecker has his ass handed to him by horace
and all he can come up with is his silly merry go round lincs back to himself and some ridiculous shit about gods wrath and punishment. zzzzzzzz
does not address any of horace's points because he cant.
dude... let go of your mythical sky fairy beliefs and get out of your little bitcointalk thread echo chamber.
embrace science. cut the crap with your pseudo intellectual bullshit.

Better me than God. Are you going to be the first who can offer some serious rebuttal to the proof that God exists?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380

Cool

No proof whatsoever, what you say in those links is pure speculation, none of it can be tested, give me an example of can we test what you say there? How do you know which God is the real God anyways? Is it the christian God or the muslim God? Is it Zeus?

God is not described perfectly by religion. Science is too weak to describe Him even as well as non-scientific religion.

The links contain scientific laws^^^. They are used as they are stated as laws. Anything outside of scientific law is speculation. That is what Scientific theories are... speculation.

A New And Unusual Force in The Universe Just Got Even Stranger






New research has expanded on the discovery of a strange phenomenon called blackbody force, showing that the effect of radiation on particles surrounding massive objects can be magnified by the space that warps around them.

The find could affect how we model the formation of stars and planets, and even help us finally detect a theoretical form of radiation that allows black holes to evaporate.

In 2013, physicists announced radiation emitted from objects called 'blackbodies' could not only nudge small particles away, but tug them closer. What's more, for hot-enough objects with only a small amount of mass, the pushing force could be stronger than their gravitational pull.

If you've never come across the term, a blackbody is any opaque object that absorbs visible light, but doesn't reflect or transmit it.

Technically, blackbodies describe theoretically perfect objects that cannot reflect any light at all. Physical examples such as the carbon nanotube materials used to make the crazy-looking Vantablack coatings come pretty close.


Read more and click the links at http://www.sciencealert.com/researchers-discover-curved-space-magnifies-light-s-pulling-power.


Cool

You didn't answer, how do you know which God is the real God because you believe in the bible, why? How do you know it was a God? Stating laws is not proof, you are making conclusions for no reason, cause and effect doesn't  point to God in any way. Everything has a cause, ok, how do you know it was God the first cause?


The real God is God. I know it because I can observe science and nature, and think... a thing you seem to not be able to do.

Cool
Astargath
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 604


View Profile
May 27, 2017, 11:27:02 AM
 #6714

so once again our delusional willfully ignorant godswilling badecker has his ass handed to him by horace
and all he can come up with is his silly merry go round lincs back to himself and some ridiculous shit about gods wrath and punishment. zzzzzzzz
does not address any of horace's points because he cant.
dude... let go of your mythical sky fairy beliefs and get out of your little bitcointalk thread echo chamber.
embrace science. cut the crap with your pseudo intellectual bullshit.

Better me than God. Are you going to be the first who can offer some serious rebuttal to the proof that God exists?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380

Cool

No proof whatsoever, what you say in those links is pure speculation, none of it can be tested, give me an example of can we test what you say there? How do you know which God is the real God anyways? Is it the christian God or the muslim God? Is it Zeus?

God is not described perfectly by religion. Science is too weak to describe Him even as well as non-scientific religion.

The links contain scientific laws^^^. They are used as they are stated as laws. Anything outside of scientific law is speculation. That is what Scientific theories are... speculation.

A New And Unusual Force in The Universe Just Got Even Stranger






New research has expanded on the discovery of a strange phenomenon called blackbody force, showing that the effect of radiation on particles surrounding massive objects can be magnified by the space that warps around them.

The find could affect how we model the formation of stars and planets, and even help us finally detect a theoretical form of radiation that allows black holes to evaporate.

In 2013, physicists announced radiation emitted from objects called 'blackbodies' could not only nudge small particles away, but tug them closer. What's more, for hot-enough objects with only a small amount of mass, the pushing force could be stronger than their gravitational pull.

If you've never come across the term, a blackbody is any opaque object that absorbs visible light, but doesn't reflect or transmit it.

Technically, blackbodies describe theoretically perfect objects that cannot reflect any light at all. Physical examples such as the carbon nanotube materials used to make the crazy-looking Vantablack coatings come pretty close.


Read more and click the links at http://www.sciencealert.com/researchers-discover-curved-space-magnifies-light-s-pulling-power.


