Scientific proof that God exists?

[BADecker]

Everything that happens in our lives is possible due to science. Science cannot prove God exists because God doesn't exist. Simple as that.

Everything that happens in our lives works through scientific happening. Science proves God. God made and upholds science and the universe.

Scientists prove that they are wrong when they express that science doesn't prove the existence of God. They prove it by dying after 50 to 100 years of life. God lives on.

Simple as that.

[BADecker]

science cannot prove God does exist since science does not believe in the concept of faith. you can't see any science book explaining faith/God since it always find physical evidence to prove one's existence.

Science proves the existence of God. But people can deny any proof that they don't like. They have the ability to do this.

The thing that science doesn't prove easily, is knowledge about the characteristics of God. In fact, science doesn't prove whether or not God is a Being that is sexually aligned, personally. Science hasn't proven that God is One, although there is some evidence for that. Certainly science hasn't proved or even found out what God thinks about people.

All the things that science HASN'T proven about God, are things that people might have faith in God for. But science HAS proven the existence of God.

[gregyoung14]

Just a thought..

If science was able to prove God's existence. Will it seriously inspire faith for everyone?

Guess we should really convince ourselves first, ask ourselves first, the need for a god and the idea of having one before we ever even try to prove it. And just perhaps proving won't be the solution to our answers.

[BADecker]

Just a thought..

If science was able to prove God's existence. Will it seriously inspire faith for everyone?

People are very diverse. If you really mean "everyone," probably not. As you can see right in this thread, some people attempt to ignore the proof when it is set right in front of them... which it is in this thread and others.

Guess we should really convince ourselves first, ask ourselves first, the need for a god and the idea of having one before we ever even try to prove it. And just perhaps proving won't be the solution to our answers.

The need for a god is universal. The reason for this is that nobody knows for a fact what is going to happen to him in life, even only one minute from now. Nobody knows anything about the future for sure.

The idea of a god suggests to people that there is something that is controlling their lives for their benefit... they hope. That's why atheists accept all kinds of science theory as fact when it isn't fact. They are looking for a god even though they don't realize it. They have no other hope. And they need hope to remain outside of despair, so that they don't commit suicide, which thing they are afraid to do, just like they are afraid to formally admit that God exists.

[QuestionAuthority]

Just a thought..

If science was able to prove God's existence. Will it seriously inspire faith for everyone?

People are very diverse. If you really mean "everyone," probably not. As you can see right in this thread, some people attempt to ignore the proof when it is set right in front of them... which it is in this thread and others.

Guess we should really convince ourselves first, ask ourselves first, the need for a god and the idea of having one before we ever even try to prove it. And just perhaps proving won't be the solution to our answers.

The need for a god is universal. The reason for this is that nobody knows for a fact what is going to happen to him in life, even only one minute from now. Nobody knows anything about the future for sure.

The idea of a god suggests to people that there is something that is controlling their lives for their benefit... they hope. That's why atheists accept all kinds of science theory as fact when it isn't fact. They are looking for a god even though they don't realize it. They have no other hope. And they need hope to remain outside of despair, so that they don't commit suicide, which thing they are afraid to do, just like they are afraid to formally admit that God exists.

You have provided absolutely no proof at all. You've just spouted the same nonsense that any little boy raping Catholic priest vomits out to frighten his victims.

You are right that emotionally weak people need something to believe in to keep them off the edge of the building. That's what Voltaire is talking about when he said, if God didn't exist it would be necessary to invent him.

[BADecker]

Just a thought..

If science was able to prove God's existence. Will it seriously inspire faith for everyone?

People are very diverse. If you really mean "everyone," probably not. As you can see right in this thread, some people attempt to ignore the proof when it is set right in front of them... which it is in this thread and others.

Guess we should really convince ourselves first, ask ourselves first, the need for a god and the idea of having one before we ever even try to prove it. And just perhaps proving won't be the solution to our answers.

The need for a god is universal. The reason for this is that nobody knows for a fact what is going to happen to him in life, even only one minute from now. Nobody knows anything about the future for sure.

The idea of a god suggests to people that there is something that is controlling their lives for their benefit... they hope. That's why atheists accept all kinds of science theory as fact when it isn't fact. They are looking for a god even though they don't realize it. They have no other hope. And they need hope to remain outside of despair, so that they don't commit suicide, which thing they are afraid to do, just like they are afraid to formally admit that God exists.

You have provided absolutely no proof at all. You've just spouted the same nonsense that any little boy raping Catholic priest vomits out to frighten his victims.

You are right that emotionally weak people need something to believe in to keep them off the edge of the building. That's what Voltaire is talking about when he said, if God didn't exist it would be necessary to invent him.

Just because you can't think your way through God's existence being proven by combining:
1. Cause and effect;
2. Complex universe;
3. Entropy;
doesn't mean that the proof isn't there.

You will have even greater trouble understanding the proof, simply because you don't want to understand.

[eon89]

If science can prove God's existence, God will be a fact not simply an idea - but I won't hold my breath for that to happen soon. And I'm being optimistic when I say this.

[BADecker]

If science can prove God's existence, God will be a fact not simply an idea - but I won't hold my breath for that to happen soon. And I'm being optimistic when I say this.

Simple, basic proof is in the post directly above the one quoted here.

God is fact. That's why billions of people around the world believe in Him. The things that are not always fact are the attributes applied to Him.

Faith is stronger if it has some fact tied to it. If this wasn't so, science theory wouldn't have any strength at all.

[morantis]

What do you think?
Please share your opinion about this article.


101 Proofs For God

A growing list of common sense Proofs for God.

Proof for God, #65 Mitochondrial Eve and Y-Chromosome Adam

 Genetic scientists seem to be in general agreement that we are all descendants of one woman and one man. This research was fairly recent, starting about 1978. They, of course, do not believe in the creation story of Adam and Eve in the Bible, but their conclusions are getting closer and closer.

In case you have not heard about this, it makes very interesting reading. But I think it raises a number of profound challenges to the Theory of Evolution.

The scientists base the above conclusions on the known facts of human reproduction, specifically on properties of the sperm and egg. .....
Full article read here: http://101proofsforgod.blogspot.com/2014/07/65-mitochondial-eve-and-y-chromosome.html

Which is it?  Common sense or scientific.  Your title says one and the OP says another.

[xompkins]

We're here. That's proof. But what you're asking is scientific proof. Science only deals with the natural. When it comes to the supernatural, science is powerless. Believing or disbelieving in God is an act of faith

[BADecker]

We're here. That's proof. But what you're asking is scientific proof. Science only deals with the natural. When it comes to the supernatural, science is powerless. Believing or disbelieving in God is an act of faith

The fact is that the ground under your feet exists. You know it by the irrefutable evidence produced by your senses when you see it and feel it under your feet.

You have faith that your area isn't going to have an earthquake today. Your experience tells you that it will not happen. But you don't know for sure, because there are other things that have happened in life that you weren't expecting.

Knowing that God exists by the fact that His existence has been scientifically proven is fact. Believing that God will do this or that is faith.

[eon89]

If science can prove God's existence, God will be a fact not simply an idea - but I won't hold my breath for that to happen soon. And I'm being optimistic when I say this.

Simple, basic proof is in the post directly above the one quoted here.

God is fact. That's why billions of people around the world believe in Him. The things that are not always fact are the attributes applied to Him.

Faith is stronger if it has some fact tied to it. If this wasn't so, science theory wouldn't have any strength at all.

People also believe in UFO's but I haven't seen one of those either. As I was saying - people believe many stupid things and most of them are BS.

[zivone]

Science is working to prove the existence of God but not enough and  came up with some facts but not enough to totally prove that there is really one supreme creator. As of now, God cannot be proven or disproven, it's up for one person to believe or not.

[eon89]

It's not a matter of approving or disapproving - it's a matter of common sense.
A being that has all of it's attributes at the superlative and without limits?
This would make a great sequel for the X-men movie.

[BADecker]

It's not a matter of approving or disapproving - it's a matter of common sense.
A being that has all of it's attributes at the superlative and without limits?
This would make a great sequel for the X-men movie.

It's kinda like if you and I walked into a hidden valley that nobody had ever visited before. And there on the floor of the valley were fist-sized and larger gold nuggets. And I said, "Wow! There's gold all over the place around here." And you said, "Naw. There's only these dumb yellow colored rocks."

[Anddos]

Prove or quit it. No one has seen God, heard God etc.
Interesting how something that no one can prove exists. Where? How?

[eon89]

Yeah, right - nuggets. Still, you people with the flat earth and God exists and other propaganda should let people decide for themselves.

[BADecker]

Yeah, right - nuggets. Still, you people with the flat earth and God exists and other propaganda should let people decide for themselves.

Nobody can force another to believe in God. Even for-real brainwashing doesn't stick. But in the foxholes... In times of great pain, fear, joy, or pleasure, all but a very few people acknowledge God. It is our nature to recognize God without proof.

When you understand the scientific proof that shows that God exists, this doesn't mean you have to accept it. However, once you understand the scientific proof, in times of great pain, fear, joy, or pleasure, you will cry out to God with open arms.

[kapipindot]

God maybe the missing link as to why science haven't figured out yet how the universe started.

[BADecker]

God maybe the missing link as to why science haven't figured out yet how the universe started.

Right! Big Bang Theory will always be a theory. Why? Because even if people actually prove that the Big Bang could have really happened, that's still a long way off from proving that it did.