Cool

You didn't answer, how do you know which God is the real God because you believe in the bible, why? How do you know it was a God? Stating laws is not proof, you are making conclusions for no reason, cause and effect doesn't  point to God in any way. Everything has a cause, ok, how do you know it was God the first cause?


The real God is God. I know it because I can observe science and nature, and think... a thing you seem to not be able to do.

Cool

I observe science and nature therefore God exists, seems legit but I still can't figure out how you figured out a God existed in the first place. I observe the nature and I think and the real God is the flying spaghetti monster.

See I can do it too, does what I said prove anything?
Horacewoodwood
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 103


https://primedice.com/?c=WINFREEBTC


View Profile
May 27, 2017, 12:51:46 PM
 #6715

so once again our delusional willfully ignorant godswilling badecker has his ass handed to him by horace
and all he can come up with is his silly merry go round lincs back to himself and some ridiculous shit about gods wrath and punishment. zzzzzzzz
does not address any of horace's points because he cant.
dude... let go of your mythical sky fairy beliefs and get out of your little bitcointalk thread echo chamber.
embrace science. cut the crap with your pseudo intellectual bullshit.

Better me than God. Are you going to be the first who can offer some serious rebuttal to the proof that God exists?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380

Cool

No proof whatsoever, what you say in those links is pure speculation, none of it can be tested, give me an example of can we test what you say there? How do you know which God is the real God anyways? Is it the christian God or the muslim God? Is it Zeus?

God is not described perfectly by religion. Science is too weak to describe Him even as well as non-scientific religion.

The links contain scientific laws^^^. They are used as they are stated as laws. Anything outside of scientific law is speculation. That is what Scientific theories are... speculation.

A New And Unusual Force in The Universe Just Got Even Stranger






New research has expanded on the discovery of a strange phenomenon called blackbody force, showing that the effect of radiation on particles surrounding massive objects can be magnified by the space that warps around them.

The find could affect how we model the formation of stars and planets, and even help us finally detect a theoretical form of radiation that allows black holes to evaporate.

In 2013, physicists announced radiation emitted from objects called 'blackbodies' could not only nudge small particles away, but tug them closer. What's more, for hot-enough objects with only a small amount of mass, the pushing force could be stronger than their gravitational pull.

If you've never come across the term, a blackbody is any opaque object that absorbs visible light, but doesn't reflect or transmit it.

Technically, blackbodies describe theoretically perfect objects that cannot reflect any light at all. Physical examples such as the carbon nanotube materials used to make the crazy-looking Vantablack coatings come pretty close.


Read more and click the links at http://www.sciencealert.com/researchers-discover-curved-space-magnifies-light-s-pulling-power.


Cool
Welcome back folks to 'The proof that Badecker is a complete idiot'. Last time we observed the tremendous stupidity that lies in the body of Badecker, the mentally challenged apologist. Now, we are back with more from this creature that managed to live without a brain for such a long time. This is what he stated this time: 'The links contain scientific laws^^^. They are used as they are stated as laws. Anything outside of scientific law is speculation. That is what Scientific theories are... speculation.' We can observe how Badecker here uses the understanding of a freshly trained monkey regarding science. He basically thinks that a theory is a kind of a pointless, personal belief like the belief that God exists, for example. He also says that only scientific laws are facts, anything else is speculation. What he means by 'theory' is actually a hypothesis, since a theory is actually 'a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that can incorporate facts, laws, inferences, and tested hypotheses'. So no, theories are not speculation. After that, Badecker posted a link about blackbodies as if it would somehow be relevant to the subject. But there's a saying nowadays: you can tell what kind of a person someone is by looking at the sources of his information. Have you seen badecker's source? Freedomspheonix  Cheesy Dumb people will always have dumb sources. Stay tuned folks, as we shall continue to bring proof of the retardation of Badecker, the apologist who lives without a brain.

▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
PRIMEDICE
The Premier Bitcoin Gambling Experience - Most Trusted & Popular Bitcoin Game @Primedice
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Horacewoodwood
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 103


https://primedice.com/?c=WINFREEBTC


View Profile
May 27, 2017, 02:16:31 PM
 #6716

God is not described perfectly by religion. Science is too weak to describe "Him" even as well as non-scientific religion.
The links contain scientific laws. They're used as they're stated as laws. Anything outside of scientific law is speculation.
That is what Scientific theories are ...... speculations. A New And Unusual Force in The Universe Just Got Even Stranger.
Only god can describe "Himself". As people is god, then deduction is that god is anything that's missing in the evolution!
There is no such thing as non-scientific religion. All that is religion is non-scientific. As for this, it is an excuse that you can not get away with anymore nowadays. If God is not described well by religion, if science is too weak to describe him and only he could describe himself, than it is a lie. This, in fact, is the description of him. How could you know of it if nothing can ever actually describe it? How can you know it can not be described if nobody can actually describe him? You can not see him, can not prove him, can not even describe him. That is what sounds like a lie

▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
PRIMEDICE
The Premier Bitcoin Gambling Experience - Most Trusted & Popular Bitcoin Game @Primedice
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
endenada
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 27, 2017, 02:33:10 PM
 #6717

okay, horaciom, let us start to explain it, me and you, we know that the word "god" exists
what that means? we have to find, regardless what science and religion say, but what we say
anyway, the science can prove it and religion can believe it, we have to describe and explain it
first when we use word god is: Oh My God = omg, we wonder, atone, adore, exclaim, revere, etc
"my" is personal god, i was surprised when i discovered it, i thought it is collective one ... lol
DarkKnight68
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 81
Merit: 10

Make Your Passion Your Addiction.


View Profile
May 27, 2017, 02:48:54 PM
 #6718

"Scientific proof that God exists?"??. I don't think that really matters? Why is there a need for a scientific proof for the existence of God for you to believe in him? What's wrong with believing without a proof? I'm pretty sure it won't hurt you or do anything bad to your life or yourself as a person if you believe in God and heed his teachings. You have the freedom to choose anyway if you will believe and do what he teaches. Just remember one thing: God will never let you down and will lead you to doing evil things.
Astargath
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 604


View Profile
May 27, 2017, 03:44:47 PM
 #6719

"Scientific proof that God exists?"??. I don't think that really matters? Why is there a need for a scientific proof for the existence of God for you to believe in him? What's wrong with believing without a proof? I'm pretty sure it won't hurt you or do anything bad to your life or yourself as a person if you believe in God and heed his teachings. You have the freedom to choose anyway if you will believe and do what he teaches. Just remember one thing: God will never let you down and will lead you to doing evil things.

So it's ok to believe in God and follow his teachings, like killing people because they work on the Sabbath? You need solid proof of something to believe it, otherwise there is no point. If someone tells you, hey, if you jump this bridge you will teleport to another dimension, should I just believe him? Because why not, right?
Horacewoodwood
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 103


https://primedice.com/?c=WINFREEBTC


View Profile
May 27, 2017, 07:31:47 PM
 #6720

"Scientific proof that God exists?"??. I don't think that really matters? Why is there a need for a scientific proof for the existence of God for you to believe in him? What's wrong with believing without a proof? I'm pretty sure it won't hurt you or do anything bad to your life or yourself as a person if you believe in God and heed his teachings. You have the freedom to choose anyway if you will believe and do what he teaches. Just remember one thing: God will never let you down and will lead you to doing evil things.
I personally have no problem with people believing, it's their choice and they are free to do it. However, most people do not choose it, but they are born into a place where they learn from a really young age about God, about the myth of the creation, they see people around believing in it, etc. That is not free will. I do think claiming the religious stories of creation, miracles and such as being the truth should not be allowed or at least should be rebutted every time and proved wrong, because it has absolutely no base of evidence. You can have faith if you really want to believe it is true, but that should never come close to a school, to young children, etc. Let them grow up researching, learning about biology, physics, mathematics, chemistry and if they want to believe after that in a God, tell them those stories and see what they choose. That being said, we reach to your question: Why is there a need for a scientific proof for the existence of God for you to believe in him?  Because religious people, not all of them but some, want to claim that this is the truth, they want everyone to say 'yes, it is true' and of course science comes in contradiction and proves them wrong. In order to maintain their story up, those religious people turn to pseudo-science and try to prove God exists scientifically. And they fail every time, of course.

▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
PRIMEDICE
The Premier Bitcoin Gambling Experience - Most Trusted & Popular Bitcoin Game @Primedice
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Pages: « 1 ... 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 [336] 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 ... 497 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Bitcointalk.org is not available or authorized for sale. Do not believe any fake listings.
Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!